Measurement of Protection from Cell Phone Radiation by 8ight Protect Disc



Similar documents
MRET-Shield Synopsis of Scientific Research Updated on June 1, 2007

Power Maxx POWER MAX EMF & EMR SHIELD. The DANGER of RADIATION from MOBILE PHONE Is REAL

EFFECTS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS ON ORGANISMS AND PROTECTION PRINCIPLES

within body bioelectricity is a biofield. It is due to concentration gradient generated across membrane of the cell.

The BRAG Antenna Ranking of Schools Grades School Children s Exposure to Cell Antennas in U.S. State Capitols & Washington, D.C.

Complete Solar Photovoltaics Steven Magee. Health and Safety


Second Grade The Human Body-Cells Assessment

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS AND PUBLIC HEALTH HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDELINES #1

The Aulterra Neutralizer Reduces the Intensity of Cell Phone Radiation

MOBILE PHONES AND FERTILITY. Microwave radiation from mobile phones and wireless technologies has been linked to sperm and DNA damage

EMISSION OF RADIO FREQUENCY RADIATION BY CELLULAR PHONES <STUDENT NAME(S)> DEN 399 RESEARCH PROPOSAL MAY 1, 200

sources in our environment i.e. Natural and man-made. The sun, earth and ionosphere are the natural source.

Wireless Radiation in the Etiology and Treatment of Autism: Clinical Observations and Mechanisms

Long-Term Effects of Drug Addiction

EMR Exposure Limits & Assessment Methods for Mobile Phone Communications. Lindsay Martin Manager, Non-Ionising Radiation Section

Wireless Medical Telemetry Laboratory

Electronic Oral Health Risk Assessment Tools

ELECTRIC POWER FREQUENCY (60 Hz) ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS (EMFs)

CELL PHONE TOWERS TOWN OF INNISFIL

Physiology Chapter 1 Lecture

High electricity costs and cell phone antennas: Is there a connection?

Effects of Mobile Phone Radiation onto Human Head with Variation of Holding Cheek and Tilt Positions

RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION, (RFR): (RFR Information - Technology Newsletter, Full Version)

Critical Product Information: VodeOX EMR Protection

3 Radio Waves and Human Body 8 Specific Absorption Rate (SAR)... 8 SAR value of a mobile handset... 8 Radiation level by a mobile tower...

Statement of the Chief Medical Health Officer

How To Know If You Are Safe To Use An Antenna (Wired) Or Wireless (Wireless)

Cell phones and brain tumors: A review including the long-term epidemiologic data. Surgical Neurology September 2009; 72; pp.

Reduce your exposure to cell phone radiation now!

Human Exposure Limits

Effect of Metallic Materials on SAR

Indoor Environment Electromagnetic Radiation

Do Cell Phones Cause Cancer? Bernard Leikind.

About the health benefits of walking, march and Nording Walking.

Cell Phone Safety Recommendations

What are radio signals?

Seriously, talk. tell. test. Celiac Disease.

The role of negative -ION in the improvement of our health

15 Stem Cell Research

FACULTY OF ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POSTURE AND HEALTH

DIABETES. Eyes, Heart, Nerves, Feet, and Kidneys.

REVIEW OF EXPOSURE LIMITS AND HEALTH CONCERNS SANTA ANA. Base Station Telecommunication Transmitters UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

The neurobiology of energy healing...a hands on approach.

Bioenergetic Blood Testing

Electromagnetic Radiation and Health

Mechanism of short-term ERK activation by electromagnetic fields at mobile phone frequencies. Biochemistry Journal. August 1, , pp.

Guideline for Hearing Conservation and Noise Control

Wireless Broadband: Health & Safety Information

Norepinephrine Effects On the System

HOW GREEN IS YOUR CORDLESS PHONE? RF RADIATION REVIEW

Listen to Dr. Klinghardts EMR lecture:

Raynaud s Disease. What is Raynaud s Disease? Raynaud s disease is also sometimes known as Raynaud s phenomenon or Raynaud s syndrome.

Risk of Brain Tumors From Wireless Phone Use. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography November/December 2010; Vol. 34, No. 6; pp.

Multiple Myeloma. This reference summary will help you understand multiple myeloma and its treatment options.

Bio-Identical Hormone FAQ s

Depression. Introduction Depression is a common condition that affects millions of people every year.

