Safety Risk Assessment in Drug Development



Similar documents
The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are

ICH guideline E2C (R2) Periodic benefit-risk evaluation report (PBRER)

Questions and Answers to the Annual Safety Report

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE E2C(R2)

and Regulatory Aspects

ST. MICHAEL S HOSPITAL Guidelines for Reporting Serious Adverse Events / Unanticipated Problems to the SMH Research Ethics Board (REB) July 09, 2014

Clinical trials: from European perspective to National implementation. CTFG / FAMHP / pharma.be. Brussels, 19 November 2010

How Industry Can Partner with FDA in Defining a Risk- Based Monitoring Program

PHARMACOVIGILANCE IN A BOX

CDISC standards and data management The essential elements for Advanced Review with Electronic Data

GUIDELINE ON THE SUBMISSION OF RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN DOCUMENTS

ISO Identification of Medicinal Products (IDMP) and HL7 Structured Product Labeling (SPL) Disclaimer

ICH guideline E2C (R2) on periodic benefit-risk evaluation report (PBRER)

Good practice guide on recording, coding, reporting and assessment of medication errors

POST-APPROVAL SAFETY DATA MANAGEMENT: DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS FOR EXPEDITED REPORTING E2D

Seminario SSFA. New Guideline on Good Pharmacovigilance Practice (GVP) Fare clic per modificare lo stile del sottotitolo dello schema

Risk Management in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Elena Apetri, Global Medical Safety Surveillance Schering AG

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

ICRIN Seminar on EU Regulation of Clinical Trials

Serious Breaches. Ian Gravenor. Senior Clinical Project Manager Novo Nordisk Ltd

The Product Review Life Cycle A Brief Overview

EphMRA Adverse Event Reporting Guidelines 2015

EphMRA Adverse Event Reporting Guidelines 2013

NRA FUNCTION IN CONTROLLING VACCINES IN CLINICAL TRIAL AND MARKETING AUTHORIZATION INDONESIA 2013 DVI MEETING 9 11 APRIL

E2C(R2) Implementation Working Group ICH E2C(R2) Guideline: Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report Questions & Answers

EudraVigilance stakeholder change management plan

Guidance notes on collection of drug safety information by employees and agents of pharmaceutical companies

Guidance notes. for Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance in Patient Support Programmes

Migration of Controlled. Compliant SharePoint Document Management Systems. Presented by: Joe Lucadamo

PHASE IIB III. inventivhealthclinical.com

Kandrea Collins, RN, BA, MA, Senior Clinical Team Manager Suzanne Olsen, RN, CCRC, Senior Clinical Research Associate

Detailed guidance AEs reporting in clinical trials ( CT-3 ) Stefano Bonato, M.D. Pharmacovigilance Country Head Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals

BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Handling of Periodic Safety Update Reports

Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for: Reporting of Serious Breaches of GCP or the Trial Protocol sponsored CTIMP s. Lisa Austin, Research Manager

GMP/Regulatory Environment in the

Comparison of the Various Project Management Competency Models

RISK MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND MANDATED POST-AUTHORIZATION STUDIES

EU Clinical Trials Regulation Regulation EU 536/2014

Standard Operating Procedure for the Recording, Management and Reporting of Adverse Events by Investigators

Standard Operating Procedure on Training Requirements for staff participating in CTIMPs Sponsored by UCL

Monitoring of medical literature and the entry of relevant information into the EudraVigilance database by the European Medicines Agency

FDA's Module 1 Update: From Ideas to Implementation. Jared C. Lantzy, PMP

Versioning in Clinical Trials. European Industry MedDRA User Group Meeting March 28 th 2014 Vienna

ORDINARY CONGRESS Minutes

A CRO's Dilemma - The CDMS Validation Package that Failed Client Audits 19.OCT Disclaimer

Agence fédérale des médicaments et des produits de santé

Update From the Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology

Risk management plans an overview

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

The New EU Clinical Trial Regulation Potential Impacts on Sites

EMEA RM DRAFT GUIDANCE ISPE RESPONSE 1

EUROPEAN INDUSTRIAL PHARMACISTS GROUP

Adopted by CHMP in November Revision 1.0 adopted by CHMP on 25 June 2009

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Clinical research: where are we with the new (Paediatric) RC trial Regulation

