MCEV reporting with mg-alfa



Similar documents
UNIQA Group Group Embedded Value April 2014 Kurt Svoboda, CRO

Market Consistent Embedded Value (MCEV)

Embedded Value Report

Disclosure of European Embedded Value as of March 31, 2015

Introduction 3 7. Assumptions 1. Covered Business 2. Market Consistent Embedded Value 2014 and its Components 3. New Business Appendix 19

Disclosure of Market Consistent Embedded Value as of March 31, 2014

Disclosure of Market Consistent Embedded Value as at March 31, 2015

SWEDBANK FÖRSÄKRING AB European Embedded Value

Disclosure of European Embedded Value (summary) as of March 31, 2012

UNIQA Group Group Embedded Value May 2013 Kurt Svoboda, CRO

Munich Re Market consistent embedded value REPORT 2010

Allianz. Market Consistent Embedded Value Report

Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION Basis of Preparation Covered Business Definitions... 4

Disclosure of European Embedded Value (summary) as of March 31, 2015

AvivaSA Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Market Consistent Embedded Value Report. Half-year 2015

Content. Pages Basis of preparation Covered business

Main Business Indicators

Liquidity premiums and contingent liabilities

Market Consistent Embedded Value Report 2014

Market Consistent Embedded Values

Pricing Variable Annuity With Embedded Guarantees. - a case study. David Wang, FSA, MAAA May 21, 2008 at ASHK

15 April 2015 Kurt Svoboda, CFRO. UNIQA Insurance Group AG Economic Capital and Embedded Value 2014

Asset-Liability Management

Market Consistent Embedded Value Principles October CFO Forum

Embedded Value of Life Insurance Companies in India. Presented by Philip Jackson FIA, FIAI Consulting Actuary

Milliman Long-Term Care Services. Industry-Leading Actuarial Services for Long-Term Care Insurance Products

INSTITUTE AND FACULTY OF ACTUARIES EXAMINATION

ING GROUP EMBEDDED VALUE REPORT 2007

Participating Life Insurance Contracts under Risk Based. Solvency Frameworks: How to increase Capital Efficiency.

Market Consistent Embedded Value in Non-Life Insurance: How to measure it and why

Leadership in life insurance. April 2015

Agenda. Questions Deloitte & Touche LLP Deloitte Advisory Sp. z o.o. Adjusted Net Asset. Value (ANAV)

EUROPEAN EMBEDDED VALUE 2007

Market Consistent Embedded Value Basis for Conclusions October CFO Forum

Summary of the Paper Awarded the SCOR Prize in Actuarial Science 2012 in Germany (2 nd Prize)

Embedded Value: Practice and Theory. Robert Frasca 1 and Ken LaSorella 2

Stochastic Analysis of Long-Term Multiple-Decrement Contracts

Milliman Life Insurance & Financial Services

Embedded Value (EV) Reporting May 2009

White paper Danica. White paper. Consolidation policy and business activities. at Danica Pension. Unaudited. February 2009.

Market-Consistent Embedded Value (MCEV)

Participating Life Insurance Contracts under Risk Based Solvency Frameworks: How to Increase Capital Efficiency by Product Design

Pricing exercise based on a collection of actuarial assumptions Assumptions generally divided into two sets

Equity-Based Insurance Guarantees Conference November 18-19, Atlanta, GA. GAAP and Statutory Valuation of Variable Annuities

Embedded Value 2014 Report

Replicating portfolios revisited

G L O B A L S E R V I C E / I N D U S T R Y A U D I T / T A X / A D V I S O R Y / L I N E O F B U S I N E S S

Principles-based Valuation of Life Insurance Products

2013 Embedded Value Results Generating Value

Quantitative Impact Study 1 (QIS1) Summary Report for Belgium. 21 March 2006

Participating Life Insurance Products with Alternative Guarantees: Reconciling Policyholders and Insurers Interests

Principles and models for the Embedded Value calculation

Practical Considerations in Variable Annuity Pricing

Participating Life Insurance Contracts under Risk Based Solvency Frameworks: How to increase Capital Efficiency by Product Design

Conference Call on Interim Report 1/2009

The Impact of Medical Cost Inflation and Dynamic Policyholder Behavior on Market Consistent Embedded Value in Health Insurance

Comparing Life Insurer Longevity Risk Transfer Strategies in a Multi-Period Valuation Framework

