Disclosure of European Embedded Value (summary) as of March 31, 2012



Similar documents
Disclosure of European Embedded Value (summary) as of March 31, 2015

Disclosure of European Embedded Value as of March 31, 2015

Disclosure of Market Consistent Embedded Value as at March 31, 2015

Disclosure of Market Consistent Embedded Value as of March 31, 2014

Main Business Indicators

SWEDBANK FÖRSÄKRING AB European Embedded Value

Embedded Value Report

UNIQA Group Group Embedded Value April 2014 Kurt Svoboda, CRO

EUROPEAN EMBEDDED VALUE 2007

Embedded Value 2014 Report

Market Consistent Embedded Value (MCEV)

15 April 2015 Kurt Svoboda, CFRO. UNIQA Insurance Group AG Economic Capital and Embedded Value 2014

UNIQA Group Group Embedded Value May 2013 Kurt Svoboda, CRO

Market Consistent Embedded Value Principles October CFO Forum

Introduction 3 7. Assumptions 1. Covered Business 2. Market Consistent Embedded Value 2014 and its Components 3. New Business Appendix 19

AvivaSA Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Market Consistent Embedded Value Report. Half-year 2015

ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD DECEMBER 2004 FRS 27 27LIFE ASSURANCE STANDARD FINANCIAL REPORTING ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD

Guideline. Source of Earnings Disclosure (Life Insurance Companies) No: D-9 Date: December 2004 Revised: July 2010

BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY DETERMINATION OF DISCOUNT RATES FOR ECONOMIC BALANCE SHEET FRAMEWORK July 2015

Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION Basis of Preparation Covered Business Definitions... 4

Allianz. Market Consistent Embedded Value Report

Conference Call on Interim Report 1/2009

Munich Re Market consistent embedded value REPORT 2010

Introduction. Coverage. Principle 1: Embedded Value (EV) is a measure of the consolidated value of shareholders interests in the covered business.

THE EMPIRE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Now, I would like to start the financial results presentation of our group for the six months ended September As usual, I will go over the

Fiscal 2013 Financial Results

THE CHALLENGE OF LOWER

Statement of Financial Condition

GE Financial Assurance Holdings, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements of. Canada Pension Plan Investment Board

White paper Danica. White paper. Consolidation policy and business activities. at Danica Pension. Unaudited. February 2009.

Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements of. Canada Pension Plan Investment Board

Content. Pages Basis of preparation Covered business

Financial performance

ING GROUP EMBEDDED VALUE REPORT 2007

Embedded Value of Life Insurance Companies in India. Presented by Philip Jackson FIA, FIAI Consulting Actuary

Liquidity premiums and contingent liabilities

MCEV reporting with mg-alfa

Preliminary Consolidated Financial Results for the Six Months Ended September 30, 2012 (Prepared in Accordance with Japanese GAAP)

Actuary s Guide to Reporting on Insurers of Persons Policy Liabilities. Senior Direction, Supervision of Insurers and Control of Right to Practice

INSTITUTE AND FACULTY OF ACTUARIES EXAMINATION

Market Consistent Embedded Values

Leadership in life insurance. April 2015

Market Consistent Embedded Value Report 2014

Summary consolidated income statement 1. Operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns 2

Session 9b L&H Insurance in a Low Interest Rate Environment. Christian Liechti

Ricoh Company, Ltd. INTERIM REPORT (Non consolidated. Half year ended September 30, 2000)

Bank of Japan Review. Japanese Life Insurance Companies' Balance-Sheet Structure and Japanese Government Bond Investment. February 2013.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Announcement of Financial Results for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2014

(Unofficial Translation) Consolidated Summary Report under Japanese GAAP for the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2011 February 13, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary 3. Introduction 5. Purposes of the Joint Research Project 6

Business Overview and Results

Autumn Investor Seminar. Workshops. Managing Variable Annuity Risk

IFRIC Interpretation 16 Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation

GN47: Stochastic Modelling of Economic Risks in Life Insurance

INDUSTRIAL-ALLIANCE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. FIRST QUARTER 2000 Consolidated Financial Statements (Non audited)

Principles and models for the Embedded Value calculation

Data Compilation Financial Data

The Empire Life Insurance Company

A chapter on Valuation basis covering the following minimum criteria should also be displayed on the web-site of the Insurers.

Application of Interest Rate Swaps in Indian Insurance Industry Amruth Krishnan Rohit Ajgaonkar Guide: G.LN.Sarma

1. Basis of Preparation. 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Principles of consolidation. (a) Foreign currency translation.