Medicine Safety Glossary

Comparison of EU-Pharmacovigilance System Master File (PSMF) with US System

LEBANESE MINISTRY OF HEALTH DIRECTIVE

Guidance for Industry E2C Clinical Safety Data Management: Periodic Safety Update Reports for Marketed Drugs

Risk Management Plan for Drug Establishments

Lifecycle CMC Management: ICH Q12 Progress to date

Stakeholder Meeting, 7 th June 2013 An inspector s perspective considerations for patient support and reimbursement programmes

Chilean Insurance Market Overview

GAMP 5 as a Suitable Framework for Validation of Electronic Document Management Systems On Premise and 'In the Cloud' Keith Williams CEO GxPi

Guidance for Industry

MedDRA in pharmacovigilance industry perspective

Post-Approval Change Management: Challenges and Opportunities An FDA Perspective

Topics for today. Issues: Regulatory Obligations Post-marketing Adverse Event Reporting; MDRs and Safety Reports. Post-marketing Submissions

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Safety Is Global: Contemporary Pharmacovigilance and Medical Product Risk Management Strategies

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

How Transparent are Regulatory Agencies with regard to Review Timelines? Disclaimer

Vertex Investigator-Initiated Studies Program Overview

Questions & answers on signal management

ICD-9-CM to MedDRA Mapping How Well Do the. Disclaimer

Clinical evaluation Latest development in expectations EU and USA

RAPID ALERT SYSTEM (RAS) IN PHARMACOVIGILANCE

Overview of Risk Management

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Custom Newsletter Program. Welcome Pack

Regulatory Considerations for Conducting Clinical Trials In India

Role of IRB/IEC in GCP. Benjamin Kuo, MD, Dr.PH, CIP.

MedDRA in clinical trials industry perspective

Target Product Profile (TPP) Process. Dr. Michele Sharp, PharmD, Sr. Director, Regulatory Affairs, Eli Lilly and Company

Questions and answers on preparation, management and assessment of periodic safety update reports (PSURs)

Guideline on Detection and Management of Duplicate Individual Cases and Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs)

Esteban Pérez Caldentey Development Studies Section Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)

An FDA Perspective on Post- Approval Change Management for PAT and RTRT

One-year report on human medicines pharmacovigilance tasks of the European Medicines Agency

Transcription:

Safety Risk Assessment in Drug Development The LA Regional Experience Terezinha C. Teotonio, RN, MSN PPD LA PVG Manager

Lessons Learned Globally Need for testing prior to marketing Need for regulations Need for systems to identify AEs Need to correlate drug marketing claims and safety Recognition that some risks can be minimized Drug Information Association www.diahome.org 2

The LA experience: Pre-approval Expedited Reports SUSAR/Local SAEs Periodic Reports PSUR/Line Listings/DSUR/CIOM S English/Spanish/ Portuguese Hard copy/online submission/e-mail English data/spanish/ Portuguese reports Hard copy-hand delivery/online submission/e-mail Various timelines (72h; 2WD; 7 calendar days, 10 calendar days; 14 calendar days) Various timelines (q 2 months/6 months, yearly and end of study) Drug Information Association www.diahome.org 3

Expedited Pre-approval Group I ARG / BRA / CHI / COL / MEX / PER Expedited submissions that involve some level of Risk- Benefit assessment since case narratives are required on each SCR Electronic or e-mail submission SUSARs/Local SAEs (R and Unrelated) and F-UP mandatory Performed by Local PVG/Reg. Affairs offices directly in the RA Web system Per study or Drug Clock start upon receipt by PVG Drug Information Association www.diahome.org 4

Expedited Pre-approval Group II ECU / GUA / HAI / DOMR / PAN / PAR / URU / VEN Local SAEs submitted by PIs or Rep Legislation is not clear Follow-up required SCR submission inclusive of case narrative Hard copy or e-mail Clock start upon PI knowledge Drug Information Association www.diahome.org 5

