MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT SENTENCING/DISPOSITION SHEET



Similar documents
DUI (Driving Under the Influence)

MONROE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER MONROE COUNTY COURTHOUSE 610 MONROE STREET, SUITE 21 STROUDSBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 18360

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE

PENALTIES AND FINES FOR ALCOHOL AND DRUG RELATED DRIVING OFFENSES IN NEW YORK STATE

An Analysis of Idaho s Kootenai County DUI Court

PRETRIAL DUI DIVERSION INFORMATION SHEET

ILLINOIS STATE PROFILE

CITY OF SALINA MUNICIPAL COURT DIVERSION INFORMATION AND APPLICATION

The High Cost of DWI. Ignition interlock license available

Criminal Justice 101. The Criminal Justice System in Colorado and the Impact on Individuals with Mental Illness. April 2009

GETTING THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

First Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP SENATE SPONSORSHIP

About D.U.I. (Driving Under the Influence) Published by The Alaska Court System PUB-11 (6/13)(green)

How To Participate In A Drug Court

IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE

PROBATION LENGTH AND CONDITIONS IN KANSAS

First Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED SENATE SPONSORSHIP

What Parents Should Know: Common Criminal Charges & Consequences for Minors

LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-third Legislature First Regular Session IN THE SENATE SENATE BILL NO. 1026

Driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicating substances;

You and the Drinking Driving Laws

TREGO COUNTY DIVERSION PROGRAM GUIDELINES

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR WOODBURY COUNTY. WRITTEN PLEA OF GUILTY AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS (OWI First Offense)

MEDINA COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT EARLY INTERVENTION PRE-TRIAL PROGRAM

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF IMPERIAL. People v. Case No. Advisement of Rights, Waiver, and Plea Form

2014 ANNUAL REPORT DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY

OLMSTED COUNTY ATTORNEY DOMESTIC ABUSE PROSECUTION POLICY POLICY STATEMENT:

What you don t know can hurt you.

I just got arrested for a State of South Carolina DUI charge. What happens now?

DRUG COURT DEFERRED JUDGMENT INFORMATION SHEET

2 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, 4 Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the

I. FIRST DUI OFFENSE VEHICLE CODE 23152

Information for Those Convicted of Minor Consuming or Possessing Alcohol (MCA)

CORRECTIONS (730 ILCS 166/) Drug Court Treatment Act.

Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide

Your Guide to Illinois Traffic Courts

Chapter 813. Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants 2013 EDITION. Title 59 Page 307 (2013 Edition)

DeKalb County Drug Court: C.L.E.A.N. Program (Choosing Life and Ending Abuse Now)

Office of the Bexar County Criminal District Attorney

Senate Bill No. 86 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security

California s Alternative Sentencing Law for Veterans and Members of the U.S. Military

York County DUI Prevention Initiative

THE BIANCHI LAW FIRM 605 Thomas Street Seattle, WA WASHINGTON DRINKING & DRIVING PENALTIES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014

THE BIANCHI LAW FIRM TH AVE NE BELLEVUE, WA WASHINGTON DRINKING & DRIVING PENALTIES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014

ARTICLE 1.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 1st Session of the 49th Legislature (2003) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE

AN ACT. The goals of the alcohol and drug treatment divisions created under this Chapter include the following:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Wisconsin Operating While Intoxicated Law A Client's Guide to the Language and Procedure

Adult Plea Negotiation Guidelines

BASIC CRIMINAL LAW. Joe Bodiford. Overview of a criminal case Presented by: Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer

Restoration of Civil Rights. Helping People regain their Civil Liberties

BARTON COUNTY DUI DIVERSION PROGRAM GUIDELINES

DRUG COURT PLEA PACKET

ARIZONA ADULT PROBATION

[As Amended by Senate Committee of the Whole] SENATE BILL No By Joint Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight 1-11

A GUIDE TO SUSPENSION & REVOCATION OF DRIVING PRIVILEGES IN NEW YORK STATE

STATE OF NEW YORK : : ALLEGANY COUNTY DRUG COUNTY OF ALLEGANY : : TREATMENT COURT. Defendant.

