SB 1420, Report to Sunset Office of Compliance and Ethics

Similar documents
Five-Year Strategic Plan

COMPLIANCE PROGRAM GUIDANCE FOR MEDICARE FEE-FOR-SERVICE CONTRACTORS

The University of Texas at Austin COMPLIANCE AND ETHICS PROGRAM CHARTER

The United States spends more than $1 trillion each year on healthcare

Fiscal Year 2014 Work Plan

Office of Compliance and Ethics Introductory Report. Lynette Fons, Chief Compliance Officer

THE FCA INSPECTOR GENERAL: A COMMITMENT TO PUBLIC SERVICE

Research Manager II. Task Statements

Senate Bill No. 466 CHAPTER 489

Summary of Budget Request

FY 2015 Internal Audit Annual Report

White Paper: The Seven Elements of an Effective Compliance and Ethics Program

UMDNJ COMPLIANCE PLAN

October 20, Sincerely. Anthony Chavez, CIA, CGAP, CRMA Director, Internal Audit Division

OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION COLLECTION AGENCY REGISTRATIONS MORTGAGE-RELATED AND CONSUMER COLLECTION AGENCY COMPLAINTS PRIOR AUDIT FOLLOW-UP

Texas Workforce Commission

INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF OPTOMETRY HIPAA COMPLIANCE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS. I. Introduction 2. II. Definitions 3

Texas Facilities Commission. Internal Audit Annual Report. Fiscal Year 2015

Program History. Prior Law and Policy

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 11

COUNTY OF ORANGE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. Corporate Compliance Plan

Aegon Global Compliance

Compliance and Ethics Program

PART I ARTICLE. apply to all insurers domiciled in this State unless exempt. (b) The purposes of this article shall be to:

BAPTIST HEALTH CORPORATE COMPLIANCE PLAN

Standards, quality processes and accountability

FY 2015 Annual Audit Report

Final. North Carolina Procurement Transformation. Governance Model March 11, 2011

Chairman Chaffetz, Ranking Member Cummings, and the members of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform:

MEDICAID COMPLIANCE POLICY

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION CONTRACT WITH DELL MARKETING, L.P., FOR MICROSOFT LICENSING AND MAINTENANCE

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF DALLAS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

LUZERNE/SCHUYLKILL WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD CORPORATE COMPLIANCE/ETHICS PLAN

Department of State Health Services Council Agenda Memo for State Health Services Council June 14, 2012

UNIVERSITY COMPLIANCE PLAN

Children, Families, and Elder Affairs Committee

INSTITUTIONAL COMPLIANCE PLAN

Compliance and Ethics Program Structure

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Charter of the Compliance and Operational Risk Management Office (CORMO)

BILL ANALYSIS. Senate Research Center S.B. 20 By: Nelson Finance 3/9/2015 As Filed

Federal Bureau of Investigation s Integrity and Compliance Program

CCQC Compliance Training

SUBCHAPTER RR. STANDARD PROOF OF HEALTH INSURANCE FOR MEDICAL BENEFITS FOR INJURIES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF A MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT 28 TAC 21.

Semiannual Report to Congress. Office of Inspector General

POLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL FRAUD, WASTE, AND ABUSE

COMPLIANCE PROGRAM FOR XL GROUP PLC

ENGROSSED COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR. Senate Bill No (By Senator Plymale)

Establishing An Effective Corporate Compliance Program Joan Feldman, Esq. Vincenzo Carannante, Esq. William Roberts, Esq.

Complaint Investigations of Minnesota Health Care Facilities

Enterprise Risk Management Plan FY December 2014

MNsure Compliance Program Strategic Plan. December 17, 2014

HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER Administrative Policy Manual

Fraud Risk Management Procedures

LEGISLATIVE AUDIT DIVISION MEMORANDUM

Federal Government Ethics Compliance Training. Federal Acquisition Regulation

SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE TO H.B. 750 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

Overview of State Procurement and

Approved by the Audit and Compliance Committee of the Providence Health & Services Board of Directors

Puerto Rican Family Institute, Inc.

Released December 18 th, 2007

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. hb er

Company s Audit and a Review of the Outside Auditor

PHI Air Medical, L.L.C. Compliance Plan

Compliance. TODAY June Meet Lanny A. Breuer. Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice.

