CONSULTATION PAPER Insurance (Fees) Regulations 2013 Registered Schemes Administrators (Fees) Order 2013 This document is relevant to all entities regulated by the Insurance and Pensions Authority under the Insurance Act 2008 and the Retirement Benefits Schemes Act 2000. Issue date: 7 December 2012 Closing Date: 21 January 2013 2013 Fee Consultation Page 1 of 17
Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 3 2 Background... 3 3 Current financial and statistical information... 4 4 Cost benefit analysis... 5 4.1 Developing the framework in a manner consistent with the ICPs... 5 4.2 Alternative strategy maintain existing framework without further development... 6 5 Proposal... 6 5.1 Overview... 7 5.2 Life insurers... 7 5.3 General insurers... 8 5.4 Insurance managers... 8 5.5 Insurance intermediaries... 9 5.6 Permit holders... 9 5.7 Pension scheme administrators... 9 5.8 Impact... 9 5.9 One-off levy in 2014/15... 10 6 Comments and Timing... 12 7 Contact... 12 Appendix I Proposed annual fees... 14 Appendix II - Proposed application fees for authorisation / registration... 15 Appendix III Jursidiction comparison in respect of life assurance... 16 2013 Fee Consultation Page 2 of 17
1 Introduction The Insurance and Pensions Authority has drafted the Insurance (Fees) Regulations 2013 and the Registered Schemes Administrators (Fees) Order 2013. A copy of the draft Regulations and Order are attached as appendices to this document and comments are invited from interested parties. The purpose of the attached proposals is to prescribe, with effect from April 2013 onwards, the annual fees charged to entities regulated by the Insurance and Pensions Authority under the Insurance Act 2008 and the Retirement Benefits Schemes Act 2000. The proposed fee increases reflect the need to continue to develop the Island s regulatory framework in order for it to meet the international standards to which it is committed. In addition, this paper sets out, for early consideration by interested parties, the Authority s proposal to apply a one-off levy on 1 April 2014 and invites comments from interested parties as to how this levy should be applied. 2 Background The insurance regulatory framework of the Isle of Man is set out in the Insurance Act 2008. In line with Government s stated policy, that the Island s regulatory frameworks for financial services continue to be able to demonstrate a high degree of compliance with applicable international standards, the form and application of this Act and its associated regulations and guidance are assessed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) under the Financial Sector Assessment Programme, through a rolling cycle of assessment. The continued endorsement by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) of the Island s framework for insurance supervision is important, not only to the Island s reputation as a responsible international jurisdiction but also for both the insurance and pensions sectors to be able to maintain market share and position themselves for continued and sustained growth in the future. The Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) issued by the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) are the international standards against which the insurance framework of the Island will be assessed by the IMF as part of its ongoing Financial Sector Assessment Programme. In October 2011, the IAIS adopted updated ICPs and these revised standards represent a significant enhancement of the previous framework. Under the new ICPs insurance regulatory standards will be expected to move fully to a framework which has more sophisticated risk based capital and solvency requirements and which will evidence the IAIS objectives of transparency and comparability. In the light of this, during the past year the Authority has undertaken a comprehensive gap analysis of its framework against the revised ICPs and is in the process of producing a detailed roadmap which will set out the development and work schedule planned over the next three to five years to enhance the Authority s framework in line with these new standards of regulatory best practice. In June 2012, as part of the Isle of Man Government s budgetary planning process, the Authority submitted budget proposals to Treasury. This budget included the anticipated cost of: 2013 Fee Consultation Page 3 of 17
a) implementing the changes necessary to ensure continued compliance against the revised international standards for effective insurance supervision; b) implementing the changes necessary to ensure continued compliance against the revised international standards for AML/CFT; c) the review and development of the existing pensions legislative framework; d) the development and implementation of a supervisory support and management information system. To achieve the above, the Authority anticipates that its expenditure base will increase by a cumulative total of 1.9m over the next three to four years. This consultation paper sets out the current financial position of the Authority, the rationale for the decision to undertake this development programme, the basis on which the Authority will seek to fund this additional cost, together with an understanding of the projected income and expenditure of the Authority on completion of the planned developments. 3 Current financial and statistical information The income and expenditure account for the Authority for the year ended 31 March 2012 is set out below: 2011/12 Actual 000 Fee Income Authorised insurers life 280 Authorised insurers non life 596 Insurance managers 55 Insurance permit holders 31 General insurance intermediaries 36 Pension scheme administrators 69 1,066 Operating costs 1,284 Contribution from general revenue (218) The above financial position shows that the expenditure base of the Authority for 2011/12 was financed from contributions from the following stakeholders: Contribution from: General insurers 46.4% Life insurers 21.8% Government general revenue contribution 17.0% Pension scheme administrators 5.4% Managers 4.2% Intermediaries 2.8% Permit holders 2.4% 2013 Fee Consultation Page 4 of 17