COMMUNITY SAFETY VICTIM RESPECT OFFENDER ACCOUNTABILITY

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ADAMS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. Number 17 of In Re: Amendment of Adams County Rules of Criminal Procedure 705.

Maricopa County Attorney s Office Adult Criminal Case Process

Adult Probation Frequently Asked Questions

Colorado Legislative Council Staff Fiscal Note STATE and LOCAL FISCAL IMPACT. Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst:

FELONY ALCOHOL INTERVENTION PROGRAM FAIP

BRYCE A. FETTER ORLANDO JUVENILE CHARGES ATTORNEY

Denver Sobriety Court Program Memorandum of Agreement

It s a Privilege to Drive: Snapshot of Impaired Driving in Montana

GETTING TO KNOW THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

Pierce County. Drug Court. Established September 2004

UNDERSTANDING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Anne Benson

Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide

You And The Drinking Driving Laws

NEW HAMPSHIRE New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated. Yes 265-A:4

External Advisory Group Meeting June 2, 2015

OWI SENTENCING GUIDELINES

OF MULTIPLE TRAFFIC OFFENSES INVOLVING ALCOHOL OR DRUGS, AND MAKING AN APPROPRIATION THEREFOR.

~ DJ.jC D N J TH CAROLINA STATE BAR,~\ ~ 09 DHC 5

ALABAMA s FELONY DUI STATUTE- A HISTORY. [This document was originally prepared by AOC and was later revised and updated by Patrick Mahaney.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Alyce Griffin Clarke Drug Court Act.

Preliminary Breath Test Law: Yes (b) Also applies to CMV operators Implied Consent Law: Arrest Required (Yes/No): Yes

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR OKALOOSA COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASS COUNTY DWI COURT. Participant Manual

Austin Travis County Integral Care Jail Diversion Programs and Strategies

Adult Probation: Terms, Conditions and Revocation

KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES

PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS Section 5505 of the Pennsylvania Crimes Code (Title 18)

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PENALTIES UNDER COLORADO LAW Fact/Discussion Sheet

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

Information to Potential Participant

Driving While Intoxicated/Driving under the Influence ( DWI/DUI ) Policy Acknowledgment form (CD A)

A Guide to Special Sessions & Diversionary Programs in Connecticut. Superior Court Criminal Division

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 12, STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TYRONE R.

SPECIAL OPTIONS SERVICES PROGRAM UNITED STATES PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

DUI. The funds received under the provisions of this subsection shall be distributed as follows:

What should I do if the police ask me to take Field Sobriety Tests?

UTAH STATE: UTAH. Basis for a DWI Charge:

2010 CRIMINAL CODE SENTENCING PROVISIONS. Effective July 29, 2010

Transcription:

MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT SENTENCING/DISPOSITION SHEET DEFENDANT: LEON CURT WALDROP AGE/DOB: 44/04-29-67 SENTENCING DATE: JULY 1, 2011 CITIZENSHIP: UNITED STATES JUDGE/DIVISION: MARGARET BENNY/RCC SE APO: KAREN VANIMAN CASE NO.: CR2011-121770-001-SE CHARGE: COUNT 1: AGGRAVATED DRIVING OR ACTUAL PHYSICAL CONTROL WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR OR DRUGS, A CLASS 4 FELONY OFFENSE DATE: APRIL 30, 2011 PRIOR CONVICTIONS/CONFINEMENTS/PROBATIONS: FELONY: PRISON: PROBATION: MISDEMEANOR: JAIL: JUVENILE: DOJC: PROBATION: PLEA AGREEMENT: REST/REIMBURSE: FINE: COMMUNITY SERVICE: RECOMMENDATIONS: DEFENSE PROSECUTION APO VICTIM SENTENCE/DISPOSITION: AGGRAVATION 13-702(C) MITIGATION 13-702 (D) COMMENTS: DAYS IN JAIL DISMISS:

PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION Superior Court Criminal Division RCC SE Sentencing Date: July 1, 2011 Sentencing Judge: Margaret Benny Prosecutor: Jane Schneider, DCA PSI Officer: Karen Vaniman Defense Counsel: Lance Antonson, DPD Present Offense: The following information is summarized from Mesa Police Departmental Report #20111200524: On April 30, 2011, at approximately 5:16 p.m., officers received a call regarding an individual who was leaving the scene of a verbal confrontation and had been drinking. The officers located the suspect vehicle and observed it being driven erratically. A traffic stop was conducted and the driver, identified as Leon Waldrop, was contacted. Mr. Waldrop had a strong odor of alcoholic beverage coming from his person, and his eyes were bloodshot and watery. He admitted he just drank a six-pack of beer and knew he should not be driving. Mr. Waldrop also admitted his license was revoked. A sample of Mr. Waldrop s blood was drawn; however, the results of the analysis were not included in the police report. Statutory Offense Requirements: The defendant must serve a minimum of four months incarceration prior to beginning any probation grant. Defendant's Statement: According to the defendant, he drank six beers prior to driving. He took his fiancée home, and then he went home. There was an altercation with his sister over $20.00, and she told him to leave. He went to work and was pulled over. He did not feel he was intoxicated or that his driving was impaired, but he knew he should not have been driving after drinking. Regarding sentencing, the defendant feels probation is appropriate. He knows he has prior DUI s, but he is done with drinking. He knows he can be successful on probation, as he has been in the past. PAGE 1

Statement of Interested Parties: The Deputy County Attorney submitted a written sentencing recommendation, which is attached for the Court s review. The defendant s prior supervising probation officer, Jill Gentry, was unavailable for comment. According to probation records, while on probation, the defendant successfully completed substance abuse treatment and a Victim Impact Panel. In addition, he reported as directed, maintained employment, maintained a stable residence, and paid Court-ordered fees in full. The defendant did not comply with condition #19, having completed 138.75 out of 200 community service hours ordered. Risk/Needs Assessment: Based on the Offender Screening Tool (OST), the following is an assessment of the defendant's risk to re-offend and criminogenic needs. Domains with scores above 60%, or Mental Health score above 50%, significantly contribute to the overall assessed Risk/Needs level and must be addressed when developing supervision strategies. Domains below 60% and above 0% may contribute to the overall assessed Risk/Needs level and may require intervention. Domains with 0% do not contribute to the overall assessed Risk/Needs level and do not require intervention. The OST is a standardized statewide tool that has been validated and approved by the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC). A copy of the OST score results in a graph format is attached to this report. OVERALL RISK/NEEDS LEVEL (Male Risk/Needs Range) 11 Low (0-5) Medium-Low (6-10) Medium-High (11-17) High (18-42) DOMAINS THAT DO NOT CONTRIBUTE TO OVERALL RISK/NEED LEVEL DOMAIN SCORE SUMMARY Drug Abuse 0/3 0% No drug use in over twenty-five years. Education 0/3 0% High school graduate. Mental Health 0/2 0% Reported no mental health issues. Residential 0/2 0% Lived with sister in crime-free area. Vocational 0/5 0% Employed full-time prior to arrest. Family and Social Relationships 0/8 0% Raised by biological parents. Positive family and peer relationships. PAGE 2

