Captive Insurance Companies in Estate Planning: A Profit Maximization and Risk Reduction Tool

Similar documents
Estate Planning Using LLCs and Limited Partnerships Achieving Estate Tax Savings Through Valuation Discounts, Protecting Against Creditor Claims

ERISA Retirement Plans: Fiduciary Compliance and Risk Management for Investment Fund Selection and Fee Disclosures

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Negotiating EHR Agreements: Complying with HIPAA, Stark and AKS, Overcoming Privacy and Security Risks

Structuring Covenants in Leveraged Loans and High Yield Bonds for Borrowers and Lenders

Structuring Equity Compensation for Partnerships and LLCs

for Landlords and Tenants Negotiating Insurance, Indemnity and Mutual Waiver of Subrogation Provisions

Agenda. What is a Captive?

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Dean C. Berry, Partner, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft, New York

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

How To Listen To A Conference On A Computer Or Cell Phone

Business Entity Conversions: Income Tax Consequences You May Not Anticipate

Estate and Trust Form 1041 Issues for Tax Return Preparers

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Overcoming Ethical Challenges for Multi-Firm Lawyers and Their Firms: Fiduciary Duty, Conflict, Fee-Splitting and More

Marital Deduction Revocable Trusts: Funding Formulas to Minimize Tax and Maximize Spousal Benefits

Insurance Due Diligence in M&A Deals: Evaluating Coverage and Gaps, Mitigating Risks and Potential Liabilities

Payment and Performance Surety Bonds in Construction Projects: Perspectives of Owners, Contractors and Sureties

Structuring Rooftop Lease Agreements: Legal and Business Considerations

Divorce: When a Spouse Files Bankruptcy

Possibilities and Pitfalls With Captive Insurance Companies

Builder's Risk Insurance for Construction Projects: Legal Issues

Commercial Leases: Risk Mitigation Strategies for Landlords and Tenants

Captive Insurance Companies: Current Lay of the Land. Fred Thomas, Deloitte Tax Natasha Ng, Deloitte Tax

M&A Purchase Price Adjustment Clauses

Performance Bonds and CGL Insurance In Construction Projects: Navigating the Interplay Between Insurance and Surety

Leveraging New IRS Rules Eliminating 36-Month Testing Period for Cancellation of Debt Income

CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANIES

Commercial Real Estate Loans: Structuring Covenants, Events of Default Provisions and MAC Clauses

New Partnership Debt for Equity Exchange Regulations Navigating Issues With COD Income, Gains and Losses, and Other Aspects of Sect.

Solar Leases: Legal Considerations for Property Owners

Allocating Defense Costs Among Multiple Insurers and Between Covered and Uncovered Claims

Captive Insurance Companies

Negotiating EBITDA and Financial Covenants in Middle Market Loan Agreements

Captive Insurance! Basic Taxation

Thursday, July WRM# 15-28

BUSINESS STRATEGIES. Buy-Sell Arrangements and Transfer-for-Value Issues

Insights on... WEALTH PLANNING CAPTIVE INSURANCE. What Closely Held Business Owners Need to Know

The Use of Captive Insurance Companies for Closely Held Businesses

Managing Sales Tax Data: Streamlining Internal Controls to Maximize Compliance Efficiency

Internal Revenue Service

Sales Tax Audits in the Era of Digital Documentation Preparing for a Computer-Based Review Involving Electronic Invoices, Bills of Lading, Etc.

Revenue Ruling states that a Captive that receives 50% of its premiums from unrelated entities will achieve adequate risk distribution.

Medical Expert Depositions in Workers' Comp Cases

VA Benefits and Medicaid Eligibility Meeting Complex Requirements for Benefits Qualification and Application

Hedge Funds: Tax Advantages and Liabilities

RISK WELL REWARDED CAPTIVE INSURANCE AND ALTERNATIVE RISK SOLUTIONS FOR THE MIDDLE MARKET ARTEX RISK SOLUTIONS, INC

831(b) Small Captive Insurance Companies

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. Number: Release Date: 5/11/2001 UIL Nos CC:FIP:4 PLR February 8, 2001.