4 Cost benefit analysis The consideration of sophisticated techniques for risk based capital and solvency assessment has been under development for many years now. The European Union has been working towards its new regulatory regime, Solvency II, and the IAIS has been working towards updating its international standards for effective supervision of insurance entities and their groups. These standards were issued in October 2011. The Authority believes that the challenge facing the Island is to develop a revised regulatory framework which addresses current international standards and, at the same time, remains proportionate to the risks inherent in the Island s insurance industry and thereby avoids placing any unnecessary regulatory burdens on licenceholders. This is a demanding and complex task, with sometimes competing demands, which will require extensive interaction between the Authority and the market to devise and implement what is anticipated to be the most significant update of the Island s dedicated insurance framework since the introduction of the Insurance Act in 1986. Whilst this challenge exists, it is important to note that the need for this development is essential, and the Authority believes that the benefits outweigh the associated cost of development. These are considered further below. 4.1 Developing the framework in a manner consistent with the ICPs As detailed above, the continued assessment by the IMF of a high degree of compliance against the ICPs is imperative to the survival and future growth of the Island s insurance industry. These revised ICPs introduce significant enhancements to the risk based capital and solvency assessment regimes expected together with the introduction of detailed requirements to assist in the effective supervision of insurance groups and more detailed and extensive disclosures to provide greater transparency to policyholders, investors and beneficiaries of insurance contracts. As detailed in section 1 above, the Authority has undertaken a comprehensive gap analysis of the Island s existing insurance framework against the revised ICPs. Utilising this gap analysis, the Authority has been able to identify and evaluate the work required to deliver a framework that is capable of complying with these enhanced standards but which is applied in a proportionate manner recognising the differing needs of each sector. The Authority is currently working towards the publication of a detailed roadmap in mid 2013, which will set out the rationale for the proposed changes, the main components of the project, the overall approach and anticipated key milestones planned over the next three to four years. This extensive programme of work will not only deliver necessary enhancements to the insurance framework without compromising the Authority s ability to react quickly to new market developments, but will also enable it to develop and implement a new data management and support system to ensure it to work in a coordinated and efficient manner. Thereby delivering real value across all sectors supervised by the Authority by enabling electronic returns, risk and data analysis and statistical reporting for both internal and external use. In addition, the development plans of the Authority incorporate a review of international developments in the pensions industry in conjunction with a detailed consideration of the Retirement 2013 Fee Consultation Page 5 of 17
Benefits Schemes Act 2000 to ensure that regulatory changes are implemented where it is appropriate to do so. In order to achieve this work the Authority estimates that its expenditure base will increase by a cumulative total of 1.9m over the next three to four years and proposes to fund this additional expenditure from a combination of increments applied to the annual fees to regulated entities, a oneoff levy to be applied in 2014 together with a proportional increase of contribution being supplied by central government as described in more detail in section 5 below. 