EVA/RAROC versus MCEV Earnings: A Unification Approach

Variable Annuities. Society of Actuaries in Ireland Evening Meeting September 17, 2008

SOA 2010 Life & Annuity Symposium May 17-18, Session 31 PD, Federal Income Tax Modeling and Reporting Issues

Valuation of the Minimum Guaranteed Return Embedded in Life Insurance Products

Stochastic Pricing for Embedded Options in Life Insurance and Annuity Products. Milliman, Inc. October 2008

Least Squares Monte Carlo for fast and robust capital projections

ING Insurance Economic Capital Framework

GN47: Stochastic Modelling of Economic Risks in Life Insurance

Guide to Financial Reporting In Irish Life & Permanent plc European Embedded Value and IFRS

Improving Participating Life Insurance Product Designs for both, Policyholders and Insurers, under Risk Based Solvency Frameworks

Case Study Modeling Longevity Risk for Solvency II

Autumn Investor Seminar. Workshops. Managing Variable Annuity Risk

ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD DECEMBER 2004 FRS 27 27LIFE ASSURANCE STANDARD FINANCIAL REPORTING ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD

MARKET-CONSISTENT EMBEDDED VALUE

State-Price Deflators and Risk-Neutral valuation of life insurance liabilities

U.S. GAAP, From Basic Application to Current Topics Seminar August 31 September 1, A: Universal Life and Deferred Annuities Under GAAP (Basic)

The Equity Indexed Universal Life Work Group of the American Academy of Actuaries prepared this report.

Scenario ( ) = = Answer E.

Embedded Value in Life Insurance

Long Term Care Insurance: Factors Impacting Premiums and The Rationale for Rate Adjustments

Life Insurance Valuation Interest Rate

Usage of Modeling Efficiency Techniques in the US Life Insurance Industry

Variable annuity dynamic lapse study: A data mining approach

Practical Applications of Stochastic Modeling for Disability Insurance

Basics of Corporate Pension Plan Funding

Effective Stress Testing in Enterprise Risk Management

GETTING THE MOST OUT OF AXIS

Institute of Actuaries of India Subject ST1 Health and Care Insurance

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary 3. Introduction 5. Purposes of the Joint Research Project 6

SOA Pandemic Model Spreadsheet Documentation

Participating Life Insurance Products with Alternative. Guarantees: Reconciling Policyholders and Insurers. Interests

Life Settlement Characteristics and Mortality Experience for Two Providers

CEIOPS Preparatory Field Study for Life Insurance Firms. Summary Report

Participating Life Insurance Products with Alternative Guarantees: Reconciling Policyholders and Insurers Interests

Pricing variable annuity product in Hong Kong -- a starting point for practitioners

Embedded Value in Life Insurance

Actuarial Guidance Note 9: Best Estimate Assumptions

Replicating Life Insurance Liabilities

top issues An annual report

ifa Variable Annuities & Alternative Guaranteed Products How to Manage Risk by Product Design Alexander Kling Ulm, Germany

GLOSSARY. A contract that provides for periodic payments to an annuitant for a specified period of time, often until the annuitant s death.

Valuation Actuary Symposium September 24-25, Session 41 PD: Enterprise Financial Modeling. Moderator Joseph P. Peterson, ASA, MAAA

The Cost of Financial Frictions for Life Insurers

Transcription:

Prepared by:, FSA, MAAA MCEV reporting with mg-alfa A focus on movement analysis and sensitivity analysis Report on the Possible Impact of the Likely Solvency II QIS5 Standard Formula on the European Life Market Dominic Clark and Scott Mitchell June 2010

Table of Contents SECTION I Introduction 2 SECTION II Sample MG-ALFA project 3 SECTION III Project setup process 4 SECTION IV Excel template and add-in tool 8 SECTION V Movement analysis 9 SECTION VI Summary 15 1

