Award FINRA Dispute Resolution



Similar documents
Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

AWARD FINRA Dispute Resolution. vs. Case Number: Hearing Site: Cincinnati, Ohio Names of Respondents NATURE OF THE DISPUTE

Award NASD Regulation, Inc.

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: Los Angeles, California Citi Bank, NA Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.

Law Offices of I.M. Tagaropulos, P.C., located in Houston, Texas.

ARIAS U.S. STREAMLINED RULES FOR SMALL CLAIM DISPUTES

September 12, 2014 Edition. FINRA Dispute Resolution Party s Reference Guide

S.B th General Assembly (As Introduced)

August 19, Final Decision and Order STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

How To Settle A Class Action Lawsuit Against Jimmy Johns

Storm Damage Arbitration Agreement ADR Systems File # xxxxxxxxx Insurance Claim # xxxxxxxxxx

HOME WARRANTY COMPANY ARBITRATION RULES AND PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS March 15, 2016 Copyright by CDRS 2006 all rights reserved

* Each Will Comply With LR IA 10 2 Within 45 days Attorneys for Plaintiff, Goldman, Sachs & Co.

Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS

ASARCO ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

TRONOX TORT CLAIMS TRUST. Individual Review and Arbitration Procedures for Category A and Category D Personal Injury Claims

State of California Department of Corporations

FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS

STEPHEN S. EDWARDS, individually and as Trustee of the Super Trust Fund, u/t/d June 15, 2001, Plaintiff/Appellant,

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL GENERAL RELEASE. This Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release ( Agreement ) is entered into

Case 1:13-cv LGS Document 131 Filed 06/24/15 Page 1 of 14 ) ) ) ) ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE: STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT LITIGATION

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.

COMMON LAW DIRECT ACTION SETTLEMENT FUND CLAIM FORM

SOLICITATION AGREEMENT

BMA ADVISORS, LLC Investment Advisory Agreement

HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY POLICY REIMBURSEMENT FORM DEFINITIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. to herein individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties." RECITALS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

PETITION TO ARBITRATE A FEE DISPUTE (Client Attorney Petition)

COMBUSTION ENGINEERING 524(g) ASBESTOS PI TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES

TABLE OF CONTENTS Arbitration of Extended Warranty Contracts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

ELMWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION V. CITY OF BERKELEY ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. RG MUTUAL RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL. Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i

State of California Department of Business Oversight

New Jersey No-Fault PIP Arbitration Rules (2013)

Title 31 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND JEFF SCHMIDT

How To Process A Small Claims Case In Anarizonia

PARRY G. CAMERON, Senior Attorney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants, Nominal Defendant.

CHAPTER 6 ARBITRATION

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS PROCEDURAL RULES FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION HEARINGS

TITLE 18 INSURANCE DELAWARE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Consumer Rights. 901 Arbitration of Automobile and Homeowners' Insurance Claims

HOME WARRANTY COMPANY ARBITRATION RULES AND PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS JANUARY 1, 2007 Copyright by CDRS 2006 all rights reserved

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

NO. 14-B-0619 IN RE: DAVID P. BUEHLER ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

AAA Reference No AMENDED ARBITRATION DEMAND. Claimant, COVENANT DEBT SOLUTIONS, a California corporation, Respondent.

Case3:09-md MMC Document345 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 7

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 20, 2014 Session

Case 3:11-cv RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 HOUSE DRH11149-TG-5 (12/01) Short Title: Tort Reform Act of (Public)

CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE GARNISHMENT CHAPTER 77

Case 2:10-cv CW Document 90 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE. Part I: Parties. This Settlement Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into by and between the State of

MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY. Appearing on behalf of the Named Plaintiff and the Class were attorneys Daniel P.

