BACKGROUND DISCUSSION



Similar documents
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, AS FOLLOWS:

BE IT ORDAINED by the Borough Council of the Borough

City Hall Council Chambers

ATTACHMENT A HCIDL A Request for Issuance of Bonds for Skid Row Southeast 1. Resolution for Skid Row Southeast 1 on next page.

APPENDIX A - CHARTER ORDINANCES

Holladay Budget Amendments for

TOWN OF PHILLIPSBURG WARREN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY BOND O:

THIS VOLUNTARY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT CONCERNING A DEVELOPMENT OF. entered into this day of, 2014, and executed in triplicate originals

SERVICE PLAN FOR METROPOLITAN DISTRICT[S] CITY OF THORNTON, COLORADO. Prepared [NAME OF PERSON OR ENTITY] [ADDRESS] [ADDRESS] [DATE]

Ormond Beach Brokerage Commission Program Non-Exclusive Open Listing Agreement

ARTICLE 345. Tax Incremental Financing Plan

Prepared by Jennifer Lockwood, Associate Research Analyst July 21, FS020

AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE PETITION OF HDH, LLC AND STL BROADWAY HOTEL, LLC AS OWNERS OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT

Rock Island County Raffle License Application Packet

MAINTENANCE AND PERFORMANCE BONDS

WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule is proposed to be amended as

162 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12231

EXHIBIT A-1 PERFORMANCE BOND AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between GARLAND GRIFFIN HOMES,

Policy No.: F-7 CITY OF OLATHE COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT. Date Issued: Effective Date: Cancellation Date:

LAFAYETTE TOWNSHIP SUSSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE

LUNA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO TAXABLE CAPITAL OUTLAY GROSS RECEIPTS TAX REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2007B ESCROW AGREEMENT

R: RESOLUTION APPOINTING RISK MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT

Agreement # INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF NORTH OGDEN CITY AND WEBER COUNTY

CITY COMMISSION MEETING Winfield, Kansas AGENDA

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 2E 1

RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MORRIS COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY

THE GROSSE POINTE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM Grosse Pointe, Michigan

RELEVANT GOVT CODE AND ED CODE SECTIONS FOR SCHOOL DIST GO BONDS

May 23, 1996 AGO Mr. James D. Palermo Tampa City Attorney 315 East Kennedy Boulevard Fifth Floor Tampa, Florida Dear Mr.

A RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNTY COUNCIL OF SPARTANBURG COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, AS FOLLOWS:

The Board of Zoning Appeals shall have the duty and power to:

PUBLIC NOTICE OF INTENT. Bylaw No A BYLAW FOR ESTABLISHING A DEVELOPMENT LEVY FOR LANDS THAT ARE TO BE DEVELOPED OR REDEVELOPED WITHIN THE

EUGENE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY

What Does It Mean To Be A Home Rule Township?

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TAX AND REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE

Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorhead, Minnesota

RESOLUTION TO BORROW AGAINST ANTICIPATED DELINQUENT 2013 REAL PROPERTY TAXES

FRENCH QUARTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

Bjerkness, Kolodge, Langley, Maki, Manderfeld, Wilkinson, Mayor Ahlgren.

SENATE BILL No. 372 page 2

CITY OF KIRKLAND Department of Finance & Administration 123 Fifth Avenue, Kirkland, WA

VILLAGE OF DOWNERS GROVE Report for the Village Council Meeting

BOND ORDINANCE NO

HOW TO DO A CITY REFERENDUM

Elliot Perry West Virginia Development Office (304)

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION AND PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

CHAPTER 42 WATER REVENUE BONDS

GROUND LESSOR S CERTIFICATE. LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. City: City of Manhattan, Kansas (the City )

Camrosa Water District Financing Authority

RESOLUTION NO (09) CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOMPOC

Request for Council Action

Adopt Resolution to Levy Taxes for the Year 2013 as

The Urban Renewal Authority of Pueblo

RULES OF ORDER SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MANATEE COUNTY, FLORIDA:

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, said survey and description was prepared and is maintained at the Lenexa City Hall.

