FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS



Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FOR MAIL FRAUD AND WIRE FRAUD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY I N D I C T M E N T. The Grand Jury, in and for the District of New Jersey,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

CASE 0:14-cr JRT-JSM Document 1 Filed 08/05/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT DISTRJCT OF MINNESOTA

2004R01432/JWD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

) (28 u.s.c. $ 2a6l(c))

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION INDICTMENT COUNTS ONE THROUGH SIX. The Scheme to Defraud

INTRODUCTION. At all times relevant to this Indictment, unless. 1. Donald & Co. Securities Inc. ("Donald & Co.") was

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Minnesota

United States Attorney Southern District of New York

COUNT ONE (Securities Fraud)

Case 3:14-cr AWT Document 39 Filed 08/05/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT.

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

09 Cr. COUNT ONE (Securities Fraud) The United States Attorney charges: Relevant Persons and Entities

v. : Criminal Number: IRINA ZELIKSON : Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1349 and 982(a)(7) I N F O R M A T I O N

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

INDICTMENT. The Grand Jury in and for the District of New Jersey, COUNT 1 (Conspiracy) 18 U.S.C At various times relevant to this Indictment:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Filed: Violations: 15 U.S.C U.S.C.

Case 1:05-cv CCB Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/2005 Page 1 of 18

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

BORIS SOKHA : Title 18, United States Code, Section 371 and Title 26, United States Code, Section 7201 I N F O R M A T I O N

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. ) No. ) ) ) ) ) COUNT ONE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Fraud - Trading Commodity Futures

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No.:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Plaintiff, v. Civil File No. 2:13-cv Defendant.

4:10-cv TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. v. : Criminal No. 08- I N F O R M A T I O N

Case 2:15-cr MSD-LRL Document 2 Filed 03/02/15 Page 1 of 22 PageID# 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT INDICTMENT GENERAL ALLEGATIONS. The Medicare Program

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1. This case involves widespread fraudulent conduct orchestrated by Shkreli from at

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

v. 18 u.s.c and 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA I N D I C T M E N T COUNT ONE. The Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No (JMR) The United States of America, by and through its attorneys,

Case 3:11-cv P Document 1 Filed 06/10/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1

I N D I C T M E N T. COUNT ONE (Racketeering) (Defendant Bergrin) The Grand Jury in and for the District of New Jersey, The Enterprise

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv SRC-CLW Document 1 Filed 12/06/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 SEATTLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INFORMATION COUNT ONE. At all times material to this information:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Kansas City, Kansas, Docket)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Hon. The defendant having waived in open court prosecution by Indictment, the.

~/

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION. ) ) ) ) No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INDICTMENT

and Cease and Desist Order ( Order ), and makes the

Case 2:14-cr AJS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

~'

2:13-cv NGE-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/10/13 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I N D I C T M E N T

Case 2:13-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/04/2013 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Michael H. TARKOFF, Defendant-Appellant. No United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Case 3:15-cv D Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv DS Document 1 Filed 08/08/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

United States District Court District of New Jersey. I, Abigail Weidner, the undersigned complainant being duly sworn, state the following is

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:05-cr Document 10 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 18. U.S. Department of. United States Attorney. 300 Virginia Street Suite 4000

Timothy N. England Alan M. Lieberman. Christopher. Washington, DC Tel: (202) (England)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Hon. Stanley R. Chesler. 18 u.s.c u.s.c u.s.c. 2

COUNT 1. The SPECIAL AUGUST 2012 GRAND JURY charges: a. Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. was a Chicago-based

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. No. COUNT ONE. The SPECIAL JANUARY 2009 GRAND JURY charges:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DMSION ) ) Filed: ) ) CRIMINAL INFORMATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : DATE FILED: I N F O R M A T I O N COUNT ONE

Law Related to Fraud. Civil Justice System Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), for its Complaint against PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Hon. Jose L. Linares INFORMATION

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Transcription:

