Ohio State Racing Commission



Similar documents
HORSE RACING TAX. RATES Pari-mutuel daily wagering (total rates): Amount Wagered Daily. Next 100, Next 100, Over 400,000 4.


Treasurer of State OVERVIEW

Insurance, Department of

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK September 2015

Department/Agency Name Executive Department/Louisiana Racing Commission

NEW YORK STATE SHELDON SILVER, SPEAKER. committee on. Racing and Wagering. J. Gary Pretlow, Chairman. Annual Report

Members of the New York Horse Racing and Agriculture Industry Alliance

Maryland Thoroughbred and Harness Horse Racing Tracks

The Horse Racing Industry in Delaware

INTRODUCTION. This report summarizes the results of an economic analysis of the Wyoming

Proposed Readoption of Special Adoption with Amendments: N.J.A.C. 2:32A

Frequently Asked Questions about Local Option Small Games of Chance:

A Competitive & Legal Canadian Gaming Marketplace

Administrative Services, Department of

LSC Redbook Analysis of the Executive Budget Proposal Board of Nursing

Pennsylvania Breeders Awards: It s As Simple As !!!

HORSE RACING ALBERTA ACT

ILLINOIS REGISTER ILLINOIS RACING BOARD NOTICE OF ADOPTED RULES PART 1305 RACE TRACK OPERATORS AND THEIR DUTIES

Enriching Tradition Through Technology

Office of Budget and Management

SOT Analysis - Special Revenue and General Tax Fund

Breakdown of the Handle

RACE HORSE INDUSTRY REFORM ACT 17, 1981, P.L.

Court of Claims. House Transportation and Justice Subcommittee. Jamie L. Doskocil, Senior Budget Analyst Legislative Service Commission

New York OTB s and Their Payments to Racetracks

LSC Redbook Analysis of the Executive Budget Proposal Department of Taxation

LSC Redbook Analysis of the Executive Budget Proposal State Dental Board

64th Legislature AN ACT REVISING PROVISIONS RELATED TO RACE MEET GAMBLING; DEFINING THE TERM "MONTANA

Texas Advanced Deposit Wagering

Description of Budget Cycle

May 20, Re: Request for Comments on Pari-Mutuel Gambling Winnings in REG

PART IV. HORSE RACING COMMISSION

Department of Alcohol and Drug Addiction Services

Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering 79 th Annual Report Fiscal Year

The work of the Auditor s office is completed through seven divisions of operation:

Department of Medicaid

SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION No. 1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY 12, 2016

Title 8: AMUSEMENTS AND SPORTS

The Economic Impact of the Thoroughbred and Greyhound Racing Industries on West Virginia s Economy 2012

Board of Nursing. House Human Service Subcommittee. Deauna Hale, Budget Analyst Legislative Service Commission. March 22, 2007

OKLAHOMA STATUTES ANNOTATED TITLE 3A. AMUSEMENTS AND SPORTS CHAPTER 2. HORSE RACING Short title. *3158 3A Okl.St.Ann. 200

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

Taxation, Department of

Gaming: Revenue Overview

CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 4. BUSINESS REGULATIONS. DIVISION 18. CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION.

Consolidation of ODMH and ODADAS into the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services

VIRGINIA WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION REPORT ON AUDIT FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND JUNE 30, 2007

32 [94 Op. Att y RACING. March 17, 2009

What Licensees Should Know About Act 90 of 2013

REPORT OF THE AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS AGREED-UPON PROCEDURES ENGAGEMENT OF THE KENTUCKY THOROUGHBRED DEVELOPMENT FUND

REPORT OF THE IMPACT OF ADVANCE DEPOSIT WAGERING ON HORSE RACING AND PARI-MUTUEL HANDLE IN NEW YORK STATE

AGRICULTURE As Passed the House House Bill 5875 H-3 FY

Louisiana Horsemen s Benevolent and Protective Association (LAHBPA) Worker s Compensation Program

Frank Zanzuccki, Executive Director. See Summary below for explanation of exception to calendar requirement

Committee on Racing and Wagering. J. Gary Pretlow, Chairman SHELDON SILVER, SPEAKER