WHAT IS DIABETES MELLITUS? CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES. Living your life as normal as possible

EMR COMPLIANCE HOW TO ENSURE YOUR NATA ACCREDITED CONTRACTOR IS ABLE TO PROVIDE A NATA ENDORSED REPORT

Prudent Avoidance Policy on Siting Telecommunication Towers and Antennas

Real-life Applications of ICNIRP Guidelines to Various Human EMF Exposure Issues

The unique chip, which protects you up to 100 % against harmful electromagnetic radiation during mobile phoning.

Multiple Myeloma Understanding your diagnosis

GROUNDING THE HUMAN BODY TO NEUTRALIZE BIO-ELECTRICAL STRESS FROM STATIC ELECTRICITY AND EMFs.

Hole s Human Anatomy and Physiology Eleventh Edition. Mrs. Hummer Hanover Area Jr./Sr. High School. Chapter 1 Introduction to Anatomy and Physiology

Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation

Anatomy: The sella is a depression in the sphenoid bone that makes up part of the skull base located behind the eye sockets.

Electromagnetic Radiation towards Adult Human Head from Handheld Mobile Phones

Recent Research on Mobile Phones Effects

Low Blood Pressure. This reference summary explains low blood pressure and how it can be prevented and controlled.

Reavis High School Anatomy and Physiology Curriculum Snapshot

CHEMICAL SENSORS 1. DEFINITION

Handheld measurement equipment for measuring extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields

Introduction. About 10,500 new cases of acute myelogenous leukemia are diagnosed each

Measures of Prognosis. Sukon Kanchanaraksa, PhD Johns Hopkins University

SARCOIDOSIS. Signs and symptoms associated with specific organ involvement can include the following:

Baby Your Legs! Get relief for: Heavy, tired or aching legs Swollen ankles and feet Varicose or spider veins. Managing leg health during pregnancy

What the experts say: The consensus of scientific opinion

MOBILE PHONE RADIATION AND HEALTH

Breathing and Holding Your Breath copyright, 2005, Dr. Ingrid Waldron and Jennifer Doherty, Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania 1

Nutrition education for adolescents: Principals' views

Endocrine System: Practice Questions #1

Chemobrain. Halle C.F. Moore, MD The Cleveland Clinic October 3, 2015

THORACIC DIAGNOSTIC ASSESMENT PROGRAM (DAP) PATIENT INFORMATION FOR:

Hormone Restoration: Is It Right for You? Patricia A. Stafford, M.D. Founder, Wellness ReSolutions

Chapter 2 What Is Diabetes?

Measurement of Output Power Density from Mobile Phone as a Function of Input Sound Frequency

Automated Meter Reading Frequently Asked Questions. What is AMR?

Thermal Effects of Mobile Phones

AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM AND HEART RATE VARIABILITY

The type of cancer Your specific treatment Your pre training levels before diagnose (your current strength and fitness levels)

Methyl groups, like vitamins, are

Transcription:

Measurement of Protection from Radiation by Protect Disc Research conducted by Lisa Tully, PhD, lisatully@earthlink.net Energy Medicine Research Institute, Boulder, CO May, Abstract A study was conducted to evaluate the ability of the Protect Disc to remediate negative health effects of cell phone electromagnetic radiation (EMR). For this study, Body Voltage, Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and Blood Microscopy were used as assessment tools. The Protect Disc demonstrated a reduction or reversal of EMR effects utilizing these tests in subjects who responded to the cell phone exposure. These results show the efficacy of Protect Disc for protection against the deleterious effects of cell phone EMR. Introduction Cell phone radiation has effects on the body including DNA damage, affecting hormone and neurotransmitter release, increasing blood sugar and cancer. More studies are reporting brain cancer links with cell phone use. Therefore, it is important to identify protective devices. According to Professor Konstantin Meyl in his book Scalar Waves, Electromagnetic Environmental Compatibility, cell phone towers should not be closer than.8 miles from a living or working area. This is certainly not the case now so counterbalancing the potential effect of radiation in our environment is of utmost importance. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of the Protect Disc to reduce negative effects of cell phone EMR as measured by Body Voltage, Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and Blood Microscopy. Research is ongoing by the author to identify the most valid tests for diagnosis of electro hypersensitivity (EHS), a disease that is becoming more prevalent as EMR exposure increases. Body voltage is used to determine the absorption of an electric field in one's environment, which can cause health problems and lead to EHS. Heart Rate Variability is used medically to assess the balance of the autonomic nervous system, which can be affected by stressors. Blood microscopy can be used to assess the amount of red blood cell aggregation, which interferes with oxygen delivery to the tissues and waste removal. These technologies were chosen to determine if a reversal of the deleterious