The Non-Lawyers Guide to Hearings before the State Engineer

Case 3:09-cv MMH-JRK Document 33 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

State of California - Department of Corporations

MASSACHUSETTS CUSTOMIZED PRACTICE COVERAGE TITLE INSURANCE AGENT LIABILITY COVERAGE UNIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

APPLICATION TO THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY BAR/ INDIGENT DEFENSE PANEL (IDP)

2014 IL App (1st) U. No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Milwaukee Bar Association Fee Arbitration

A M SA HOUSEHOL D GOOD S DISPUT E SET TLEMENT P R O G R A M

SUMMARY OF CHANGES COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES

July 19, Sent Via to: XXXXX. Re: Letter Agreement for Legal Services. Dear XXXXX:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

TO: ALL PERSONS AND BUSINESSES WITH A VERIZON.NET ADDRESS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Case4:13-cv SBA Document40 Filed10/14/14 Page1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION

CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION SERVICES AGREEMENT

trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations.

PENNSYLVANIA BUILDERS ASSOCIATION INSTRUCTIONS TO HOME IMPROVEMENT MODEL CONTRACT STANDARD FORM Introduction

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT BAUER V. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. CASE NO. BC375017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT

FILED THE HONORABLE MARY YU HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING

ATTACHMENT A TO PLAN EXHIBIT B THE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES

RULES OF GOVERNOR S OFFICE OF CONSUMER PROTECTION GEORGIA LEMON LAW ACT OF Chapter Georgia Lemon Law Administration

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. This Settlement and Release Agreement ("Agreement") is made as of this

Case 2:10-cv IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

Accounting and Related Services Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. In re: JEFFERY W. POTTER, No MS

How To Get A $1,000 Filing Fee From A Bankruptcy Filing Fee In Arkansas

Case 2:06-cv SMM Document 17 Filed 04/13/07 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

RECONSIDERATION AND NOTICE OF 8 INTENTION TO ISSUE SANCTIONS Defendant. (LABOR CODE 5813) 9

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/17/2014

Terms Completed. ORDER SUMMARY Case Number: C

Directors & officers (D&O) liability insurance claims scenarios

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Claimant Irving J. Nast Case Number: 14-00029 vs. Respondents Equities Trading Corporation Global Arena Capital Corp. Brian Joseph Hagerman Joseph Gunnar & Co., LLC John Scott Matthews Hearing Site: Los Angeles, California Nature of the Dispute: Customer vs. Members and Associated Persons This case was decided by an all-public panel. REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES For Claimant Irving J. Nast ("Claimant"): Marc I. Zussman, Esq., Law Offices of Marc I. Zussman, Los Angeles, California. For Respondent Joseph Gunnar & Co., LLC ("Joseph Gunnar"): John E. Lawlor, Esq., The Law Offices of John E. Lawlor, Esq., Mineola, New York. For Respondents Equities Trading Corporation ("Equities Trading"), Global Arena Capital Corp. ("Global Arena"), Brian Joseph Hagerman ("Hagerman"), and John Scott Matthews ("Matthews"): Ronald S. Herzog, Esq., LeClairRyan, New York, New York. Hereinafter, Respondents Joseph Gunnar, Equities Trading, Global Arena, Hagerman, and Matthews are collectively referred to as "Respondents." CASE INFORMATION Statement of Claim filed on or about: January 3, 2014. Claimant signed the Submission Agreement: December 27, 2013. Statement of Answer filed by Respondent Joseph Gunnar on or about: March 5, 2014. Statement of Answer filed by Respondents Equities Trading, Global Arena, Hagerman, and Matthews on or about: March 5, 2014.

