BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMIS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE 98 DHC 8



Similar documents
~ DJ.jC D N J TH CAROLINA STATE BAR,~\ ~ 09 DHC 5

WAKE COUNT T DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION C 0 HE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR

3 7g 4F ' - d112 l3 IqS g 3 NORTH CAROLINA. co. 99 V'r BEFORE THE, cn

[Cite as Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bauer, 143 Ohio St.3d 519, 2015-Ohio-3653.]

z c9 j `:. FINDINGS OF FACT

PRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM. RE: Sample Bankruptcy Motions and Orders for Personal Injury Practitioners and Trustees

0)..1S"D.~.~ISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION

People v. Fischer. 09PDJ016. May 7, Attorney Regulation. Following a Sanctions Hearing, a Hearing Board suspended Erik G.

STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

WRONGFUL DEATH COMPROMISE PROCEEDINGS IN SURROGATE S COURT JUNE 10, Andrew L. Martin Chief Court Attorney Nassau County Surrogate s Court

THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO (Court Administration)

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO

2008 WI 91 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against R. L. McNeely, Attorney at Law:

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION

NO. 03-B-0910 IN RE: HARRY E. CANTRELL, JR. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

Petition to Compromise Doubtful Claim of Minor/Ward INSTRUCTIONS. I. Specific Instructions

Case 2:06-cv FCD-KJM Document 220 Filed 06/02/2009 Page 1 of 11

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

[Cite as Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Vivo, 135 Ohio St.3d 82, 2012-Ohio-5682.]

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Court Approval Over Cases Involving Injuries to Minors By Adam J. Zayed

Table of Contents. 1. What should I do when the other driver s insurance company contacts me?... 1

MASSACHUSETTS CUSTOMIZED PRACTICE COVERAGE TITLE INSURANCE AGENT LIABILITY COVERAGE UNIT

THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO (Court Administration)

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL GENERAL RELEASE. This Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release ( Agreement ) is entered into

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Dearfield, 130 Ohio St.3d 363, 2011-Ohio-5295.]

NO. 04-B-0828 IN RE: VINCENT ROSS CICARDO ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Gilbert, 138 Ohio St.3d 218, 2014-Ohio-522.]

ARIZONA TITLE 12 - COURTS AND CIVIL PROCEEDINGS, CHAPTER 20, STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS, ARTICLE 1, GENERAL PROVISIONS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 112,059. In the Matter of PETER EDWARD GOSS, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

State of California Department of Business Oversight

NC General Statutes - Chapter 55 Article 15 1

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS STATE OF NEW JERSEY

, Plaintiff, Defendant., Esq., appeared on behalf of the petitioning

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES

SLIP OPINION NO OHIO-522 CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION

HOW TO RESPOND WHEN SERVED: Surviving the Divorce Process in New York State

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants, Nominal Defendant.

FORM - SIMPLE ORDER FOR A STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT. Index No: Upon the application of plaintiff s counsel for judicial approval for a structured

COMPLAINT IN INTERPLEADER ON LIFE INSURANCE POLICY

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. THIS REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Regulatory Settlement

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Chasser, 124 Ohio St.3d 578, 2010-Ohio-956.]

HOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. RULES OF MEMBERSHIP

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

AGREEMENT. Solicitor Without Per Diem Compensation

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY SESSION

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement

A Guide for the General Practitioner: Ethical Issues When Evaluating, Selecting and Handling Personal Injury Case I.

Estate Procedures for

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. of America, acting through the United States Department of Justice and the United States

Plaintiffs, -against- IAS Part 5 Justice Kathryn E. Freed. WHEREAS Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York

AUTHORITY TO REPRESENT AND CONTINGENCY FEE AGREEMENT

CRIMINAL DEFENSE AGREEMENTS

How To Settle A Lawsuit Against The City Of Naperville

FORM - COMPLEX ORDER FOR A STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT

How To Process A Small Claims Case In Anarizonia

PREVIEW. 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit.

(Before a referee) APPELLATE ARGUMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

906 Olive Street, Suite 420 St. Louis, MO

Sample Settlement Agreement and Release for an Employment Law Claim

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS AGREEMENT

May Tex. B. J. 442

ACCIDENT BENEFIT CONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT

2011: The Year in Ethics and Bar Discipline. By Constance V. Vecchione, Bar Counsel January 2012

rdd Doc 402 Filed 10/25/13 Entered 10/25/13 16:17:31 Main Document Pg 1 of 10. (Jointly Administered)

How To Get A $1,000 Filing Fee From A Bankruptcy Filing Fee In Arkansas

Atlanta Bar Association LAWYER REFERRAL AND INFORMATION SERVICE OPERATING RULES

In the Matter of Thomas J. Howard, Jr. O R D E R. This matter is before the court pursuant to a petition for reciprocal discipline filed by this

NEW ERA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY GENERAL AGENT S CONTRACT. For. Name. Address. City State Zip

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY

South Carolina s Statutory Whistleblower Protections. A Review for SC Qui Tam Attorneys, SC Whistleblower Lawyers & SC Fraud Law Firms

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. O'Brien, 96 Ohio St.3d 151, 2002-Ohio-3621.]

VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD MEMORANDUM ORDER

What to do when a lawyer dies:

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com

ATTORNEY CONSULTATION AND FEE CONTRACT FOR CONTINGENCY CASES

NEW YORK NY GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW TITLE 17 STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT PROTECTION ACT

Two Sample Engagement Letters (with optional notices)

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Transcription:

NORTH CAROLINA WAKE COUNTY 15LgL- BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMIS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE 98 DHC 8 X01 it 6<'' 4 - lqg19 THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, ) vs. Plaintiff, ) CONSENT ORDER OF DISCIPLINE VYA 2 4'6 8 L 9c,' G. PHILLIP DAVID, ATTORNEY This matter was heard before a hearing committee of the Disciplinary Hearing Commission composed of Henry C. Babb Jr., Chair, Michael L. Bonfoey and B. StephenHuntley, pursuant to Section.0114(h) of the Discipline and Disability Rules of the North Carolina State Bar. The Plaintiff was represented by Fern Gunn Simeon. The Defendant was represented by Joseph B. CheshireV. and Alan M. Schneider. Both partieshave, agreed to waive a formal hearing in this matter and both parties stipulate and agree the to following findingsof fact and conclusionsof law recited in this consent order and to. the discipline imposed. Based upon the consent of the parties, the hearing committee hereby enters the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1; The Plaintiff, the North Carolina State Bar, is a body duly organized under the laws of North, Carolina and is the proper party to bring this proceeding under the authority granted it in Chapter 84 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, and the Rules and Regulations of the North Carolina State Bar promulgated thereunder. 2.; The Defendant, G. Phillip David was admitted to the North Carolina State Bar in 1988, and is, and was at all times referred to herein, an attorney at law licensed to practice in North Carolina, ' subject to the rules, regulations and Rules of Professional Conduct of the North Carolina State Bar. 3. During all of the relevant periods referred to herein, defendant was actively engaged in the practiceof law in the Stateof North Carolina and maintaineda law office in the city of Wilmington, North Carolina. 00489

4. In late 1994 or early 1995, the defendant agreed to represent Nellie Ballard (hereafter Ballard) in a wrongful death action concerning the death of Ballard's nephew, Jessie Junior Darden (hereafter Darden) arising from an automobile accident which occurred on July 26, 1994 in Brunswick County. 5. Although Darden had resided with Ballard and had been raised by her since infancy, the defendant was aware that Darden's natural mother was alive and that Ballard, although Darden's aunt, was not his natural mother. C 6: Also, there was a minor child who survived Darden but defendant was unaware of the child's existence and did not take the necessary steps to determine the child's existence. 7. The defendant pursued a wrongful death claim against Ballard ' s uninsured motorist carrier, Seibels Bruce. 8. On February 1, 1995, a check in the amount of $1,000.00 was- issued from Seibels Bruce to Ballard, as the executrix of the estate of Darden, and to the Defendant.. This cheek represented payment of a medical payment claim in the Darden wrongful death action. 9. At the time the $1;000.00 medical payment claims check was issued to Ballard, she was not the executrix of Darden' s. estate. 10. On February 20, 1995, defendant sent the $1,000.00 medical payments claim to Ballard. 11. The defendant did not give the $1,000.00 medical payment to Darden 's lawful heir. 12. In April 1995, the defendant settled the wrongful death claim for $25,000.00. 1 13. On April 6, 1995, a check in the amount of $25,000.00 from Seibels Bruce was issued to Ballard, as the executrixof the estate of Darden, and to the defendant, 14. At the time the $25,000 check was issued to Ballard, she was not the executrix of Darden' s estate. 15. Some time after receiving the $25,000.00 check from Seibels Bruce, the defendant deposited the check in his trust account. 16. The defendant issued two checks to Ballard from the $25,000.00 proceeds of the wrongful death claim. On April 20, 1995, the defendant issued check number 1246 in the amount of $11,316.58 a Nellie Ballard. The defendant also issued check number 1255 to Atlantic Health Clinic or Nellie Ballard in the amount of $2,868 which was payment of a personal obligation of Ballard. 2 0040