LSC Redbook. Analysis of the Executive Budget Proposal. Ohio Facilities Construction Commission

Same as the House. 1 Prepared by the Legislative Service Commission 8/14/2009

Fiscal Note & Local Impact Statement 127 th General Assembly of Ohio

KEMI Alumni Association

STATE OF MAINE Department of Public Safety Gambling Control Board 87 State House Station Augusta, Maine March 10, 2015

PLAN FOR THE FUTURE OF THE ONTARIO HORSE RACING AND BREEDING INDUSTRY ONTARIO HORSE RACING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

ARTICLE 9. PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING

Size & scope -Racing Industry Fast Facts - each year

University of British Columbia (the University) CUPE Local 2278 English Language Instructors

Ohio Legislative Service Commission

J. Gary Pretlow, Chairman

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2009 Session

NSWLR116. (1) Bets with bookmakers must be for a win, or win and place, unless otherwise approved by the Controlling Body.

Oklahoma Workers Compensation Commission

12 LC S. The House Committee on Health and Human Services offers the following substitute to HB 972: A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

ADDING A BET BONUS PROMO CODE TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Fuentes, et al. v. UniRush, LLC, et al., Case No. 1:15-cv (S.D.N.Y.) RushCard Settlement CLAIM FORM

CHAPTER 69N SPORTS WAGERING

STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY: DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OVERSIGHT OF WHOLESALERS COMPLIANCE WITH THE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL LAW

Main Operating Appropriations Bill. Same as the House. 1 Prepared by the Legislative Service Commission

Department of Mental Health

FEDERAL ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER DISCLOSURES

A REPORT BY THE NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2009 Session

Agency Profile Agency Fiscal Page (Gov Rec) Change Summary Agency Change Items Convert To Dedicated Funding... 9

Proposition 29. Imposes Additional Tax on Cigarettes for Cancer Research. Initiative Statute.

GOVERNMENT LAW ONLINE

The Department of Justice

How To Amend The Law Of England

Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology Board

> New Account Registration > Electronic Wagering Requirements > Users Guide COPOW ( )

BSM Connection elearning Course

13 LC S. The House Committee on Health and Human Services offers the following substitute to HB 178: A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

BOOKMAKER TELEPHONE, ELECTRONIC BETTING AND APPROVED BETTING PREMISE OR AUTHORISED BETTING OFFICE RACING NSW STANDARD CONDITIONS

New Jersey Racing Commission, Frank Zanzuccki, Executive Director. See Summary below for explanation of exception to calendar requirement.

Recoupment Revenues for Indigent Defense

UNOFFICIAL COPY OF SENATE BILL 660. ENROLLED BILL -- Finance/Economic Matters -- Read and Examined by Proofreaders:

Louisiana State Racing Commission

Feasibility of Outsourcing Florida s Statewide Retirement Systems

Lake Erie Commission OVERVIEW

Legislative Council Panel on Home Affairs. Authorization of Football Betting Betting Duty (Amendment) Bill

Casino Gaming & Oversight in Pennsylvania

Mapping Your Future. All About Money: Financial and Accounting Services. What Is This Field? Who Should Work In This Field?

COMPARISON OF CALIFORNIA, ILLINOIS, AND OREGON STATE-RUN RETIREMENT PLAN LEGISLATION

Transcription:

Ohio State Racing Commission Phil Cummins, Economist The Commission promotes and regulates Ohio horse racing on which pari-mutuel betting is permitted This agency's budget, all non- GRF, depends on fees and a share of wagering on these horse races OVERVIEW The Ohio State Racing Commission (RAC) promotes and regulates horse racing in Ohio. Its five members are appointed to four-year terms by the Governor. Duties and Responsibilities The Racing Commission prescribes rules under which horse racing with pari-mutuel wagering may be conducted, licenses participants, and oversees races at seven commercial tracks and most of Ohio's county fairs. It contracts for laboratory testing of specimens collected from horses and sometimes also from humans. It promotes horse racing by providing purse subsidies and supplements that encourage breeding and racing. The Racing Commission employs administrators, inspectors, and investigators, and contracts with officials and veterinarians at tracks. The Commission's budget consists of five state special revenue funds and one holding account redistribution fund. Commissions on wagers on simulcast horse races account for about two-thirds of RAC's receipts. Simulcast wagering, on live races elsewhere, takes place at Ohio's commercial tracks and at two satellite wagering facilities in Ohio. Other receipts are mainly from taxes on betting at the tracks where live horse racing is taking place. The Racing Commission also receives funds from fees imposed on various racing industry participants and from fines and penalties. The holding account redistribution fund receives performance bonds from commercial permit holders and county fairs as well as bonds from license holders appealing commission rulings. The majority of RAC's expenditures are for subsidies, mostly additions to purses at live horse races. Part supports the Ohio horse racing industry in other ways, including awards to Ohio breeders of winning race horses, supplements to purses for Ohio horses that win races at Ohio tracks against horses from other states, and other promotional activities. Most outlays other than subsidies are for regulation, including oversight of horse races and enforcement of rules; drug testing, mainly of horses but also of licensees; laboratory research, primarily on equine disease; expenses related to licensing; and investigation. As of August 2005, the Racing Commission had 16 full-time and 4 part-time employees, not including stewards, judges, veterinarians, or the 5 Commission members. Pari-mutuel wagering on horse racing at Ohio tracks and satellite wagering facilities, the source of most of RAC's funding, has been declining. Such betting at live horse races in the state peaked in 1989 and declined gradually in the first half of the 1990s, before betting at simulcast race meets was introduced in the state in 1996 to compete with gambling programs in surrounding states. The total of pari-mutuel betting at live horse races in Ohio as well as simulcast and satellite wagering peaked in 1998, as shown in the accompanying chart. The amount bet is referred to as the handle. The decline since 1998 appears to be partly a reflection of the 2001 recession and slow recovery in the economy and partly due to competition from out-of-state gambling venues and Internet betting. (Wagering also declined in the early Page 698

1980s and early 1990s corresponding to recessions.) The state's racing industry is having difficulty competing with tracks in other states that offer larger horse racing purses, which gives them an edge in attracting faster horses. Better horses in turn attract gambling dollars. A prospering racing program helps to support horse breeders. The Racing Commission does not currently receive revenues from bets placed through the Internet. The ability of tracks in other states to offer larger purses is in part a result of allowing video lottery terminals (VLTs) at tracks, with a portion of the gambling proceeds added to horse racing purses. West Virginia, for example, has VLTs at racetracks as well as other locations, and uses part of the 700 Pari-Mutuel Wagering, Ohio Horse Racing 600 500 Millions of Dollars 400 300 200 Total Handle including Wagering at Tracks and Satellite Facilities on Simulcast Races Live Racing Handle 100 0 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 proceeds to increase horse race purses. Horses and breeders are enticed out of Ohio by the larger purses available elsewhere. Two sources of funding to the Racing Commission expired at the end of FY 2005. The budget bill for the 125th General Assembly directed an additional one-quarter percent of wagers other than win, place, or show, referred to as exotic wagers, to the Racing Commission for two years. This added revenue, nearly $900,000 per year, ended June 30. The budget bill for the 126th General Assembly took away interest earnings previously credited to two of the Racing Commission's funds, also effective June 30. The Racing Commission has coped with these financial stringencies in various ways. Staffing was cut in 2005 through an early retirement program. Vacated positions were left unfilled. One inspector is being employed at each commercial track, instead of two as in the past, and some inspectors are parttime. Travel by inspectors that is eligible for reimbursement has been reduced. Two investigators are employed, down from three in the past, and the agency has reduced the number of state cars it uses, also to two. A charge of $40 to $54.50 per race at the seven commercial tracks is being deducted from purse money to pay part of the cost of drug testing. Use of digital licenses is expected to save $22,000 per year. Page 699

The Racing Commission's long-time relationship with the laboratory at the Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine is ending in September 2005. Beginning in October and continuing through June 2007, drug testing is to be performed for the Commission by a laboratory in Ohio's Department of Agriculture. The Racing Commission plans to seek bids on a contract to do its testing beginning in July 2007. Agency in Brief Agency In Brief Number of Employees* Total Appropriations-All Funds GRF Appropriations 2006 2007 2006 2007 Appropriation Bill(s) 24 $29.08 million $29.08 million $0 $0 Am. Sub. H.B. 66 *Employee count obtained from the Department of Administrative Services (DAS) payroll reports as of June 2005. Vetoed Provisions No provisions of Am. Sub. House Bill 66 affecting the Racing Commission were vetoed. Total Budget by Fund Group Holding Account Redistribution Fund Group 1% SSR 99% Total Budget by Program Series Promotion 85% Regulation 15% Page 700