Rating Methodology by Sector. Life Insurance

Canadian Life Insurance Company Asset/Liability Management Summary Report as at: 31-Jan-08 interest rates as of: 29-Feb-08 Run: 2-Apr-08 20:07 Book

Estimating Risk free Rates. Aswath Damodaran. Stern School of Business. 44 West Fourth Street. New York, NY

Report of the statutory actuary

Market-Consistent Embedded Value (MCEV)

Measuring performance Update to Insurance Key Performance Indicators

Private Sector Life Insurance Companies and the Mutual Insurance Business of the Agricultural Cooperatives (JA-kyosai)

5N PLUS INC. Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) For the three month periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands

Hedging at Your Insurance Company

SAVINGS PRODUCTS AND THE LIFE INSURANCE INDUSTRY IN CANADA

GN45: Determining the With-Profits Insurance Capital Component

Financial Review. 16 Selected Financial Data 18 Management s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

FINANCIAL REVIEW. 18 Selected Financial Data 20 Management s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Introduction, Forwards and Futures

Practice Education Course Individual Life and Annuities Exam June 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS

E.ON International Finance B.V Annual Report. Rotterdam, The Netherlands

MARKET-CONSISTENT VALUATIONS OF LIFE INSURANCE BUSINESS: THE U.K. EXPERIENCE. A report for the Society of Actuaries. Chris O Brien

D4: How to Operate in Low Interest Rate Environment - Japan Case Study

Consolidated Financial Results April 1, June 30, 2001

A chapter on Valuation basis covering the following minimum criteria should also be displayed on the web-site of the Insurers.

Quantitative Impact Study 1 (QIS1) Summary Report for Belgium. 21 March 2006

SUMITOMO DENSETSU CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES. Consolidated Financial Statements

THE EMPIRE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Article from: Risk Management. November 2005 Issue 6

How To Understand The Financial Market For Insurers In Swissitzerland

IASB/FASB Meeting Week beginning 11 April Top down approaches to discount rates

PNB Life Insurance Inc. Risk Management Framework

IAA PAPER VALUATION OF RISK ADJUSTED CASH FLOWS AND THE SETTING OF DISCOUNT RATES THEORY AND PRACTICE

Key performance indicators

Embedded Value in Life Insurance

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Kikkoman Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries Years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008

Nippon Life Insurance Company (the Company ; President: Yoshinobu Tsutsui) announces financial results for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.

Consolidated Financial Summary For the third quarter of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2009

Variable Annuity Living Benefits

Data Compilation Financial Data

Market-Consistent Valuation of the Sponsor Covenant and its use in Risk-Based Capital Assessment. Craig Turnbull FIA

Transcription:

May 25, 2012 SUMITOMO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Disclosure of European Embedded Value (summary) as of 2012 This is the summarized translation of the European Embedded Value ( EEV ) of Sumitomo Life Insurance Company (hereinafter Sumitomo Life ) as of 2012. Sumitomo Life has adopted EEV Principles and related guidance issued by the European CFO Forum, while also taking into account a market-consistent approach, in calculating its Embedded Value. As a mutual life insurance company, Sumitomo Life regarded the surplus after policyholder dividends as the value attributable to the company in calculating its EEV. Also, foundation funds, classified as net assets in the statutory financial report, were classified as liabilities in the calculation of EEV. 1

1. EEV Results a. EEV Results 2011 2012 EEV 1,969.5 2,318.5 348.9 Adjusted net worth 861.2 1,313.4 452.2 Value of in-force business 1,108.2 1,005.0 (103.2) 2011 2012 Value of new business 156.7 177.7 21.0 b. Adjusted Net Worth 2011 2012 Adjusted net worth 861.2 1,313.4 452.2 Total net assets on the non-consolidated balance 444.4 492.6 48.2 sheets(note) Retained earnings in liabilities (after tax) 287.0 298.6 11.5 Unrealized gains (losses) on securities and miscellaneous items (after tax) 140.3 532.6 392.2 Unrealized gains (losses) on loans (after tax) 92.9 95.8 2.9 Unrealized gains (losses) on real estate (after tax) (37.5) (44.9) (7.4) Unrealized gains (losses) on liabilities (after tax) (14.9) (11.9) 3.0 Unfunded retirement benefit obligation (after tax) (51.0) (49.3) 1.6 (Note) Foundation funds, the total amount of valuation adjustments, and expected distributions from capital are excluded. c. Reconciliation of total net assets to adjusted net worth 2011 2012 Total net assets on the consolidated balance sheets (Note) 450.4 496.6 46.1 PLUS Retained earnings in liabilities (after tax) 287.0 298.6 11.5 PLUS Unrealized gains (losses) (after tax) 174.8 567.6 392.8 PLUS Unfunded retirement benefit obligation (after tax) (51.0) (49.3) 1.6 LESS Book value of businesses not covered - - - Adjusted net worth 861.2 1,313.4 452.2 (Note) Foundation funds, the total amount of valuation adjustments, and expected distributions from capital are excluded. 2

