Life-Cycle Assessment of McCarty Landfill Gas to CNG in California San Diego Metropolitan Transit System



Similar documents
CNG, LNG, and Other Fuels from Landfill Gas ---Prospects for Future Development----

Well-to-Wheels Energy and Emission Impacts of Vehicle/Fuel Systems Development and Applications of the GREET Model

David Mezzacappa, P.E. SCS Engineers Contractor to U.S. EPA on LMOP

Think Green. Think Waste Management.

Bringing Biomethane to the Vehicle Fuel Marketplace

National Biomethane Summit Company and date here 23 June 2009

Executive Briefing: LNG Supply for Marine Vessels

Pet Coke Consulting, LLC. Phil Fisher Argus Conference, Houston September 19-21, 2012

Efficiency Metrics for CHP Systems: Total System and Effective Electric Efficiencies

Natural Gas and Greenhouse Gases. OLLI Lectures November 2014 Dennis Silverman Physics and Astronomy UC Irvine

Biogas to CNG The Future is Now! November 19, 2013 Chris Voell, BioCNG, LLC

Governor s Executive Order, Dept. of Ecology, Air Quality Program Bob Saunders

Well-to-Wheels analysis of future fuels and associated automotive powertrains in the European context. Preliminary Results for Hydrogen

The Next Generation Near-Zero Emission Natural Gas Vehicles

Draft Large-scale Consolidated Methodology ACM00XX: Construction of a new natural gas power plant

CHP & ENVIRONMENTAL COMMODITIES: MARKET & POLICY UPDATE FOR MONETIZING RENEWABLE ENERGY CREDITS FROM CHP PROJECTS. Thomas Jacobsen October 2012

California Energy Commission California Perspective on Biofuels and Energy

SSE s criteria used for GHG emissions reporting

How to Earn the LEED Green Power Credit

ENERGY SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS AND ENERGY SAVINGS

Emissions Comparison for a 20 MW Flywheel-based Frequency Regulation Power Plant

Summary: Apollo Group Greenhouse Gas Inventory (Worldwide)

RENEWABLE ENERGY. The Sustainable Energy Plant.

California Barriers to the Development of RNG as a Transportation Fuel

2010 Advanced Energy Conference

Clean Diesel versus CNG Buses: Cost, Air Quality, & Climate Impacts

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): ENERGY. 1. Sector Performance, Problems, and Opportunities

The California GHG Emissions Reporting Tool

Waste a source of energy. Regional Solid Waste Management Plan Review: Engaging solutions for tomorrow. Incineration. Incineration

Expanding the Twin Ports Energy Cluster to include LNG and CNG Production and Distribution. Dr. Richard Stewart, Co-Director-GLMRI May 21, 2014

The European Renewable Energy Directive and international Trade. Laurent Javaudin Delegation of the European Commission to the U.S.

Power. Income Fund. January 18,2006. Stephen Somerville Senior Manager, Business Development Probyn & Company and Clean Power Income Fund

Renewable Choice Energy

Woodfibre Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Project. Review of Related Upstream Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Estimates

Texas Landfill Gas Energy Workshop

Combined Heat & Power. Discussion with Connecticut Energy Advisory Board. February 23, 2010

Converting Biogas to CNG for Vehicle Fuel. September 30, 2013 Chris Voell, Eastern Sales Manager

GENERATION TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

St. Petersburg, FL: Vehicle Use of Recycled Natural Gas Derived from Wastewater Biosolids

Capturing Methane to Fuel Drilling Operations

Renewable Energy LORD Green Real Estate Strategies, Inc.

Opportunities for Combined Heat and Power at Wastewater Treatment Facilities: Market Analysis and Lessons from the Field

Electric Power Annual 2013

MISSION. NAVFAC Environmental Restoration

Transportation. Fueled by Clean Natural Gas

Electric Power Annual 2014

Badger State Ethanol, LLC Request for Fuel Pathway Determination under the RFS Program Office of Transportation and Air Quality

Environmental Defense Fund NAFA Fleet Management Association

CHP Strategies and Options / Stored Energy ENERGY SYMPOSIUM April8, 2014 Reading Country Club

Natural Gas Diversification Strategy for PREPA GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT BANK FOR PUERTO RICO