17. The defendant did not pay the wrongful death proceeds to Darden's lawful heir pursuant to N.C.G.S. Section 28A-18-2. 18. The defendant did not have the clerk of superior court approve the disbursements made from the wrongful death claim as required by N.C.G.S. Section28A-18-2. 19. Although the Defendant mistakenly believed that Ballard had been appointed as the -personal representative of Darden ' s estate; through adequate preparation and investigation, the defendant should have known that Ballard had not been appointed as personal representative Darden' s estate at the time the two checks from Seibels Bruce were issued to Ballard. 20. The conduct in question did not involve any intentional wrongdoing or any fraudulent conduct on the part of the defendant, but was the result of the defendant's lack of familiarity an knowledge regarding the proper procedures involved in handling a wrongful death case. 21. Since the filing of the grievance with the North Carolina State Bar, a compromise settlement of all claims arising out of the defendant's erroneous distribution of (received proceeds pursuant to a wrongful death claim ) has been negotiated. As a result, the parties have reached a mutually satisfactory resolution of the underlying civil claim whereby the defendant has paid the sum of$22,517.08 in satisfaction. This settlement amount represents $25,000 received from the uninsured motorist provisions of Ballard's personal automobile policy,000 plus med $1 pay, less the cost of a funeral ($3,482.92). Additionally, the defendant as part of the negotiated settlement, paid the sumof $7,505.69 to defray the minor 's attorney's fees and costs incurred in pursuing and obtaining a compromise settlement of the malpractice action. 22. The Petition For Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem, the Order appointing Guardian Ad Litem, the Judgment and Release, the Petition For Court Approval, and the Court Order approving Judgment found that the minor child had a claim for relief against the defendant G. Phillip: David and David & Associates, P.L.L.C. for negligent disbursement of funds received pursuant to a wrongful death claim which arose from the death of said minor 's father, child Jessie JuniorDarden, in an automobile accident which occurred on July 26,1994 in BrunswickCounty. 23. On December 19, 1995, the defendant agreed to represent Lula Wright (hereafter Wright) in a personal injury case. Wright and the defendant entered into a contract for legal services on December 1995. 24. Paragraph 6 of the contract for legal services signed by Wright and the defendant provided that if Wright "discontinue[d] her cause and/or dismisse[d]" the defendant after an offe of settlement was made, Wright must pay the defendant the "contracted percentage amount of th most recent offer of settlement..." 25. The defendant adopted this clause approximately 9 years ago from another local law firm's Fee Agreement. Although the defendant has occasionsover had the years where he was discharged` by the client, he has never pursued any compensation whatsoever from a client upo 3 49

discharge. In addition, immediately upon learning that the language in the fee agreement wa problematic, he revised his fee agreements to eliminate the provision in question. Based upon the consent of the parties and the foregoing Findings of Fact, the hearing committee enters the following: 1 1. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW All parties are properly before the Hearing Committee and the Committee has jurisdiction over the defendant and the subject matter of this proceeding. 2. The Defendant's conduct, as set out in the Findings of Fact above, constitutes ground for discipline pursuant to N.C.G.S. Sec. 84-28(b) as follows: a. By failing to determine the existence of Darden's lawful heirs and by disbursing the wrongful death claim proceeds and medical payment check to Nellie Ballard and not to Darden' lawful heir, the defendant handled, a legal matter without adequate preparation under the circumstances in violation of Rule 6(a)(2); handled a legal matter which defendant knew or should have known he was not competent to handle without associating a lawyer who wa competent to handle a wrongful death case in violation of Rule 6(a)(1); and engaged in conduc prejudicial to the administration of justice in violation of Rule 1.2(d). b. By requiring in his December 19, 1995 contract for legal services that his client pay the contractual contingent fee instead of a quantum meruit amount if his client discharged hi before there was a final settlement in the case, the defendant entered into a fee agreement violation of Rule 2.6. Based upon the consent of the parties, the hearing committee also enters the following FINDINGS OF FACT REGARDING DISCIPLINE 1. The Defendant's conduct is mitigated by the following factors: a. Full and free disclosure to the Committee and cooperative attitude toward the proceedings; b. absence of dishonesty; c. good character and reputation;. 4

d. The Defendant has been subjected to a civil malpractice claim regarding this matter which proceeding has been resolved to the satisfaction of all parties, with full restitution being made; and e. The Defendant has exhibited sincere remorse regarding his mishandling of this matter. 2. The Defendant's conduct is aggravated by the following factors: a. Prior discipline involving advertising. 3. The mitigating factors outweigh the aggravating factors. ' Based upon the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law and the findings regarding discipline and based upon the consent of the parties, the hearing committee enters t following: ORDER OF DISCIPLINE The defendant is hereby suspended from the practice of law for six months. suspension shall be stayed for one year based on the following conditions: This (a) Defendant shall successfully complete an 12 extra hours of CLE prior to the end of the stay; (b) Defendant shall violate no provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct during the one year stay period; (c) Defendant shall violate no laws of the state of North Carolina during the one year stay period; (d) Defendant shall pay the costs of this proceeding as determined by the Secretary of the North Carolina State Bar. F 5

Signed by the hearing committee chair with the consent of the other members of the hearing committee. Ii4k- This the day of 5L, 1998. Babb, Jr., Chair yiplinary Hearing Committee consented to: G. Phillip David, Defendant bseph Cheshire V. Attorney or Defendant Alan M. Schneider Attorney for, Defendant Fern Gunn Simeon Attorney for Plaintiff 6 030,494