Risk Management Plan for Drug Establishments

Similar documents
Risk management plans an overview

Questions & answers on signal management

Guidance notes on collection of drug safety information by employees and agents of pharmaceutical companies

Overview of Risk Management

Detailed guidance AEs reporting in clinical trials ( CT-3 ) Stefano Bonato, M.D. Pharmacovigilance Country Head Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals

Risk Management Plan (RMP) Guidance (Draft)

Stakeholder Meeting, 7 th June 2013 An inspector s perspective considerations for patient support and reimbursement programmes

Post-authorisation safety studies and the EU PAS Register

Risk Management Plan - Bayer Experience :

Risk Management Plan (RMP) on Biologicals and NCE

MedDRA in pharmacovigilance industry perspective

Guidance notes. for Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance in Patient Support Programmes

TGA key performance indicators and reporting measures

Agence fédérale des médicaments et des produits de santé

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

GUIDELINE ON THE SUBMISSION OF RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN DOCUMENTS

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Guidance Notes for Applicants of the Certificate for Clinical Trial on Medical Device

Safety Risk Management Company Perspective

Legal actions & practice against wrongdoers in the hungarian medicinal market

COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS GUIDELINE FOR THE CONDUCT OF POST-MARKETING SURVEILLANCE STUDIES OF VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

One-year report on human medicines pharmacovigilance tasks of the European Medicines Agency

Guidance for the format and content of the protocol of non-interventional post-authorisation safety studies

Questions and answers on preparation, management and assessment of periodic safety update reports (PSURs)

The information contained in these slides is for general purposes only and presents the state of knowledge at November 30, 2011

Measures on Administration of Health Insurance

PROPOSED UPDATED TEXT FOR WHO GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS: MAIN PRINCIPLES (JANUARY 2013)

Questions and Answers to the Annual Safety Report

PHARMACOVIGILANCE IN A BOX

MEDICAL DEVICES INTERIM REGULATION

Risk Management in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Elena Apetri, Global Medical Safety Surveillance Schering AG

Public Assessment Report. Scientific discussion. Paracetamol Orifarm 500 mg film-coated tablets. (Paracetamol) DK/H/2271/001/DC.

Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency

Risk Assessment in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Dorothea Köppe Liability Insurance: The Never-ending Story September 9th, 2009

BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Handling of Periodic Safety Update Reports

Data Standards in Clinical Trials, A Regulatory Perspec9ve

Good practice guide on recording, coding, reporting and assessment of medication errors

REPORT 2016/066 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION. Audit of management of technical cooperation projects in the Economic Commission for Africa

Temporary Authorisations for Use (ATU)

EU PAS Register Guide

SUBJECT: RULES AND REGULATIONSTO GOVERN THE ACCREDITATION OF TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES

ST. MICHAEL S HOSPITAL Guidelines for Reporting Serious Adverse Events / Unanticipated Problems to the SMH Research Ethics Board (REB) July 09, 2014

MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR No. 182 Series of 2003 TO : ALL OVERSEAS SHIPPING COMPANIES AND OTHER MARITIME ENTITIES CONCERNED.

RISK MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND MANDATED POST-AUTHORIZATION STUDIES

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE E2C(R2)

Youth Development Institute. Advancing Youth Development. A Curriculum for Training Youth Workers

Medicine Safety Glossary

FDA Tobacco Regulatory Science Fellowship

ICRIN Seminar on EU Regulation of Clinical Trials

FDA Presentation - Society for Clinical Research Sites

Pharmacovigilance System Master File (PSMF), QPPV and audits

The EU Clinical Trial Regulation A regulator s perspective

Public Assessment Report UKPAR. Levonorgestrel 1.5 mg tablet. (levonorgestrel). UK Licence No: PL 41947/0006. ELC Group s.r.o.

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

EphMRA Adverse Event Reporting Guidelines 2013

DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Document issued on: July 2015

NON-RESIDENT PHARMACY PERMIT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

California E-Pedigree Update. August 2013

Addressing Risk in Partner / Contractor Selection and Onboarding. Michael Davidson VP Quality Systems and Compliance March 2014

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

PROJECT PREPARATION GRANT (PPG) APPLICATION FORM-3

Essential Documents for the Conduct of a Clinical Trial. Debra Dykhuis Associate Director RSO

US Perspective on the Regulatory Assessment of Benefit-Risk of Vaccines

Quality Risk Management The Pharmaceutical Experience Ann O Mahony Quality Assurance Specialist Pfizer Biotech Grange Castle

Making SOP Training More Effective

DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only.