4.2 Consideration of maintaining the existing framework without further development In arriving at its decision to develop the framework in a manner consistent with the ICPs, the Authority did consider other options available to it, including the scenario where the Authority maintains the existing framework and does not seek to enhance it in line with the revised ICPs. Whilst this scenario sees negligible investment required by both the Authority and industry as the framework in place is already well established, the risks associated with this strategy are considerable. Further, this alternative strategy is inconsistent with both Government s stated policy and objectives and the Authority s own statutory objectives of policyholder protection, the protection of the Island s reputation, and the reduction to the extent possible of the risk of the Island s insurance and pensions sectors being used for financial crime. Risks: In the absence of further development of the regulatory standards applied, any future IMF report in respect of the regulatory framework in place in the Isle of Man will be likely to conclude that there has been a significant reduction in the level of compliance against international standards in respect of insurance supervision and AML/CFT. The potential for the loss of confidence in the Island as a responsible international jurisdiction will increase with the resultant wider impact on the Island s economy, including the attractiveness of the Island s pension s proposition. Legitimate and profitable business opportunities for Isle of Man insurers may become more difficult as competitors from compliant jurisdictions find it easier to demonstrate the level of consumer protection afforded by the solvency regime adopted. Large international groups with insurance subsidiaries on the Isle of Man may seek to redeploy resources to group entities operating in more compliant jurisdictions, potentially resulting in falling investment, funds under management and employee numbers. Over time it is likely that licenceholder numbers will fall resulting in lower fee income and a consequent increase in the contribution required from Government. 5 Proposal 2013 Fee Consultation Page 6 of 17
5.1 Overview The Authority proposes to apply an increase to the annual fees of each regulated entity as detailed in appendix 1. These fee increases are considered in greater detail in the relevant section for each segment of the sector below and are set out in the attached draft Insurance (Fees) Regulations 2013 and draft Registered Schemes Administrators (Fees) Order 2013, which if approved will come into effect on 1 April 2013. In addition to the annual fees, the Authority intends to apply a one off levy across the insurance sector on 1 April 2014. It is anticipated that this levy will raise an additional 765,000 in 2014/15 and is considered in greater detail in section 5.9 below. It is important to understand that this consultation is concerned with two inter-related but separate proposals: a) The consultation necessary to understand stakeholder views and the potential impact on industry and other stakeholders of the proposed increases to the annual fees applied to regulated entities as set out in appendix 1 and the draft Insurance (Fees) Regulations 2013 and draft Registered Schemes Administrators (Fees) Order 2013, which if approved will come into effect on 1 April 2013. b) To obtain the early views and comments of industry and other interested stakeholders of the proposed one off levy to be applied across the insurance industry on 1 April 2014. These views and comments will be considered by the Authority and where appropriate taken into consideration when drafting the proposed Insurance (Additional Levy) Regulations 2014. These regulations will be the subject of a further consultation in due course. 5.2 Life insurers In developing this proposal the Authority has considered the existing contribution made by each segment of the sector. Section 3 above provided information in respect of how the expenditure base of the Authority in respect of 2011/12 was financed and showed that the contribution from the life sector was 21.8% as compared to the general sector which contributed 46.4%. This split reflects, in part, the differential in licenceholder numbers across these segments where the number of life assurers as at 30 September 2012 is 16 (this has reduced by one in October due to consolidation) whereas the general sector totals 125 authorised insurers, consisting mainly of captive insurers. The Authority has also taken into account the profitability of each sector, the fees applied in competitive jurisdictions in respect of life assurance (see appendix 3), and the relative contribution of each sector to the economy of the Isle of Man. It has also taken into account the likely benefits to the various sectors of the updated framework in comparison with the impact of maintaining the status quo. Based on the above considerations, it is proposed by the Authority to stratify the application of annual fees across the life sector based on funds under management, as detailed in the table below. This proposal is preferred to premium income as it reflects the largely unit linked nature of the industry and 2013 Fee Consultation Page 7 of 17