ANALYSIS OF THE ENACTED BUDGET Program Series 1 Promotion Purpose: To promote horse racing in Ohio. The following table shows the line items that are used to fund the promotion program and the enacted funding levels. Note that the amounts shown for the first three of these line items are less than the full amounts budgeted for those line items, with the rest included in the regulation program. Fund ALI Title FY 2006 FY 2007 State Special Revenue Fund SSR 5C4 875-607 Simulcast Horse Racing Purse $17,000,000 $17,000,000 SSR 562 875-601 Thoroughbred Race Fund $4,519,128 $4,519,128 SSR 563 875-602 Standardbred Development Fund $3,094,810 $3,092,082 SSR 564 875-603 Quarterhorse Development Fund $2,000 $2,000 State Special Revenue Fund Subtotal $24,615,938 $24,613,210 Total Funding: Promotion $24,615,938 $24,613,210 This analysis focuses on the following specific programs within the promotion program series: Simulcast Horse Racing Purse Thoroughbred Race Fund Standardbred Development Fund Quarterhorse Development Fund Simulcast Horse Racing Purse Program Description: Simulcasting is a process of presenting horse races from tracks other than the one where live racing is occurring. By simulcasting races, a track can present more races on which fans can wager, increasing revenues for track and horse owners. A portion of every wager on a simulcast race is returned to the track, to horsemen's associations, race purses, and the state. Monthly distributions to purse accounts are made according to a formula based on average amounts wagered at all tracks on live racing days. Funding Source: The Simulcast Horse Racing Purse Fund receives revenues from a portion of the wagers placed at commercial tracks when no live races are scheduled. The Ohio State Racing Commission collects the funds and then redistributes them to permit holders to be used for horsemen's purse accounts. Interest on money in this account was previously credited to the account, but instead goes to the GRF effective in FY 2006. Implication of the Enacted Budget: The amounts appropriated for the Simulcast Horse Racing Purse Fund for FY 2006 and FY 2007 are somewhat more than actual outlays during FY 2005, when expenditures fell. If the downtrend in simulcast wagering continues, the amount of spending from this account may be less than was budgeted. Page 701

Thoroughbred Race Fund Program Description: The Thoroughbred Program provides purse subsidies for various overnight/stake races, supplements purses for registered thoroughbreds that win open races, and provides broodmare and stallion awards to breeders of winning registered horses. It also funds equine research that is currently conducted at the Ohio State University Analytical Toxicology Laboratory. Funding Source: 1.125% of pari-mutuel special account wagering on thoroughbred racing and 0.52% of pari-mutuel wagering on commercial harness racing plus one-twelfth of 3% of exotic wagering on thoroughbred racing Implication of the Enacted Budget: The amount appropriated for the Thoroughbred Race Fund for each of FY 2006 and FY 2007 is considerably more than the amount actually spent during FY 2005. If the downtrend in wagering continues, the amount of spending from this account may be less than budgeted. Standardbred Development Fund Program Description: By providing purse subsidies for the Ohio Sires Stakes series of races, the Fund encourages breeding and racing in the state. The Standardbred Program also provides funds for research and testing. Funding Source: 1.125% of pari-mutuel wagering on harness racing plus one-twelfth of 3% of exotic wagering on harness racing. Interest on money in this account was previously credited to the account, but instead goes to the GRF effective in FY 2006. Implication of the Enacted Budget: The amounts appropriated for the Standardbred Development Fund for FY 2006 and FY 2007 exceed the amount actually spent during FY 2005. If the downtrend in wagering continues, the amount of spending from this account may be less than this. Quarterhorse Development Fund Program Description: The Quarterhorse Program provides quarterhorse racing purse subsidies. Few quarterhorse races are run in Ohio. Funding Source: This program is funded completely by the Quarterhorse Development Fund. The Fund receives 0.625% of pari-mutuel wagering on quarterhorse racing plus one-twelfth of 3% of exotic wagering on quarterhorse racing. Implication of the Enacted Budget: The amount appropriated for this subsidy account for each of FY 2006 and FY 2007, $2,000, matches the amount budgeted for FY 2005 and should be adequate. Page 702