EFPIA Good Practice Revision 1, October 2014

Regulations on Supervision and Administration Responsibilities of Local Offices

REVISED POLICIES AND STANDARDS (PS) FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING (BSIE)

MEDICAL BENEFITS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUE

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Information Security Standard

Our name ASPHALION derives from the Greek word asphaléia, alluding to values such as firmness, stability, certainty and reliability.

ICH guideline E2C (R2) on periodic benefit-risk evaluation report (PBRER)

ICH guideline E2C (R2) Periodic benefit-risk evaluation report (PBRER)

Overview. Health Science Authority. Implementation of ICH guideline in Singapore. Singapore s experience

Update: Proposed Medical Device Regulation (MDR) & IVD Regulation (IVDR)

Memantine hydrochloride 20 mg film-coated tablets PL 17907/0291

GOVERNMENT NOTICE NO. 416 published on 28/12/2012 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS THE BANK OF TANZANIA (CREDIT REFERENCE BUREAU) REGULATIONS, 2012

E2C(R2) Implementation Working Group ICH E2C(R2) Guideline: Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report Questions & Answers

RAPID ALERT SYSTEM (RAS) IN PHARMACOVIGILANCE

EphMRA Adverse Event Reporting Guidelines 2015

STREPSILS BLACKCURRANT FLAVOUR LOZENGES STREPSILS DRY & SORE THROAT BLACKCURRANT FLAVOUR LOZENGES

Cancer Drug Reimbursement within the Context of Clinical Trials. (Draft for consultation purposes) Version 8.0

Arrangement of Clauses

CLINICAL RESEARCH ROLES CLINICAL RESEARCH ROLESCLINICAL RESEARCH ROLES

Life Science Application Medical Device Liability

Fexofenadine Hydrochloride 120 mg Film-coated Tablets Fexofenadine Hydrochloride 180 mg Film-coated Tablets PL 36390/ UKPAR TABLE OF CONTENTS

Use of Electronic Health Record Data in Clinical Investigations

Adventist HealthCare, Inc.

Implementation strategy for ISO IDMP in EU

Guidelines for the use of electronic signature

Transcription:

Republic of the Philippines Department of Health FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Risk Management Plan for Drug Establishments Center for Drug Regulation and Research Food and Drug Administration 17 December 2014

Presentation Outline A. Regulatory Basis B. Risk and Risk Management C. Draft FDA Circular D. Discussion

Regulation Outline I. Background/Rationale II. III. IV. Objective Scope Implementing Details V. Roles/Responsibilities of Applicant/MAH and FDA

Regulation Outline VI. Penalties and Sanctions VII. Repealing and Separability Clause VIII. Effectivity

Republic of the Philippines Department of Health FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION REGULATORY BASIS

Republic Act No. 9711 Issued to strengthen FDA, ensuring monitoring and regulatory coverage over establishments and products, including drugs

Republic Act No. 9711 Section 5, (k) all marketing authorization holders (MAHs) and other concerned stakeholders are required to implement an RMP for the issuance of the appropriate authorization

Republic Act No. 9711 Section 5, (l) Strengthen the post-market surveillance system in monitoring health products

FDA Circular No. 2013-004 Section V, (2) all MAH shall establish a PMS system for every product in the market, which shall be translated into a RMP

Republic of the Philippines Department of Health FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION RISK AND RISK MANAGEMENT

event that has a probability of occurring could have either a positive or negative impact to the lifecycle of a medicinal product may have one or more causes one or more impacts (e.g., on cost, schedule, or performance) all drug products assume some element of risk Risk

a set of pharmacovigilance activities and interventions designed to identify, characterise, prevent or minimise risks relating to medicinal products including the assessment of the effectiveness of those activities and interventions Risk Management System

a detailed description of the risk management system Risk Management Plan

Other Risk From Risk Management Seminar (& Workshop) presentation by Juancho Robles Managements

Other Risk Managements From Risk Management Seminar (& Workshop) presentation by Juancho Robles

Other Risk From Risk Management Seminar (& Workshop) presentation by Juancho Robles Managements

Republic of the Philippines Department of Health FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Draft FDA Circular: Risk Management Plan (RMP) for Drug Establishments

I. Background/ Rationale Article VII, Section 4 (h) of IRR of RA 9711 Article II, A, Section 2 (l) of IRR of RA 9711

I. Background/ Rationale Section V, D of AO 2014-0034 FDA: implementation of an RMP coordinated and economical applications of resources to monitor, minimize, and control the probability and/or impact of risks to drug products with respect to safety, efficacy, and quality

II. Objective prepare and implement an RMP as part of the reqts for the issuance of LTO provide appropriate guidance

Manufacturers Distributors Drugstores/Pharmacies/ Boticas including hospital and institutional pharmacies RONPDs CROs Sponsors III. Scope