MINUTES REGULAR MEETING MUNICIPAL COUNCIL - CITY OF RAHWAY, NEW JERSEY FEBRUARY 8, P.M.

Florida Senate SB 980

TITLE 10. Public Works

VLCT SAMPLE TOWN OF LEVY OF TAX COLLECTOR S WARRANT

Resolution authorizing the sale, issuance and execution of not to exceed $165,000,000

Waupaca County Planning & Zoning

and residents sixty years of age or older who are surviving spouses

1976, adopt a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of Ocean Springs, Mississippi, which has

with the balance paid from seat licensing fees and contributions from the team. In addition, all of the costs, including RAD s will also be paid from

FINANCE AND AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE UTILITY DEBT SECURITIZATION AUTHORITY MINUTES OF THE 5 TH MEETING HELD ON JULY 28, 2015 IN UNIONDALE, NY

ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 5 BUILDING REGULATIONS ARTICLE I. ADMINISTRATION

TAX LEVY ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 200

TRUTH IN TAXATION - ALL TAXING DISTRICTS

Land Use Series. Check List # 1I For Adoption of an Amendment to a Plan. December 22, Bringing Knowledge to Life!

M E M O R A N D U M. Mayor Prussing and Members of the Urbana City Council

September 25, Steuben Trust Company 11 Schuyler Street Belmont, NY RE: Village of Belmont, $ Bond Anticipation Note 2012

EMERGENCY SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS AND THE WILLIAMSON COUNTY SERVICES DISTRICT #8 (Amended September, 2010)

MASTER ROAD REPAIR AGREEMENT STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF HOOD

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CRESTWOOD, MO AND BIEG PLUMBING COMPANY FOR ON-CALL PLUMBING SERVICE FOR THE PERIOD

NOTICE OF ELECTION ON TAX LEVY IN EXCESS OF THE TEN MILL LIMITATION

Chapter 3.26 CAR RENTAL OCCUPATION TAX

SECTION AWARD AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT

ARTICLE XII FISCAL ADMINISTRATION

THE TOWN OF LAKE COWICHAN BYLAW NO

Transcription:

CITY COMMISSION AGENDA MEMO November 20, 2006 FROM: Jason Hilgers, Assistant City Manager MEETING: November 28, 2006 SUBJECT: PRESENTER: Public Hearing and Ordinance Establishing a Transportation Development District (TDD) Jason Hilgers, Assistant City Manager BACKGROUND Dial Realty has petitioned the City of Manhattan to create a Transportation Development District (TDD) to assist with the internal public improvements associated with the Limey Pointe PUD. The internal public improvements consist of on-site street, sanitary sewer, and water improvements DISCUSSION For the on-site improvements at Limey Pointe, a benefit district was necessary to allow construction and temporary financing of the internal public streets, sewer, and water projects. The temporary financing associated with the benefit district will allow the City to pursue the issue of a TDD bond at a point when the bonds are marketable. Temporary financing under the benefit district allows the businesses at Limey Pointe up to four years to establish a sales tax history, which will assist in the marketability of the future TDD bonds. A half-cent TDD has been petitioned for to assist in the payment of the on-site improvements. The total projects costs associated with the on-site improvements totaled an estimated $640,000. The businesses within the district are projected to generate between $40,000 and $50,000 annually. It is anticipated by the time the temporary financing in place (i.e. the benefit district temporary notes) reaches maturity (City may issue temporary notes up to four years before permanent financing is required) the City will be able to market and sell the TDD bonds to finance the above mentioned public improvements. The primary reason for establishing the TDD for internal improvements is to assist relocating businesses from the North project redevelopment area. This will avoid additional costs due to special assessments, which they do not currently pay.