SECTION I Introduction In this report we will present the results of a recent research project that was initiated to automate the process involved in MCEV reporting using MG-ALFA. A significant number of companies in Europe and Asia either have switched to or are considering switching to the market-consistent embedded value (MCEV) reporting framework. MG-ALFA can currently handle MCEV calculations, but it involves a significant amount of manual work, from model setup to report generation. In this report we will present the results of a recent research project that was initiated to automate the process involved in MCEV reporting using MG-ALFA. In addition to this report, the results of our research include a zip file that contains the backup of a sample MG-ALFA project, and an Excel template that uses the MG-ALFA results. These files are available upon request. Both the sample MG-ALFA project and the Excel template focus on producing two important tables as part of the MCEV reporting, the Movement Analysis Table and the Sensitivity Analysis Table. The completion of these two tables requires the most number of different (nested) stochastic projections and the largest quantity of financial data compared with other tables required in MCEV reporting. This report will not discuss the preparation of other parts of the MCEV reporting. It should be emphasized that the purpose of the research project is to recommend a streamlined process and template for preparing the two tables. Both the sample MG-ALFA project and the Excel templates are for illustration only and are not intended to represent any meaningful MCEV results. The remainder of the report is structured as follows. Section II describes the sample MG-ALFA project in detail. Section III summarizes the step-by-step process involved in setting up all the MG-ALFA runs. Section IV describes the Excel template and the MG-ALFA Excel add-in tool. Section V summarizes the roll-forward logic behind the Movement Analysis Table in our template. Section VI serves as a conclusion together with recommendations on how our work may be customized in real MCEV work. 2

SECTION II Sample MG-ALFA project The sample MG-ALFA project contains 16 AIN files, 1 ADB file, 4 AIL files, 16 ASD files mapping to each of the AIN files, and 16 AFD files each produced from the corresponding AIN file. The AIN and ADB files will be described in more detail in Section III. The ASD files are results of loading different risk-neutral scenarios and will also be discussed in Section III. The AFD files are to be accessed by the Excel template and will be discussed in Section IV. The single ADB file is shared by all AIN files. It is the standard U.S. variable annuity database with only a slight modification to the srdiscrate where it was changed from an input to a formula reading 90-day rates from the yield curve. A new total temp, Total003, is also introduced that stores the result variables useful to MCEV reporting. The variable annuity database was chosen as the model platform simply because the database is ready to run with stochastic economic scenarios and has built-in logic for simple embedded guarantees. The latter is relevant to produce the time value of options and guarantees (TVOG) in MCEV reporting. The MG-ALFA models were built purely to illustrate the process. The user will benefit remarkably from the streamlined process and user-friendly interface presented in this report, but is still responsible for product-related and MCEV-related database coding. While some attempt was made to ensure reasonableness of results, greater efforts were made to make sure the rollforward logic in the Movement Analysis Table is sound. The roll-forward logic will be discussed in detail in Section V. Nonetheless, the following simplifications and assumptions should still be noted. The user will benefit remarkably from the streamlined process and user-friendly interface presented in this report, but is still responsible for product-related and MCEVrelated database coding. The post-tax profits and distributable earnings were assumed to be correct from MG-ALFA calculations. But different companies may have different approaches in calculating certain MCEV items, and it is difficult, if meaningful at all, to generalize these calculations. The required capital (RC) was assumed to be a simple percentage of account value. This value must be compliant with both statutory capital requirement and the economic capital requirement, which might involve complicated modeling techniques possibly including nested stochastic projections. The cost of non-hedgeable risk (CNHR) was assumed to be a simple percentage of required capital. In reality, this may involve complicated calculations. A simple return of premium (ROP) guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB) product was illustrated in the sample project. It was assumed to have only one separate account linked to the S&P 500. Assets in the general account were simply cash. If other forms of assets are modeled in reality, then consideration should be given to whether assets are modeled on a book value or market value basis. If the former, some adjustments will be necessary to bring the surplus to a market-consistent basis. 3

SECTION III Project setup process The automation will be part of a new feature of MG-ALFA currently under development. The feature will allow the user to set up, update, and run the MG-ALFA models through the Excel file. The sample MG-ALFA project was set up to support MCEV calculations as described below. The step-by-step process enables the completion of both the Movement Analysis Table and the Sensitivity Analysis Table. The process was carried out manually in our research project, but it is expected to be automated in future MG-ALFA development. The automation will be part of a new feature of MG-ALFA currently under development. The feature will allow the user to set up, update, and run the MG-ALFA models through the Excel file. This feature, combined with the Excel add-in tool discussed in Section IV, essentially will allow the user to start and finish the reporting process without having to open and close the MG-ALFA interface. Until the feature is ready, the user will manually execute the following steps. The generation of AIL files and the scenario files is assumed to be completed before these steps. It should be noted that these steps describe a recommended process but not necessarily the only process. The user may vary the order or the way each step is carried out based on the specific requirement. For example, Step 2 calculated the value of new business (VNB) with issue point and assumptions all as of the beginning of the reporting period. However, the middle or end of the period also may be used. Also, we varied expense, lapse, and mortality assumptions in our exercise. In reality, the assumption changes might be different. In addition, Step 3 below describes the setup for experience variance calculation. Some companies may execute this as the last step. 4