ESI Discovery in Federal Criminal Cases: Leveraging the New JETWG Recommendations

Internal Revenue Service

Settling Wage/Hour Claims: Weighing Settlement Options, Negotiating Damages, and Ensuring Court Approval

SIIA A2: Introduction to 831(b) Captives

LIFE INSURANCE PLANNING EXPERT S OPINION: PLANNING FOR LIFE INSURANCE IN QUAILIFIED PLAN-DOL PERMITS SALE OF LIFE INSURANCE TRUSTS 1.

Small Insurance Companies or Associations IRC 501(c)(15)

Thursday, 5 December 2013 WRM# TOPIC: Inserting Flexibility into Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust Planning.

SURVIVING AN IRS AUDIT

The Delaware Advantage

Many U.S. companies have formed captive insurance companies

Micro Captives: The Insurance Company You Keep

What Are the Roles and Responsibilities of a Captive Manager?

Captive Insurance Companies

Captive Insurance Company

Insuring your business. Ensuring your future. Private Insurance Companies

Captive Insurance Issues and Trends. Michael Mead, Kyle Mrotek and Doug Youngren

Liquidity & Succession Planning Using ESOPs The State of the Market

Stock Options in an Employee Stock Purchase Plan: Mastering the New IRS Regs Meeting the Comprehensive Rules for Plan Qualification and Tax Treatment

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

AMICORP INSURANCE COMPANY (AIC)

IRS Captive Insurance Ruling Creates Opportunities for Plan Sponsors

Business Risk v. Insurance Risk. Current IRS Targets. Captive Insurance Taxation- Brief

AMICORP INSURANCE COMPANY (AIC)

Negotiating Contractual Indemnity in M&A Deals: Transactional and Litigation Considerations

Growing numbers of publicly traded companies, large and

Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT)

[Collar: NA] [RMC ]

Sharing interests in a life insurance policy

The State Tax Implications Of Captive Insurance Companies

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE FIELD SERVICE ADVICE. DEBORAH A. BUTLER ASSISTANT CHIEF COUNSEL (Field Service) CC:DOM:FS

Small Captive Insurance Companies

Wealth Transfer Planning

Tax Challenges for Foreign Investors in U.S. Real Estate

Builder's Risk and CGL Insurance for Construction Projects: Mitigating Developer and Contractor Risks

Number: Release Date: 9/8/2006 Internal Revenue Service. Department of the Treasury Washington, DC Index Number: 162.

For the reasons set out below, I believe that COLI arrangements produce inappropriate tax benefits. Specifically:

16 LC ER A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF GEORGIA:

Section Tax on Insurance Companies other than Life Insurance Companies

Business Succession Planning With ESOPs

Pursuing Insurance Bad Faith Claims Over Personal Injury Claim Delays, Denials and Low Ball Offers

SBA Lending: Documenting, Closing and Servicing 7(a) and CDC/504 Loans

As the costs associated. Captive Solutions for Medical Stop Loss: Take Your Self-Insurance Program to the Next Level by Allison Repke

June 11, 2015 by Robert Boland, J.D., L.L.M., and Thomas Cifelli, J.D., CPA* (*inactive)

Sales to Intentionally Defective Grantor Trusts (IDGT)

Effective Planning with Life Insurance

Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts

Internal Revenue Service

M&A Transaction Consideration: Evaluating Cash, Stock, Seller Notes and Earnouts

Life Insurance: Business Applications

US TAX ISSUES WITH LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES 13th February 2013

Does the arrangement described below constitute insurance within the meaning

Transcription:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Captive Insurance Companies in Estate Planning: A Profit Maximization and Risk Reduction Tool Leveraging the Benefits for Asset Protection, Wealth Transfer and Retention, and Tax Minimization THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain 10am Pacific Today s faculty features: J. Scot Kirkpatrick, Shareholder, Chamberlain Hrdlicka White Williams & Aughtry, Atlanta Kimberly S. Bunting, Shareholder, Chamberlain Hrdlicka White Williams & Aughtry, Atlanta Karen S. Kurtz, Attorney, Chamberlain Hrdlicka White Williams & Aughtry, Atlanta The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.

Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory and you are listening via your computer speakers, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-961-9091 and enter your PIN -when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.

FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps: In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of attendees at your location Click the SEND button beside the box

If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps: Click on the + sign next to Conference Materials in the middle of the lefthand column on your screen. Click on the tab labeled Handouts that appears, and there you will see a PDF of the slides for today's program. Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.

CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANIES: A PROFIT MAXIMIZATION AND RISK REDUCTION TOOL September 13, 2012 J. SCOT KIRKPATRICK, ESQ. (404) 658-5421 scot.kirkpatrick@chamberlainlaw.com KIMBERLY S. BUNTING, ESQ. (404) 658-5428 kim.bunting@chamberlainlaw.com KAREN S. KURTZ, ESQ. (404) 658-5438 karen.kurtz@chamberlainlaw.com

What is a Captive? An Insurance Company formed by a business owner to insure the risks of related or affiliated businesses. Over 50% of the Fortune 1500 have Captives There are an estimated 5,000 to 7,500 Captives world-wide, and that number is expected to double in the next three years. 6

Business And Economic Reasons For Forming A Captive Risk Management and Risk Financing Lower Insurance Costs Increased Cash Flow Access to Coverage Typically Unavailable in the Commercial Market Access to the Reinsurance Market Ability to Retain Risks Tax Minimization and Deferral Asset Protection and Wealth Preservation 7

Steps and Considerations in the Structure and Formation of Captives Insurance audit/feasibility study Determine Type of Captive Pure Determine if Captive will be Small or Large Income Tax Considerations Corporate Formation and Place of Domicile Capitalization Management Shareholders Underwriting/Development of Policies Insurance Certificate Bank Account Reporting Requirements Investment Restrictions Captive Regulatory Management 8

Risk Management Analysis The first step in implementing a captive insurance company program involves a risk management analysis for the company and other assets owned by the owner of the company individually. The risk management analysis contains the following three steps. Review Existing Insurance Program Review and Analysis of Business Operations and Assets to Determine Insured Risks Recommendations for Risk Management / Captive Insurance Program 9

Types of Risks Typically Insured vs. Uninsured/Retained Risks Insured Risks General Liability Auto Liability Worker s Compensation Health Insurance Professional Liability E & O D & O Property Management Liability D&O, Fiduciary, EPL, Fidelity Uninsured/Retained Risks (Risks that can be insured by a Captive) Deductibles for Insured Risks Loss of Key Customer Loss of Key Employee Loss of Key Supplier Administrative Actions Litigation Expense D & O (excess) E & O (excess) Employment Practices Liability Fiduciary Coverage Fidelity Coverage Insured Policy Exclusions Contract Claims Business Risk Indemnity Excess General Liability Other coverages tailored to company s risk profile 10

Coverage and Premium Determination Detailed application for coverage similar to commercial insurance policy applications In depth review of existing insurance policies for types of coverage in place, deductibles, gaps and exclusions Actuarial analysis of proposed coverages, loss data and loss factors for coverage Determine premiums for Captive Insurance company to charge including projected losses, costs, overhead and profit 11

Structural Considerations The inclusion of a captive insurance company in a business s risk management program is ideal when the business has a substantial amount of self-insured risk. Businesses with sufficient risk and substantial profits may be ideal candidates for pure captive insurance company implementation. Such a business would potentially have risk significant to justify $1.2M in premiums paid to the pure captive insurance company. A pure captive insurance company is formed by business owners (or a trust for the benefit of business owners and their family) to provide insurance to the business. Participation in a risk management pool may be required depending on the business s structure. Captives may also be an option for operating businesses that have lesser profits and/or that cannot justify a $1.2M per year premium. Cell captive arrangements may permit business owners to efficiently participate in a captive program without implementing a pure captive structure. A cell captive arrangement involves unrelated 3 rd parties and the organization of those parties is generally accomplished through a captive management company. In situations where annual premiums would be $500,000 or less the use of a cell captive is generally preferred to a pure captive. 12