DATE: September 17, Jon Weizenbaum Commissioner. BACKGROUND: Federal requirement Legislative requirement Other

Indicators for Florida School District Best Financial Management Practices

APPLYING THE STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS

STATE BOARD OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES AND OCCUPATIONAL EDUCATION AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Canada Media Fund/Fonds des médias du Canada

TEXAS STATE MEDICAID F RAUD CONTROL UNIT: 2013 ONSITE REVIEW

Office of Health Care Ombudsman, statutory duties

How To Manage A Company

Medicare Compliance and Fraud, Waste and Abuse Detection and Prevention Program 2015

POLICY SUBJECT: EFFECTIVE DATE: 5/31/2013. To be reviewed at least annually by the Ethics & Compliance Committee COMPLIANCE PLAN OVERVIEW

Compliance Requirements for Healthcare Carriers

STAYING AHEAD OF THE PACK: EMERGING TRENDS & ISSUES WHISTLEBLOWING AFTER DODD-FRANK: A NEW WORLD

Standards of. Conduct. Important Phone Number for Reporting Violations

Matrix for Responsible Expense Practices

Business Impact Analysis

Health Sciences Compliance Plan

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 7029

Office of Personnel Management. Policy Policy Number: Definitions. Communicate: To give a verbal or written report to an appropriate authority.

Corporate Governance Framework

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY COMMISSION

Fraud Prevention and Deterrence

GAO. Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government. Internal Control. United States General Accounting Office.

Metropolitan Jewish Health System and its Participating Agencies and Programs [MJHS]

SUBJECT: BUSINESS ETHICS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE PROGRAM & PLAN (BERCPP)

Arizona State Real Estate Department

Corporate Compliance and Ethics Program Effective as adopted on February 21, 2012

MATTEL, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, INC.

BELMOND LTD. (the "Company") Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

The SEC's New Whistleblower Program: What It Means for Companies and How to Respond. July 22, 2011

February Audit committee performance evaluation

CORPORATE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM

Transcription:

SB 1420, Report to Sunset Office of Compliance and Ethics Phil Wilson, Executive Director Texas Department of Transportation December 2012 1 Submitted in compliance with Transportation Code, Chapter 201, Subchapter F-1

On June 17, 2011, Governor Perry signed Senate Bill (SB) 1420, Texas Department of Transportation s (TxDOT s) sunset legislation. SB 1420 amended Chapter 201 of the Texas Transportation Code to establish a compliance program that includes a compliance office to oversee the program. The specific provisions of Chapter 201, Subchapter F-1 are as follows: The compliance office is responsible for: (1) Acting to prevent and detect serious breaches of departmental policy, fraud, waste and abuse of office, including any acts of criminal conduct within the department; (2) Independently and objectively reviewing, investigating, delegating, and overseeing the investigation of: (A) conduct described by Subdivision (1); (B) criminal activity in the department; (C) allegations of wrongdoing by department employees; (D) crimes committed on department property; and (E) serious breaches of department policy; (3) overseeing the operation of the telephone hotline established under Section 201.211; (4) ensuring that members of the commission and department employees receive appropriate ethics training; and (5) performing other duties assigned to the office by the commission. The Texas Transportation Commission, in response to a recommendation from the Legislature in 2009, selected an independent audit firm, Grant Thornton, LLP, to conduct an organizational review of the entire agency. The final report was delivered to the Texas Transportation Commission on May 26, 2010. Three outside experts, Jay Kimbrough, David Laney, and Howard Wolf, were brought in to serve as the TxDOT Restructure Council (Council). The Council evaluated the Grant Thornton report, as well as other audits and reviews, and presented their report of priorities and recommendations to the Commission on January 5, 2011. The Restructure Council report provided the foundation and focus for the TxDOT Modernization Project. At the direction of the Transportation Commission, the Modernization Leadership Team (MLT) was formed to champion the TxDOT Modernization effort. The team was made up of district engineers and division, office and region directors, this group of diverse leaders were committed to leading this effort. They worked diligently to ensure positive improvements were made and that TxDOT employees and our industry stakeholders and partners were involved along the way. Through TxDOT s modernization effort, a team was created to establish the Office of Compliance and Ethics (OCE). The goal of the Modernization team for OCE was to establish a single point of responsibility to oversee and monitor compliance with all applicable laws. The team members included: the Deputy General Counsel, two District 2

