BYU Idaho s Evolving Approach to Online Course Quality



Similar documents
In his inaugural response, President Kim B. Clark said:

James Madison University. Best Practices for Online Programs

Southwest Texas Junior College Distance Education Policy

Standards for Professional Development

Distance Education Program

Distance Learning Plan We cannot switch the mission (of education), unless we also switch the method. Seth Godin

Texas Wesleyan University Policy Title: Distance Education Policy

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

PROGRAM DESIGN. Our design process, philosophy and values.

Graduate Handbook. for. Master of Arts in Music. Music Education Concentration

Assessment Coordinator: Bill Freese 214 Reid Hall

APPLIED MINISTRY HANDBOOK

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Information Literacy Program of the A.C. Buehler Library at Elmhmst College, Elmhurst, Illinois

Policies for the Development and Delivery of Online and Hybrid Courses and Programs at the University of La Verne A. Introduction

Strategic Plan Every Student: College and Career Ready. Strong Students Strong Schools Strong Staff Strong System

NAAS - inacol Standards for Quality Online Programs

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP 6801 N. Yates Road, Milwaukee Wisconsin, 53217

CHAPTER 77 STANDARDS FOR TEACHER INTERN PREPARATION PROGRAMS

Richland College Improving Accounting Student Success through Caring Behaviors

Pittsburg State University Distance Education Plan,

and College Planning Priorities Detailed Description of Challenges and Initiatives. I. Accreditation

STRATEGIC PLAN for VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL

University Libraries Strategic Plan 2015

September 1, 2015 Trustees Innovation Fund Developing Programs for Nontraditional Student Audiences

A New Approach to Needs Assessment and Communication to Connect and Collaborate with Faculty

Delaware Performance Appraisal System

Guide to Best Practices in Online Teaching. Online Teaching and Learning Committee Cuyamaca College. Revised November 2012

TVCC Distance Learning Faculty Handbook. Distance Learning. Faculty Handbook. 1 P age

Community College of Philadelphia Administrative Function and Support Service Audit Learning Lab Executive Summary

Position Statement on Science Education

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT (SIG) PRACTICE:

Strengthening the Role of Part-Time Faculty in Community Colleges

Criteria for Approval of Online Providers and Courses to Satisfy UC Subject ( a-g ) Requirements

Guidelines for Addressing Distance and Correspondence Education

Academic Audit Site Visit Report. Pellissippi State Community College University Parallel Program April 17, 2015

Principal Practice Observation Tool

Lakeland Community College Campus Completion Plan

Professional Development for the Virtual School Setting: Aligning and Designing

North Carolina School Library Media Coordinators Standards

Civil & Environmental Engineering

Arkansas Teaching Standards

Guidelines for Massachusetts Early Educator Preparation Programs Participating in the Early Childhood Educator Scholarships Program.

Hybrid Courses: Obstacles and Solutions for Faculty and Students. Robert Kaleta Director, Learning Technology Center University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

The Communications Handbook

Support and Process for Developing Online and Blended Courses

Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana

Rhode Island School of Design Strategic Plan Summary for critical making. making critical

EKU e-campus Learning Model for Eastern Kentucky University. Draft 6

How To Teach At The University Of Africanus Recipe Cards

Georgia Perimeter College Faculty Senate Other Curriculum Changes

Department of Counseling Services Operational Plan

Implementing Guided Pathways at Miami Dade College: A Case Study

Distance Learning Guidelines

North Carolina Professional Technology Facilitator Standards

College of Human Environmental Sciences Strategic Plan for

Motivating Adult Learners in Accelerated Online Courses: An Instructional Design Perspective. Jahna Kahrhoff

SDA Bocconi Learning Goals

Educational Practices REFERENCE GUIDE. Aligned to the AdvancED Standards for Quality Schools

Julian R. Cowart EDUCATION

Distance Learning Faculty Handbook

Troy University Case Study

The University of Hawai i Community Colleges Online Learning Strategic Plan

We Could Do That! A Guide to Diversity Practices in California Community Colleges

Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)

FAU Faculty Survey for Distance Learning Online Courses, Summer Office Hours 2014 Results Summary and Recommendations

THE FRAMEWORK FOR INSTRUCTIONAL COACH ENDORSEMENT GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Ch. 354 PROFESSIONAL EDUCATORS 22 CHAPTER 354. PREPARATION OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATORS GENERAL PROVISIONS GENERAL CATEGORY PROGRAM DESIGN