Landfill Gas as a Liquefied Natural Gas Fuel Source for Refuse Trucks

Role of Natural Gas in a Sustainable Energy Future

Current and Future Uses of Renewable Natural Gas A gas utility perspective

Solid Waste: Opportunities for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction in Sonoma County. Community Climate Action Plan

Austin Energy Resource, Generation and Climate Protection Plan to 2025: An Update of the 2020 Plan

Impacts of AB 32 on California s electricity sector

ERCOT Analysis of the Impacts of the Clean Power Plan Final Rule Update

A Technoeconomic Analysis of Biomethane Production from Biogas and Pipeline Delivery

Today s Topic. Plano Solar Advocates. Non-profit grassroots volunteer group. North Texas Renewable Energy Group

City of Bath Maine. A Small Landfill s Preliminary Evaluation of Carbon Credits and Renewable Energy Projects. December 11, 2008

Greenhouse Gas Inventory Valencia Community College May 7 th 2010

Biomethane production and its use in captive fleets. Lille Metropole Experience

Development of large-scale H 2 storage and transportation technology with Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier (LOHC)

Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2015

Addendum Combined Heat and Power Revisions to the CPUC GHG Calculator Revised Report

Founded 1900, 8 Nobel Prize Winners Premiere Centre for Science & Engineering

Biggest Challenge for the Hydrogen Economy Hydrogen Production & Infrastructure Costs. Presentation Overview

Biomethane as vehicle fuel

How To Make A High Co 2 Gas Blend

Multiple sources of energy will be available, giving the consumer choices. A Higher Percentage of Energy will come from renewable energy sources

H2A Biomethane Model Documentation and a Case Study for Biogas From Dairy Farms

Fact sheet. Conversion factors. Energy and carbon conversions 2011 update

Communicating Your Commitment: Your Guide to Clean Energy Messaging

Letter from the Chairman 2 Recycling 5 RecycleBank 7 Composting 9 Renewable Energy 11 Alternative Fuel Vehicles 13 Fleet Optimization 15 Communities

Instrument Gas to Instrument Air Conversion Protocol October 2009 SPECIFIED GAS EMITTERS REGULATION OCTOBER Version 1.0.

DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY TRACKING SYSTEM

Natural Gas and Transportation

Bridge Fuel or Gangplank? America s Natural Gas. James McGarry Chief Policy Analyst Chesapeake Climate Action Network

Does that math work?

Transforming America s Energy Future. Kentucky. Energy Statistics. Developed by

Biomass-to-Fuel-Cell Power For Renewable Distributed Power Generation

Comparison of Recent Trends in Sustainable Energy Development in Japan, U.K., Germany and France

LANDFILL GAS TO ENERGY- COMBINED ENGINE AND ORC-PROCESS

LFG Used as Fuel for a Medical Waste Treatment Facility in Argentina

Natural Gas in Transportation J.B. HUNT Perspective

Youngs California's Energy Future UCB Bioeconomy Heather Youngs, PhD Bioenergy Analyst University of California, Berkeley

State Incentives for Waste Heat to Power

Indonesia Biogas Asia Pacific Forum Developing A Biogas Hub In Commercialising Biogas For Asia. Opportunities for Biogas as a Vehicular Fuel

Revision to the approved baseline methodology AM0011

Energy Efficiency Opportunities

2012 Guidelines to Defra / DECC's GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting

Comparison of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Gasoline and E85 Vehicles, Fuels, and Greenhouse Gases The E85 Alternative

Overview on SEA output

A Green Idea. Reclaiming Urban Wood Waste And Urban Forest Debris. For Fuel/Combustion & Renewable Energy

First to US Market with trucked compressed natural gas delivered to companies beyond the pipeline. Bennington presentation by NG Advantage LLC

Renewable Natural Gas (Biomethane)

CNG and LNG: What s Best for Your Fleet?