Steps involved to complete the Movement Analysis Table: Steps Step 1: Prior Period Model (assumed to be 12/31/2008) Step 2: New Business Model Action (1) Open the prior period model Mcev_Demo_Bop.Ain. (2) Link to the in-force AIL as of the beginning of the reporting period. (3) Run the model with Certainty Equivalent ( CE ) and stochastic scenarios as of the beginning of the period. (1) Open Mcev_Demo_Bop.Ain. (2) Rename the model as Mcev_Demo_Nb.Ain. (3) Link to the new business AIL. (4) Run the model with CE and stochastic scenarios as of the beginning of the period. Step 3: Experience Variances (1) Open Mcev_Demo_Bop.Ain. (2) Rename the model as Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step1.Ain. (3) Change the valuation date to the current period (ie, 12/2009). (4) Link the current period s in-force file to the model (refresh the model and fill in the data holes if needed). (5) Change FreeSurplus to that as of the current period. (6) Run the model with CE and stochastic scenarios as of the prior period. Step 4: Maintenance Expense Changes (1) Open Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step1.Ain. (2) Rename the model as Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step2.Ain. (3) Change the maintenance expense assumptions to match what is in the current period model. (4) Run the model with CE and stochastic scenarios as of the prior period. Step 5: Lapses Changes (1) Open Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step2.Ain. (2) Rename the model as Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step3.Ain. (3) Change lapse assumptions to match what s in the current period model. (4) Run the model with CE and stochastic scenarios as of the prior period. Step 6: Mortality Changes (1) Open Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step3.Ain. (2) Rename the model as Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step4.Ain. (3) Change the mortality assumptions to match what s in the current period model. (4) Run the model with CE and stochastic scenarios as of the prior period. Step 7: Economic Changes (1) Open Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step4.Ain. (2) Rename the model as Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step5.Ain. (3) Change the CE and stochastic scenarios to match what s in the current period model. (4) Run the model with CE and stochastic scenarios as of the current period. 5

Steps involved to complete the Sensitivity Analysis Table: Steps Step1: Shift 100bp Up in Swap Curve Action (1) Open Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step5.Ain. (2) Rename the model as Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step6.Ain. (3) Replace the CE and stochastic scenarios with the new ones. Step 2: Shift 100bp Down in Swap Curve (4) Run the model with the new CE and stochastic scenarios. (1) Open Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step5.Ain. (2) Rename the model as Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step7.Ain. (3) Replace the CE and stochastic scenarios with the new ones. Step 3: 10% decrease in equity/property values Step 4: 25% increase in equity/property implied volatilities Step 5: 25% increase in swaption implied volatilities Step 6: 10% decrease in maintenance expenses Step 7: 10% proportionate decrease in lapse rates (4) Run the model with the new CE and stochastic scenarios. (1) Open Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step5.Ain. (2) Rename the model as Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step8.Ain. (3) Replace the in-force file with the new where account values are reduced by 10%. (4) Run the model with CE and stochastic scenarios as of current period. (1) Open Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step5.Ain. (2) Rename the model as Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step9.Ain. (3) Replace the CE and stochastic scenarios with the new ones. (4) Run the model with the new CE and stochastic scenarios. (1) Open Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step5.Ain. (2) Rename the model as Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step10.Ain. (3) Replace the CE and stochastic scenarios with the new ones. (4) Run the model with the new CE and stochastic scenarios. (1) Open Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step5.Ain. (2) Rename the model as Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step11.Ain. (3) Change AIN input to reduce maintenance expenses by 10%. (4) Run the model with CE and stochastic scenarios as of current period. (1) Open Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step5.Ain. (2) Rename the model as Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step12.Ain. (3) Change AIN input to reduce lapse by 10%. (4) Run the model with CE and stochastic scenarios as of current period. 6

Steps involved to complete the Sensitivity Analysis Table (Continued): Steps Step 8: 5% proportionate decrease in base mortality Action (1) Open Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step5.Ain. (2) Rename the model as Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step13.Ain. (3) Change AIN input to reduce mortality by 5%. (4) Run the model with CE and stochastic scenarios as of current period. Step 9: Required capital equal to level of solvency capital (1) Open Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step5.Ain. (2) Rename the model as Mcev_Demo_Eop_Step14.Ain. (3) Change AIN input to make target surplus to the level of solvency capital. (4) Run the model with CE and stochastic scenarios as of end of period. 7