d. Value of In-force Business(VIF) 2011 2012 Value of in-force business 1,108.2 1,005.0 (103.2) Certainty equivalent present value of future profits 1,473.6 1,388.8 (84.8) Time value of financial options and guarantees (126.7) (150.8) (24.1) Cost of holding required capital (Note) (90.3) (69.8) 20.5 Cost of non-hedgeable risks (148.2) (163.0) 2 (14.8) (Note) In the calculation of cost of holding required capital as of 2012, Sumitomo Life defines required capital as the amount required to maintain a solvency margin ratio of 400%, reflecting the revision of Japanese solvency margin standards. It was 600% under the previous standards. e. Value of New Business 2011 2012 Value of new business (Note1) 156.7 177.7 21.0 Certainty equivalent present value of future profits 203.9 200.7 (3.1) Time value of financial options and guarantees (27.6) (6.5) 21.0 Cost of holding required capital (Note2) (7.4) (4.9) 2.4 Cost of non-hedgeable risks (12.1) (11.5) 0.6 (Note1) The value of new business for the fiscal year ended 2012, includes 22.7 billion of positive result by the change in the corporate tax rates. (Note2) In the calculation of cost of holding required capital for the fiscal year ended 2012, Sumitomo Life defines required capital as the amount required to maintain a solvency margin ratio of 400%, reflecting the revision of Japanese solvency margin standards. It was 600% under the previous standards. The new business margin (the ratio of the value of new business to the present value of premium income) is as follows: 2011 2012 Value of new business (a) 156.7 177.7 21.0 Present value of premium income (b) (Note) 2,291.0 1,897.3 (393.7) New business Margin (a) (b) 6.8 % 9.4 % 2.5pt. (Note) Future premium income is discounted by the risk-free rate used for the calculation of the value of new business. 3

2. Statement of changes in EEV Adjusted net worth Value of in-force business Values as of 2011 861.2 1,108.2 1,969.5 (1) Value of new business - 177.7 177.7 (2) Expected existing business contribution (at the risk-free rate) 0.8 14.9 15.8 (3) Expected existing business contribution (in excess of risk-free rate) 12.7 228.7 241.5 (4) Expected transfer from VIF to adjusted net worth 134.7 (134.7) - in-force at beginning of year 252.8 (252.8) - EEV new business (118.0) 118.0 - (5) Non-economic experience variances (Note1) (32.7) 16.9 (15.8) (6) Non-economic assumptions changes - 27.3 27.3 (7) Economic variances 305.8 (505.0) (199.1) (8) Changes in corporate tax rates (Note2) 30.6 70.8 101.5 Values as of 2012 1,313.4 1,005.0 2,318.5 (Note1) This item includes the impact of the changes in cost of holding required capital reflecting the revision of Japanese solvency margin standards. (Note2) This item represents the impact of the latest changes in corporate tax rates. The impact for the new business is not included in this item as it has already been reflected in the Value of new business. 4

3. Sensitivity Analysis a. Sensitivity Analysis of EEV EEV EEV as of 2012 2,318.5 - Sensitivity 1: 50bp upward parallel shift in risk-free yield curve 2,568.6 250.0 Sensitivity 2: 50bp downward parallel shift in risk-free yield curve 2,013.2 (305.3) Sensitivity 3: 10% decline in equity and real estate values 2,163.5 (154.9) Sensitivity 4: 10% decline in maintenance expenses 2,399.7 81.1 Sensitivity 5: 10% decline in surrender and lapse rates 2,473.4 154.9 Sensitivity 6: Sensitivity 7: 5% decline in mortality and morbidity rates for life insurance products 5% decline in mortality and morbidity rates for annuities 2,500.4 181.9 2,315.7 (2.7) Sensitivity 8: Setting required capital at statutory minimum level 2,355.5 36.9 Sensitivity 9: 25% increase in implied volatilities of equity and real estate values 2,306.1 (12.3) Sensitivity 10: 25% increase in implied volatilities of swaptions 2,275.5 (42.9) Only the value of in-force business is affected in sensitivities 4 through 10. The following table shows the effect of sensitivities 1 through 3 on adjusted net worth. Sensitivity 1: 50bp upward parallel shift in risk-free yield curve (511.0) Sensitivity 2: 50bp downward parallel shift in risk-free yield curve 441.8 Sensitivity 3: 10% decline in equity and real estate values (146.9) 5