Award Page 2 of 6 Joseph Gunnar signed the Submission Agreement: February 28, 2014. Equities Trading signed the Submission Agreement: March 21, 2014. Global Arena signed the Submission Agreement: March 21, 2014. Hagerman signed the Submission Agreement: March 21, 2014. Matthews signed the Submission Agreement: March 21, 2014. CASE SUMMARY Claimant asserted the following causes of action: fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, elder abuse, violation of unfair business practices, and violation of federal/state securities laws and FINRA conduct rules. The causes of action relate to Claimant's investments in allegedly unsuitable, high risk equities and private placement offerings, including but not limited to. Access Integrated Technologies, Dryships, Advance Blast, and Global Arena Holding Corp. Unless specifically admitted in its Answer, Respondent Joseph Gunnar denied the allegations made in the Statement of Claim and asserted various affirmative defenses. Unless specifically admitted in their Answer, Respondents Equities Trading, Global Arena, Hagerman, and Matthews denied the allegations made in the Statement of Claim and asserted various affirmative defenses. RELIEF REQUESTED In the Statement of Claim, Claimant requested: 1. Rescission and restitution, or in the alternative, compensatory damages in the amount of at least $452,000.00; 2. Treble damages, attorneys' fees, and costs for elder abuse, pursuant to California Civil Code Section 3345 and California Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15657.5; 3. Lost opportunity costs, the amount to be established at the arbitration hearing, which will show how a well-managed portfolio for Claimant would have performed; 4. Disgorgement of profits Respondents generated from Claimant's accounts, in an amount according to proof, but not less than the total commissions and fees; 5. Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the applicable legal rate; 6. Attorneys' fees, expert fees, and costs; 7. Punitive damages in an amount according to proof; and 8. Other and further relief the Panel deems just and proper. Respondent Joseph Gunnar requested that the Statement of Claim be dismissed in its entirety because Claimant has failed to state any claim against Respondent Joseph Gunnar upon which relief can be granted and because Claimant has failed to allege any actionable damages that are proximately, or causally, related to Respondent Joseph

Award Page 3 of 6 Gunnar. Respondents Equities Trading, Global Arena, Hagerman, and Matthews requested that, after the hearing on the merits, this matter be dismissed with prejudice with all costs and fees charged to the Claimant, and any other relief the Panel deems just and proper. At the close of the hearing. Claimant requested interest in the amount of $117,470.00 as part of an alternative damage claim, treble damages against Joseph Gunnar in the amount of $300,807.00, treble damages against Respondents Equities Trading, Global Arena, Hagerman, and Matthews in the amount of $1,078,041.00, and attorneys' fees in the amount of $208,000.00. OTHER ISSUES CONSIDERED AND DECIDED The Arbitrators acknowledge that they have each read the pleadings and other materials filed by the parties. After the conclusion of Claimant's case-in-chief. Respondents Equities Trading, Global Arena, Hagerman, and Matthews moved to dismiss the claims asserted against them. Claimant opposed the request. The Panel denied the motion to dismiss finding Respondents Equities Trading, Global Arena, Hagerman, and Matthews failed to present reasons why the case should be dismissed. The parties have agreed that the Award in this matter may be executed in counterpart copies or that a handwritten, signed Award may be entered. AWARD After considering the pleadings, the testimony and evidence presented at the hearing, the Panel has decided in full and final resolution of the issues submitted for determination as follows: 1. Claimant's claims are denied in their entirety. 2. Any and all relief not specifically addressed herein, including punitive and treble damages, is denied. FEES Pursuant to the Code, the following fees are assessed: Filing Fees FINRA Dispute Resolution assessed a filing fee* for each claim: Initial Claim Filing Fee =$ 1,800.00 *The filing fee is made up of a non-refundable and a refundable portion.

