PROGRESS THROUGH PARTNERSHIP MAKING A DIFFERENCE GUIDANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT



Similar documents
How councils work: an improvement series for councillors and officers. Managing performance: are you getting it right?

How To Manage Performance In North Ayrshire Council

Appendix 1: Performance Management Guidance

HARLOW COUNCIL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

Performance Management Framework

Aberdeen City Council. Performance Management Process. External Audit Report o: 2008/19

The Quality Initiative in Scottish Schools

Report of the Assistant Director Strategy & Performance to the meeting of Corporate Governance & Audit Committee to be held on 20 March 2009.

ROLE PROFILE. Performance Consultant (Fixed Term) Assistant Director for Human Resources

HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

The Risk Management strategy sets out the framework that the Council has established.

Performance objectives

Volunteer Managers National Occupational Standards

Performance Management and Service Improvement Framework

Performance Management Framework. December 2013

The city of Joburg is measuring up

Higher National Unit Specification. General information for centres. Occupational Therapy Support: Audit. Unit code: F3NE 34

How To Help Your Educational Psychology Service Self Evaluate

Confident in our Future, Risk Management Policy Statement and Strategy

The Performance Management Overview PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 1.1 SUPPORT PORTFOLIO

AUDIT & PERFORMANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE ON 26 TH SEPTEMBER 2007

Care service inspection report

Infrastructure Asset Management Strategy

How Good is Our Council?

Scotland s public sector workforce. Good practice guide

CIMA Development assessment matrix

City and County of Swansea. Human Resources & Workforce Strategy Ambition is Critical 1

DATA QUALITY STRATEGY

Housing Association Regulatory Assessment

Director: Improvement and Corporate Services. Improvement & Corporate Services

MARCH Strategic Risk Policy Update March 2012 v1.10.doc

People Strategy 2013/17

Business Plan 2012/13

Role Profile. Directorate Corporate Support Department Customer Service and Business Transformation

Services for children and young people in North Ayrshire 28 October Report of a pilot joint inspection

Performance Monitoring

JOB DESCRIPTION. Performance Improvement Officer (within Customer Services Team) Enquiries, Compliments and Complaints Co-ordinator

Data Quality Policy. Appendix A. 1. Why do we need a Data Quality Policy? Scope of this Policy Principles of data quality...

Financial Services Core Competences

Version No: 2 Date: 27 July Data Quality Policy. Assistant Chief Executive. Planning & Performance. Data Quality Policy

Managing ICT contracts in central government. An update

DEVELOPING AN EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Ross Fraser HouseMark

JOB DESCRIPTION. Position Assistant Director Asset

How To Write A Workforce Strategy

Internal Audit Division

RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY AND STRATEGY. Document Status: Draft. Approved by. Appendix 1. Originator: A Struthers. Updated: A Struthers

PEOPLE AND ORGANISATION DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN NORTHERN IRELAND

General Notes Time allowed 1 hour. Answer all 60 multiple choice questions Use the proforma answer sheet provided.

CHANGE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Mary Immaculate College. Human Resources Strategy

Head of Engineering Job Description

INVESTORS IN PEOPLE REVIEW REPORT

Business Continuity Management Framework

D-G4-L4-126 Police contact management and demand reduction review Deloitte LLP Service for G-Cloud IV

Corporate Services Business Plan 20015/16- Day to Day Tasks. Corporate Services, Performance Management. Signed off: G Walsh

Partnership Checklist March 2014

Applies from 1 April 2007 Revised April Core Competence Framework Guidance booklet

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

Community Risk Management

Staff Development and Performance Management Policy & Procedure

MANAGING DIGITAL CONTINUITY

Job Description. Information Manager (Spoke) Band 8b

The Trust. Customer Experience Policy. Customer Experience Team. Version: Final Version. Effective Date: July Affected Teams: All

Legal and Protective - Section 1 - PI Summary

Funding success! How funders support charities to evaluate

Request for feedback on the revised Code of Governance for NHS Foundation Trusts

The following criteria have been used to assess each of the options to ensure consistency and clarity:

for Safer Better Healthcare Draft National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare September 2010 Consultation Document September 2010

