PATTERNS OF MORTALITY IN ASBESTOS FACTORY WORKERS IN LONDON*



Similar documents
Survey on the Mortality from Malignant Tumors of Female Asbestos Spinning Workers

NHS Barking and Dagenham Briefing on disease linked to Asbestos in Barking & Dagenham

Scientific Update on Safe Use of Asbestos. Robert P. Nolan, PhD International Environmental Research Foundation New York, New York

Health effects of occupational exposure to asbestos dust

Changing Trends in Mesothelioma Incidence. Hans Weill, M.D. Professor of Medicine Emeritus Tulane University Medical Center

NISG Asbestos. Caroline Kirton

THE TIMES OF OCCURRENCE OF MESOTHELIOMAS IN RATS FOLLOWING INOCULATION WITH ASBESTOS

ASBESTOS DISEASES. Dr Alastair Robertson

Lung cancer and asbestos

Mesothelioma Trends as Predictors of the Asbestos- Related Lung Cancer Burden

Asbestos related cancers

EFFECT OF CHILDREN'S AGE AND LIFE EXPECTATION ON MESOTHELIOMA RISK 1

Emerging evidence that the ban on asbestos use is reducing the occurrence of pleural mesothelioma in Sweden

Malignant Mesothelioma Among Employees of a Connecticut Factory that Manufactured Friction Materials Using Chrysotile Asbestos

Industrial Injuries Advisory Council Information Note CANCERS OF THE LARYNX OR OVARY AND WORK WITH ASBESTOS. February 2015

Asbestos and the diseases it causes

Mesothelioma: Questions and Answers

MESOTHELIOMA IN AUSTRALIA INCIDENCE 1982 TO 2009 MORTALITY 1997 TO 2011

Mortality of workers in a French asbestos cement factory

Mesothelioma in Australia: Incidence (1982 to 2013) and Mortality (1997 to 2012)

Asbestos and Mesothelioma a briefing document for the Metropolitan Police

Mortality Experience in an Historical Cohort of Chrysotile Asbestos Textile Workers

The Burden of Occupational Lung Cancer Paul A. Demers, PhD

Chrysotile and Lung Cancer Yano et al. Cancer Mortality among Workers Exposed to Amphibole-free Chrysotile Asbestos

MESOTHELIOMA IN AUSTRALIA INCIDENCE 1982 TO 2008 MORTALITY 1997 TO 2007

Lessons learned from the Western Australian experience with mesothelioma

Francine Lortie-Monette, MD, MSc, CSPQ, MBA Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of Western Ontario 2003

Estimation of the Number of Lung Cancer Cases Attributable to Asbestos Exposure

Current Usage and Health Significance of the Modern Use of Chrysotile Products: Review of Recently Published Evidence

Sir William Osler: Listen to the patient; the patient tells you everything.

ANNEX 2: Assessment of the 7 points agreed by WATCH as meriting attention (cover paper, paragraph 9, bullet points) by Andy Darnton, HSE

Asbestos Diseases. What Is Asbestos?

Health Statistics Review of Asbestos- Related Diseases in Three Massachusetts Communities with Potential Human Exposure to Vermiculite Ore

Future Trends of Mesothelioma Mortality in Japan Based on a Risk Function

How To Determine The Risk Of Mesothelioma In Brake Workers

Testimony of. Dr. James Crapo. April 26, 2005

Worldwide mesothelioma mortality trends

Influence of Fiber Type, Size, and Number in Human Disease: Conclusions from Fiber Burden Analysis

Williams v. University of Birmingham [2011] EWCA Civ 1242 Court of Appeal, 28 October 2011

Incorrect Analyses of Radiation and Mesothelioma in the U.S. Transuranium and Uranium Registries Joey Zhou, Ph.D.

