SUBSEQUENT INJURY TRUST FUND ASSESSMENTS, REIMBURSEMENTS AND SETTLEMENTS



Similar documents
The Employers Guide to. Pennsylvania s Workers Compensation Law

ANNUAL REPORT Per SCR 111 of 2007

Risk Management Division Municipal Manager Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

OSHR Workers Compensation Settlement Reserve Funds Allocations Beginning July 1, Administration Process Pages 2-5

TITLE 85 EXEMPT LEGISLATIVE RULE WORKERS' COMPENSATION RULES OF THE WEST VIRGINIA INSURANCE COMMISSIONER

Drug and Alcohol Testing of Doctors. Medical Negligence Lawsuits. Initiative Statute.

MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE MANDATORY REPORTING OF DETAILED CLAIM INFORMATION

Manual of Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pennsylvania Public Schools CHAPTER 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS. Chapter 9 9.1

OREGON LAWS 2013 Chap. 5

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2016

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2015

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

Drug and Alcohol Testing of Doctors. Medical Negligence Lawsuits. Initiative Statute.

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CLOSED CLAIM DATA COLLECTION UNDER CONNECTICUT PUBLIC ACT

Q: Has Dollar General had any claim issues around loosing the common law defenses and exclusive remedy? A: No.

Policy and Procedures for Recoupment & Coordination of Benefits: Workers Compensation Payment

July 2, Richard F. Daines, M.D. Commissioner Department of Health Corning Tower Empire State Plaza Albany, NY Re: Report 2008-F-29

NEW JERSEY COMPENSATION RATING & INSPECTION BUREAU EXPLORING THE COST OF A WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE POLICY

Pension & Health Benefits Committee California Public Employees Retirement System

plan, hereinafter referred to as the Plan, means the statutory, COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE 82-33

LOUISIANA PATIENT'S COMPENSATION FUND STRATEGIC PLAN FISCAL YEAR THROUGH FISCAL YEAR VISION

ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED BILLS TO REFORM THE WORKERS COMPENSATION SYSTEM

BACKGROUND. August 28, Hon. Kamala D. Harris Attorney General 1300 I Street, 17 th Floor Sacramento, California Initiative Coordinator

WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION STANDARDS

A REVIEW OF CURRENT WORKERS COMPENSATION COSTS IN NEW YORK

Maryland Insurance Administration s 2005 Report on the Availability and Affordability of Health Care Medical Professional Liability Insurance in

State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION Division of Insurance 1511 Pontiac Avenue Cranston, RI 02920

GEORGIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION Explanation of Basic Procedures

WORKCOVER WA REVIEW OF THE WORKERS COMPENSATION AND INJURY MANAGEMENT ACT 1981 FINAL REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS Self-Insurance Certification

NEW YORK INSURANCE LAW ARTICLE 70 CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANIES

Minnesota Workers' Compensation. System Report, minnesota department of. labor & industry. research and statistics

Medicare Issues in Workers Compensation Settlements PRESENTED BY: MICHELLE A. ALLAN, ESQ.

Executive Office of the President Office of Management and Budget ACCOUNTING FOR DIRECT LOANS AND LOAN GUARANTEES

How To Get A Workers Compensation Rate Decrease In Florida

THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Room 475 EBA Office of Educational Management Services Albany, NY (518)

A Guide to Legal Malpractice Insurance

State Cashflow Management

MEDICARE AND WORKERS= COMPENSATION CLAIMS WHO=S ON FIRST? Michael E. Rusin. January, 2002

CONTACT: Ted Cooke Debbie Jo Maust (623) (623) Report and Discussion Regarding Captive Domicile Review

A Guide to Legal Malpractice Insurance

MONTANA SELF INSURERS ASSOCIATION

Optima Tax Relief Case Study A Look at the Tax Resolution Process

Sundry debts recovery policy

OPTION TO SELF-CALCULATE YOUR FINAL CONDITIONAL PAYMENT AMOUNT PRIOR TO SETTLEMENT

IRS gives first glimpse of rules on ACA excise tax on high cost health plans and asks for input