On November 7, 2006, the City Commission also awarded a contract to Bayer Construction in the amount of $383,149.80 for the on-site public improvements. On November 7, 2006, the City Commission passed a resolution setting the date for a public hearing in reference to a TDD associated with the Limey Pointe PUD internal improvements. The public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, November 28, 2006. On November 21, 2006 the City Commission passed first reading of an ordinance creating a TDD at Limey Pointe PUD. ALTERNATIVES It appears the Commission has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Commission may: 1. Hold a Public Hearing and approve Ordinance No. 6590 creating a Transportation Development District at Limey Pointe PUD. 2. Deny the item. 3. Modify the proposed ordinance to meet the needs of the City Commission. 4. Table the issue. RECOMMENDATION City Administration recommends the Commission hold a public hearing and approve Ordinance No. 6590 establishing the proposed Transportation Development District. POSSIBLE MOTION Approve Ordinance No. 6590 establishing a Transportation Development District within the City of Manhattan. Enclosure: 1. Ordinance No. 6590 06155 JH 2

(Published in The Manhattan Mercury on December, 2006) ORDINANCE NO. 6590 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IN MANHATTAN, KANSAS FOR THE LIMEY POINTE PROJECT; AUTHORIZING THE MAKING OF CERTAIN TRANSPORTATION PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS RELATING THERETO; APPROVING THE ESTIMATED COSTS OF SUCH TRANSPORTATION PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE METHOD OF FINANCING; AUTHORIZING THE IMPOSITION OF A TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT SALES TAX WITHIN THE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IN MANHATTAN, KANSAS; ESTABLISHING A METHOD OF COLLECTION OF SUCH SALES TAX; AND PROVIDING FOR THE SEGREGATION OF SUCH SALES TAX REVENUES FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE COSTS OF CERTAIN TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS WITHIN TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Transportation Development District Act, K.S.A. 12-17,140 et seq. (the "Act") authorizes the governing body of any city or county to create transportation development districts ("transportation districts") within such jurisdiction, to acquire interests in property and to construct any project or undertaking relating thereto to improve any bridge, street, road, highway access road, interchange, intersection, signing, signalization, parking lot, bus stop, station, garage, terminal, hangar, shelter, rest area, dock, wharf, lake or river port, airport, railroad, light rail or other mass transit facility and any similar or related project or infrastructure (collectively, "transportation projects"); and WHEREAS, the Act further authorizes said governing body, in order to pay the costs of such transportation projects, to impose a transportation district sales tax on the selling of tangible personal property at retail or rendering or furnishing services within transportation districts in any increment of.10% or.25% not to exceed 1.0% and/or the levy of special assessments upon property within such transportation districts, and to issue revenue bonds payable from such sales taxes and/or special assessments; and WHEREAS, a petition (the "Petition") was filed with the City Clerk of the City of Manhattan, Kansas (the "City"), on October 27, 2006, proposing the creation of a transportation district, the making of transportation projects relating thereto and the imposition of a transportation district sales tax in order to pay the costs of such transportation projects; and WHEREAS, said Petition was signed by the owners of record, whether resident or not, of all of the land area within the proposed transportation district; and WHEREAS, the Act provides that prior to creating any transportation district, the governing body shall, by resolution, direct and order a public hearing on the advisability of creating such transportation district and the construction of such transportation projects therein, and to give notice of the hearing by publication at least once each week for two consecutive weeks in the official City newspaper and by certified mail to all property owners within the proposed transportation district, the second publication to be at least seven days prior to the hearing and such certified mail sent at least ten days prior to such hearing; and