SECTION IV Excel template and add-in tool The MG-ALFA Excel add-in tool does not require the user to open any MG-ALFA model or outputs and thus eliminates the work of manually exporting results. The Excel template uses the MG-ALFA Excel add-in tool to extract the results from the AFD files after runs finish. This tool is available as part of the version 7.0 release. The MG-ALFA Excel add-in tool proved to be a very efficient tool in this exercise. It does not require the user to open any MG-ALFA model or outputs and thus eliminates the work of manually exporting results. The add-in also automatically calculates the average present values of any specified cash flows across multiple scenarios. A user manual for the add-in tool is available from the MG-ALFA team. The template file has many tabs. The Control tab specifies the different AIN and AFD files from which results are to be retrieved. The Non-MGALFA Inputs tab contains some inputs that are typically not from MG-ALFA. A good example is the CNHR assumption. However, this tab is expected to vary significantly among different users depending on their extent of MG-ALFA modeling. The MCEV Movement Calc tab shows the results of the Movement Analysis Table in the format prescribed by the CFO Forum. The MCEV Sensitivity Calc tab shows the results of the Sensitivity Analysis Table with sensitivities consistent with MCEV requirements. All the other tabs store results from the different MG-ALFA runs. We split the CE and stochastic results in different tabs, but it is possible to have them shown in a single tab. The Excel format makes it relatively straightforward to modify links and calculations in the file. However, it requires careful considerations and good MCEV knowledge to make the Movement Analysis Table sound and reasonable. The template file is expected to be customized by the user. The Excel format makes it relatively straightforward to modify links and calculations in the file. However, it requires careful considerations and good MCEV knowledge to make the Movement Analysis Table sound and reasonable. In the next section, we will provide an explanation of the roll-forward logic underlying our calculation. 8

SECTION V Movement analysis In the Movement Analysis Table, there are six columns in total, each rolling from the beginning of the reporting period to the end of the reporting period, with sources of changes prescribed by the MCEV Principles: Free surplus (FS) Required capital (RC) Present value of future profits (PVFP) Time value of options and guarantees (TVOG) Frictional cost (FC) Cost of non-hedgeable risk (CNHR) In the following paragraphs, explanation is provided behind the roll-forward logic in the Movement Analysis Table, but it might still be helpful to reference the formulas in the Excel template. 1. Roll-forward of free surplus Opening free surplus + {- first year RC from NB CE run + first year after-tax profit from the NB CE run} New business value + Opening free surplus * i (expected risk-neutral) Expected existing business contribution (reference rate) + Opening free surplus * [i (expected real-world) i (expected risk-neutral)] Expected existing business contribution (in excess of reference rate) + {- expected change in required capital - expected profits in projection year 1} Transfers from VIF and required capital to free surplus + {actual profits in the current year + actual release in capital in current year expected profits in year 1 expected release in capital in year 1} * Experience variances *the investment gains/losses are excluded here and grouped in economic variances + {Required capital/cnhr/fc under old assumption required capital/cnhr/fc under new assumption} Assumption changes + {Actual investment gains/losses expected investment gains/losses} Economic variances = Closing free surplus 9

2. Roll-forward of required capital Opening required capital + {first year RC from NB CE run } New business value + Opening required capital * i (expected risk-neutral) Expected existing business contribution (reference rate) + Opening required capital * [i (expected real-world) i (expected risk-neutral)] Expected existing business contribution (in excess of reference rate) + {expected required capital at end of year 1- opening required capital accumulated with interest } Transfers from VIF and required capital to free surplus + {Time 0 required capital from experience variance run time 1 required capital from opening run NB value} Experience Variances + {beg required capital from assumption change run beg required capital from experience variance run} Assumption changes + {beg required capital from economic variance run beg required capital from experience variance run} Economic variances = Closing required capital 10

3. Roll-forward of PVFP Opening PVFP (PV of post-tax profit from CE run) + { PV of post-tax profit from NB CE run } New business value + Opening PVFP * i (expected risk-neutral) Expected existing business contribution (reference rate) + expected investment income (net of expenses and tax) in year 1 Expected existing business contribution (in excess of reference rate) + {- after tax profit in projection year 1 of the opening run - expected investment income (net of expenses and tax) in year 1} Transfers from VIF and required capital to free surplus + {PVFP from experience run PVFP from year 2 on from opening run (actual interest on opening PVFP expected interest on opening PVFP)} Experience variances + {PVFP from assumption change run PVFP from experience variance run} Assumption changes + { PVFP from economic variance run PVFP from assumption change run } Economic variances = Closing PVFP 11