b. Sensitivity analysis of the value of new business Value of new business Value of new business for the fiscal year ended 2012 177.7 - Sensitivity 1: 50bp upward parallel shift in risk-free yield curve 202.7 25.0 Sensitivity 2: 50bp downward parallel shift in risk-free yield curve 147.7 (29.9) Sensitivity 3: 10% decline in equity and real estate values 177.7 (0.0) Sensitivity 4: 10% decline in maintenance expenses 182.1 4.4 Sensitivity 5: 10% decline in surrender and lapse rates 195.7 18.0 Sensitivity 6: Sensitivity 7: 5% decline in mortality and morbidity rates for life insurance products 5% decline in mortality and morbidity rates for annuities 184.5 6.8 177.7 0.0 Sensitivity 8: Setting required capital at statutory minimum level 180.3 2.6 Sensitivity 9: 25% increase in implied volatilities of equity and real estate values 177.4 (0.2) Sensitivity 10: 25% increase in implied volatilities of swaptions 175.3 (2.3) 4. Note The calculation of EEV requires numerous assumptions regarding future projections that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Future results may differ from those assumptions used in the calculation of EEV. 6

Appendix: Principal EEV Assumptions 1. Economic assumptions a. Risk-free rate In the certainty equivalent calculation and the interest rate model calibration, Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs) are used as a proxy for risk-free rates. Given the poor liquidity of ultra-long JGBs, we have extrapolated risk-free rates for tenors greater than 30 years with reference to the shape of the Japanese swap rates with 30 to 50 year tenors as the observable market rates. The table below shows, for selected tenors, the risk-free rates (spot rates) which are used in the calculations. Tenor 2011 2012 1 year 0.151% 0.104% 2 years 0.198% 0.123% 3 years 0.281% 0.173% 4 years 0.408% 0.250% 5 years 0.492% 0.332% 10 years 1.268% 1.050% 15 years 1.884% 1.600% 20 years 2.198% 1.914% 25 years 2.278% 1.998% 30 years 2.335% 2.106% 35 years 2.383% 2.200% 40 years 2.419% 2.271% 45 years 2.452% 2.327% 50 years 2.511% 2.375% (Source:Bloomberg (interpolated/extrapolated) ) 7

b. Principal dynamic assumption (1) Interest rate model As an interest rate model, Sumitomo Life has adopted a single-factor Hull-White model, in which interest rates associated with Japanese yen, U.S. dollars, Euros and British pounds are calculated. The model has been adjusted to be in line with a risk-neutral approach in which Japanese yen is set as a base currency, and correlations between the interest rates have also been taken into account. The interest rate model has been calibrated to be consistent with the market environment as of each reporting date, and parameters used are estimated from the yield curve and implied volatilities of interest rate swaptions with various maturities. 5,000 scenarios are used in calculating the time value of financial options and guarantees through the stochastic method. A summary of implied volatilities of interest rate swaptions used to calibrate the scenarios is as follows: Interest rate swaptions implied volatilities Option Tenor Swap Tenor 2011 2012 JPY USD EUR GBP JPY USD EUR GBP 5 years 5 years 32.5% 22.9% 19.2% 16.5% 34.8% 30.3% 27.5% 25.1% 5 years 7 years 30.1% 21.9% 18.7% 15.8% 31.7% 29.0% 26.5% 23.1% 5 years 10 years 28.2% 21.0% 18.6% 15.1% 29.4% 28.0% 25.8% 21.4% 7 years 5 years 26.7% 20.7% 17.5% 14.4% 30.1% 27.3% 24.4% 20.1% 7 years 7 years 25.7% 20.0% 17.2% 13.9% 29.5% 26.6% 24.1% 19.3% 7 years 10 years 25.3% 19.4% 17.5% 13.8% 27.1% 26.5% 24.4% 19.0% 10 years 5 years 23.6% 18.3% 15.9% 13.0% 26.8% 24.9% 22.5% 17.4% 10 years 7 years 23.6% 17.9% 16.0% 13.1% 26.3% 24.9% 23.1% 17.5% 10 years 10 years 24.0% 17.7% 16.5% 12.7% 26.2% 24.2% 24.2% 17.1% (Source:Bloomberg) 8