This Report will be made public on

Investors in People Assessment Report. Presented by Alli Gibbons Investors in People Specialist On behalf of Inspiring Business Performance Limited

External Audit BV Performance Report: Delivering Change Management and Financial Sustainability

Derbyshire Trading Standards Service Quality Manual

Procurement Programmes & Projects P3M3 v2.1 Self-Assessment Instructions and Questionnaire. P3M3 Project Management Self-Assessment

P3M3 Portfolio Management Self-Assessment

Benefits of conducting a Project Management Maturity Assessment with PM Academy:

U.S. Department of the Treasury. Treasury IT Performance Measures Guide

Improving Resident and Customer Services Strategy

Enterprise governance framework: Align your enterprise to make better decisions

Asset Management Policy March 2014

7 Directorate Performance Managers. 7 Performance Reporting and Data Quality Officer. 8 Responsible Officers

Employability Skills Summary

Corporate Procurement Strategy

Appendix 4 - Statutory Officers Protocol

Quality Management in Education. Self-evaluation for quality improvement

Transcription:

PROGRESS THROUGH PARTNERSHIP MAKING A DIFFERENCE GUIDANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT July 2014

Contents Page Introduction 3 What is continuous improvement? 4 Why do we need performance management? 4 Integrated Planning - 5 Moray 2023 A Plan for the Future Corporate Plan Service Plans Team Plans Employee Review and Development Programme Supporting Processes - 8 Audits and Inspections Benchmarking Customer Results Financial Planning Performance Indicators Risk Management Self Assessment Public Performance Reporting 2

Guidance on the Performance Management Framework and Continuous Improvement The following information is provided as a reference document to identify the different aspects of performance and provides explanations of what, why and how these components work together to build an overall picture of the Council s performance management arrangements and commitment to continuous improvement. Introduction The Moray Council delivers a wide range of services to a wide variety of users. We must meet the needs of our local communities, provide high quality services and operate reliable and accessible procedures all at a price that offers the best value for money. Performance management is about the approach and systems implemented to manage and improve performance. It is an inherent part of the Council s culture and is fundamental to the achievement of continuous improvement. The Council is accountable to its customers and stakeholders, and therefore managing our performance and reporting results is a necessary and important requirement; we must inform you of what we are doing and how well we are doing, what quality of service is being delivered and how we intend to improve our performance. This process demonstrates our commitment to seeking continuous improvement. All employees and elected members have a role in improving Council services, but sometimes it is unclear how day-to-day activities contribute to the overall improvement of services. This guide aims to develop a picture that demonstrates how these systems and components fit together in order to make a difference. Performance management and continuous improvement are not added extras; they are part of service management and delivery. 3

What is continuous improvement? Continuous improvement for the Council is about maximising the benefits to our customers through the continual review of services, decision-making and action to implement improvement. In order to achieve continuous improvement we need to have an integrated planning process and an effective performance management system to answer the four fundamental questions: What is the Council trying to achieve? How has the Council set about delivering its priorities? What has the Council achieved / not achieved to date and how will it know? In light of what the Council has learned to date, what does it plan to do next? Why do we need performance management? Due to the huge range of services that the Council delivers to a wide variety of users it is important that the Council plan what we are here to achieve and how we are going to do it. As we are accountable both to the public and to central government, we need to have measures in place to assess how well we have performed against our stated long-term vision and objectives. If we do not have measures in place we will not know how well we have performed or where we can improve and decisions may not be based on fact. Performance management is need in order to: Ensure we are on track to achieve our stated vision and objectives Identify strengths and areas of good practice which can be shared Identify areas for improvement Inform decision making, planning and resource allocation Compare and benchmark against other organisations Ensure accountability What has performance management got to do with me? Every employee has a part to play in performance management, whether it is in completing designated tasks, gathering data within service areas or dealing with customers. It may not be easy to see how what is done as a day-to-day activity fits into the bigger picture but no matter how small, it will likely have an impact on wider objectives. 4