MERCY COLLEGE SCHOOL BUILDING LEADERSHIP PROGRAM

Instructional Computing in Secondary Schools

How To Get A Degree From A Church College

Management Fundamentals in Healthcare Organizations

Ohio Standards for School Counselors

Online Learning Solutions for the Challenges of Catholic Education

Alabama Standards for Instructional Leaders

THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT MARTIN DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES

Transcription:

BYU Idaho s Evolving Approach to Online Course Quality ALAN YOUNG, JOEL GALBRAITH, & STEVEN ADAMS Traditional wisdom suggests it is not possible to increase the quality of the learning experience, serve more students, and also reduce the cost simultaneously. Something has to give. Many institutions in higher education strive to serve more students, but with a student price tag as high as the market will allow and with minimal attention to the quality of the learning experience. In contrast, BYU Idaho put the quality of the student learning experience as its highest priority in the launch of the online learning initiative in 2008. Reducing costs and serving more students were our second and third priorities, respectively. We began with a goal and the faith to accomplish all three. Working together we have accomplished much in each of these areas, but there is much more to do and to learn. Some view online learning as an advantageous business decision, cranking out mediocre classes with hired-gun teachers simply to slash costs and serve more students, while diluting the quality of what BYU Idaho is really all about. Improving the quality of education is not just something to which the Academic Development team (the official name of BYU Idaho s online organization) pays lip service. It is a paramount priority that influences each decision of the team, from evaluating the learning experience in each course, to creating new courses, to choosing and training instructors, and to on-going course improvement. In this article we illustrate our commitment and capacity to create and deliver high-quality courses using specific examples of our approach. Evaluation, Research, and Development President Kim B. Clark (2011, p. 4) has explained that an essential kind of learning occurs when we work together in systematic inquiry directed at learning. An essential feature of our approach to learning online is systematically collecting information about the quality of the learning environment and applying the lessons we learn. In short, we are continually learning about the learning environment. Online and on-campus instructors, as well as instructional designers, regularly review each course to identify opportunities for improvement. Students evaluate PERSPECTIVE 24

BYU Idaho puts the quality of the student learning experience as its highest priority every course every semester. The graph below shows averages of instructor ratings from the student evaluations. As the graph shows, these ratings have steadily increased over the past few years as they approach the average for all courses at BYU Idaho. Student feedback informs new course development as well as improvements in existing courses. However, student-satisfaction surveys only show a partial picture of the quality of the experience. We are in the process of implementing more outcomes-based evaluations. We are also working with course councils to implement evaluations that are specific to courses and lessons. Evaluations also influence our research and development efforts, and vice versa. We introduce new approaches in a few sections and compare the evaluation results. We then implement the approach with better results across all sections of a course or across a broad range of courses. Recent R&D projects include student group work, online teaching assistants, delivery on mobile devices, and English-language-learning analysis. Upcoming R&D Evaluations of Online Instructors are Improving 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 S09 F09 W10 S10 F10 W11 S11 F11 W12 All BYU-- I Students Online Students projects include adaptive learning, the top ten teach-oneanother activities and other successful course-design patterns, bounded-choice learning activities, and using text messages to promote student engagement and retention. The information we gather through evaluation and research drives ongoing changes to the course-quality standards, templates, or modular elements for many courses. Our systematic evaluation and research will increasingly inform and support the thoughtful, collaborative improvement of learning online and integrated curricula. Course Development To increase the quality of the student learning experience, a team of BYU Idaho professionals creates each online course as part of an integrated curriculum. The team includes a full-time faculty member with load reduction, an instructional designer, media developers, a remote instructor who will teach the class, and one or more additional full-time faculty. The development team may also include other campus experts such as librarians, assessment specialists, and copyright experts. The team develops each online course to be high quality based on standards and best practices, as well as to a scale to accommodate thousands of students throughout the world. The information we gather through evaluation and research drives ongoing changes to the course-quality standards, templates, or modular elements for many courses. YOUNG, GALBRAITH, & ADAMS 25

