Perception of Youth towards Online Shopping ISSN 2348-8891 Chetna Sawant*, Dr. Surendra Malviya** Abstract Today youth comprise the highest segment of India s population. The young are busy with their schedule and multiples distractions. Since, purchasing now just a click away and reduces their precious time, hence the youths perception towards online shopping has changed radically. They rely more on the internet for ticketing, booking or shopping. This study includes youth of Indore. Sample size for this study was 170 but 13 were discarded and only 157 respondents were taken into consideration. Primary data was collected by using closed end questionnaire. This questionnaire consists of two sections, Section A and Section B. Section A, included the demographic profile of the respondent, which includes gender, age, qualification and occupation of the respondents. Section B, include 16 statements which were measured by five point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. This research identified six factors Web portal Quality, Web portal ease of use, Security and other policy, Clear Payment and Delivery, Pre and Post Sales Services, Trust on Web portal,. All the six factors have given label YPWP (Youth Perception for Web portal). Keywords: Youth Perception, Web portal. Introduction E-commerce in the present day is swiftly on the rise all across the world and India is not untouched. The Indian youth s curiosity towards online shopping is escalating day by day. The youth s perception towards online shopping is different; they see in it an ease of time, comfortable, variety and with more interest. When online shopping had just come into the picture, the perception was of high rates, low security, and untrustworthy. But gradually, the perception has changed and at the moment it is showing encouraging signs among Indian Youth s. Online shopping creates a craze among youth especially among females because previously where they spent a lot of time in window shopping, today just sitting at home they can browse through many sites and choose the best deal and place an order within few minutes. Online shopping sites face competition from thousands of available options. Online traffic has increased which shows the popularity of the Internet shopping. *Faculty at Institute of management and Studies, DAVV, Indore. **Faculty at Institute of management and Studies, DAVV, Indore
Review of Literature The consumer perception towards online shopping depends on ease of using website. Menon and Kahn, (2002); Childers et al., (2001); Mathwick et al., (2001) concluded that Online shopping features can be either consumers perceptions of functional and utilitarian dimensions, like ease of use and usefulness, or their perceptions of emotional and hedonic dimensions like enjoyment by including both utilitarian and hedonic dimensions, aspects from the information systems or technology literature, as well as the consumer behavior literature are integrated in our framework. Li and Zhang (2002) defined consumer satisfaction as the extent to which consumes perceptions of the online shopping experience confirm their expectations. Kateranttanakul (2002) argued that the reliability of website content facilitates consumers to perceive lower risks, better justifications for their decisions and ease in reaching the optimal decisions, and in turn affects customer satisfaction and intention to purchase online. Jung-Hwan and Chungdo (2010) conducted a research to compare the e-service quality perceptions of US and South Korean consumers in relation to overall e-service quality, e-satisfaction, and e-loyalty to understand geographic and cultural differences in the context of international expansion of e-business. Results of the research revealed that there is a significant positive effect of overall e-service quality on consumers e-satisfaction towards online shopping and the positive effects of overall e-service quality and e-satisfaction on e-loyalty (Jung-Hwan & Chungho, 2010). Technology factors deal with the consumer s perceptions of their interaction with the B2C website and the Internet merchant responsible for that website. Some researchers focus primarily on the impact of consumer perceptions of website characteristics (Ho and Wu 1999, Szymanski and Hise 2000), such as logistical support, security, homepage design, and the like, on customer satisfaction with Internet shopping. These insights into consumer perception help identify features of Internet stores that have considerable impact on building customer satisfaction. Consumers previous experiences with online purchases, or lack thereof, can be a significant influence of levels of risk perception by consumers and their purchasing decisions [Dillon, T. D., & Reif, H. L. (2004). Factors influencing consumer s e-commerce commodity purchases. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance, 22(2), 1-12.].Churchill and Surprenant urged disconfirmation as an intervening variable affecting satisfaction and that the effect of disconfirmation is adequately captured by expectation and perceived performance. Syed and Norjaya (2010) had conducted a study to investigate the key factors that influencing customer satisfaction through online shopping. Jarvenpaa and Todd [1997] claim that it may be that consumers expect e-commerce to offer a wider product variety because of the reach of the Internet and the potential to track down specialty goods and services. Superior product assortment results in positive perceptions of customer satisfaction [Szymanski & Hise 2000], especially if the customer wants an item that isn t widely available. Tse and Wilton [3] followed the results proposed by Churchill and Surprenant, and investigated customer satisfaction formation. Oliver proposed a model that expresses consumer satisfaction as a function of expectation and expectancy disconfirmation. Prior research has identified and validated many elements of trustworthiness, such as ability, benevolence, and integrity [Lee & Turban 2001; Manes 1997; Van Slyke et al. 2004].