health effects of cell phone EMR by the Protect Disc could be achieved. Protect Disc A phone or other wireless devices including transmission towers induce a biological incompatibility that can be measured. The Protect Disc works by counterbalancing the resonance of the EMF's with the biological compatibility of the body. The resonance of the Protect disc, reacting with the body, offsets the resonance of the EMF frequencies lowering the stress on the body and restoring the body back into biocoherence. Note. No claim is made by of blocking EMF signals that blow through the body at the speed of light. Only by continuously counterbalancing the results of the disruption to the biocoherence of the body by the EMF signals, can the stress and other issues caused by the EMF signals be addressed. Body Voltage Exposure to an external electric field will induce an electric field within our bodies. In this sense, our bodies act as antennas picking up fields from nearly everything connected to a source of electric power such as cell phones, cell phone antennas, and transmission towers sending microwave signals. Body Voltage from AC (alternating current) electric fields inducted into the body is measured as Body Potential in millivolts (mv) by mv meters. Heart Rate Variability Heart rate variability (HRV) refers to the beat-to-beat alterations in heart rate. It was developed over years ago and is a quantitative assessment of the relative balance of the two branches of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), which controls most physiological functions. HRV has the ability to evaluate the impact of any intervention or activity and to detect the early signs of pathological development or functional disorders, which may not be revealed by routine physical examination. Therefore, HRV is a useful assessment of the general health of an individual and because it evaluates the ANS, it can be used to quantify the response to a stressor. The algorithms used by Nerve-Express have been developed and tested for over twenty years in studies involving more than twenty thousand patients. The algorithms generate two values that represent the physical fitness, the level of the functioning of the physiologic systems and the adaptability of the individual.

Blood Microscopy By observing a fresh blood sample with a microscope, one can determine the amount of red blood cell aggregation. Normal blood has dispersed red blood cells whereas rouleax formation occurs when red blood cells adhere to each other. Rouleax formation produces poor blood circulation, less oxygen delivery, and reduced waste removal. Symptoms one might experience from poor circulation include headaches, fatigue, difficulty concentrating, numbness, and heart and blood pressure problems. Electromagnetic Radiation Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) is a very dangerous side effect of the exponential increase in technology that we all rely on. Reports of brain cancer resulting from cell phone use are increasing. Therefore, it is important to identify devices that protect from cell phone and other device radiation. Results of the current study indicate that the Protect Disc reverses the negative effects of cell phone exposure, as measured by the GDV technique. Methods Ten healthy subjects ranging from age 9 to 75 were tested with the digital multimeter (www. lessemf.com), Nerve Express HRV (www.nerveexpress.com) and blood microscopy to determine a baseline measurement. Blood samples were observed and photographed with a Celestron Microscope. Initial measurements were taken to determine a baseline. Subjects were tested during (Body Voltage and HRV) and just following (blood microscopy) exposure to a Treo Palm Pilot cell phone for 6 minutes. The Treo was chosen because it is one of the phones with the highest specific absorption rate (SAR,.5 Watts/kilogram), which is a measure of phone EMR radiation. The subjects were given minutes to recover and retested after using the phone with an Protect Hologram attached to the phone. Data is presented showing the alterations in the three measures for subjects who responded to the cell phone exposure. Results Of the ten subjects tested, three responded to the cell phone with the HRV and the body voltage measurement and responded as measured by blood microscopy. In all of these cases, the Protect Disc reduced or reversed the negative health effects of cell phone exposure. The same three subjects responded to cell phone exposure with the HRV and Body voltage measurement. A reversal or significant reduction of the response to cell phone exposure was