A 37-year observation of mortality in Chinese chrysotile asbestos workers

Asbestos Disease: An Overview for Clinicians Asbestos Exposure

Tail of Two Carcinogens

Workers' Compensation in Japan

Asbestos Health Risks. Dr Andrew Pengilley Acting Chief Health Officer

Asbestosis and Mesothelioma Among British Asbestos Workers ( )

MORTALITY FROM LUNG CANCER IN ASBESTOS WORKERS

Carcinogens in the Construction Industry

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ASBESTOS

Update of the scientific evidence on asbestos and cancer. Kurt Straif, MD MPH PhD. The IARC Monographs

Asbestos Diseases Uncovered

RR833. The joint effect of asbestos exposure and smoking on the risk of lung cancer mortality for asbestos workers ( )

Exigency Hardship Claim. Last Name First Name Middle Name Suffix. Last Name First Name Middle Name Suffix. Last Name First Name Middle Name Suffix

Asbestos Exposure and the Continuing Burden of Asbestos Related Disease. Paul A. Demers Partners in Prevention April, 2014

Mesothelioma in Northeastern Minnesota and Two Occupational Cohorts: 2007 Update. December 7, 2007

Mesothelioma in Northeastern Minnesota and Two Occupational Cohorts: 2007 Update. December 7, 2007

An Application of the G-formula to Asbestos and Lung Cancer. Stephen R. Cole. Epidemiology, UNC Chapel Hill. Slides:

AUSTRALIAN VIETNAM VETERANS Mortality and Cancer Incidence Studies. Overarching Executive Summary

L Lang-Lazdunski, A Bille, S Marshall, R Lal, D Landau, J Spicer

HEALTH CARE FOR EXPOSURE TO ASBESTOS The SafetyNet Centre for Occupational Health and Safety Research Memorial University

Malignant Mesothelioma

Malignant Mesothelioma

Workers around the world who encounter hazardous substances are aware of the measures needed

The Carcinogenicity of Chrysotile Asbestos A Review

Mesothelioma Act 2014 and the Diffuse Mesothelioma Payment Scheme

Cohort studies. Chapter 8

Uses and Abuses of Pathology in Asbestos-exposed Populations

Asbestos Related Diseases. Asbestosis Mesothelioma Lung Cancer Pleural Disease. connecting raising awareness supporting advocating

Review of Eliminating occupational cancer in Europe and globally by J. Takala

Transcript for Asbestos Information for the Community

Asbestos Related Diseases

Asbestos and your lungs

Basic Study Designs in Analytical Epidemiology For Observational Studies

Asbestos in the Home MISAWA AB, JAPAN

Burns and Roe Asbestos Personal Injury Settlement Trust Claim Form

Asbestos at the Work Site

The effect of the introduction of ICD-10 on cancer mortality trends in England and Wales

NIOSH Publishes Study of Cancer Among Firefighters Claire Reiss National League of Cities Risk Information Sharing Consortium.

Asbestos: health effects and risk. Peter Franklin Senior Scientific Officer, EHD Senior Research Fellow, UWA

Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit. And other compensation schemes

The quantitative risks of mesothelioma and lung cancer in relation to asbestos exposure a comparison of risk models based on asbestos exposed cohorts

Asbestos Disease Claims

Mesothelioma Incidence and Community Asbestos Exposure

Epidemiology of Malignant Mesothelioma An Outline

Transcription:

PATTERNS OF MORTALITY IN ASBESTOS FACTORY WORKERS IN LONDON* M. L. Newhouse TUC Centenary Institute of Occupational Health London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London WCIE 7HT. England G. Berry MRC Pneumoconiosis Unit Llandough Hospital Penarth, Glamorgan CF6 IXW, Wales This paper reports the results of a mortality study of workers employed at an East London asbestos factory. The factory opened in 191, at first producing chiefly asbestos textiles, but later, producing also insulation materials, particularly asbestos pipe sections and a variety of other products. Crocidolite asbestos was used until the late 195s but also chrysotile and amosite. Both men and women were employed. The factory closed in 196. The male cohort of 46 men consists of all males who began work between April I, 19, the date of implementation of the Asbestos Regulations of 191, and March 1, 1964; the female cohort consists of 922 women, all of whom were first employed between January 1, 196 and December 1, 1942, a period when wartime identity records facilitated followup. Identification details of these workers were sent to the Central Registers of the National Health Service and to the National Insurance Scheme, now administered by the Department of Health and Social Security. These registers identified the vital status of the workers and subsequently sent to us copies of death certificates for the deceased and for those who died during the study period. Previous reports on this study have been published. - The present study was continued to December 1, 1975 and thus includes 5 additional years of data. Jobs have been classified into six grades of exposure. There was little difference in experience between grades 1- and grades 5 and 6, and these two groups are classified as low-moderate and severe exposure, respectively. The experience of laggers is considered separately. The levels of dust exposure have recently been reviewed and suggest that before 1945, the dust levels in such processes as opening, carding, and sectional pipe making and in most other production jobs averaged 2 fibers/ml or higher. In jobs classified by the authors as low-moderate, asbestos levels in the air were probably 5-1 fibers/ml. Only in nonproduction jobs and, possibly, brake-lining departments and departments that make rubber jointings were these levels below 5 fibers/ml. In 1946. dust suppression improved, and dust levels were probably reduced by 5%. In 1955, the textile departments moved to another location, and factory hygiene further improved, but many areas in the factory may have contained levels above the current industrial standard of 2 fibers/ml. *This study was financed by a grant from the Medical Research Council. 5 77-92/79/~5 $1.75/ 1979, NYAS

54 Annals New York Academy of Sciences t! B e P e, 1!2 t P * B La e f d I. f s

Newhouse ~ Berry: Asbestos Mortality 55 MALE COHORT There have been 775 deaths among the male workers. An analysis of the 545 deaths that occurred among workers, excluding laggers, who had been followed for 1 years or longer is presented in TABLE 1. Asbestos-related disease is rarely if ever manifest in those dying within 1 years of first exposure. In the Tables, the deaths from mesothelial tumors are given in parentheses but are included in the total number of observed deaths in any particular diagnostic category. There were 46 deaths from mesothelial tumors, 19 pleural and 27 peritoneal. All have been validated by histologic examination. Nearly all of the pleural tumors were identified among the intrathoracic tumors (carcinoma of the lung and pleura, ICD 162, 16). The peritoneal tumors weie included with gastrointestinal tumors if certified as a peritoneal mesothelioma (ICD 15) or if confused with carcinoma of the bowel or pancreas. They were included with other cancers if certified as carcinomatosis (ICD 199) or as sarcoma or other tumors. Two deaths from mesothelial tumors were identified among causes of death not shown in the Tables. There were, apart from pleural mesothelioma, 1 deaths from carcinoma of the lung, which remains the most common tumor of asbestos workers. Statistically significant excess mortality from chronic respiratory disease is only TABLE 2 LAGGERS AND MATES (I 6 MALES) Observed Expected All causes *(1) 51.2 Cancers of lung and pleura (ICD 162,16) 25*(4) 5.6 Gastrointestinal cancer (ICD 15-15) (5) 4. Other cancers 4.1 Chronic respiratory disease 12 1.4 *p <.1. seen, as previously, among those with long and severe exposure. Asbestosis was given as the cause of death in 1 instances but as the underlying cause of death in 4 of the deaths from lung cancer and in 27 of the deaths from either pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma. In four instances, coronary thrombosis was the actual cause of death. In the majority of the above cases, exposure had been long and severe. TABLE 2 shows the mortality experiences of the laggers. The majority of these men were first employed after 1955. It is the custom, however, for laggers to work on contract for various employers, and some may have had previous exposure, so we are not entirely sure of their durations of exposure. Only approximately 2% of the entire group has been followed for years or longer, but to date their experience is not dissimilar from that of other severely exposed male workers. Mortality experience was also examined according to the length of followup, and an analysis of the standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for cancers of the lung and pleura is presented in TABLE. In general, the SMR increases with increased length of followup and with increasing exposure, but for those with long exposure, the SMRs are higher in the group with followups between 2 and years. Only 2% of these workers have been followed up for years or longer, and currently about half of the deaths from mesothelial tumors occurred between 2 and years after their first