Engineers, Director of Audit, and the Interim Director of the Compliance office, and two subject matter experts. The team collected feedback from customers and stakeholders and catalogued the information into four areas of focus. The categories were: compliance/risk, investigations, reporting, and training. Based upon the needs of TxDOT customers and stakeholders, the team created a staffing profile that involved risk assessment, investigations, and a training plan. This staffing profile is based on the following three components necessary for a compliance office according to the US Sentencing Guidelines. The components in the US Sentencing Guidelines are as follows: compliance risk assessment, investigations, and outreach/training, and reporting. The modernization team provided OCE with a plan for implementation. Compliance Risk Assessment The Compliance Risk Assessment focuses on compliance with the law and TxDOT s ethics policy. The risks are analyzed and ranked according to the probability of occurrence and the operational impacts including but not limited to enforcement consequences, financial, and reputational impacts. Section 201.451 of the Texas Transportation Code provides that, The compliance office is responsible for acting to prevent and detect serious breaches of departmental policy, fraud, waste and abuse of office, including any acts of criminal conduct within the department. To prevent and detect serious breaches of departmental policy, fraud, waste and abuse of office, including any acts of criminal conduct within the office, a department wide compliance risk assessment will be performed every three years. The Director of the Office of Compliance and Ethics and the department Officer of Compliance will identify members of departmental work groups comprised of subject matter experts. The subjects will include the department functions. Each Subject Matter Expert Team (SMET) is constructed of: two to three subject matter experts, one district/region employee, one attorney from OGC, and one auditor. Every three years, a Compliance Risk Assessment (CRA) will be conducted by OCE utilizing the previous CRA, and department audit and performance monitoring pertinent information. The department strategic plan will also be reviewed and incorporated as appropriate. Responsible Divisions and Offices will work with the SMETs to rank the risks in their area of responsibility, and review the current risk controls. The Divisions and Offices will be responsible for any required coordination with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Upon completion of this initial analysis: the Ethics Council will analyze the risks identified by OCE and suggest to Administration a priority for the mitigation of risks. 3

Triage, Assignment and Reporting Plan The Office of Compliance and Ethics (OCE) has statutory oversight of all investigations of complaints alleging fraud, waste and abuse and/or serious violation of department policy. To maintain oversight, procedures for routing all allegations or complaints were created to evaluate, triage, assign, and report complaints. Although all complaints involving employee conduct will be tracked for reporting purposes, only serious violations will be investigated. All complaints received through the hotline/database will be sent to OCE, and OCE will assign for investigation those complaints that allege fraud, waste, and abuse of office or serious breach of department policy, wrongdoing by department employees, criminal conduct within the department, criminal activity in the department or crimes committed on department property. The process of tracking complaints/allegations will be centralized through OCE. Centralizing this process offers the ability to accurately report activity and provide the Agency with a realistic, holistic picture of issues that may impact employee s performance and compliance. The director meets with individual commission members, the Audit subcommittee, the entire commission, and in executive session as needed. The process flow of complaints is represented in Graph 1. 4

Additionally, SB 1420 also requires that, The director of the compliance office shall present to the commission at each regularly scheduled commission meeting at other appropriate times reports of investigations and a summary of information relating to investigations. To comply with this requirement, at each Transportation Commission Meeting, the Director of the Office of Compliance and Ethics presents a monthly report to the Commissioners on the number, type, and outcome of investigations, and any trends and recommendations. Training and Awareness Plan It is critical for each TxDOT employee to understand expected behavior according to the ethical standards as applied to TxDOT. Furthermore, employees must know the implications of failing to follow standard guidelines as it impacts both the agency and the individual. Previous training can be improved to focus on issues that are relevant to different audiences. OCE will restructure the ethics training and compliance awareness to meet the specific needs of individuals at every level of the Agency. Plans include utilizing blended learning options to provide the maximum amount of education with the minimum amount of disruption to the workforce as provided by law. Each employee shall annually affirm the employee s adherence to the department s ethics policy at the time they complete the mandatory annual compliance and ethics training. The Transportation Commission, Administration and Commission Aides will be trained annually in accordance with Minute Order 113355. OCE will coordinate Transportation Commission training. Subject matter experts from the department shall be utilized as presenters. This training shall be updated annually. Outreach and Awareness The training content and the department ethics policy is routinely updated as necessary to ensure content is current. Newsletters for Employees OCE shall provide quarterly newsletters for employees providing information on ethics and compliance topics, and information on where to send questions. Website (TxDOT internet) The content on the TxDOT internet site is routinely updated as necessary to ensure content is current. Website (OCE Crossroads website) The content on the OCE Crossroads website is routinely updated as necessary to ensure content is current. 5

Accomplishments of the Office of Compliance and Ethics (OCE) The Office of Compliance and Ethics created a goal to establish a single point of responsibility to oversee and monitor compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. To achieve this goal, several steps were taken. First, the office needed to be fully staffed. Suzanne Latimer, an attorney with the Office of General Counsel at TxDOT was named the Director for the Office of Compliance and Ethics in December 2011. Suzanne received her Doctor of Jurisprudence from the University of Texas and began her legal career in property law in the Austin area. She left private practice to join public service and has been instrumental in the areas of eminent domain and compliance for TxDOT. At the request of the Texas Transportation Commission and Administration, she researched and developed a compliance program for TxDOT. This program was recognized for Excellence by the Western Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (WASHTO). Recently, Suzanne was TxDOT s nominee for Outstanding Management awarded to Outstanding Women in Texas Government by the State Agency Council to the Governor. A staffing plan was created using the recommendations from the Modernization Team. The office is completely staffed and includes the following: an attorney that handles the Compliance Risk Assessment, an individual that handles Investigations, and an individual that handles Training and Awareness, and an individual that handles Outreach Support. 6