DOMAINS THAT MAY CONTRIBUTE TO OVERALL RISK/NEED LEVEL DOMAIN SCORE SUMMARY Attitude 2/7 29% Expressed some beliefs supportive of crime. Feels his conviction was fair. Recognizes a need for change in his life and willing to accept help. Willing to comply with community supervision. DOMAINS THAT SIGNIFICANTLY CONTRIBUTE TO OVERALL RISK/NEED LEVEL DOMAIN SCORE SUMMARY Alcohol Use 3/3 100% Drinks occasionally to intoxication. Present offense is alcohol related. Two prior alcohol-related convictions. Admits he has an alcohol problem and needs treatment. Criminal Behavior 6/9 67% Present offense is a designated felony. Three prior felony convictions. No prior probation revocation. No juvenile history. Additional Assessments and Screenings: The defendant submitted to a self-administered alcohol abuse survey, on which he scored in a range indicative of having an alcohol problem. The defendant was screened and found eligible for Intensive Probation Supervision. The defendant was screened for DUI Court but is not eligible because he resides outside the supervision area. Financial Assessment: Prior to his arrest, the defendant was employed full-time as a produce clerk at Fry s for six months. He earned a monthly income of $1,700.00 and reported monthly expenses totaling $430.00. He believes he will be able to return to his job at Fry s upon his release. It is believed the defendant should be responsible for payment of any Court-ordered fees, including mandatory DUI assessments. PAGE 3

Discussion and Evaluation: The present offense represents the defendant s fourth felony conviction and third conviction for driving under the influence. The defendant was involved in the present offense less than one and a half years after completing a five-year probation grant for a similar offense. Through his reckless actions, the defendant continues to jeopardize the safety of the community. Assessments indicate the defendant poses a medium-high risk to reoffend. The criminogenic domains that contribute most significantly to his risk are alcohol use and criminal behavior. The domain that may contribute to his overall risk is criminogenic attitude. To his credit, the defendant is educated, maintained employment, had a stable residence, does not use illegal drugs, has positive family and peer relationships, and has no mental health issues. The defendant has been afforded ample opportunity to remain in the community and properly address his alcohol abuse issues, yet his involvement in criminal activity has continued. A sentence to the Department of Corrections was considered; however, given the defendant s successful completion of probation in the past, it is believed an opportunity for Intensive Probation Supervision (IPS) may be appropriate. This will provide strict monitoring of the defendant in the community, while allowing him to maintain employment and ensuring his participation in any necessary treatment/counseling. The defendant has done well under supervision in the past, and it is hoped he takes advantage of this opportunity to make positive changes in his life and cease his involvement in criminal activity. If he does not, and his criminal behavior continues despite exhausting all intermediate sanctions, a sentence to the Department of Corrections may be warranted. Identification Status: Due to his incarceration, the defendant does not have access to documents to verify his identity. Recommendation: It is respectfully recommended that the defendant be granted five year(s) supervised probation to begin upon release from prison for felony DUI (to serve four months prison with zero days credit). Abide by the following additional conditions: Condition #15 I will be financially responsible by paying all restitution, fines, and fees in my case as imposed by the Court. I understand, if I do not pay restitution in full, the Court may extend my probation. 15b. Probation Service Fee of $75.00 per month beginning on December 1, 2011. 15d. Pay a Fine of $750.00 PAGE 4

Condition #16 Condition #21 15e. Plus a surcharge of 84 percent, in the total amount of $1,380.00 in payments of $10.00 per month beginning on December 1, 2011 15f. Reimbursement in the total amount of $90.00, at $5.00 per month beginning on August 1, 2011. 15g. Pay DUI Abatement Fund Total Amount of $250.00 in a Monthly Payment of $5.00 beginning on December 1, 2011. 15i. Pay Prison Construction Fund in the total amount of $1,500.00 in monthly payment of $10.00 beginning on December 1, 2011. 15j. State General Fund in the total amount of $1,500.00 in monthly payment of $10.00 beginning on December 1, 2011. 15p. Probation Surcharge in the total amount of $20.00. 15q. Time Payment Fee of $20.00. I will not consume or possess any substances containing alcohol. I will abide by the attached special conditions of probation: Intensive Probation Status of Driver License: According to the defendant, his driver license is revoked and is not in his possession. Reviewed by: Judge: Date: Respectfully submitted by: Karen Vaniman, Adult Probation Officer Cell: (602) 619-5440/ Office: (602) 372-3660 October 26, 2012 mailto:kvaniman@apd.maricopa.gov Lisa Roubicek, Supervisor Phone: (602) 506-4190, (602) 619-3233 PAGE 5