AUG-10-2010 16:47 U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFC PEO 309 671 7259 P.02/10 c(j) (PIt'THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS AT PEORIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 1 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Criminal No. 10-10088 ) WILLIAM HUBER 1 ) VIO: Title 18, United States Code l Sections ) 1341 1 1956(a)(1)(B)(i)and 1957(a) ) Defendant. ) INFORMA TION THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY CHARGES: At all times material hereto: COUNT 1 (Mail Fraud) INTRODUCTION 1. WILLIAM HUBER (hereafter, "Huber ll ) was the sole directorl president, secretaryl treasurer, and majority shareholder of Hubadex, an illinois corporation, which maintained its principal office in Forsyth, illinois. 1

AUG-10-2010 16:47 U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFC PEO 309 671 7259 P.03/10 2. Hubadex served as the general partner for two inveshnent funds, The Quarter Funds, L.P. and The Symmetry Fund, L.P. Hubadex also served as the general partner and fund manager for The Trimester Fund, an investment dub. a. The Quarter Funds, L.P. was an Illinois limited partnership which represented itself to be a pooled investment fwld which purportedly engag~d in speculative trading of options on the S & P 100 Index. b. The Symmetry Fund, L.P. was an illinois limited partnership which represented itself to be a pooled investment fund and a multi-manag~r, multi-strategy, and well diversified investment fund, commonly known as a fund of funds. c. The Trimester Fund represented itself to be an inveshnent dub which engaged in speculative trading of options on exchange~tradedcommon stocks. (The three funds are collectively referred to herein as "The Funds.") 3. HUBER and Hubadex controlled The Funds' bank. and brokerage accounts and managed all aspects of The Funds' business. 4. InSeptember 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission(hereafter, SEC) ordered that HUBER cease trading. 2

RUG-10-2010 16:47 U.S. RTTORNEY'S OFC PEO 309 671 7259 P.04/10 SCHEME and ARTIFICE 5. Beginning in or about 1998 and continuing thereafter until in or about 2009, at Forsyth, in the Central District of illinois, and ~lsewhere,william HUBER devised and executed a scheme and artifice to defraud cli~nts, the SEC, and others through false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises. 6. Itwas a part of the scheme and artifice to defraud that HUBER commingled investments in the three Funds, moving funds intended by clients for invesbnent in a particular fund into an account for another fund. 7. It was a part of the scheme that HUBER did not invest clients' funds as represented. Contrary to his representations about the stated purpose of the investments, HUBER engaged in a Ponzi - type scheme whereby clients who requested redemptions based on the falsely inflated position of their investments were paid with funds invested by other clients. 8. It was a pc of the scheme that HUBER mailed a "Performance Update & Commentary" and monthly account statement to investors. The account statements set out the total amount of money held in the particular fund, the net trading profits for the month, the accrued Fund management fees an,d the gross and net returns on investment, as well as the individual investor's current 3

AUG-10-2010 16:47 U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFC PEO 309 671 7259 P.05/10 account balance and current gain or loss. In truth and fact, the account statements HUBER provided were grossly inflated and false, substantially misrepresenting the amount of assets being managed and the amount of returns. 9. It was a part of the scheme that HUBER represented that Hubadex did not receive a management fee for directing trades on behalf of the Quarter Funds and Trimester Fund, but instead received an "incentive fee" ranging from 10% to 20% of the gains achieved in each Fund. For the Symmetry Fund, HUBER represented that Hubadex received a monthly cash fee based on the net assets of the Symmetry Fund and a quarterly incentive fee of approximately 20% of the gains achieved by the Symmetry Fund. In truth and fact, HUBER misrepresented the current assets and returns for The Funds, thereby significantly inflating the monthly cash fees and incentive fees Hubadex was purportedly entitled to receive from The Funds. 10. Itwas further a part of the scheme that HUBER invested funds for friends and acquaintances in The Funds and obtained new investors by deceiving existing investors as to the success of their investments, thereby generating referrals. 4