Federal Income Taxation as an Insurance Company Requirements: Bona-fide Business Purpose Risk Transfer Risk Distribution Operates as an insurance company Reasonable premiums Adequate capitalization 13

Case Law - Federal Income Taxation as an Insurance Company An insurance company must offer insurance what is insurance? Helvering v. Le Gierse, 312 U.S. 531 (1941) This was the first case to set forth the standard that true insurance must have both risk shifting and risk distribution. Harper Group, Inc. v. CIR, 979 F.2d 1341 (9 th Cir. 1992) A three prong test was developed by the Court (i) insurance risk must exist, (ii) risk shifting and risk distribution must exist, and (iii) the captive must offer insurance. In addition, the Court set the 30% risk distribution standard. 14

Safe Harbor Rulings and Other Rulings That Provide the Requirements for Risk Shifting, Risk Distribution, and Captive Formation Revenue Ruling 2002-89 50% Unrelated Risk Revenue Ruling 2002-90 12 Subsidiaries Revenue Ruling 2002-91 Group Captive Revenue Ruling 2005-40 Disregarded Entities and More Revenue Ruling 2008-8 = Cell Captive Revenue Ruling 2009-26 Reinsurance and Risk Distribution 15

Tax Advantages of a Captive Insurance Company Deduction of premiums by Insureds Generally, the loss reserves are deductible by a captive which reduces Premium Income to the Captive 831(b) election allows Captive with $1.2 million or less Premium Income to elect to be tax exempt on Premium Income and taxed only on its investment income 16

Potential Problem Areas and Repair Thinly capitalized Large loan-backs Investment in life insurance Can be a signal to the Service that this was a sham transaction/lacking in economic substance Let the captive mature before buying life insurance, and be sure there is a substantial, nontax purpose (estate planning/buy-sell purpose may be helpful) Service has issued summonses for Aviva Life, AmerUs (now Aviva), and Indianapolis Life (now Aviva) related to ongoing scrutiny of captive promoters maintaining alliances with life insurance companies Inadequate third party risk Less than 12 insureds Risk pools that pay no claims Protected cell companies (Rev. Rul. 2008-8) Heavy investment in the activities of affiliate companies (Service could use this as evidence in a sham transaction) Heavy investment in illiquid assets (not acting like an insurance company) 17

Potential Problem Areas and Repair Accessing captives through any sort of alliance, institute or other title used to notate a consortium of individuals banded together to sell tons of life insurance through the aggressive marketing and inappropriate use of taxadvantaged structures This is a sure way to get a target painted on your back or your client s back No attorney-client privilege The Service can and does get customer lists from these groups These groups tend to be more reckless in their marketing materials since they need the sizzle to attract the attention of life insurance producers The Service can and does use reckless marketing materials to hang taxpayers Such as materials marketing captives as a way to deduct life insurance premiums and never pay tax on the proceeds Like any advanced planning tool, captives should be accessed through an attorney as part of a comprehensive approach in arranging a client s affairs Attorney-client privilege will apply 18

Do It Right But If Problems Exist, Captive Repair Is An Option Like any advanced planning tool, captives should be accessed through an attorney as part of a comprehensive approach in arranging a client s affairs. However, if problems exist take the necessary steps to repair the captive. 19

831(b) - Simple Example Client s Operating Business & Entities $1.2M deduction $1.2M premium Irrevocable Trust for benefit of client s children Shareholder(s) Captive Insurance Company Captive pays NO income tax on $1.2M of premium income Wealth Transfer of Captive net profit (Premium income plus investment income minus expenses and claims payments) Qualified dividend or capital gain to shareholder(s) 20