A. RMP for Drug Establishments reqt for the licensing of drug establishments During initial for new establishments During renewal for existing establishments Must always be available for inspection IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 1. Introduction 2. Risk Identification 3. Risk Minimization 4. Risk Communication 5. Risk Monitoring and Management Evaluation IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 1. Introduction a) Internal Environment sets the basis on how risks are viewed and addressed Description of the establishment (objectives, mission and vision, activities) Responsibilities attached to the LTO IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 1. Introduction a) Internal Environment sets the basis on how risks are viewed and addressed Description of the organization (heads, functions and responsibilities/duties) Risk management officer/team IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 1. Introduction a) Internal Environment sets the basis on how risks are viewed and addressed Other attached establishments/institutions critical to the functioning of the establishment IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 1. Introduction a) Internal Environment sets the basis on how risks are viewed and addressed Contact information of responsible officers during and beyond office hours IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 1. Introduction b) Risk Management Approach overall risk management approach (processes, personnel involved, periodic reporting and monthly procedures to be performed) IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 1. Introduction c) Risk Management Objectives ensure the safety, efficacy, and quality of drug products they engage with in order to protect public health IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 1. Introduction d) Data Lock point timeframe to which the RMP is expected to be valid IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 2. Risk Identification Events that may adversely affect the set objectives Assessment of significance and likelihood of occurrence of the identified risks IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 2. Risk Identification Tabulated summary risk register: Specific objectives the risk belongs Naming convention for each risks identified Description of the risks and the assessment of their probability and impact IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 2. Risk Identification Risks not currently known, the planned activities by the establishment to identify them IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 3. Risk Minimization For each key risks identified, the risk minimization action plan should be prepared and implemented IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 3. Risk Minimization a) Routine risk minimization Those planned and conducted by the establishment regularly to minimize the identified risks IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 3. Risk Minimization a) Routine risk minimization Batch release testing Detailmen training on promotion Formulation and approval procedure of marketing claims IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 3. Risk Minimization a) Routine risk minimization Benefit-risk assessment PSUR Regular updating of FDA issuance Many others as determined by FDA IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 3. Risk Minimization b) Additional risk minimization Those planned and conducted by the drug establishment should a significant risk or an unidentified risk occur IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 3. Risk Minimization b) Additional risk minimization Processing and reporting to FDA of ADR/ADE and SSFFCs received from consumers/hcps IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 3. Risk Minimization b) Additional risk minimization Review and revision of labeling and product information Provision of assistance IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 3. Risk Minimization b) Additional risk minimization Conduct of voluntary recall Segregation of products suspected to be SSFFC And many others as determined by FDA IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 3. Risk Minimization For identified risks with no risk minimization activities, appropriate justification must be provided IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 4. Risk Communication Communication system of establishment to: a) Internally b) FDA c) Consumers and HCP d) Other relevant stakeholders IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 4. Risk Communication Criteria when communication must be done Means for communicating Internal reporting procedure to management and appropriate regulatory agencies IV. Implementing Details

B. Framework for RMP for Drug Establishments 5. Risk Monitoring and Management Evaluation Periodic monitoring of identified risks Criteria where evaluation is needed When RMP revision is required IV. Implementing Details

C. Submission of RMP When RMP is revised submit to FDA Cover letter and summary of revisions made must be included IV. Implementing Details

D. RMP Implementation Trigger drug establishments are mandated to implement their submitted RMP It is in this context RMP is comprehensive to cover all possible risks, whether already identified or yet to be identified IV. Implementing Details

V. Roles and Responsibilities of Applicant/MAH and FDA MAH overall responsible for quality, safety, and efficacy of products Expected to have a larger role Other drug establishments involved in the supply chain expected to cooperate and coordinate with MAHs

V. Roles and Responsibilities of Applicant/MAH and FDA Evaluation: a) Drug establishment is capable of maintaining/performing its post-marketing commitments to ensure the safety, efficacy, and quality of the drug product b) ensuring public health safety

VI. Penalties and Sanctions Failure to act on the part of the establishment as stipulated in the submitted RMP, as well as violation to any section in this FDA Circular shall be a ground for the filing of appropriate regulatory action, administrative sanctions, fines, and/or penalties

Provisions in previous circulars and memoranda that are inconsistent with this Circular are hereby withdrawn, repealed, and/or revoked accordingly If any provision in this FDA Circular, or application of such provision to any circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the provisions in this FDA Circular shall not be affected VII. Repealing/ Separability Clause

Upon approval and signature of the FDA DG VIII. Effectivity

Republic of the Philippines Department of Health FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION DISCUSSION