Renewable Gas Vision for a Sustainable Gas Network. A paper by National Grid

The Role of Natural Gas in Texas and America CEA Meeting August 24 th, 2010

2014 Government GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting: Methodology Paper for Emission Factors FINAL

Transcription:

Life-Cycle Assessment of McCarty Landfill Gas to CNG in California San Diego Metropolitan Transit System October 21 st, 2014; Updated August 25 th, 2015 Submitted to: BP Natural Gas and Power Prepared by ICF International 75 E. Santa Clara St., Suite 300 San Jose, CA 95113 POC: Jeffrey Rosenfeld; Jeffrey.rosenfeld@icfi.com

Table of Contents General Information... 3 Process Description... 3 Data Collection and Process Results... 4 LFG Production Plant... 4 Transportation to California by Pipeline... 8 Compression... 8 MCCARTY Fuel Pathway Results... 10 Appendix A: Summary of CA-GREET Inputs... 11 Appendix B: List of Supporting Annexes... 12

General Information GSF Energy, LLC owns the McCarty Road LFG Recovery Facility, a gas collection and processing facility located at the McCarty Road Landfill in the city of Houston, Texas. The facility produces high BTU gas for sale to Centerpointe Energy, Inc. The McCarty Facility uses solvent absorption technology for the removal of moisture, contaminants, and CO2 from the raw landfill gas. Compression, scrubber and radiator engines are operated on the high BTU gas produced in the McCarty Facility. Prior to December 2012, the McCarty Facility purchased electricity from Direct Energy Services to serve the plant s electrical demand. The facility then switched to Champion Energy Services starting on December 21st 2012 and continues to be serviced by this electricity provider. The McCarty renewable fuel facility permits, which are required to be submitted to EPA, consist of the most recent applicable air permits issued by EPA or by the state pollution control agency (the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality). These air permits include Permit, issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (April 27, 2010); and a Minor Revision, permit number, dated February 28, 2012. These permits do contain limitations on air contaminant emissions rates for the facility, but do not specify a maximum volume output of renewable fuel for the facility. The McCarty Facility has submitted documents to EPA that demonstrate the facility s actual peak capacity. These documents include a spreadsheet showing the production of high BTU gas at the facility on a daily basis for the five year period from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011. The resulting actual peak capacity for the McCarty Facility is gallons of renewable fuel per year. Pipeline grade LFG is transported via pipeline from Texas to San Diego, CA for compression and use as CNG. The following pathway was produced using two years (April 2012 March 2014) 1 of landfill gas production data and two (2) years (July 2011 June 2013) 2 of compression data. Process Description (THIS SECTION CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION) 1 Please see Annex 5 and Annex 6 for MCCARTY electric and gas bills, and Annex 7 for the facility s gas sales; these invoices are summarized in Annex 2 2 Please see Annex 4 for CNG data from SD Metro. 3 Please see Annex 3 HR Green Engineering Report for additional details 3

A landfill gas with a molar methane content is processed to on average methane purity, the balance being the inerts of N2 and CO2. Approximately of the methane is recovered in the gas to be sold. The balance is consumed in the thermal oxidizer. Data Collection and Process Results To estimate GHG emissions, the energy and materials necessary for the following processes needs to be determined: LFG Production Plant, Transport of Gas to San Diego, CA (Pipeline), and Compression. LFG Production Plant (THIS SECTION CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION) Two years (April 2012- March 2014) of plant modeling data show an average landfill gas inlet of mmscf/day 4 at methane and product gas of MMBtu/day 5 of biogas at an average methane. The McCarty facility imports the necessary electricity to purify the landfill gas and imports natural gas as a pilot for the onsite thermal oxidizer and open flares to 4 Please see Annex 2, Summary tab, cell C23 for the calculation of this figure 5 Please see Annex 2, Summary tab, cell L6 for the calculation of this figure 6 Please see Annex 2, Summary tab, cell D31 for the calculation of this figure 4

combust off-gases generated during the regeneration steps and when plant is not operating. Natural gas is also imported to fuel compressors. Table 1 below shows the available data provided by McCarty for input biogas, product biogas, biogas consumed on-site and imported electricity from April 2012 to March 2014. The balance of the biogas consumed in the thermal oxidizer and flare is calculated based on monthly production data provided by McCarty (Annex 2) and an assumption of methane content of input biogas. The table also shows the provided data converted to GREET model inputs. The McCarty pathway utilizes the CA-GREET default values for LFG recovery. The value of MMBtu/day in Table 1 below is the average amount of product pipeline quality biogas produced per day. To determine combustion emissions from the consumed natural gas and landfill gas at the landfill gas plant, the GREET default values for natural gas combustion process for natural gas liquefaction (100% natural gas turbine) were chosen since they represent the processes more closely than natural gas compression (100% natural gas engine). TABLE 1. MCCARTY LFG PLANT OPERATING ENERGY AND FLARE CREDIT 7 (THIS TABLE CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION) April 2012 March 2014 Daily Data Btu/MMBtu of Product Gas Input Value Changed Cells NG Tab Calculated w/in GREET 9 Below is a simplified process diagram of the facility that includes the estimated energy flow associated with each step of the LFG recovery process. 7 Please see Annex 2, Summary tab for the calculations of the figures presented in this table 8 Please see Annex 7 for PDFs of gas sales invoices 9 Please see Annex 1 for the Modified GREET model referred to in this report 5