~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ 56 Annals New York Academy of Sciences TABLE CANCERS OF THE LUNG AND PLEURA IN MALES (SMRS) Length of Low to Moderate Exposure Severe Exposure Follow-up (years) <2 Years >2 Years c2 Years >2 Years 1-2 14 112 255 46 2G 159 26 1 21 67 5 + 27 I4 265 446 employment. However, as has been demonstrated previ~usly,~ the number of deaths from mesothelial tumors will continue to rise for some time. In TABLE 4, we have made a finer subdivision of job categories and of periods of employment in the factory. It is noteworthy that in categories 1 and 2, ground workers, canteen workers, and productive workers with very little and short exposures to dust, the SMR was 176, and there were three deaths from mesothelial tumors. Up to 1955, the estimated level of asbestos in the air was 2-5 fibers/ml. However, when we turn to the death rates for mesothelial tumors graded by exposure category (TABLE 5), we find that the rates reveal, as in previous analy~es,~ a very definite relationship to length and severity of exposure. FEMALE COHORT Due to name changes at marriage, women were more difficult to trace than were men. and the vital status of only 77% was ascertained in 1971. By December 1, 1975. 225 had died. Because the last date of entry to the cohort was the end of 1942, all women who have survived and were traced have been followed for more than years. Over 4 women were employed in the traditionally female jobs of carding, spinning, and doubling; 1 were employed in mattress making. Crocidolite was used heavily in textile departments, exposure was generally estimated to be very high, and women were also employed in other production departments, and also, a small group in offices, canteens, and other low-exposure departments. The same pattern of analyses has been adopted, and TABLE 6 shows the observed versus the expected mortality in the general population, for groups with 1 years or more of followup. TABLE 4 CANCERS OF LUNG AND PLEURA (SMRs) Exposure Duration of Exposure Category 22 Years 2-5 Years 5 or More Years Low to moderate 1-2 176 216 I26 51 152 Severe 4 247 227 714 5 2 26 567

Newhouse & Berry: Asbestos Mortality, 57 In the low-moderate exposure group, there was one death from a mesothelialpleural tumor. In all, there were 1 pleural-mesothelial tumors ideptified and eight peritoneal tumors, approximately the same proportion of all deaths (( 1%) as among the males. Among the severely exposed women with long exposures, there was a greater excess of lung cancer than among males with similar exposure. Also, apart from peritoneal mesotheliomas, there was an excess of deaths from gastrointestinal tumors and other cancers. Cancers of the ovary, uterus, and breast were analyzed separately. In the group of severely exposed women with long periods of employment, statistically significant excesses of cancer of the breast (obs., 6; exp., 2.1; p <.5) and ovary (obs., ; exp.,.74; p <.5) were noted. Not too much reliance can be placed on a single set of figures from one comparatively small cohort of women, and other factors related to marital status and parity that may operate in industrially employed women may be of importance. As in the males, the mesothelioma death rate (TABLE 5) relates clearly to the degree and length of exposure. TAEIC 5 MMOTHELIOMA DEATH RATES Exposure Category and Duration ~ Rate per 1, (years) Pleura Peritoneum S years S years Males Low to moderate <2 1 12. I 12 4 7,5 9 Severe <2 6 1 15,42 14 >2 7 I2 7.27 24 Laggers <2 2 7,9 6 >2 1 4 2,69 I6 Females Low to moderate 1 2.66 4 Severe <2 5 9,5 16 22 4 4, 6 ASBESTOS AND CIGARETTE SMOKING A survey of smoking habits of a selected cohort of male factory and all surviving female workers was made between April and August 1971. A greater proportion of both men and women smoked, or had smoked, than in the general population of England and Wales, after taking into account the factor of age.6 Among men, 74% of the factory population smoked compared with 66% expected from national figures. For women, 49% smoked, and 2% had previously smoked compared with 4% and 1% expected, respectively. Thus, the excess mortality due to lung cancer reported above is in part due to smoking; however, this bias is small and may be represented by factors of 1.1 and 1.2 for men and women, respectively. A prospective survey of