Senate Bill 1025-First Edition

CRIMINAL DEFENSE AGREEMENTS

WATERFRONT WORKERS (COMPENSATION FOR ASBESTOS RELATED DISEASES) ACT

2005 SCHOOL FINANCE LEGISLATION Funding and Distribution

Department of Civil Service

MCARE legislation does not apply to dentists: it should

Kansas Health Care Stabilization Fund General Information (As of July 1, 2014)

Livingston County Michigan Human Resources Policy Manual

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO HB 2064 would make several amendments to the Insurance Code to:

Higher Education Capital Matching (HECap) Grant Program Legislation (the HECap Act )

In Defense of Insured Contracts

Workers Compensation (Default Insurance Fund) Amendment Act 2009 (No 2)

The Kansas Health Care Stabilization Fund

GEORGIA WORKERS COMPENSATION BASICS Michael Memberg Ken David & Associates, LLC

Nebraska Filing Requirements for Workers Compensation Large Deductibles

2011 Changes to Kansas Workers Compensation Act

WORKERS COMPENSATION SUBROGATION AND THIRD PARTY SETTLEMENTS. B. Industrial Revolution and Workers Compensation Statutes

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

GUIDE TO FUNDING YOUR MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CLAIM

Colorado Division of Workers Compensation FAQs re: Uniform Settlement Agreements ( USAs )

Concerning the Cap on Pain and Suffering Awards for Minor Injuries

CALIFORNIA ALTERNATIVE ENERGY AND ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION FINANCING AUTHORITY Meeting Date: February 18, 2014

NEW YORK STATE WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD ASSESSMENTS

QUESTIONS YOU SHOULD ASK THE INSURANCE ADJUSTER

Transcription:

SUBSEQUENT INJURY TRUST FUND ASSESSMENTS, REIMBURSEMENTS AND SETTLEMENTS Richard McGee, Fund Administrator David Taylor, Deputy Fund Administrator Luanne Clarke, attorney, Moore, Clarke, DuVall & Rodgers, Fund Advisory Committee Contrary to many rumors floating around, the Subsequent Injury Trust Fund (SITF or FUND) does not intend to stop reimbursement to insurers and self insurers nor is its intention to stop or stall settlements. To the contrary, the Fund is struggling to find a solution that allows predictable acceptable assessments; continued reimbursement of costs on open claims; and authorization for settlement of claims. The bottom line is without enacting a change on the settlement reimbursement procedure, the Fund will be out of money for settlements for the reminder of 2008, and will only have a total of approximately 42 million available in 2009 and 2010, respectively, to address 1200 anticipated new claims and a 135 million backlog. In short there is insufficient money unless insurers and self insurers wish to face a 20% assessment for the 2008 and 2009. The Fund has two types of repayments to issue to the insurers and self-insurers based on the assessments against those entities each calendar year. The Fund has an ongoing obligation to issue reimbursement funds for accepted claims that are open and will remain open for a period of time. The Fund also has a certain number of requests for settlement funds that must be processed so that the settlement payments are made to the insurer and self insurer. In January 2008 the Fund had 140 million to spend for the calendar year minus a +/- $3 million dollar administrative budget. As of May 2008, it had 1

paid out approximately 94 million in reimbursement and settlements. Thus, for the remaining eight months of the 2008 calendar year only 43 million dollars remained to continue to provide the ongoing reimbursement requests which meant with little monies remaining to allocate toward claim settlements. The Fund is charged with the responsibility of repayment to the insurers and self insurers based on the availability of monies for the regular reimbursement of indemnity and medical expenses as well as the payment of total settlement of claims. Therein lies the current money crunch. In the past few years the Fund has been required to increase assessments to handle the ever increasing requests for Fund acceptance of new claims, evaluation of claims wherein the statue was tolled, and settlements. The Fund acknowledges the validity of each of these requests and would gladly pay each accepted claim when requested. But the reality is insurers and self insurers are legitimately opposed to an assessment increase to immediately fund these requests both new and old. In 2010 through 2015, a legislative leveling of assessments of 7% for insurers and self insurers should net 100 million for the Fund s use in those calendar years. Of this 100 million, the administrative costs are approximately 3% ($3 million). Unfortunately, there was an already existing 60 million dollar backlog as of June 6, 2006, the date the Fund could no longer accept new claims. This backlog has increased to 135 million due to the a staggering request for reimbursement of 4881 claims submitted because of the June 2006 deadline for the filing of new claims. The assessments would have to leap to 20 % in 2008 and perhaps 2009 for insurers and self 2