4. Roll-forward of TVOG Opening TVOG (PV of average stochastic post-tax profit - PVFP) + { PV of post-tax profit from NB stochastic run PVFP from NB CE run } New business value + {Time 2 TVOG from opening run - Time 1 TVOG in opening run} Expected existing business contribution (reference rate) + 0 Expected existing business contribution (in excess of reference rate) + 0 Transfers from VIF and required capital to free surplus + {Time 1 TVOG from experience run Time 2 TVOG from opening run)} Experience variances + {Time 1 TVOG from assumption change run Time 1 TVOG from experience variance run} Assumption changes + {Time 1 TVOG from economic variance run Time 1 TVOG from assumption change run } Economic Variances = Closing TVOG 12

5. Roll-forward of FC Opening FC (PV of CE DE PVFP - RC) + {PV of CE DE from NB run PVFP from NB run Time 1 RC from NB run} New business value + Opening FC * i (expected risk-neutral) Expected existing business contribution (reference rate) + {- expected tax on RC in year 1} Expected existing business contribution (in excess of reference rate) + {+ expected tax and investment expenses on RC in projection year } Transfers from VIF and required capital to free surplus + {Time 1 FC from experience run Time 2 FC from opening run - NBV} Experience variances + {Time 1 FC from assumption change run Time 1FC from experience variance run} Assumption changes + {Time 1 FC from economic variance run Time 1FC from assumption change run } Economic variances = Closing FC 13

6. Roll-forward of CNHR Opening CNHR (PV of CE required capital * -1%) + {PV of CE RC from NB run * -1%} New business value + {PV of CE RC starting from year 2 * -1% - opening CNHR Expected existing business contribution (reference rate) + 0 Expected existing business contribution (in excess of reference rate) + 0 Transfers from VIF and required capital to free surplus + {PV of CE RC * -1% from experience run PV of CE RC * -1% from year 2 on from opening run NBV} Experience variances + {PV of CE RC * -1% from assumption change run - PV of CE RC * -1% from experience run} Assumption changes + {PV of CE RC * -1% from economic variance run - PV of CE RC * -1% from assumption change run} Economic variances = Closing CNHR 14

SECTION VI Summary This report documents the research project on preparing the MCEV reporting with MG-ALFA. Through a sample MG-ALFA project and the Excel reporting template, a streamlined process is illustrated to prepare the Movement Analysis Table and the Sensitivity Analysis Table. In addition, this report documents the assumptions and simplifications in the modeling, provides a brief description of the Excel add-in tool, and explains the roll-forward logic underlying the Movement Analysis Table. The process described in the report is likely to be customized in real-life projects. Some customizations may relate to the specific product designs, some may be necessary because of the existing practices of the company, and others may be due to a different interpretation of the MCEV Principles. To best utilize the tools and the process presented in the report, the user may wish to consider the following in the customization process: Try to have as much calculation done in MG-ALFA as possible. This will maximize the benefits of the Excel add-in tool and minimize the non MG-ALFA inputs in the template. Try to avoid having too many projections in one AIN. This may get confusing over time and creates a very large result file. If unsure of result variables eventually needed, capture the entire income statement and balance sheet variables in the total temp. The process described in the report is likely to be customized in real-life projects. Some customizations may relate to the specific product designs, some may be necessary because of the existing practices of the company, and others may be due to a different interpretation of the MCEV Principles. In cases where the Movement Analysis Table needs to be changed, keep a check line similar to row 33 in the template. Read the user manual for the Excel add-in tool to learn more about it. This can help greatly if the user wishes to build custom reports 15

is among the world s largest independent actuarial and consulting firms. Founded in Seattle in 1947 as Milliman & Robertson, the company currently has 52 offices in key locations worldwide. Milliman employs over 2,400 people, with a professional staff of more than 1,100 qualified consultants and actuaries, including specialists ranging from clinicians to economists. The firm has consulting practices in healthcare, employee benefits, property & casualty insurance, life insurance and financial services. Milliman serves the full spectrum of business, financial, government, union, education and nonprofit organizations. For further information, visit milliman.com. 1301 Fifth Avenue Suite 3800 Seattle, WA 98101 +1 206 624 7940 milliman.com