the normal relationship between profitability of a unit linked business being directly attributable to the size of the funds under management. Funds under management at 31 December 2012: 2012 2013 Annual fee Annual fee (proposed) 1 billion or greater 19,000 50,000 Less than 1 billion 19,000 25,000 Similar increases are proposed to the life core and cells of ICC and PCC structures as set out in more detail in the appendix and draft regulations. 5.3 General insurers As detailed in section 5.2 above in developing these proposals the Authority has considered the profitability of each sector, the fees applied in competitive jurisdictions in respect of life assurance (see appendix 3), and the relative contribution of each sector to the economy of the Isle of Man. It has also taken into account the likely benefits to the various sectors of the updated framework in comparison with the impact of maintaining the status quo. Based on these considerations, and in recognition that this category consists mainly of insurers in the captive sector it is proposed to apply marginal increases to the existing fee levels in respect of authorised insurers in the non life sector to take the annual fee applied from 4,600 in 2012 to 4,750 in 2013. Similar increases are proposed to the non life core and cells of ICC and PCC structures as set out in more detail in the appendix and draft regulations. 5.4 Insurance managers Similarly, it is proposed to apply marginal increases to the existing fees for insurance managers, retaining the existing stratification to fees based on the number of insurers managed by the entity as follows: Number of insurers managed by the manager: 2012 2013 Annual fee Annual fee (proposed) Less than 2 2,000 2,080 Less than 5 2,500 2,600 5 or more 4,250 4,420 2013 Fee Consultation Page 8 of 17
5.5 Insurance intermediaries There is a minimum cost associated with the supervision of entities in the regulated sector. Insurance intermediaries, in common with most regulated entities are required to submit annual reports and information, which provide the Authority with the data it needs to assess the continued registered status of the entity concerned. In addition, off site analysis and a programme of on site inspections contribute to the cost of effective regulation necessary to provide an appropriate level of protection to Isle of Man consumers and the international reputation of the Island. Based on the above considerations, and taking into account the fees charged by competitive jurisdictions after adjusting for the fees that might be applied by the Isle of Man Financial Supervision Commission ( FSC ) for investment related advisory regulated activities, the Authority proposes to increase the fee payable by general insurance intermediaries in 2013 to 2,080. 5.6 Permit holders In recognition of the role of the Authority as host regulator in the supervision of permit holders it is proposed to apply marginal increases to the existing fees in respect of permit holders to reflect the impact of inflation, taking the proposed fees for EU permit holders to 1,700 and for non EU permit holders to 4,750. 5.7 Pension scheme administrators In setting the level of fees to be applied to professional schemes administrators the Authority has given due consideration to the continued growth of this sector and level of supervisory activity necessary to regulate it. Consideration is also given to the degree of activity anticipated over the development period in the review and possible enhancements to the framework in place. In addition, reference has been made to the level of supervisory fees applied by the FSC to trust service providers who act as trust corporations. In the light of the above considerations, it is proposed to increase the level of fees payable by professional pension scheme administrators to 4,000. 5.8 Impact The impact of the proposed annual fee increases on the relative contribution towards costs is considered in the income and expenditure account below which considers the anticipated fee income and the expenditure of the Authority following conclusion and implementation of the proposed enhanced framework and associated development costs. 2013 Fee Consultation Page 9 of 17
2011/12 Post development Actual Forecast 000 000 Fee Income Authorised insurers life 280 590 Authorised insurers non life 596 616 Insurance managers 55 63 Insurance permit holders 31 42 General insurance intermediaries 36 70 Pension scheme administrators 69 114 1,066 1,495 Operating costs 1,195* 1,831 Contribution from general revenue (129) (336) * In 2012 the Authority transferred responsibility for the maintenance and rental of the office space utilised by the Authority to the Department of Infrastructure Properties Division. To ensure comparability the operating costs for 2011/12 have been adjusted accordingly. The above financial position shows that the anticipated expenditure base of the Authority post development to be financed from contributions from the following stakeholders: Contribution from: 2011/12 Post (Adjusted) development General insurers 49.9% 33.6% Life insurers 23.4% 32.2% Government general revenue contribution 10.8% 18.4% Pension scheme administrators 5.8% 6.2% Managers 4.6% 3.4% Intermediaries 3.0% 3.8% Permit holders 2.6% 2.3% 5.9 One-off levy in 2014/15 As detailed above the Authority believes that it is appropriate for the ongoing fee structure to remain competitive so as not to deter new entrants and to help retain existing businesses within the Island. Consistent with this and to ensure that increases to the recurring annual regulatory fee are kept to an acceptable level, it is proposed that 765,000 of the cost of development be met from a one-off levy to be applied to applicable licenceholders on 1 April 2014. The purpose of this section of the consultation is to receive the views of respondents as to how the 765,000 levy should be applied across the industry. It is important to understand that this levy will not be applied until 2014, and respondents will have a further opportunity to respond in consultation to the proposed fee in the 2014 fee consultations. The following represents a number of options available to the Authority in the application of this levy across the sectors: 2013 Fee Consultation Page 10 of 17
