TGA key performance indicators and reporting measures



Similar documents
Regulatory Reform: Are we heading in the right direction?

STRATEGIC PLAN

Draft Guidance: Non-economic Regulators: Duty to Have Regard to Growth

Monitoring Highways England The monitoring framework

CHECKLIST OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE CIPFA CODE OF PRACTICE FOR INTERNAL AUDIT

Application instructions

Effective consultation The ACMA s guide to making a submission NOVEMBER 2015

National Standards for Disability Services. DSS Version 0.1. December 2013

The Trans-Tasman Early Warning System. Processes in Australia and New Zealand

Standard 1. Governance for Safety and Quality in Health Service Organisations. Safety and Quality Improvement Guide

Quality Assurance. Policy P7

Sector Development Ageing, Disability and Home Care Department of Family and Community Services (02)

Collaborative development of evaluation capacity and tools for natural resource management

Guide to the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards for health service organisation boards

Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission: Regulatory Approach Statement

Regulators Code July 2013

2 December Dear Professor Pearce. Re: TGA Transparency Review

EPA Victoria Engagement Policy ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK GENERAL NAT OVERVIEW

Submission to the Department of Environment Regulation s Draft Guidance Statement on Regulatory Principles December 2014

BOOSTING THE COMMERCIAL RETURNS FROM RESEARCH

AUSTRAC. supervision strategy

Management of Business Support Service Contracts

Evidence-informed regulation The ACMA approach

the Defence Leadership framework

APES 325 Risk Management for Firms

Achieve. Performance objectives

Criteria for adopting International Standards and Risk Assessments

Trade Training Centres in Schools Programme

The APRA Supervision Blueprint

Reporting Service Performance Information

Review of Quality Assurance: Terms of Reference. Background

Preparation of a Rail Safety Management System Guideline

General Manager Commissioning and Partnerships Commissioning and Partnerships business unit Health Service Engagement business unit

Response from the Department of Treasury, Western Australia, to the Productivity Commission s Draft Report Regulatory Impact Analysis: Benchmarking

Risk management systems of responsible entities

Note that the following document is copyright, details of which are provided on the next page.

Communications Strategy

(Article 131(2) of the Financial Rules of the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking)

Small business guide to trade practices compliance programs. April 2006

Disability Employment Services Quality Framework Advice V 2.0

DEPARTMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

THE NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR VOLUNTEER INVOLVEMENT

Strategic Plan to Working Together for Australian Sport

THE NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR VOLUNTEER INVOLVEMENT

ARB's overarching goals The Board has identified two objectives from the Act which underpin all of our work:

Financial intelligence centre REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

GEMS Regulator Performance Framework Metrics

Guide to Assessment and Rating for Regulatory Authorities

Care service inspection report

Guide to Assessment and Rating for Services

Joint Statement of Principles for Professional Accreditation

GUIDELINE NO. 22 REGULATORY AUDITS OF ENERGY BUSINESSES

WA Food Regulation: Temporary and Mobile Food Businesses

ISO 9001:2000 AUDIT CHECKLIST

Social impact assessment. Guideline to preparing a social impact management plan

Foreign collective investment schemes

STANDARD. Risk Assessment. Supply Chain Risk Management: A Compilation of Best Practices

Quality Manual Quality Management System Description

1.1 Terms of Reference Y P N Comments/Areas for Improvement

PROJECT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION INQUIRY: THE MARKET FOR RETAIL TENANCY LEASES IN AUSTRALIA

University of New England Compliance Management Framework and Procedures

C o r p o r at e p l a n. adding value to public sector performance and accountability

Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency

AER reference: 52454; D14/54321 ACCC_09/14_865

Council of Australian Governments Business Advisory Forum Canberra, 6 December 2012 Communiqué

ISO 9001:2000 Gap Analysis Checklist

Australian Communications and Media Authority. Entity resources and planned performance

Module 4. Risk assessment for your AML/CTF program

List of Guiding Principles Promoting Good Governance in the Pharmaceutical Sector 1

GLASGOW SCHOOL OF ART OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICY. 1. Occupational Health and Safety Policy Statement 1

Position Description

ICH guideline Q10 on pharmaceutical quality system

Risk management systems of responsible entities: Further proposals

Complaint management policy About this policy

PRIVACY POLICY. comply with the Australian Privacy Principles ("APPs"); ensure that we manage your personal information openly and transparently;