Integrated Planning We have recognised that we need to identify and plan what we are here to achieve and how this can be translated into tangible day-to-day activities for employees. There are several plans within the Council which combine to make the Performance Management Framework. These plans allow us to communicate our goals, plan resources and measure progress against defined actions. The Framework brings together a raft of reporting mechanisms to enable Elected Members, the Corporate Management Team and senior officers to gain an accurate and reliable understanding of their service to inform the direction of the Council. Hierarchy of Plans Moray 2023 A Plan for the Future Sets out a series of high-level indicators against which the performance of the Community Planning Partnership will be judged Corporate Plan Defines the Council s commitments from Moray 2023 A Plan for the Future adding in administrative and Council priorities Service Plan Details service commitments from the Corporate Plan adding in what the service aims to develop over the coming year and also sets out performance targets Team Plan Operational document setting out the priorities for the team, which come in part from the hierarchy of plans Employee Review and Development Programme (ERDP) Define the role of the individual in delivering the Team Plan and how the Council supports individuals to provide the services that will enable the Council to achieve its overall vision and objectives 5

Moray 2023 A Plan for the Future This ten year plan, prepared in conjunction with the key partners in Moray, followed a fundamental review of services that began in 2012 using the Area Based Review approach. The Plan provides an overarching framework for everything the Council does and a long-term vision and broad strategic objectives for Moray. It is about joining up services to make them better for our local community and to provide a high quality of life for our residents. Through carrying out our daily business we are directly impacting on our plans, which ultimately impact on the Moray 2023 A Plan for the Future. The Community Planning Board is responsible for Moray 2023 A Plan for the Future and alongside Community Planning Strategic Groups they monitor progress made against the Plan, which covers the ten year period to 2023. Corporate Plan The Corporate Plan is a four year plan that sets out the Council s medium to longterm objectives. The key difference between the Corporate Plan and Moray 2023 A Plan for the Future is that it is primarily about the Council s own vision and priorities for the area. The Corporate Plan should be the constant reference point for new plans, strategies and projects. New activities should contribute to broader goals set out in the Plan so we are all moving in the one direction together. The Corporate Management Team (CMT) is responsible for the plan, which covers the four year period to 2018 but is updated on an annual basis so that any new internal or external commitments are incorporated, e.g. duties arising from the Local Government are Scotland Act 2003. Regular progress reports are presented to the Policy and Resources Committee. Service Plans Service Plans set out the priorities of the service and how these link to the wider Council objectives set out in the Moray 2023 A Plan for the Future and Corporate Plan. They provide a breakdown of the priorities within the department identifying the specific actions, outcomes, resources and targets that are aspired to in terms of performance. Service managers identify the relevant priorities within the service and these will be prioritised in conjunction with the Head of Service / Corporate Director to ensure the departmental priorities mirror those of the Council. Each Departmental Management 6

Team is responsible for monitoring achievement against the plan and identifying and actioning any areas of improvement. Service Plans are reviewed annually and in place for the start of the new financial year. Regular progress reports are presented at the relevant Service Committee. Team Plans Team Plans are the detailed plans that stem from Service Plans. The Service Manager / Team Leader is responsible for the Plan and Departmental Management Teams monitor these Plans regularly. The Plan is the reference point for day-to-day work and should contain all the actions relating to the Service Plan, together with the detail of how these will be achieved. In line with Service Plans, Team Plans are reviewed annually and are in place for the start of the new financial year. Employee Review and Development Programme (ERDP) The Employee Review and Development Programme is the Council s staff appraisal system. It consists of a meeting between each employee and his / her immediate supervisor / line manager to review individual performance and to determine an employee s contribution towards the department s objectives. The purpose of ERDP is to review individual performance and to set clear objectives and priorities for employees in pursuit of departmental objectives. The employee and supervisor / line manager will agree what action can be taken to improve performance and achieve objectives. The Council s aim is that ERDP will: Help managers plan and allocate work, and develop their team Allow all employees to participate in planning their own work and development Allow all employees to offer ideas about how to improve our practices and services The supervisor / line manager will monitor progress against the ERDP and review annually. 7