Per MMTBtu Sales Gas MMBtu/day Imported Electricity for General Plant Use Inlet Compression Gas Clean Up Compression Sales Gas Waste Gas with remaining methane Thermal Oxidizer Pipeline NG for TOX Pilot and Compression Figure 1. McCarty Process per MMBtu and MMBtu/day Energy Flows The GREET model LFG pathway was then modified to adjust efficiency gas and process energy shares as listed in Table 2. The Southeast Asia region on the Regional LT tab was changed to the ERCOT All (ERCT) Region to represent the 2012 egrid data for year 2009 (8 th Edition 10 ) where Houston, TX is located. The ARB methodology of converting egrid electricity mix to marginal mix was employed. This changed the electric mix cells of J83-J88 on the Region LT tab to those shown in Table 2. The remaining values from the Southeast Asia Region (now the ERCT region) were changed to match the US Average. TABLE 2. ERCT ELECTRICITY GRID MIX egrid CY2009 Grid Mix Marginal Grid Mix CA-GREET Cell Regional LT Tab Residual oil 1.2% 1.2% J83 Natural gas 47.8% 60.4% J84 Coal 33.0% 33.0% J85 Nuclear 12.3% 0.00% J86 Biomass 0.1% 0.1% J87 Other (renewables) 5.5% (w/ hydro) 5.3% (w/o hydro) J88 10 egrid 8 th Edition Version 1.0, Year 2009 Summary Tables, created May 2012. www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/documents/egridzips/egrid_8th_edition_v1-0_year_2009_summary_tables.pdf 6

This produced the results for LFG to LNG shown in Table 3 below. These values are taken from the NG Tab of the Modifed GREET model which can be found in Annex 1 of the supporting documents submitted in conjunction with this report. Conversion from g/mmbtu to g/mj was done using the conversion factor of 1055.055 MJ/MMBTU as is done in the CA-GREET model. The recovery energy and emissions are based on ARB LFG pathway defaults of 4621.25 Btu of electricity/mmbtu of landfill gas. 11 The default LFG transport distance of one mile was used since the distance between McCarty Road LFG Facility and the McCarty Road Landfill is less than 1 mile, as can be seen in Figure 2 below. Figure 2. Proximity between McCarty Road LFG Facility (identified location) and the McCarty Road Landfill 11 http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/022709lcfs_lfg.pdf; page 9. 7

TABLE 3. MCCARTY LFG PLANT GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (THIS TABLE CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION) gvoc/mmbtu gco/mmbtu gch4/mmbtu gn2o/mmbtu gco2/mmbtu gco2e/mmbtu gco2e/mj gco2e/mj Flare Credit Total gco2e/mj Recovery + Processing Recovery Emissions MCCARTY LFG Plant CA-GREET Cell NG Tab B151/C151 B152/C152 B153/C153 B154/C154 B155/C155 B156/C156 B157/C1587 D157 E157 Transportation to California by Pipeline The pipeline transport distance was modified to 1,468 miles from Houston, TX to San Diego, CA where the gas will be compressed. The distance was determined by the using the driving route most similar to the pipeline map. Google Maps was used to determine the driving routes with the I-10 route most similar to the pipeline map. The emissions were determined by linked cell E148 on the NG tab to cell F479 on the T&D_Flowcharts tab for LFG to CNG, and this same distance will be used for LFG and LNG. The table below shows the pipeline transport emissions from cells F151-F157 on the NG Tab. TABLE 4. MCCARTY LFG TRANSPORT GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (THIS TABLE CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION) Transport Emissions gvoc/mmbtu gco/mmbtu gch4/mmbtu gn2o/mmbtu gco2/mmbtu gco2e/mmbtu gco2e/mj Compression McCarty LFG Transport (THIS SECTION CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION) Based on the submitted Confidential Business Information from SD Metro, SD Metro will be submitting for one pathway for their CNG Stations based on two (2) years of data (July 2011- June 2013). The weighted average energy consumption is kwh/gge 12. Table 5 and 12 Please see Annex 4 for the CNG station Electrical Efficiency Data 8