Award Page 4 of 6 Member Fees Member fees are assessed to each member firm that is a party in these proceedings or to the member firm(s) that employed the associated person(s) at the time of the event(s) giving rise to the dispute. Accordingly, as parties. Global Arena Capital Corp. and Joseph Gunnar & Co., LLC are assessed the following: Global Arena Capital Corp. Member Surcharge =$ 2,800.00 Pre-Hearing Processing Fee =$ 750.00 Hearing Processing Fee =$ 5,000.00 Joseph Gunnar & Co., LLC Member Surcharge =$ 2,800.00 Pre-Hearing Processing Fee =$ 750.00 Hearing Processing Fee =$ 5,000.00 Adiournment Fees Adjournments granted during these proceedings for which fees were assessed: January 5-9, 2015, adjournment by parties = waived June 1-5, 2015, adjournment by parties = $1,200.00 The Panel has assessed $1,200.00 of the adjournment fees jointly and severally to Respondents. Three-Day Cancellation Fees Fees apply when a hearing on the merits is postponed or settled within three business days before the start of a scheduled hearing session: June 1-5, 2015, adjournment by parties = $200.00 The Panel has assessed $200.00 of the three-day cancellation fees jointly and severally to Respondents. Discovery-Related Motion Fees Fees apply for each decision rendered on a discovery-related motion. One (1) Decision on a discovery-related motion on the papers with one arbitrator @ $200.00 = $200.00 Claimant submitted one discovery-related motion One (1) Decision on a discovery-related motion on the papers with three arbitrators @ $600.00 = $600.00 Respondents Equities Trading, Global Arena, Hagerman, and Matthews submitted one discovery-related motion Total Discovery-Related Motion Fees = $800.00 The Panel has assessed $800.00 of the discovery-related motion fees jointly and severally to Respondents.

Award Page 5 of 6 Contested Motion for Issuance of a Subpoena Fees Fees apply for each decision on a contested motion for the issuance of a subpoena. One (1) Decision on a contested motion for the issuance of a subpoena with one arbitrator @ $200.00 = $200.00 Total Contested Motion for Issuance of Subpoenas Fees = $200.00 The Panel has assessed $200.00 of the contested motion for issuance of subpoenas fees jointly and severally to Respondents. Hearing Session Fees and Assessments The Panel has assessed hearing session fees for each session conducted. A session is any meeting between the parties and the arbitrator(s), including a pre-hearing conference with the arbitrator(s), that lasts four (4) hours or less. Fees associated with these proceedings are: Four (4) Pre-hearing sessions with the Panel @ $1,200.00/session =$4,800.00 Pre-hearing conferences: June 30, 2014 1 session August 6, 2014 1 session January 8, 2015 1 session May 18, 2015 1 session Twenty (20) Hearing sessions @ $1,200.00/session =$24,000.00 Hearing Dates: August 31, 2015 2 sessions September 1, 2015 3 sessions September 2, 2015 2 sessions September 3, 2015 2 sessions September 4, 2015 2 sessions October 19, 2015 2 sessions October 20, 2015 3 sessions October 21, 2015 2 sessions October 30, 2015 2 sessions Total Hearing Session Fees =$28,800.00 1. The Panel has assessed $24,000.00 of the hearing session fees to Claimant. 2. The Panel has assessed $4,800.00 of the hearing session fees jointly and severally to Respondents. All balances are payable to FINRA Dispute Resolution and are due upon receipt.

Award Page 6 of 6 ARBITRATION PANEL Edward J. Costello, Jr. -, Presiding Chairperson - Yvonne Brathwaite Burke - I, the undersigned Arbitrator, do hereby affirm that I am the individual described herein and who executed this instrument which is my award. Concurring Arbitrators' Signatures Edward J. Costello, Jr., Presiding Chairperson Yvonne Brathwaite Burke Decembers. 2015 Date of Service (For FINRA Dispute Resolution office use only)

ARBITRATION PANEL Edward J. Costello, Jr. Yvonne Brathwaite Burke, Presiding Chairperson I, the undersigned Arbitrator, do hereby affirm that I am the individual described herein and who executed this instrument which is my award. Concurring Arbitrators' Signatures Edward J. Costello, Jr., Presiding Chairperson / Yvonne Brathwaite Burke Decembers. 2015 Date of Service (For FINRA Dispute Resolution office use only)

Award Paae 6 of 6 ARBITRATION PANEL Edward J. Costello, Jr. Yvonne Brathwaite Burke, Presiding Chairperson I, the undersigned Arbitrator, do hereby affirm that I am the individual described herein and who executed this instrument which is my award. Concurring Arbitrators' Signatures Edward J, Costello, Jr., Presiding Chairperson 1/ c Yv^ne Brathwaite Burke (blic Arbitrator Decembers, 2015 Date of Service (For FINRA Dispute Resolution office use only)