Supporting processes All of these Plans are driven, informed and supported by a number of processes and targets to aid the delivery of the Council s priorities Self assessment Audit, inspections Public Performance Reporting Risk management Hierarchy of Plans Benchmarking Customer results Performance indicators Financial planning Audit and inspections Undertaken externally and internally, audit and inspections will judge services on how well they are currently performing and on their potential for improvement based around national priorities. In the majority, findings to include improvement plans and timescales are reported to Service Committees. Benchmarking Benchmarking is a way of comparing processes and procedures to ensure that we can deliver the Council s services in the most efficient and effective way possible by opening up new methods, ideas and tools to improve the delivery of services. Through looking at our performance results and comparing these with other council s and private sector companies we can identify how better results can be achieved. This enables the Council to decide what level of quality and cost should be used to deliver its desired results. Some services are a member of service led benchmarking clubs, but nationally comparison across all authorities is also available. The Scottish Local Government Benchmarking Framework Project, led by the Society of Local Authority Chief Executives (SOLACE) in partnership with the Improvement Service, collaboratively developed a comparative benchmarking framework for Scottish Local Government that supports the targeting of 8

transformational / change resources to areas of greatest impact in terms of efficiency (unit costs), productivity and outcomes. The Project Board publishes annually a wide range of information allowing Scottish Councils to assess performance in delivering better services to local communities by providing comparison nationally and with other relevant local authorities through family groups. The published data is presented in tables, graphs and charts on the project s website. A national overview report is published and Knowledge Hub created to provide an online forum for all councils. http://www.improvementservice.org.uk/benchmarking/index.html Customer results Service s use various approaches to gather valuable information on how we are meeting the needs of our customers to inform service delivery and improvements. Services are constantly receiving customer feedback through surveys, complaints, comments, consultations, meetings with service users and from staff. This information provides valuable feedback, measuring customer satisfaction in services. It is a requirement that services gather and report customer results at least every 3 years. Financial planning Sound financial planning ensures that all the plans operate within the Financial Regulations and resource implications are reflected in all plans and that all plans do not exceed resources available. Performance indicators The Council uses over 300 indicators as a way of measuring how a service is performing against its objectives. They do not provide answers to why performance differences exist but help raise questions and identify areas where problems may occur. Performance information is central to any effective performance management system. If you do not know how well you are doing then it is impossible to know how best to refine your policies and activities to further improve them. There are different categories of indicators needed to address different questions Input indicators Process indicators Output indicators What resources are used to deliver the service? (e.g. employees, equipment, buildings, money) Is the Council doing what is required to achieve the desired output? Are we on track to meet targets? What level of service is being provided? How many units of service are being delivered? 9

Outcome indicators What is the impact of this service? Is the Council achieving its objectives? Does the problem that led us to adopt this objective still exist? Performance indicators can be set nationally or locally and departments are responsible for monitoring and reporting on these using the Council s performance management system, Covalent to departmental management, service committees and to the public. A review of indicators and targets is undertaken annually. Risk management Services use this process to determine the likelihood of identified risks materialising and the severity of their consequences if they do materialise after action to mitigate the risk as far as possible has been taken. Risk registers for all council services are updated annually. Self assessment Self assessment is designed to ensure that all services identify their strengths and areas for improvement which will inform our annual planning and improvement activities. It helps identify and understand the gaps in service and looks at how these can be resolved. The Public Sector Improvement Framework (PSIF) is based on the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) self assessment model identified by the Council as one of the management tools to assist in continuous improvement although some services use alternative models. Self assessment should be carried out annually and before Team Plans are reviewed and revised so that any identified improvements can be incorporated into the Plan. Public Performance Reporting The Accounts Commission, under the Local Government Act 1992, directs all Council s to publish a range of information, sufficient to demonstrate that it is securing Best Value. Public Performance Reporting is about providing accurate, balanced and timely information to the right people at the right time. The information should clearly identify the quality of service being delivered, allow readers to make informed decision about services, enabling them to contribute to decisions about standards of service and to challenge performance in the interests of future service improvement. Each department is responsible for their own public performance reporting. An overarching council wide report is produced annually. 10

Public performance reporting allows the Council to report performance in an open and accountable manner, balanced with both good and poor areas of performance. The information should be provided in context and should highlight what we will do in the future to improve our current performance. The Council s Performance Reporting web pages present the layers of covering Community Planning, Corporate and Service performance. http://www.moray.gov.uk/moray_standard/page_1277.html Further information, if required, can be obtained by contacting the Council s Corporate Policy Unit. 11