Table 6 below show the calculation from kwh/gge to process efficiency and the cells that were changed and the results from cells G151- G157. TABLE 5. CNG STATION PLANT OPERATING EFFICIENCY (THIS TABLE CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION) All Units in Btus per GGE Compression Input Value Changed Cells NG Tab CNG Produced Compression Electricity AA79 Compression Natural Gas Compression Efficiency AA75 AA66 TABLE 6. CNG COMPRESSION GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (THIS TABLE CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION) Recovery and Processing Emissions gvoc/mmbtu gco/mmbtu gch4/mmbtu gn2o/mmbtu gco2/mmbtu gco2e/mmbtu gco2e/mj Compression 13 109,772 Btu/GGE default CA-GREET value 9

MCCARTY Fuel Pathway Results When the CA-GREET model is run completely with the modifications listed above, the table below shows the complete pathway results. The WTT pathway gco2e/mj results were taken from cell H158 which is the sum of cells E158 G185 on the NG tab for CNG. The TTW gco2e/mj was taken from the Detailed California-Modified GREET Pathway for Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) from Landfill Gas 14. TABLE 7. PATHWAY RESULTS GHG Emissions (gco2e/mj) MCCARTY LFG Plant to CNG SD Metro Landfill Gas Recovery Landfill Gas Processing Flare Credit Landfill Gas Transport Compression gco2e/mj WTT Carbon in Fuel Vehicle CH4 and N2O gco2e/mj TTW gco2e/mj WTW 19.82 14 http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/022709lcfs_lfg.pdf 10

Appendix A: Summary of CA-GREET Inputs Parameter Unit Value CA-GREET Cell Changed LFG Recovery and Transport Thermal Btu/MMBtu CA-GREET Default (L85) Electricity Btu/MMBtu CA-GREET Default 15 (L91) Total Energy Btu/MMBtu N/A LFG Plant NG Tab LFG Processing Efficiency % AI66 (via C182) Electricity Fuel Share % AI79 (via C184) LFG Fuel Share % AI75 (via C183) Natural Gas Fuel Share % AI76 (via C186) Electricity kwh/mmbtu N/A Electricity Btu/MMBtu Calculated in CA-GREET (AI91) LFG Btu/MMBtu Calculated in CA-GREET (AI87) Natural Gas Btu/MMBtu Calculated in CA-GREET (AI85) Credit for Not Flaring Btu/MMBtu Calculated in CA-GREET (AJ88) Total Energy Btu/MMBtu N/A ERCT Electricity Grid Mix Regional LT Tab Residual oil % 1.2 J83 Natural gas % 60.4 J84 Coal % 33.0 J85 Nuclear % 0.0 J86 Biomass % 0.1 J87 Other (renewables) % 5.3 J88 Natural Gas Transport T&D Flowcharts Tab (via NG Tab) Pipeline Distance mi 1,468 F479 (via E148) Compression NG Tab Electricity kwh/gal LNG N/A Compression Efficiency % AA66 Electricity Fuel Share % AA79 Natural Gas Fuel Share % AA75 Electricity Btu/MMBtu Calculated in CA-GREET (AA91) Natural Gas Btu/MMBtu Calculated in CA-GREET (AA85) 15 http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/022709lcfs_lfg.pdf, pages 9-10. 11

Appendix B: List of Supporting Annexes Annex 1 - Modified GREET model LFG to CNG Annex 2 - Facility Energy Data & Analysis_070214 Annex 3 HR Green Eng Report Annex 4 SD Metro Calculation Summary File Annex 5 - McCarty Electric Utility Invoices Apr 2012 - Mar 2014 Annex 6 - McCarty Gas Utility Invoices Apr 2012 - Mar 2014 Annex 7 - McCarty Gas Sales Invoices Apr 2012 - Mar 2014 Annex 8 SD Metro Invoices 12