a) The fee is applied across the life and general sectors only, to reflect the likely benefits which those sectors will derive from a modern, forward-looking regulatory framework that contributes to the maintenance of the Isle of Man s reputation as a responsible international financial services centre. At this stage of our considerations, this option is the preferred option of the Authority with the following one off levy being proposed: Authorised insurers life FUM > 1 bn 50,000 FUM < 1 bn 25,000 Authorised insurers non life nil Insurance Managers 1 insurer nil Less than 5 insurers 12,500 5 or more insurers 25,000 b) The fee is applied across all licenceholders, resulting in a lower attributable cost across all entities. However, it does not necessarily reflect the capacity of each segment to meet those increases nor the proportional benefit that may accrue to the individual licenceholders as a result of enhancing the framework. c) A combination of the above options whereby authorised insurers in the general sector also contribute thereby reducing the level of fees to be applied across managers and life companies. Consideration may also be given to whether the inclusion of general insurers in the proposed levy should be restricted to third party writers including the reinsurance entities of third party risks. d) Interested parties may consider an alternative option is preferable to each of the options outlined above. To bring about the legislative and regulatory changes detailed previously in this document the Authority must identify the means to fund the associated development costs. As detailed above, it is proposed to fund this additional expenditure from a combination of increments applied to the annual fees to regulated entities together with a proportional increase of contribution being supplied by central government. However, further additional funding of 765,000 is required and it is proposed to raise this by levy. The Authority believes that option a) provides the most equitable method of spreading this cost across the insurance industry and is interested in receiving the views and comments of industry and other interested stakeholders to this proposal. Which of the above options do respondents feel should be applied when determining who should meet the required one off levy? In responding please provide: i) an explanation of your choice; 2013 Fee Consultation Page 11 of 17
ii) consideration as to the potential impact and possible benefits of your choice on each regulated entity type and the overall economy of the Island. To assist stakeholders to consider the options available, the following table provides a summary of registrations as at 30 September 2012, of entities regulated by the Authority: Summary of Registrations 30-9-12 FUM no. > 7.5b > 5b > 1b > 500m < 500m Authorised Insurers - Life 16 2 4 2 3 5 Authorised Insurers - Non Life 125 - - - 2 123 Permitted insurers 15 No. of insurers >4 <5 <2 Insurance Managers 22 6 5 11 General insurance intermediaries 33 Professional schemes administrators 26 In-house scheme administrators 41 International schemes 384 Domestic schemes 780 6 Comments and Timing The Authority invites comments on the proposed Regulations by 21 st January 2013, though earlier submission would be welcome. Respondents are encouraged to provide evidence and/or reasoning, where appropriate, to support their responses. The Authority will seek to respond to any comments or questions as soon as is practicable following their receipt. Respondents must please identify themselves and provide contact details with their submissions. Please note that anonymous submissions will be disregarded. A summary of responses will be posted on the Authority s website at http://www.gov.im/ipa/insurance/regulations/consultativedocuments.xml. However, the summary will not name respondents. Please note that, whilst the Authority will give careful consideration to all responses received, a response to this consultation does not guarantee a change to the proposed Regulations. 7 Contact Any questions or correspondence on this should be addressed in the first instance to: 2013 Fee Consultation Page 12 of 17
Francesca Signorio-Hooper The Insurance and Pensions Authority Ground Floor Finch Hill House Bucks Road Douglas Isle of Man IM1 3DF Email: francesca.hooper@ipa.gov.im 2013 Fee Consultation Page 13 of 17
Appendix I Proposed annual fees Proposed annual fees Current Proposed Authorised Life / PCC ICC core / cell - Life FUM > 1bn 19,000 50,000 Authorised Life / PCC ICC core / cell - Life FUM < 1bn 19,000 25,000 Authorised insurer Non Life / PCC ICC core - non life 4,600 4,750 PCC ICC cell - non life 540-4,600 560-4,750 PCC cell dormant 110 115 PCC cell non life Max aggregate 27,000 27,900 Permit holder incl. PCC core or life cell Non EU 4,600 4,750 Permit holder - non life cell Non EU 540-4,600 560-4,750 Permit holder - PCC cell dormant Non EU 110 115 Permit holder - PCC cell non life Non EU Max aggregate 27,000 27,900 Permit holder EU 1,650 1,700 Intermediary 1,400 2,080 Insurance manager One insurer 2,000 2,080 Insurance manager <5 2,500 2,600 Insurance manager >4 4,250 4,420 RBS Administrator - in house 270 280 RBS Administrator - professional 3,500 4,000 * - The fee for a non-life cell is calculated based on the level of premiums written by the cell. 2013 Fee Consultation Page 14 of 17