(2) Implied volatilities of equities and currencies Volatilities of major equity indices and currencies are calibrated based on implied volatilities of options traded in the market. Implied volatilities used to calibrate the scenarios are as follows: Stock options Currency JPY USD EUR GBP Currency options Underlying Asset Nikkei225 S&P 500 Euro Stoxx50 FTSE 100 Option Tenor Volatility 2011 2012 3 years 21.4% 21.4% 4 years 21.5% 21.9% 5 years 21.7% 22.5% 3 years 20.7% 22.5% 4 years 21.5% 23.4% 5 years 22.4% 24.2% 3 years 20.6% 24.7% 4 years 20.7% 25.1% 5 years 21.1% 25.3% 3 years 18.8% 22.2% 4 years 19.4% 23.2% 5 years 20.1% 24.1% (Source:several investment banks) Currency Option Tenor Volatility 2011 2012 USD 5 years 16.4% 15.0% EUR 5 years 19.2% 17.7% GBP 5 years 17.8% 16.6% (Source:Bloomberg) 9

(3) Correlations In addition to the implied volatilities described above, Sumitomo Life has calculated implied volatilities reflecting its asset portfolio and correlation factors. The share of each asset is assumed to be unchanged over the projection periods. With regard to correlation factors, market-consistent data from exotic options with sufficient liquidity have not been observed in the market. Therefore, Sumitomo Life estimated correlation factors based on historical market data. Specifically, the monthly data from March 31, 2002 to 2012 have been used. The following table shows correlation factors between major variables. /JPY /USD /EUR /GBP USD/JPY EUR/JPY GBP/JPY NIKKEI 225 S&P 500 Euro Stoxx50 FTSE 100 /JPY /USD /EUR /GBP 1.00 0.40 0.39 0.43 0.18 0.06 0.20 0.40 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.40 1.00 0.75 0.72 0.48 0.18 0.34 0.38 0.38 0.46 0.39 0.39 0.75 1.00 0.75 0.32 0.31 0.36 0.32 0.44 0.47 0.41 0.43 0.72 0.75 1.00 0.33 0.11 0.34 0.28 0.33 0.34 0.29 USD/JPY 0.18 0.48 0.32 0.33 1.00 0.52 0.67 0.42 0.17 0.22 0.19 EUR/JPY 0.06 0.18 0.31 0.11 0.52 1.00 0.76 0.50 0.47 0.35 0.37 GBP/JPY 0.20 0.34 0.36 0.34 0.67 0.76 1.00 0.46 0.35 0.28 0.20 NIKKEI 225 S&P 500 Euro Stoxx50 FTSE 100 0.40 0.38 0.32 0.28 0.42 0.50 0.46 1.00 0.65 0.61 0.63 0.15 0.38 0.44 0.33 0.17 0.47 0.35 0.65 1.00 0.88 0.87 0.13 0.46 0.47 0.34 0.22 0.35 0.28 0.61 0.88 1.00 0.90 0.13 0.39 0.41 0.29 0.19 0.37 0.20 0.63 0.87 0.90 1.00 (Source:Bloomberg) c. Assumed investment yield used for the calculation of expected returns Assumed investment yields on major asset categories used for the calculation of Expected existing business contribution in 2. Statement of changes in EEV are as follows: Assumed investment yield Fixed income assets 1.6% Foreign bonds 3.0% Stocks 7.0% Total 2.3% 10

2.Non-economic assumptions All cash flows (premiums, operating expenses, benefits and claims, cash surrender value, tax, etc.) are projected applying the best estimate assumptions, by product, referring to past, current and expected future experience. a. Operating expenses Operating expenses are set based on the experience of Sumitomo Life. The look-through basis is applied in terms of operating expenses of insurance business. Future unit cost reductions are not assumed. Adjustment is made for one-time expenses which are considered to be non-recurrent in the future. The amount excluded from the expense assumption analysis is about 1.0 billion which is caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake. Future inflation rates are assumed to be zero. b. Policyholder dividends Policyholder dividend rates are based on the current dividend policy, and set according to market-consistent, risk-neutral scenarios. c. Effective tax rate In the projection of future profits, effective tax rate is set at the following rates, reflecting the change in corporate tax rates. 36.15% for the fiscal year ended 2012 33.28% for the fiscal years ending 2013, 2014, and 2015 30.73% for the fiscal year ending 2016, and each fiscal year thereafter 11