insurers if the Fund continued to issue settlement authority at its current rate while still issuing the monies necessary for the open file reimbursement process. In addition to issuing reimbursements the Fund has a fiscal responsibility to insurers and self insurers to provide stability for the insurers and self insurers. Past and future projected assessments are: 2000 6.5% 2001 6.2% 2002 11.6% 2003 8.5% 2004 10.3% 2005 10.8% 2006 15.5% 2007 10.1% 2008 10-11% ESTIMATED (PROJECTED 140 MILLION) 2009 10-11% ESTIMATED (PROJECTED 140 MILLION) 2010 7% (100 MILLION -STATUTORY CHANGE) 2011 7% (100 MILLION STATUTORY CHANGE) 2012 7% (100 MILLION STATUTORY CHANGE) 2013 7% (100 MILLION STATUTORY CHANGE) 2014 7% (100 MILLION STATUTORY CHANGE) 2015 7% (100 MILLION -STATUTORY CHANGE_ 2016 through 2020 --- no projected assessments due to a surplus and reduction in claims eligible for reimbursement 3

2020 Elimination of the Fund The Fund is introducing an installment reimbursement program that takes into consideration the fact that as of 2010 only $100 million will be collected without incurring a greater backlog or a significant assessment in 2008 and 2009. In the past, the Fund was at its maximum capacity to process $150 million in reimbursement and settlement requests. As a result, the Fund will be looking at a $100 million assessments and resulting backlog until the requests for settlement are reduced or addressed in another manner. As of 2010, the Fund will be receiving only $100 million in available funds to reimbursements and settlements. Employers can rely on an approximately seven percent (7%) assessment; however, the Fund must modify its current method of reimbursement of settlements due to the fact that the available funds will have dropped from $140 million to $150 million per year to $100 million per year. It is anticipated that claims will have been identified and reduced by 2010 so that the backlog can be addressed and a surplus begin to grow. In an effort to recognize the effects of the $100 million cap in 2010, the Fund has looked at a structured reimbursement for settlements only. The reimbursement for indemnity and medical in ongoing cases will continue in the same manner. However, the Fund has put into place an installment settlement repayment plan so that settlements may move forward in a timely fashion. The Fund recognizes that the insurer and self-insurer are incurring administrative costs while seeking reimbursement on an open file. Further the Fund has to earmark 4

monies first for reimbursement of ongoing indemnity and medical expenses before it can address the need for monies to close and settle claims. The purpose of the new installment program is to allow the Fund to authorize settlement of an insurer or self-insurer claim with the settlement resulting in a reimbursement of settlement proceeds up to a period of three years. In this way, the insurer and self insurer minimizes its ongoing reimbursement cost because the claim is settled and they avoid the cost of staff preparing reimbursement requests, monitoring the reimbursement requests, and obtaining appropriate reimbursement from the Fund. The reimbursement process will remain the same. However, if a case is moved to settlement, then the insurer and self-insurer and the Fund will all benefit from a reduction in reimbursement requests and administrative costs pertaining to these requests and also the parties will be able to close additional files. The purpose of the settlement structure reimbursement process is to ensure that the Fund has adequate monies on hand to accommodate the ongoing responsibility of reimbursement of medical and indemnity in cases that have not settled. Additionally, in that the Fund has a sunset date of 2020, the Fund will also be maximizing the amount of claims which can be settled while still continuing to build a surplus of funds available to cover the remaining liabilities in 2020. Since the Fund is legislatively limited in the amount of money it can collect from 2010 until 2015 and does not anticipate any assessments thereafter, a short term solution is needed in the interim to allow the Fund to continue to approve settlement requests. It is anticipated that, with this new settlement structure reimbursement process, the Fund will build up sufficient monies so as to reduce the backlog and, if the actuarial study 5