Better Regulation. Consumer Engagement Guideline for Network Service Providers

HTA NETWORK MULTIANNUAL WORK PROGRAMME

Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme. Strategic Plan

DNV GL Assessment Checklist ISO 9001:2015

Communications Policy

Risk management plans an overview

Consultation requirements under the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage (Environment) Regulations 2009

Submission on Professional Standards of Financial Advisers Bill 2015

School Focused Youth Service Supporting the engagement and re-engagement of at risk young people in learning. Guidelines

Guideline. Records Management Strategy. Public Record Office Victoria PROS 10/10 Strategic Management. Version Number: 1.0. Issue Date: 19/07/2010

Invitation to Quote for consultancy services: a review of business planning arrangements

Health and Safety Policy Part 1 Policy and organisation

Informatics: The future. An organisational summary

Energy Safe Victoria. Charter of Consultation and Regulatory Practice. January energysafe salor " VIC f ORIA dectric:ty;1d gas

Information Governance and Management Standards for the Health Identifiers Operator in Ireland

La Trobe University is committed to maintaining a comprehensive and effective Compliance Framework.

Preparing for Unannounced Inspections from Notified Bodies

Hertsmere Borough Council. Data Quality Strategy. December

Job Description Strategic Projects Team Leader

Records Authority. Department of Health Private Health Insurance

ACADEMIC POLICY FRAMEWORK

Housing Related Support Contract Management Framework 2009/10

Transcription:

TGA key indicators and reporting measures Regulator Performance Framework Version 1.0, May 2015

About the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is part of the Australian Government Department of Health, and is responsible for regulating medicines and medical devices. The TGA administers the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (the Act), applying a risk management approach designed to ensure therapeutic goods supplied in Australia meet acceptable standards of quality, safety and efficacy (), when necessary. The work of the TGA is based on applying scientific and clinical expertise to decisionmaking, to ensure that the benefits to consumers outweigh any risks associated with the use of medicines and medical devices. The TGA relies on the public, healthcare professionals and industry to report problems with medicines or medical devices. The TGA investigates reports received by it to determine any necessary regulatory action. To report a problem with a medicine or medical device, please see the information on the TGA website <http://www.tga.gov.au>. Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2015 This work is copyright. You may reproduce the whole or part of this work in unaltered form for your own personal use or, if you are part of an organisation, for internal use within your organisation, but only if you or your organisation do not use the reproduction for any commercial purpose and retain this copyright notice and all disclaimer notices as part of that reproduction. Apart from rights to use as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968 or allowed by this copyright notice, all other rights are reserved and you are not allowed to reproduce the whole or any part of this work in any way (electronic or otherwise) without first being given specific written permission from the Commonwealth to do so. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights are to be sent to the TGA Copyright Officer, Therapeutic Goods Administration, PO Box 100, Woden ACT 2606 or emailed to <tga.copyright@tga.gov.au>. Page 2 of 11

Introduction Regulator Performance Framework The Australian Government has developed a framework to measure the of regulators. The Regulator Performance Framework (the Framework) comprises six outcomesbased key indicators (KPIs) to articulate the Government s overarching expectations of regulator : 1. Regulators do not unnecessarily impede the efficient operation of regulated entities 2. Communication with regulated entities is clear, targeted and effective 3. Actions undertaken by regulators are proportionate to the regulatory risk being managed 4. Compliance and monitoring approaches are streamlined and coordinated 5. Regulators are open and transparent in their dealings with regulated entities 6. Regulators actively contribute to the continuous improvement of regulatory frameworks. These KPIs are supported by measures of good regulatory to assist regulators in assessing their achievement of the KPIs. The Framework aims to encourage regulators to undertake their functions with the minimum impact necessary to achieve regulatory objectives and to effect positive ongoing and lasting change within regulators. The Framework will allow regulators to report objectively on the outcomes of their efforts to administer regulation fairly, effectively and efficiently. The new Framework will apply from 1 July 2015 with the first assessment period being the 2015 16 financial year. Further information on the Framework is available at: https://www.cuttingredtape.gov.au/resources/rpf. Assessing our achievement of the KPIs In consultation with the TGA Industry Consultative Committee (TICC) and the Australian Therapeutic Goods Advisory Council, we have developed a series of qualitative and quantitative outputs and evidence to assess our achievement of the six KPIs and associated measures. The first report assessing our achievement of the KPIs will be available following completion of the first assessment period (2015-16 financial year), and then annually thereafter. These annual reports will replace the previous TGA KPI reports published twice yearly. These reports will focus on our as a regulator and our engagement with stakeholders. We will, however, continue to produce other reports with more detailed information about our regulatory and corporate activities, including: The half-yearly reports The TGA annual business plan These are available on the TGA website and can be read in conjunction with the reports that will be produced against the Framework KPIs. Page 3 of 11