observed in both measures when the Protect Hologram was used. Two different subjects who did not respond with HRV or Body Voltage exhibited rouleax formation when observing blood and this effect was eliminated by use of the Protect Hologram. Heart Rate Variability Three of the subjects responded negatively to cell phone exposure, as measured by HRV. In all three of the responsive subjects, the Protect Disc reduced the negative effects induced by cell phone exposure. Figures - show the HRV results from three different subjects before and during cell phone exposure and after cell phone exposure with the Protect Disc attached to the phone. In each of the figures, Physical Fitness values are shown. For each treatment, the first column represents the functioning level of the physiological systems and the second column indicates the adaptability of the individual. The lower the values, the healthier the individual and the ideal value range for an athlete is - /-, for general health is -9/-5 and 9-/5-7 is considered unhealthy. 9 8 7 6 5 Figure. The Protect Disc Reduces the Negative Effects of Exposure as Measured by HRV with adaptability returning to baseline values.

9 8 7 6 5 Figure. The Protect Disc Reduces the Negative Effects of Exposure as Measured by HRV. 8 6 Figure. The Protect Disc Reduces the Negative Effects of Exposure as Measured by HRV. In this case the baseline improved more than the original baseline. For each of the responsive subjects, the Value was substantially increased by cell phone exposure and this increase was reduced by the Protect Disc. The value was not altered as much by cell phone

exposure and in two of the subjects, the change in this value was reversed by the Protect Disc. Body Voltage The same three subjects that responded to cell phone exposure with the HRV measurement also responded with the body voltage and these effects were reduced or reversed by the Protect Disc. Figures -6 show the results for Body Voltage alterations and the figures are in the same order for each subject as the HRV data (figures -). Figures and 5 show that the Protect Disc reverses the increase in Body Voltage produced by a cell phone, while Figure 6 shows a reduction in the change in Body Voltage. Body Voltage.5.5.5.5 Figure. The Protect Disc Reverses Body Voltage Effects Induced by Cell Phone Exposure below the original baseline measurement. Body Voltage 6 5 Figure 5. The Protect Disc Reverses Body Voltage Effects Induced by Cell Phone Exposure in a Different Subject to the baseline measurement.

Body Voltage.5.5.5.5 Figure 6. The Protect Disc Reverses Body Voltage Effects Induced by Cell Phone Exposure in a Different Subject. This subject had an extreme low voltage in the baseline. Blood Microscopy Figure 7 shows photographs of blood before and after cell phone exposure and after cell phone exposure with the Protect Disc. As seen, cell phone exposure creates extensive rouleax formation and this effect is eliminated by the Protect Disc. Blood Blood After Exposure

Blood After with Figure 7. Eliminates Rouleax Formation Induced by Exposure and effects seem to be better than the baseline blood. Figure 8 shows blood microscopy results in another subject, there was rouleax formation at the baseline measurement and this was exacerbated by cell phone exposure. Interestingly, the rouleax formation was that was observed at baseline and after cell phone exposure was completely eliminated by the Protect Disc. Blood Blood After Exposure Blood After with Figure 8. Eliminates Rouleax Formation of and Induced by Cell Phone Exposure.

Discussion Research has shown that some individuals are more sensitive to EMR. The author has been developing a method to determine the electrical sensitivity of individuals. By using these tests, one can measure a physiological response to a cell phone and evaluate the effectiveness of protective devices. The subjects that did not respond to these tests are not being affected by cell phones, as measured by these tests, but are likely being affected on some level that we are not able to measure at this date. In this study, three of the ten subjects responded to cell phone exposure with HRV and Body Voltage. These subjects were more affected in the Physical Fitness value than the value. It is logical that the organs and other systems are more affected than the adaptability response. The Protect Disc reverses the negative effects of cell phone exposure on both values and in one subject; the value was lower than the baseline, suggesting that the Protect Disc can be beneficial beyond EMR protection. Since Body Voltage measurements were altered in a similar way to HRV, these tests appear to be effective in the evaluation of devices that protect from electrosmog. As seen in the two Microscopy shots, the Protect Disc generated improvement in the subject s blood microscopy above the baseline measurement. This effect suggests that the Protect Disc produces more health benefits than EMR protection and further study is recommended to confirm this effect. Conclusions The results of this study show that exposure to a cell phone produces negative health effects and these effects are reversed by using the Protect Disc. These results were observed as a reversal of the deleterious effects as measured by HRV, body voltage and blood microscopy. Therefore, the Protect Disc is recommended for protection from cell phone exposure.