TABLE 6 MORTALITY EXPERIENCES OF FEMALE FACTORY WORKERS a E Exposure Category Severe E Low to Moderate <2 Years >2 Years 4 (9) (96) Cause of Death Observed Expected Observed Expected Observed Expected g v) z CD (199) % 2 All causes 4*(1) 22. t(1) 65.6 W(7).4 P, Cancers of lung and pleura (ICD 162,16) *(1).5 15$(7) 1.9 2 ~ 4 ). e Gastrointestinal cancer (ICD 1561 5) I.9 14t(4) 5.1 9 w 2.6 Other cancers 4.2 16 (2) 11.9 16$(1) 5. Y -7 Chronic respiratory disease 2. 6 6. lot.2 *p <.5. g tp <.1. a $p <.1. 2

Newhouse & Berry: Asbestos Mortality 59 TABLE 7 OBSERVED AND EXPECTED MORTALITIES FROM LUNG CANCER (AUGUST 1971 TO DECEMBER 1975) Smokinp. Habit Observed Exwcted' Men Never I.6 Past and current 2 12.64 Women Never I.1 Past and current 6.97 'Allowing for smoking habits. mortality is now in progress. Only 2 deaths from lung cancer had occurred by December 1, 1975, and the current results are presented in TABLE 7. Two of the lung cancer deaths occurred in workers who had never smoked. There are insufficient data to analyze in more detail, but the results are consistent with our earlier findings5 that asbestos and smoking appear to combine multiplicatively in producing lung cancer. Firm conclusions must, however, await the accumulation of more data. 1 MALES 9 - *; a 7 6 I * 1 2 4 Years since first employment FIGURE 1. Proportion of surviving male subjects.

6 Annals New York Academy of Sciences Finally, FIGURES 1 and 2 show the proportions of males and females, respectively, who survived at 5-year intervals after their first employment compared to the expected survival rates in unexposed populations. In the males, the rates begin to decline more steeply than expected about 25 years afer first exposure; in the women, this decline began about 5 years earlier. At 5 years after first exposure, the differences between the observed and expected survival rates are approximately 7% for men and 1% for women. Under conditions that prevailed in the past, men and women who start work in their early twenties would have markedly diminished life expectancies. FEMALES I I I 1 2 4 Years since first employment FIGURE 2. Proportion of surviving female subjects. REFERENCES 1. NEWHOUSE, M. L. 1969. A study of the mortality of workers in an asbestos factory. Brit. J. Ind. Med. 262941. 2. NEWHOUSE, M. L., G. BERRY, J. C. WAGNER & M. E. TUROK. 1972. A study of the mortalityof female asbestos workers. Brit. J. Ind. Med. 29 14-141.. NEWHOUSE, M. L. 197. Asbestos in the workplace and the community. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 1697-17. 4. NEWHOUSE, M. L. & G. BERRY. 1976. Predictions of mortality from mesothelial tumors in an asbestos factory. Brit. J. Ind. Med. : 147-1 5 1. 5. BERRY, G., M. L. NEWHOUSE & M. E. TUROK. 1972. Combined effects of asbestos exposure and smoking on mortality from lung cancer in factory workers. Lancet: 476-479. 6. TODD, G. F. 1969. Statistics of Smoking in the United Kingdom. 6th edit. Research paper 1. Tobacco Research Council. London.