Effective website design includes navigation capability or visual appeal of the website (Cyr, 2008). Liu et al. [1997] examined the web sites of Fortune 500 companies to identify how they are using the web for interacting with their customers. Ho [1997] examined 1800 websites from various industries across several countries. Hoffman et al. [1996] created six categories for classifying commercial web sites: online storefront, Internet presence, content, mall, incentive site, and search agent. Others classify online shopping stores as superstores, promotional stores, sales stores, one-page stores, and product listings [Spiller & Lohse, 1997]. Kalakota and Whinston [1996] define a security threat as a circumstance, condition, or event with the potential to cause economic hardship to data or network resources in the form of destruction, disclosure, modification of data, denial of service, and/or fraud, waste, and abuse. Navigation, product information, and site design are critical to e-satisfaction [Szymanski & Hise 2000]. Thus, a key to building a usable Website is to create good links and navigation mechanisms Mannix 1999; Radosevich 1997). Cyr (2008) examined characteristics of culture and design, which are information design, navigation design and visual design, as antecedents to website trust, website satisfaction and e-loyalty in a sample of three countries which are Canada, Germany and China. Christy and Matthew (2005) illustrated security as the website s ability in protecting consumer personal information collected from its electronic transactions from the unauthorized use of disclosure. Consumers concern about the security, liability and privacy of the online website (Gefen, 2000). According to the prior research (Elliot & Fowell, 2000; Szymanski & Hise, 2000), as perception of security risk decreases, satisfaction with the information service of online stores is expected to increase. In other words, strong security attribute does increase the degree of customer satisfaction. In the study conducted by Christian and France (2005), they identified three categories of factors as keys to influence e-satisfaction in which including technology, shopping, and individual product factors. Kateranttanakul (2002) argued that the reliability of website content facilitates consumers to perceive lower risks, better justifications for their decisions and ease in reaching the optimal decisions, and in turn affects customer satisfaction and intention to purchase online. Online shoppers expect websites to protect personal data, provide for secure payment, and maintain the privacy of online communication (Franzak et al., 2001).Cox and Dale (2001) suggested that without a quality management approach that guarantees quality from its systems, staff and suppliers, a business will not be able to deliver the appropriate level of service quality to satisfy its customers. The study conducted by Christian and France (2005) through a conjoint analysis of consumer preferences based on data collected from 188 young consumers reveals that the three most important attributes to consumers for online satisfaction are privacy (technology factor), merchandising (product factor), and convenience (shopping factor). Szymanski and Hise (2000) indicated that wider assortment of products may be attractive to customers and e-satisfaction would be more positive when online stores offer superior product assortments. Doll and Torkzadeh (1988) developed a measure that includes content, accuracy, format and timeliness of system output. Delivery is the amount of time necessary for the package to go from the distribution center to the customer s door. Internet shopping experiences are heavily relied on the information published on the website, as well as the quality of the system (Chen and Wells 1999, Janda et al. 2002, Szymanski and Hise 2000, Wolfinbarger and Gilly 2001). Turban and Gehrke (2000) urged that the
quality of the web content determines whether potential customers will be attracted to or driven away from the website. Janda et al. Information quality and system quality, representing semantic level and technical level respectively, are postulated as two key antecedents of user satisfaction (DeLone and McLean 1992). Objective of the study To study the determinants related to Youth Perception towards online shopping. Research Methodology Effective website design includes navigation capability or visual appeal of the website (Cyr, 2008). The population for this study was Youth of Indore. Those youth of Indore was considered who use online shopping. Sample size for this study was 170 but 13 were discarded and only 157 respondents was taken into consideration. Primary data was collected by using closed end questionnaire. This questionnaire consist of two section, section A and section B. Section A, included the demographic profile of the respondent, which includes gender, age, qualification and occupation of the respondents. Section B, include 16 statements which were measured by five point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Reliability Reliability is accessed by determing the proportion of systematic variation in a scale. This is done by determing the association between scores obtained from different administrations of the scale. If the association is high, the scale yields consistent results and is therefore reliable. Approaches for assessing reliability the test-reset, alternative forms, and internal consistency methods. Reliability can be of three types test-retest reliability, internal consistency reliability and split-half reliability. In this research internal consistency reliability has been used. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha.723 16 N of Items The Reliability for all the 16 items is.723 which is high means the scale is reliable. The reliability of each factor was expected by computing its Cronbach s alpha.