proves to be correct, the Fund will be able to build sufficient reserves so as to eliminate a backlog; pay reimbursements on open claims; and meet the settlement needs of the insurer and self-insurer. The Administrator of the Fund is authorized to reduce or suspend assessments for the Fund when a complete actuarial survey shows further assessments are not needed. The most recent actuarial study, utilizing the $100 million assessment rate, projects that the Fund will have sufficient monies to cover its normal reimbursement requests for open claims, its requests for settlement, and also will allow the Fund to build up a reserve so that the Fund should not have a situation of no funds for additional claims or unanticipated settlements assessments as of 2015. It is important that insurers and selfinsurers understand that this is a projected elimination of backlog and building of reserves to accomplish this goal; however, there are often unknown issues that can arise which could result in the Administrator having to continue assessments beyond the year 2015. There is no guarantee that the Administrator can suspend assessments as of that date, but that is certainly the goal of the Fund. (Another actuarial study will be done in early 2010 to better define the future liabilities of the Fund.) Due to the new legislative limitations on the ability to pursue old claims that have been filed with the Fund, it is anticipated that by the year 2010 those old claims will be identified and/or eliminated so that the 2010 actuarial study should show the liability for actual existing exposure. This more complete and actual data will result in the Administrator having a better idea as to whether or not assessments can be suspended in 2015. The bottom line is unless these settlement structural installments are made by the Fund, the Fund will only have the ability to issue $30 million or less in settlements per 6

year in 2008, 2009 and 2010. This is unacceptable to all. It does not accomplish the purpose of the Fund; it results in additional administrative and backlog costs to the Fund and, additionally, this creates a backlog for the insurer and self-insurer and oftentimes results in higher settlement costs to all parties. The newly implemented 3 year settlement reimbursement program will allow settlement of more cases during these three years. The Fund has instituted the installment reimbursement process as follows: Any settlement up to $75,000.00 will be reimbursed in full as the current backlog allows. Any settlement of a case from $75,000.00 to $150,000.00 will be paid under an installment process of $75,000.00 within the seven to eight months (depending on the backlog). The remaining $75,000.00 installment will be reimbursed on the payment anniversary date twelve (12) months later. Even though the insurer and self-insurer will be receiving reimbursements in installments, the Fund will not require additional filing seeking reimbursement of settlement funds, but rather the Fund will automatically issue a settlement reimbursement payment the anniversary date of the initial installment payment. Any settlements of $150,000.00 to $225,000.00 will be paid at $75,000.00 per twelve (12) month period with the second and third payments being automatically issued on the anniversary date of the prior payment. Any settlements above $250,000.00 will be reimbursed in three (3) yearly equal installments. Again, the subsequent installment payments will automatically be issued by 7

the Fund, and the insurer and self-insurer can calendar the anticipated date of payment so that budgeting and other fiscal planning can be made by the insurers and self insurers. The Fund s goal is not to impair the settlement or cases but to create a system wherein settlements can continue. The result should be that more cases settle. In fact, in an effort to enhance understanding for the need of this change, any insurer or self-insurer who objects to reimbursement in installments when a case has already been approved for settlement will be requested to attend a mandatory meeting with management of the Fund for a conference to discuss the rationale for such refusal. Given the effect of this change, the Fund will be actively involved in the analysis of those cases that require settlement to ensure that the settlements occur in a timely fashion and for a reasonable amount. Therefore, meetings between the Fund and the insurer and self insurer may be necessary to be certain that all parties understand the benefits of this new procedure. The Fund is making every effort to maximize the use of the assessment dollars and meet the needs of reimbursement and settlement. In order for this effort to be successful, insurers and self insurers must be willing to accept payments over a three year period or face the reality that settlements of cases will all but stall until a surplus of funds can be built or, alternatively, a higher assessment is required. This is a simple matter of supply and demand. The participants in the system are demanding a higher payout than the insurers and self insurers are willing to pay in as assessments in these next couple of years of short fall. Thus, the Fund asks for everyone s assistance and co-operation during the next couple of years as utilization of the three year installment plan guarantees your payments on a set anniversary date and 8

allows the assessments to remain at an acceptable level while settlements of claims continue. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Our goal is to communicate with you, the system users, as to why this installment process is a necessity. SUBSEQUENT INJURY TRUST FUND, Atlanta Richard McGee, Administrator, rmcgee@sitf.ga.gov, 404-206-6355 David Taylor, Deputy Administrator, dtaylor@sitf.ga.gov, 404-206-6354 MOORE, CLARKE, DuVALL & RODGERS, attorneys at law Luanne Clarke, lclarke@mcdr-law.com Atlanta 770-563-9339 Albany 229-888-3338 Valdosta 229-245-7823 Cell 229-343-1328 9