AUG-10-2010 16:47 U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFC PEo 309 671 7259 P.06/10 11. It was further a part of the scheme that HUBER sent emails to investors falsely reassuring them as to the safety of their investments, as well as his own honesty. 12. Itwas further a part of the scheme that HUBER caused false and fraudulent information to be provided to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Among other lies, HUBER claimed that he and Hubadex managed over $40 million in investor funds. In truth and fact, HUBER and Hubadexonly managed approximately $3 million. Huber also concealed the location of Symmetry Fund assets by claiming they were held by six different hedge funds. In truth and fact, the Symmetry Fund had never invested with five of those funds and the sixth fwld only held a relatively small gain from a prior investment. 13. It was further a part of the scheme that HUBER diverted client funds to support a lavish lifestyle, paying personal expenses for himself and others. The diversion included mortgage payments and remodeling expenses for residences in La Jolla, California and Naples, Florida, a $197,000 down payment for another's residence, and over $331,000 in premiums for life insurance policies. 5

AUG-10-2010 16:47 U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFC PEO 309 671 7259 P.07/10 14. As a result of the scheme and artifice to defraud, WILLIAM HUBER defrauded approximately 300 clients and others of approximately $15 million. Mailing 15. On or about September 9, 2009, at Lexington, in the Central District of illinois and elsewhere, WILLIAM HUBER, defendant herein, for the purpose of executing and attempting to execute the aforesaid scheme and artifice to defraud and to obtain money and property by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, and in attempting to do so, did knowingly cause certain mail matter, that being an account statement of Quarter Funds, L.P., to be delivered according to the directions thereon by the United States Postal Service to a client identified herein as W.S.; In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1341. 6

AUG-10-2010 16:47 U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFC PEO 309 671 7259 P.08/10 elsewhere, COUNT 2 (Money Laundering) On or about October 20 1 2006, in the Central District of lllinois and WILLIAM HUBER, defendant herein, did knowingly conduct and attempt to conduct a financial transaction affecting interstate and foreign commerce l to wit, the wire transfer of $110,000 from the Trimester Fund account at Buena Vista National Bank in Decatur, illinois to the Jade Rene Osseck Trust account at the Navy Federal Credit Union in Virginia, which involved the proceeds of specified unlawful activityl that is mail fraudl knowing that the transaction was designed in whole and in part to conceal and disguise the nature, source l and ownership of the proceeds of said specified unlawful activity and that while conducting and attempting to conduct such financial transaction knew that the property involved in the financial transaction represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity. In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(a)(1)(B)(i). 7

AUG-10-2010 16:47 U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFC PEO 309 671 7259 P.09/10 COUNT 3 (Prohibited Monetary Transaction) On or about September 7, 2007, at Decatur, in the Central District of illinois, and elsewhere, WILLIAM HUBER, defendant herein, did knowingly engage and attempt to engage in a monetary transaction by, through, and to a financial institution affecting interstate commerce, in criminally derived property that was of a value greater than $10,000, that is the transfer of United States currency, funds, and m.onetary instruments to Bank of America in the amount of $500,000.00 by a wire transfer of funds from the Symmetry Fund account at the Buena Vista National Bank, a financial institution, to the Hubadex account at Bank of America for use in the purchase of a residence in La Jolla, California, such property having.been derived from a specified unlawful activity, that is mail fraud, in violation of 8

AUG-10-2010 16:48 U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFC PEO 309 671 7259 P.10/10 Title 18, United States Code, Section 1341, said statute being specified in Title 18, United States Code, Section 1961(1); Inviolation of Title 18.. United States Code.. Section 1957(a). UNITEDSTA~OFAMrnIDCA JAMPS A. LEWIS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY S: /Darilynn }. Knauss DarilynnJ. Knauss Supervisory Assistant United States Attorney One Technology Plaza 211 Fulton Street, Suite 400 Peoria, illinois 61602 Telephone: 309-671-7050 9 TOTAL P.10