Our role and our stakeholders We are a partner in the National Medicines Policy with a major role in ensuring the quality, safety and efficacy of medicines. We are committed to working with our partners under the policy towards better health outcomes for the Australian population. Consumers and health professionals are key stakeholders, as well as the members of the therapeutic goods industry. In addition to this, our overarching mission is to: safeguard and enhance the health of the Australian community through the effective and timely administration of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989. As part of the Department of Health we work collaboratively with a number of other areas of the department towards achieving our collective vision of better health and wellbeing for all Australians. While the purpose of the Framework is to encourage regulators to minimise the impact of carrying out their regulatory objectives, with a particular focus on the regulated industry, we have a broader remit, as outlined above. Therefore, we have developed outputs and activitybased evidence as required by the Framework, as well as additional outputs to demonstrate that we are fulfilling our public health and safety obligations. Page 4 of 11

KPI 1 Regulators do not unnecessarily impede the efficient operation of regulated entities. 1. Regulators demonstrate an understanding of the operating environment of the industry or organisation, or the circumstances of individuals and the current and emerging issues that affect the sector. 2. Regulators take actions to minimise the potential for unintended negative impacts of regulatory activities on regulated entities or affected supplier industries and supply chains. 3. Regulators implement continuous improvement strategies to reduce the costs of compliance for those they regulate. a. Number of TGA participations in industry formal stakeholder forums, including meetings and working groups and feedback received on TGA presentations. This metric will include information on how the TGA has addressed feedback and survey information received from industry, at workshops and after GMP inspections b. Information on informal interactions with industry and how they are able to build understanding, for example ad hoc meetings between senior TGA staff and industry on specific issues and educational seminars for TGA staff on industry business activities. a. Evidence of continued compliance with our practice of engagement with industry before a regulatory impact statement (RIS) is finalised, to minimise the potential for unintended impacts on regulated entities and product supply. a. Progress towards implementation of the Australian Government Digital Transition Policy b. Progress of the strategies being implemented under the business improvement programme and other specific projects aimed at reducing compliance costs for industry. Page 5 of 11

KPI 2 Communication with regulated entities is clear, targeted and effective. 1. Regulators provide guidance and information that is up to date, clear, accessible and concise through media appropriate to the target audience. a. Percentage of pages on the TGA website that comply with Australian Government accessibility requirements b. Improvements made to guidance documents, forms, and information on the TGA website c. Number of educational materials and other documents developed or updated for stakeholders (industry, consumers, health professionals). Number of downloads of these from the website and social media, and data on user satisfaction where available. 2. Regulators consider the impact on regulated entities and engage with industry groups and representatives of the affected stakeholders before changing policies, practices or service standards. a. Details of formal consultations completed during the reporting period, including evidence that the TGA has closely considered submissions from stakeholders b. Evidence of discussions with affected stakeholders before TGA processes are changed. 3. Regulators decisions and advice are provided in a timely manner, clearly articulating expectations and the underlying reasons for decisions. 4. Regulators advice is consistent and supports predictable outcomes. 1 a. Information for consumers, health professionals and industry on the basis for the TGA s decision making, including any work to improve the quality of our decision making b. Percentage of pre-market applications and post-market activities processed in target timeframes c. Publication of information for health professionals, consumers and industry when medicines are registered and/or new information arises on therapeutic goods, for example through Australian Public Assessment Reports (AusPARs), recall notices, safety alerts and expert advisory committee meeting statements. a. Percentage of substantive regulatory decisions 2 subject to internal review, for which the original decision is revoked and substituted, without consideration of additional information b. Outcomes of matters referred by sponsors to the AAT, including where TGA decisions are upheld, and where the outcome is indicative of an issue about the quality of the decision. 1The best evidence for this measure is reporting on possible issues with individual regulatory decisions made at the TGA, which are usually identified through legislative review processes. 2Substantive regulatory decisions include decisions: to not include products on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (the Register) to remove products from the Register to grant or revoke a manufacturing licence or conformity assessment certificate. Page 6 of 11