WHEREAS, the governing body of the City adopted Resolution No. 110706-J on November 7, 2006 directing that a public hearing on the proposed transportation district within the City be held on November 28, 2006 and requiring that the City Clerk provide for notice of such public hearing as set forth in the Act; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Public Hearing containing the following information: (a) the time and place of the hearing; (b) the general nature of the proposed transportation projects; (c) the estimated cost of the proposed transportation projects; (d) the proposed method of financing the costs of the transportation projects; (e) the proposed amount of the transportation development district sales tax; (f) the proposed amount of any special assessments and the method of assessment; and (g) the map or boundary description of the proposed transportation district, was mailed (by certified mail) to all property owners within the proposed transportation district on November 10, 2006 and published once each week for two consecutive weeks in The Manhattan Mercury, the official City newspaper, on November 10, 2006 and November 17, 2006; and WHEREAS, on November 28, 2006 the governing body of the City conducted a public hearing on the proposed transportation district, the proposed transportation projects, the estimated costs thereof, the method of financing the same; and the imposition of the transportation district sales tax; and WHEREAS, the governing body of the City hereby finds and determines it to be advisable to create a transportation district and set forth the boundaries thereof, authorize transportation projects relating thereto, approve the estimated costs of such transportation projects, approve the method of financing the same and impose the transportation district sales tax, all in accordance with the provisions of the Act. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MANHATTAN, KANSAS: SECTION 1. Creation of Transportation Development District; Boundaries. The governing body of the City hereby finds and determines that it is advisable to create, in accordance with the provisions of the Act, Transportation Development District within the City ("Transportation District"). The legal description of the property contained in the Transportation District is set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. A map generally outling the boundaries of the Transportation District is attached as Exhibit B hereto and incorporate herein by reference. SECTION 2. Authorization of Transportation District Projects; Estimated Costs. The governing body of the City hereby finds and determines that it is advisable to authorize certain transportation district projects (the "Projects") within the Transportation District, as more fully described on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated by reference. The estimated costs of the Projects are $641,186, plus costs of issuance, costs of interest on any temporary financing and associated reserves. SECTION 3. Method of Financing. (a) In order to provide funds to finance the costs of the Projects, it is advisable to impose, in accordance the provisions of the Act, a transportation district sales tax within the Transportation District in the amount of 0.5% on the selling of tangible personal property at retail or rendering or furnishing services within the Transportation District (the "Sales Tax"). (b) There will be no special assessments levied on property within the boundaries of the Transportation District.

(c) The costs of the Projects will be financed by the issuance of revenue bonds of the City issued in accordance with the provisions of the Act in an estimated principal amount of $641,186, plus costs of issuance, costs of interest on any temporary financing and associated reserves. The revenue bonds will be secured by the pledge of money received from the imposition of the Sales Tax to be imposed on the selling of tangible personal property at retail or rendering or furnishing services within the Transportation District. SECTION 4. Imposition of Transportation District Sales Tax. In order to provide for the payment of the Projects and/or the repayment of the Revenue Bonds issued to finance the same, the governing body of the City hereby imposes the Sales Tax within the Transportation District in an amount of 0.5% on the selling of tangible personal property at retail or rendering or furnishing services taxable pursuant to the provisions of the Kansas retailers' sales tax act within the Transportation District with such Sales Tax to commence on April 1, 2007. SECTION 5. Collection of the Sales Tax. The collection of the Sales Tax shall be made in the manner prescribed by the Act. The provisions of this section may be amended and/or modified pursuant to one or more ordinances and/or resolutions of the governing body of the City that provide for the issuance and repayment of the Revenue Bonds or by incorporation by reference any modifications to the Act that provide for collection of the Sales Tax. SECTION 6. Segregation of Sales Tax Revenues. All revenues derived from the collection of the Sales Tax shall be deposited into a special fund of the City to be designated as the Transportation District Sales Tax Revenue Fund (the "Revenue Fund"). Such revenues shall be used to pay the costs of the Projects and/or to repay the Revenue Bonds and related expenses. The provisions of this section may be amended and/or modified pursuant to one or more ordinances and/or resolutions of the governing body of the City that provide for the issuance and repayment of the Revenue Bonds. SECTION 7. Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage by the governing body and publication in the official City newspaper. [SEAL] PASSED by the City Commission of the City of Manhattan, Kansas on November 28, 2006. Attest: Mayor City Clerk

EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Lots 1-6, Limey Pointe Addition, an addition to the City of Manhattan, Riley and Pottawatomie Counties, Kansas

EXHIBIT B TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP

EXHIBIT C TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PROJECTS Limey Pointe Transportation Development District (TDD) Project Description Generally the construction of infrastructure improvements associated with the TDD has been referred to as the Limey Pointe on-site improvements. These improvements include street, sanitary sewer and water infrastructure improvements. The street project includes the construction of Goodfood Place, Limey Place, the new intersection of Limey Place and McCall Road, and the new intersection of Goodfood Place and Hostettler Drive. The street project also includes various drainage improvements such as an underground storm sewer system and street inlets. The sanitary sewer and water project mainly involves the construction and extension of underground sanitary sewer collection and water distribution systems to service the six lots within Limey Pointe Addition.