Periodic Pre-approval - All Countries International SUSARs and Local SAEs Line listings-psurs and DSURs Cross-reporting per Drug for various ongoing studies Submitted by Reg. Affairs/PVG LA/PI Involves some level Risk-Benefit analyses and support from sponsors Complexity and clear definitions same as expedited for each group - I and II Drug Information Association www.diahome.org 6

The LA experience: Post-approval Expedited Report SUSAR/Local SAEs Periodic Report PSUR/Line Listings/CIOMS Spanish/Portuguese Spanish/Portuguese Online submission/e-mail or Fax Various timelines (SAEs 7Wd; 10Wd and non-serious q 2months) Hard copy-hand delivery/online submission/e-mail Various timelines (q 2 months/6 months, yearly PSUR in Mexico all others specific template and LL) RMPs in MEX ARG, PER and BRA Drug Information Association www.diahome.org 7

Post-approval Expedited & Periodic Reporting Similar to pre-approval additional demands on risk-benefit Gradual requirements from new MAH to older marketed drugs Same level of complexity on same countries and lack of clear regulations on the group II countries previously presented Drug Information Association www.diahome.org 8

Pre-Post Reporting Methods No harmonization among LA countries for pre and postmarketing reporting methods SCR (single case reports) and periodic reporting for pre and post-approval in most countries Acceptance of DSURs and PSURs/LL across the board, transcribed into local reports Vaccines require specific reporting methods Ongoing updates from LA RAs on how information is processed once received Drug Information Association www.diahome.org 9

Challenges PM - Drugs in the Market Reports that lack quality HCP reports are on the rise Web-based programs to stimulate reports and opening avenues for immediate reporting Drug Information Association www.diahome.org 10

Current Challenges Pre and Post-Marketing LA Pre Lack of Harmonization between LA countries Timelines Communication on Updates and changes Outside SUSAR definition for Local Expedited When SUSAR not all countries accept in the language that the CIOMS/MW are generated Line Listings and PSURs versus own templates Post Only ARG-BRA- MEX have online submissions CIOMS/MW submitted in country s national languages Other LA countries own format for Expedited and Periodic submissions Periodic submissions mostly Line listings Risk-benefit mentioned in ARG and BRA Related cases and not only unexpected (non-susar) Drug Information Association www.diahome.org 11

Global Standards & Guidance Most guidelines applied in LA are based on the EMA guidelines for pre and post-approval Data collected individually (ICRs) and compiled periodic reports DSURs and PSURs EMA harmonization of collection and analyses Recent release Periodic benefit-risk evaluation report (PBRER) Drug Information Association www.diahome.org 12

From PSUR to PBRER 1996 PSUR-Periodic Safety Updates Report Marketed Drugs-The ICH E2C- Clinical Safety Data Management. Widely accepted in LA on its original format or adapted through line listings and specific RA reports. 2013 PBRER- Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report Further development of submission technology including electronic reporting leading to the immediate capture and further evaluation of the benefit-risk evaluation. Implementation undergoing in Latin America. Drug Information Association www.diahome.org 13

Global and Latin America current challenges How can we transfer pre-approval standards to post-approval? PBRER releases in 2012/13 by the EMA, under cost analyses by all involved and implementation Social Media and the Internet huge demands on drug complains Can we meet consumer s demands? Can we capture all data available? How can we improve PM reporting and awareness in LA? Drug Information Association www.diahome.org 14

Safety Risk Assessment in Drug development in LA The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to Drug Information Association, Inc. ( DIA ), its directors, officers, employees, volunteers, members, chapters, councils, Special Interest Area Communities or affiliates, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated. These PowerPoint slides are the intellectual property of the individual presenter and are protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America and other countries. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Drug Information Association, DIA and DIA logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of Drug Information Association Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Drug Information Association www.diahome.org 15

Safety Risk Assessment in Drug development in LA THANK YOU! Drug Information Association www.diahome.org 16

Safety Risk Assessment in Drug Development The LA Regional Experience Terezinha C. Teotonio, RN, MSN PPD LA PVG Manager