KPI 3 Actions undertaken by regulators are proportionate to the regulatory risk being managed 1. Regulators apply a risk-based, proportionate approach to compliance obligations, engagement and regulatory enforcement actions. 2. Regulators preferred approach to regulatory risk is regularly reassessed. Strategies, activities and enforcement actions are amended to reflect changing priorities that result from new and evolving regulatory threats, without diminishing regulatory certainty or impact. 3. Regulators recognise the compliance record of regulated entities, including using earned autonomy where this is appropriate. All available and relevant data on compliance, including evidence of relevant external verification is considered. a. Outcomes of completed investigations and alleged offences b. Publication of evidence of compliance activities to support the continued availability of safe, effective and high quality therapeutic goods for the Australian public. a. Information for consumers, health professionals and industry on the TGA s risk framework published on the TGA website, and regularly kept up-to-date b. Information on activities undertaken to ensure that a riskbased approach is taken to prioritise complaints and other signals of possible non-compliance with regulatory requirements. a. Information on activities undertaken to ensure that a riskbased approach is taken to monitoring and compliance activities, such as: scheduling of inspections based on compliance record the use of information from international regulators on regulated activities proportionate complementary medicines compliance activities. Page 7 of 11

KPI 4 Compliance and monitoring approaches are streamlined and coordinated. 1. Regulators information requests are tailored and only made when necessary to secure regulatory objectives, and only then in a way that minimises impact. 2. Regulators frequency of information collection is minimised and coordinated with similar processes including those of other regulators so that, as far as possible, information is only requested once. 3. Regulators utilise existing information to limit the reliance on requests from regulated entities and share the information among other regulators, where possible. 4. Regulators base monitoring and inspection approaches on risk and, where possible, take into account the circumstance and operational needs of the regulated entity. a. Information on activities undertaken to minimise the need for, or number of, requests for information to sponsors under the relevant legislation. a. Refer to KPI 1.3 (Progress of business improvements, and other specific projects, so that sponsors will only need to provide some information to the TGA once) b. Information on cooperative activities carried out with international regulators to minimise information collection from industry (such as joint inspections and desktop GMP clearances). a. The use of information from, or in collaboration with, other regulators; for example, development of processes for sharing with international regulators, the number of product evaluation and inspection reports shared b. Collaborative work undertaken with health professionals. For example, interactions on significant medicine shortages, recall actions or safety issues. a. Refer to KPI 3.3 (Information on activities undertaken to ensure that a risk-based approach is taken to monitoring and compliance activities). Page 8 of 11

KPI 5 Regulators are open and transparent in their dealings with regulated entities. 1. Regulators risk-based frameworks are publicly available in a format which is clear, understandable and accessible. 2. Regulators are open and responsive to requests from regulated entities regarding the operation of the regulatory framework, and approaches implemented by regulators. 3. Regulators measurement results are published in a timely manner to ensure accountability to the public. a. Refer to KPI 3.2 (Information on the TGA s risk framework published on the TGA website). b. Information on the TGA s regulatory compliance framework published on the TGA website, with evidence of systems for regular review and updates. a. Adherence to quantitative standards of service commitments and agreed measures in relation to responding to enquiries received through the TGA s public information lines b. Refer to KPI 1.1 (Information on interactions with industry). a. Information on ongoing reporting activities including applicable timeframes: Half Yearly Performance Reports published twice yearly Measures in Portfolio Budget Statements Regulatory Performance Framework KPI report Agreed reporting on the TGA s reform program plans and achievements. Page 9 of 11

KPI 6 Regulators actively contribute to the continuous improvement of regulatory frameworks. 1. Regulators establish cooperative and collaborative relationships with stakeholders to promote trust and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the regulatory framework. 2. Regulators engage stakeholders in the development of options to reduce compliance costs. This could include industry selfregulation, changes to the overarching regulatory framework, or other strategies to streamline monitoring and compliance approaches. 3. Regulators regularly share feedback from stakeholders and information (including from inspections) with policy departments to improve the operation of the regulatory framework and administrative processes. a. Market research conducted on an annual basis to measure consumer, health professional and industry trust in and engagement with the regulatory framework b. Percentage of stakeholders satisfied or very satisfied with TGA consultative processes a. Refer to KPI 2.1 (Evidence of continuous compliance with our practice of engagement with industry before a RIS is finalised) b. Progress of business improvements and other projects aimed at reducing compliance costs. a. Information on cooperation and collaboration with policy areas of our Department b. Information on interactions with other Australian government departments, regulators and statutory authorities. Regulator Performance Framework: TGA key indicators and reporting measures Page 10 of 11

Version history Version Description of change Author Effective date V1.0 Original publication Regulatory Engagement, Education and Planning Branch May 2015 Therapeutic Goods Administration PO Box 100 Woden ACT 2606 Australia Email: info@tga.gov.au Phone: 1800 020 653 Fax: 02 6232 8605 http://www.tga.gov.au Reference R15/452390