CIC Structure Option I Multiple Entities can obtain insurance from a single Small Captive Insurance Company. Entity 1 Children s Trust Entity 2 $1.2 M in Premiums Small Captive Insurance Company Entity 3 Investments 21

CIC Structure Option II One Large Captive that pays reinsurance premiums to a Small Captive. Both the Large Captive and the Small Captive will own investments. Multiple entities can obtain insurance from the Large Captive. Children s Trust Entity 1 Small Captive Insurance Company Entity 2 $1.2 M in Reinsurance/Premiums Entity 3 Premiums (No Limit Under Internal Revenue Code) Large Captive Insurance Company (Owned by Children s Trust) 22

CIC Structure Option III One Large Captive that pays reinsurance premiums to multiple Small Captives. Both the Large Captive and the Small Captive will own investments. Multiple entities can obtain insurance from the Large Captive. Trust Trust Entity 1 Small Captive Insurance Company Small Captive Insurance Company Entity 2 Entity 3 Premiums (No Limit Under Internal Revenue Code) $1.2 M in Reinsurance/Premiums to each Small Captive Large Captive Insurance Company (Owned by Family Trusts) 23

CIC Structure with Multiple Owners The preceding captive structures can involve more than one owner/family. The diagram below shows a sample structure with multiple owners. Owner I Owner II Owner III Owner I or Trust Owner II or Trust Owner III or Trust 55% 35% 10% 55% 35% 10% Company Premiums Small Captive Insurance Company Investments 24

Case Study : Formation of a Captive in Conjunction with the Sale of a Business A traditional Small Captive Insurance Company structure is most appropriate in many situations where the sale of a business is involved. For many reasons, including asset protection and wealth preservation, it is recommended that a trust be the owner of captive insurance company interests. Husband is the Grantor Delaware Dynasty Trust 100% Wife is the Trustee, Wife and the children are the beneficiaries Small Captive Insurance Company* Investments *Please note that different ownership structures are possible. A Small captive insurance company qualifies under IRC Section 831(b) for exemption from income tax on up to $1.2M of premiums received per year. 25

Case Study: Sale of Business A stock or asset sale of an existing business may create the need to form a new entity that will survive the stock or asset sale and purchase insurance from the Small Captive Insurance Company. The business owners will own the new entity and the Delaware Dynasty Trust may also be an owner. The new entity may be capitalized with cash, earn out receivables, and other assets from the business owner. Business Owner Delaware Dynasty Trust Business Owner Existing Business Cash, Earn Out Receivable, and Other NEW S Corporation or Limited Liability Company 26

Case Study: Sale of Business The new entity will provide indemnification for the business owners against certain obligations arising from the stock or asset sale of the existing business including possibly receivables, representations and warranties, and other liabilities. Business Owner Delaware Dynasty Trust Business Owner NEW S Corporation or Limited Liability Company Cash, Earn Out Receivable, and Other 27

Case Study: Sale of Business The new entity will purchase insurance from the Small Captive Insurance Company to insure against various risks, including risk arising from the obligations related to the stock or asset sale of existing business including receivables, representations and warranties, and other liabilities. Business Owner Delaware Dynasty Trust Business Owner Delaware Dynasty Trust NEW S Corporation or Limited Liability Company $1.2 Million Premiums* 100% Small Captive Insurance Company Cash, Earn Out Receivable, and Other *Premiums are deductible by new entity, but exempt from income taxation to the Captive under IRC 831(b). Investments 28

DISCLAIMERS The information contained in this presentation is for illustration purposes only and not intended to constitute formal tax or legal advice. The rules imposed by IRS Circular 230 require us to state that, unless it is expressly stated, any opinions expressed with respect to a significant tax issue are not intended or written by the practitioner to be used, and cannot be used by the recipient, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the recipient or any other person who may examine this correspondence in connection with a Federal tax matter. 29