TESTIMONIAL The Pathway Program is a great program and has improved my life greatly. It is because of the Pathway Program that I am now a college student seeking a degree. Being able to go to school online is a great experience because I can fit it around my schedule. The Pathway Program got me in the mindset of learning and gave me the discipline and tools to continue online schooling. I love how the Pathway Program prepares us not only for college work, but also for life. We learned a lot of great skills that we can use throughout our lives. I hope to see this rogram thrive and expand throughout the world. It is a great opportunity to learn in a gospel setting. The Pathway Program gives people the opportunity to learn when they thought they never would have the chance. a m y f a s t e s o n Over the past couple of years the Curriculum Development Department has increased its capacity not only for instructional design, but also for media development, including art, graphic design, video and audio production, etc., and will continue to develop in this area to improve the student experience. The following images illustrate the course appearance before and after a graphic makeover: BYU Idaho has created 135 courses for online delivery thus far. In most cases the faculty teams involved with the creation process have discovered that articulating the course for online delivery has also made them rethink and improve the quality of their course for the classroom. The Online Instructor At its core, the quality of the learning experience is found in the hearts of the people involved. Each semester, the online instructors provide the life and heart of courses built on an integrated curriculum. The instructors, scattered across 14 states, typically work professionally in their discipline while teaching one section for BYU Idaho. The online instructor is the course facilitator, leading and moderating learning activities and discussion among students, prompting students to check assumptions and interact meaningfully around course topics. She draws on her own experience in the field to contextualize lesson concepts for students and seeks to build confidence and testimony through feedback on assignments as well as by personal outreach outside of assignments. Each online instructor joins BYU Idaho through a rigorous hiring process. The flexibility of teaching a single section from home attracts a wide variety of highly- Online Course Appearance Before (Left) and After (Right) a Graphic Makeover PERSPECTIVE 26

qualified instructors. Applicants go through a rigorous fivestep process to become eligible to teach, and instructors who do not meet baseline criteria do not qualify for a teaching contract the next semester. The hiring process The online instructors provide the life and heart of courses built on an integrated curriculum. includes an interview with the hiring coordinator from Online Learning Operations, a review by the Department Chair or Foundations team lead (a change made in 2010 in lieu of an Associate Dean review), an ecclesiastical endorsement, and a two-week evaluation course. In the evaluation course, potential instructors demonstrate their capacity to teach online as they are placed in various authentic situations such as reaching out to difficult students or inspiring personal preparation and other aspects of the Learning Model. Originally, only remote instructors were able to teach online sections. Currently, each course lead (the on-campus faculty member assigned by the department to oversee the curriculum for a course) has the option to teach an online section once a year in lieu of a face-to-face section. Also, any BYU Idaho faculty member or administrator can apply to teach BYU Idaho online courses. BYU Idaho places heavy emphasis on online instructor development. New instructors participate in a certification course where they hone online teaching skills in the context of the Learning Model and the Spirit of Ricks. Each instructor is placed in a teaching group where they form strong bonds as they answer one another s questions and share effective practices. Teaching groups meet live via web conference once a month, and hold ongoing discussions in a virtual community. An online teaching coach will soon be added to the team. Ongoing, Incremental Course Improvement Each course developed for online delivery includes a course council with stewardship for the ongoing improvement of the course. Under the direction of the Department Chair, the course lead heads the course council. The council includes a representative of the online instructors for that course as well as any other members assigned by the department. Some departments have chosen to use these councils to consider improvements to YOUNG, GALBRAITH, & ADAMS 27

an integrated curriculum across multiple delivery types such as face-to-face, hybrid, and online. Within the Online Learning organization, a specially designated course improvement team supports course councils. As improvements are recommended, the online course improvement team verifies the changes against the course standards and implements the changes in current and/or future sections of the course. The improvement team also helps councils with resources to support changes or to develop new content. This council-based approach to course improvement has allowed the online courses to be centered in departments while staying aligned with online course quality and delivery standards and approaches. However, the formal articulation of course improvements has introduced some challenges. For example, most of us are used to making changes to our courses on the fly. It is a much more time-consuming and rigorous process to articulate desired course changes to be reviewed by other faculty and intructional designers and developers. The online course improvement team is refining the improvement process so that course council members can edit course content directly, if desired, while still fulfilling the council process and centralized collection of course content needed for online course delivery. Also, starting Fall 2012, an instructional designer will be a resourse to course councils even after the initial development of a course. Conclusion We have chosen to place highest emphasis on the quality of the learning experience. Through working together we have identified key approaches for building and maintaining a quality experience. That teamwork, combined with faith, will allow us to see ongoing fulfillment of this promise from President Clark (2011, p. 6): If we continue to build Zion here, the Lord will bless us with new understanding of learning of every kind. With it will come new understanding of teaching, and the Lord will bless us to know how to implement what we learn. There is still much for us to learn together. Our team approach will allow us to reach the levels of quality we seek. Reference Clark, Kim B. Learning and Teaching: To Know, To Do, and To Become. BYU Idaho Faculty Meeting, September 6, 2011. http://www2.byui.edu/presentations/ Transcripts/MiscellaneousAddresses/2011_09_06_Clark.htm This council-based approach to course improvement has allowed the online courses to be centered in departments while staying aligned with online course quality and delivery standards and approaches. PERSPECTIVE 6