Program Series 2 Regulation Purpose: To regulate horse racing in Ohio. The following table shows the line items that are used to fund the regulation program. Amounts shown for the simulcast, thoroughbred, and standardbred funds pay the costs for Racing Commission staff members who regulate those activities. Fund ALI Title FY 2006 FY 2007 State Special Revenue Fund SSR 5C4 875-607 Simulcast Horse Racing Purse $61,489 $63,948 SSR 562 875-601 Thoroughbred Race Fund $123,250 $123,250 SSR 563 875-602 Standardbred Development Fund 66,865 69,593 SSR 565 875-604 Racing Commission Operating $4,000,000 $4,000,000 State Special Revenue Fund Subtotal $4,251,604 $4,256,791 Holding Account Redistribution Fund Group R21 875-605 Bond Reimbursements $212,900 $212,900 Holding Account Redistribution Fund Subtotal $212,900 $212,900 Total Funding: Regulation $4,464,504 $4,469,691 This analysis focuses on the following specific programs within the program series: Racing Commission Operating Bond Reimbursements Racing Commission Operating Program Description: The majority of the Commission's funding for administration is used for regulation of the horse racing industry in Ohio. Licensing is a large part of this responsibility. There are currently 60 categories of licensees listed on the Commission's website. The licensing program requires potential licensees to submit to fingerprinting sanctioned by the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Identification and the FBI. Licenses are approved by state stewards and presiding judges and issued by inspectors. Two investigators are employed by the Commission to police the commercial tracks. They work closely with stewards and judges. Investigators examine computer printouts that detail betting patterns, investigate public complaints related to the outcomes of races, and search stable areas when they suspect that illegal activity is occurring. They complete investigations ranging from routine inquiries to full-scale operations. The Commission also tracks the flow of dollars wagered in the state to ensure that Ohio tracks comply with wagering laws. It conducts an annual audit of the bank account records, receipts, and payments of the permit holder selected as Ohio's collection and settlement agent and investigates when a track or the collection and settlement agent fails to collect, pay, disburse, or account for money and fees. If necessary, the Commission must enforce payment to or by the collection and settlement agent. Page 703

The Racing Commission Operating Fund provides funding for most of RAC's employees. Purchased services also make up a significant portion of the Racing Commission's budget. This money funds the stewards, judges, and veterinarians who help regulate the racing industry. Stewards and judges represent the Racing Commission at racetracks, acting essentially as "referees." Stewards oversee thoroughbred tracks and judges oversee standardbred tracks. Veterinarians are responsible for drug testing at all commercial tracks. Following each race the veterinarian collects a test sample of the winning horse's blood or urine for the purpose of analysis. In addition, for two races on each racing day, samples are collected from every horse entered. Human samples are sometimes also collected. The samples are processed by the laboratory with which the Racing Commission contracts. Funding Sources: Fees collected (license, fingerprinting, registration, permit, etc.) and a share of the horse racing wager tax Implication of the Enacted Budget: The amount budgeted for the Racing Commission Operating Fund for each of FY 2006 and 2007, $4,000,000, is about 2% more than actual outlays during FY 2005. As detailed above, the Commission has instituted numerous efficiency measures to operate within this budget. Bond Reimbursements Program Description: Permit holders are required to post performance bonds. In addition, if a licensee is found to have violated one of the Commission's rules, the individual is entitled to appeal the decision. Individuals who appeal rulings must deposit a bond with the Commission. The Bond Reimbursement Fund receives these bond deposits. This fund was established on January 1, 1986, replacing an earlier fund used for the same purpose. Funding Sources: Performance bonds collected from permit holders and bonds posted by appellants Implication of the Enacted Budget: The amount enacted for this account for each of FY 2006 and FY 2007, $212,900, exceeds actual FY 2005 reimbursements and should be ample. Page 704