KMO and Bartlett s Test KMO and Bartlett's Test Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. Bartlett's Test of Sphericity.630 Approx. Chi-Square 1.055E3 Df 120 Sig..000 KMO (Kaiser-Meyer Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy). This measure will tell us that variables included in the study having a common variance. High value of KMO that is between 0.5 and 1 indicates the appropriateness of the factor analysis for the data in hand. For Bartlett s test of Sphercity the value less than 0.05 indicates that there exists a significant relationship among the variables taken for the factor analysis. Factor analysis was appropriate because the value of KMO is 0.630 (between 0.5 and 1.0) and the result of Bartlett s Test of Sphericity showed that the value of Approx. The value of Sig is 0.000 (which is less than 0.05) in which indicated that the data are suitable for data analysis (Xue, 2006). df = 120. Once it has been determined that factor analysis is suitable for analyzing the data, an appropriate method must be selected. The approach used to derive the weights or factor score coefficients differentiates the various methods of factor analysis. The two basic approaches are principle components analysis and common factor analysis. In principal components analysis, the total variance in the data is considered. The diagonal of the correlation matrix consists of unities, and full variance is brought into the factor matrix. Principal components analysis is recommended when the primary concern is to determine the minimum number of factors that will account for maximum variance in the data for use in subsequent multivariate analysis. The factors are called principal components. In common factor analysis, the factors are estimated based only on the common variance.
Variables Items Cranach s alpha Factor Loading Q3. Website Color Combination is.607 good. Q4. Website content is relevant..480 Q.5 Website product display.749.604 properly. Factor 1 ( Web Q6. Website has correct product.883 Portal Quality) Specifications (size, color etc) Q7. Website Delivered me exactly.822 what I order. Factor 2 ( Web Portal Ease of Use) Q1. Website is easy to navigate..822 Q2. Website layout is attractive..800.708 Q15. Website has necessary.840 required certification (Versign) Factor 3 (Security and other Policy) Factor 4 (Clear Payment and Delivery) Factor 5 (Pre and Post Sales Services) Factor 6 (Trust on Web portal) Q9. Website provide easy replacement of defective products. Q10. Website has cash back policy against defective products. Q14. Website provides secured transaction. Q8. Website delivered product on time. Q11. Website provides different payment methods. Q12. Website provide after sales service on the product. Q13. Website provides trail facility before purchasing the product. Q16. I am confident my personal information is not misused..767.684.777.648.710.742.832.542.870.545.953
Web Portal Quality This means Website Color Combination, Website content, Website product display, Website Specifications in size, color etc and Website Delivery. Web Portal Ease of Use This means that Website is easy to navigate, Website layout is attractive, and Website has necessary required certification (Versign). Security and other Policy Website has cash back policy against defective products and also Website provides secured transaction. Clear Payment and Delivery Website delivered product on time and also provides different payment methods. Trust on Web portal This shows that customer is confident that his personal information is not misused. Pre and Post Sales Services Website provides trail facility before purchasing the product. ISSN 2348-8891 Conclusion This research identified six factors Web portal Quality, Web portal easr of use, Security and other policy, Clear Payment and Delivery, Pre and Post Sales Services,Trust on Web portal,. All the six factors have given label YPWP (Youth Perception for Web portal). The total % of Variance is 74.
Reference 1. Anderson, R., Srinivasan, S. (2003). E-Satisfaction and E-Loyalty: A Contingency Framework. Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 20(2), pp. 123 138. 2. Ballantine, P. (2005), Effects of interactivity and product information on consumer satisfaction in an online retail setting, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 33 Iss: 6, pp. 461 471. 3. Ballantine, P. (2005), Effects of interactivity and product information on consumer satisfaction in an online retail setting, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 33 Iss: 6, pp. 461 471. 4. Cheung, C., M., K., Lee, M., K., O.(2005). Research Framework for Consumer Satisfaction with Internet Shopping. Working Papers on Information Systems, 5(26),pp. 1-19. 5. Changchit, c., consumer perceptions of online shopping (2006). Issues in information systems, 7 (2), pp. 177-181. 6. Guo, X., Ling, K.C., Liu, M.(2012). Evaluating Factors Influencing Consumer Satisfaction towards Online Shopping in China. Asian Social Science, 8(13), pp.40-50. 7. Ghane, S., Fathian, M., Gholamian, M. R.(2011). Full relationship among e satisfaction, e -trust, e-service quality, and e-loyalty: the case of Iran e-banking. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 33(1), pp. 1-6. 8. Haq, z., perception towards online shopping: an empirical study of Indian consumers. National monthly refereed journal of research in commerce & management, 1(8), pp. 1-22. 9. Marcus, J. (n.d.). Online Shopping in India: Evolution and way ahead. Retrieved April 17, 2013, from http://www.articlerich.com/article/online-shopping-in-india Evolution-andway-ahead-/2121570. 10. Schaupp, L., C., Belanger, F. (2005). A conjoint analysis of online consumer satisfaction. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 6 (2), pp.95-111. 11. Styleever, (2012). Evolution Of Online Shopping In India. Retrieved May 10, 2013, from http://www.articlesbase.com/fashion-articles/evolution-of-online-shopping-in india- 6095758.html 12. Szymanski, D., Hise, R. (2000). e-satisfaction: An Initial Examination. Journal of Retailing, Volume 76(3), pp. 309 322. 13. Torres, A., I., Martins, F., V.(2004).AN e-satisfaction model application to internet information search and purchase. IADIS International Conference e-commerce, pp. 313-319.