Appendix II - Proposed application fees for authorisation / registration The following increases are proposed in respect of the fees charged on application for authorisation or registration: Current Proposed Authorisation Fee Authorised life 3,800 3,875 Authorised non-life 2,170 2,210 PCC/ICC core 2,170 2,210 PCC/ICC cell 1,085 1,110 Permit holder EU 1,085 1,110 Permit holder non EU 2,170 2,210 Permit holder non EU PCC 2,170 2,210 Insurance manager 2,170 2,210 RBS Administrator - in house 100 100 RBS Administrator - professional 2170 2,210 2013 Fee Consultation Page 15 of 17
Appendix III Jursidiction comparison in respect of life assurance Looking at the following relevant key competitor jurisdictions for the life industry annual fees are currently set according to a varying criteria as follows: Dubai: Guernsey: Hong Kong: Ireland: The Dubai Financial Services Authority apply a flat rate fee of US$40,000 in respect of non captive insurers. The Guernsey Financial Supervision Commission applies fees to life assurers based on policyholder liabilities. Using the criteria specified under Guernsey s proposed fees for 2012, all Isle of Man life companies, bar one, would be paying the maximum fee of 20,325. The Hong Kong Office of the Commissioner of Insurance currently apply a flat rate fee of HK$227,300 in respect of life insurers. Under current proposals to create an self funding independent Insurance Authority 1 fees will increase to a flat fee of HK$300,000 plus a 0.0039% of Technical liabilities plus a a levy of 0.1% on premiums of all insurance policies. Using the 2011 annual statements and applying the same basis we estimate that seven Isle of Man insurers will pay over 100,000, four in excess of 50,000 with the remainder all paying in excess of 25,000. Under the current basis of fee levy the Central Bank of Ireland charges insurers a flat rate fee of 10,000 plus a fee of 0.007642% of premium income. In addition to that a consumer levy is applied on premiums written on Irish risks. For the purposes of this comparison the consumer levy is discounted. On this basis five Isle of Man insurers would pay in excess of 50,000, a further four would pay in excess of 25,000 and the remaining would pay less than 25,000. The CBI has recently issued for consultation a paper 2 which proposes changing the methodology of fee calculations to one that considers the impact in the event of failure (it does not consider the risk of failure in this context). The higher the impact the greater the fees chargeable. The impact metrics used in the life sector are 3, required solvency margin, gross reserves, total assets, total liabilities and annual premium equivalent. The CBI currently assesses that this will result in fees being chargeable in the range of 1.3m for a ultra-high impact insurer (including non life) to 9,361 to a low impact insurer according to the following table: Ultra high 1,313,240 High 599,166 Medium High 136,249 Medium Low 27,086 Low 9,361 1 Key legislative proposals on establishment of an independent insurance authority ( IIA ) issued by the Financial Services and Treasury Bureau October 2012 2 CP61 issued by the Central Bank of Ireland 20 November 2012 3 PRISM explained issued by the CBI November 2011 2013 Fee Consultation Page 16 of 17
Luxembourg The base fee applied by the Commissariat aux Assurances to insurers in Luxembourg is based on premium income, except where the technical reserves exceed 10 times the premiums where the fee is calculated by reference to one tenth of the technical reserves. Applying the basis of calculation to Isle of Man life companies nine companies would pay a fee of between 25,000 and 46,000, with remainder paying a fee of 8,300 or more. Malta: UK: Annual fees payable to the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) in respect of a life assurance company are calculated by reference to gross premiums as shown in the annual financial statements. Using the 2011 financial statements of Isle of Man assurers, we consider that utilising the same basis, in 2012 nine insurers would pay an equivalent fee of just over 31,000 pa, three insurers 23,000 and the remaining would pay 12,500 or less. The Financial Services Authority in the UK currently charges fees to life assurers with reference to adjusted annual gross premium income 4 (AGPI) and mathematical reserves (MR) as follows: 806.72 per million of AGPI plus a Solvency II adjustment of between 68.13 and 137.16 per million of AGPI Plus 17.73 per million of MR plus a Solvency II adjustment of between 1.44 and 2.96 per million of MR On this basis and applying similar rules to the 2011 financial statements of Isle of Man assurers, in 2012 three insurers would have paid in excess of 1m, two in excess of 500,000, five over 100,000 and two in excess of 50,000 in fees before applying the adjustment for Solvency II. 4 Amount of new regular premium business (yearly premiums including reassurances ceded but excluding cancellations and reassurances accepted), times ten; plus amounts of new single premium business (total including reassurances ceded but excluding cancellations and reassurances accepted). Group protection business (life and private health insurance) must be included; less premiums relating to pension fund management; less premiums relating to Trustee Investment Plans. 2013 Fee Consultation Page 17 of 17