As a newly created office, the Director of the Office of Compliance and Ethics, and the Modernization team created an implementation timeline and established goals that are shown on Graph 2. Compliance Risk Assessment The implementation timeline for Compliance Risk Assessment provided that a compliance risk assessment tool would be developed and communicated and that work groups would be formed by July 2012. The work groups were formed in May and a kick off informational meeting was held on June 4, 2012. The following subject matter work groups were formed: Assets, Contracts, Corporate Governance, Safety, Grant Management, Planning/Programming, Environmental, and Financial. At the beginning of this process, guidance was developed for the work groups to assist them in quantifying the risk. The work groups consisted of an employee from both the Office of General Counsel (OGC) and Audit, two subject matter experts from Austin, and one subject matter expert from the district or region. Attorneys from (OGC) served as group leaders with oversight of each group provided by OCE. Each work group was assigned specific primary functions of the department. The work groups analyzed the quantification of risks concerning both the significance and the probability from a holistic departmentwide perspective. The work groups reviewed the functions and commented on the 7

current controls listed to determine if the current controls adequately eliminated or mitigated the risk. Work groups also reviewed and commented on the proposed actions to mitigate and made suggestions to lower the probability of risks from occurrence. OCE together with OGC prioritized the assigned risks to develop a list of risks to be considered by the Ethics Council. The Ethics Council will coordinate with the Commission Audit Subcommittee and the Administration to develop and deliver to the work groups, the Department Risk Assessment Prioritized List. The prioritized list will then be presented back to the work groups to assist with implementing the mitigation plans. OCE has also been assigned the new role of monitoring legislative implementation for Administration. This role compliments the compliance risk assessment and the mitigation plans with other divisions/offices within the agency. Triage Assignment and Reporting Plan The investigations component of OCE completed the implementation ahead of the initial schedule set forth by the Modernization team. OCE currently coordinates with Audit and OGC and triages all complaints which provide transparency and collaboration on issues. OCE also established procedures for routing all complaints and employees concerns to OCE for documentation and investigation assignment as appropriate. OCE also reviews investigation reports and disciplinary actions, and continues to monitor the TxDOT watch hotline. The data captured by OCE provides holistic communication, analysis and reporting abilities. OCE as directed by the statute reports monthly to the Commission on existing investigations and meets with individual Commissioners on a one on one basis as needed. OCE also reports quarterly to the Audit subcommittee. Training and Awareness Plan The objective of the Outreach section in OCE is to provide the agency and its stakeholder s resources to assist in achieving our goal of reducing unethical behavior. OCE puts together a quarterly newsletter that is made available to all TxDOT employees via the internet. The newsletter has included topics on the following areas: Revolving Door, Gifts, Legislative Session, Ethics Training, Ethics Policy, and OCE department updates. OCE also continues to monitor our office website to ensure that the content is current. To provide outreach and awareness of OCE to the districts, Suzanne Latimer visited several different District Engineers (DE)s and district employees. She attended and presented information about OCE at the Urban DE s meeting in Waco and also visited 8

with the Tyler DE and his district staff. She attended Regional Leadership meetings for the South, East, North, and West regions. Suzanne also presented requested material and represented OCE at a variety of internal conferences such as the Audit Conference. Suzanne and the individual in charge of investigations for OCE also were presented with the opportunity to attend a conference hosted by the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics. The society is a member based organization for compliance professionals. The conference was a unique educational opportunity that provided OCE with the most recent developments in compliance and the latest compliance news. OCE continues to monitor Human Resources changes to New Employee Orientation to ensure that new employees verify ethics policy compliance. OCE developed a facilitation program to accommodate special training requests and provided training material to support Audit s outreach initiatives. OCE also continues to monitor and update training to maintain compliance and provided open records material to update the New Employee Orientation training. As of December 2012, commission training will be completed for Fiscal Year 2013. OCE is also continuing to work on the concept of Compliance Champions with Districts/Divisions/Offices/Regions to develop a mechanism for an effective field presence for OCE. Conclusion OCE s goal is to provide due diligence and the promotion of the desired organizational culture as stated in the statutory requirements and the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Meeting this goal will position TxDOT as a leader in ethical organizational behavior which will translate well in the event that an ethical issue arises. 9