Accreditation with the AQIP



Similar documents
COIMBATORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, COIMBATORE

Created Actual Completion. Last Modified

AACSB Standards. from the Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation Handbook, revised January 31, 2010

Template for Departmental Report for Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities Self Study (The most critical information is in Italic)

Chapter XXIX 29 TEACHER PERFORMANCE CERTIFIED PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS

MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES BOARD OF TRUSTEES. Agenda Item Summary Sheet

Accreditation Overview

Southern University College of Business Strategic Plan

The globalisation of management education and the value of AACSB accreditation. Stephen Watson November 2009

AACSB Self Evaluation Report Documentation. Supporting Materials and Timeline

Review of the Master of Social Work (M.S.W.)

Demonstrating Institutional Quality through Academic Accreditation

Site Visitor Report Template for Doctoral Programs

GOAL I - Help students successfully obtain their diverse educational goals

NAAS - inacol Standards for Quality Online Programs

Office of Undergraduate Education Strategic Plan

An Overview 30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2400 Chicago, IL Fax:

Division of Human Resources. Strategic Plan For a Culture of Excellence

FROM: E. Thomas Sullivan, Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost. Provost s Charge to Task Force on College Design: CNR/COAFES/CHE

National Center for Healthcare Leadership SUMMARY. Health Leadership Competency Model

Performance Factors and Campuswide Standards Guidelines. With Behavioral Indicators

This page is intentionally blank in the pdf version available online. With this blank page, you will be able to print the document on both sides and

Agricultural Communication Strategic Plan

WV School Counseling Program Audit

WV School Counseling Program Audit

Program Personnel Standards Approval Form. Disciplrne: Nursing. ','J1* )lplll. RTP Committeehair Date i

Strategic Planning at Lane Community College

STRATEGIC PLAN

Strategic Planning & Change Management 3 DAYS

Introduction. Purpose

The Role of Student Learning Outcomes in Accreditation Quality Review

Institutional Assessment Plan. Chicago State University

CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY WORKFORCE PLANNING FRAMEWORK

Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne (IPFW)

Approval of Annual Reauthorization of Degree- Granting Institutions. Salem International University

Assessment PLANS. An effective assessment plan includes several important characteristics:

AACSB INTERNATIONAL SELF-EVALUATION REPORT GUIDELINES

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

School of Accounting Florida International University Strategic Plan

FIVE YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN

Establishing a Successful Onboarding Process Barbara Centeno AVP Human Resources University of Texas San Antonio

Delaware State University. Reflecting on our past while preparing for our future

The AACSB Accreditation Process and Update. Today s Agenda

Strategic Plan for the Enterprise Portfolio Project Management Office Governors Office of Information Technology... Ron Huston Director

DESIGNING OUR FUTURE

OPP CITY SCHOOLS JOB DESCRIPTION. (1) Master s degree from an accredited educational institution.

How To Improve A School

SBBC: JJ-002 FL: 28 THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA JOB DESCRIPTION. Approved School-based Administrators Salary Schedule

SOBA. School of Business Administration Strategic Plan

The University of Texas at San Antonio. Business Affairs 2016 STRATEGIC PLAN December 2007

Strategic Goals: The BSP identifies four overarching strategic goal statements that reinforce and support the mission and vision of the College.

Council for Higher Education Accreditation CHEA Award for Institutional Progress in Student Learning Outcomes

Principal Appraisal Overview

A Strategic Vision for Human Resources

HIRING MANAGER ONBOARDING GUIDE

1. INTRODUCTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL SCAN SQUAMISH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 2014 STRATEGY WORKSHOP BUILDING THE STRATEGIC PLAN

CSR / Sustainability Governance and Management Assessment By Coro Strandberg Principal, Strandberg Consulting

Chapter Three: Challenges and Opportunities

DR. ERIC GRAVENBERG, INTERIM DEPUTY CHANCELLOR DR. MICHAEL ORKIN, VICE CHANCELLOR FOR EDUCATIONAL SERVICES

QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY

Dr. Ryan McLawhon Texas A&M University

Strategic Plan. Delaware College of Art and Design. Approved by the Board of Directors, DATE. A Creative Partnership of Pratt and the Corcoran

Appendix A Sample Job Descriptions for a Coordinator/Manager

SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM ASSESSMENT REPORT

The HLC at MCC Accreditation Overview Assurance Process Timeline Quality Initiative Timeline The Criteria The Evidence & Arguments

Libraries and Educational Technologies Professional & Performance Development Form Library Faculty Self Evaluation

Principal Job Description

Evaluate. Execute. Excel. Facilities Management Evaluation Program

Thomas Nelson Community College

Setting Standards in Public Health Training. The Australian Experience Asia-Pacific Academic consortium for PH Accreditation in PH Education

Strategic Plan The Faculty of Nursing University of Windsor: Making a Difference.

PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESS

AUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITIES QUALITY AGENCY. Report of an Audit of the Three Colleges of Think: Colleges Pty Ltd (Higher Education)

Transcription:

Accreditation with the Academic Quality Improvement Program AQIP

Accreditation by nationally recognized agencies provides objective, public assurance that an institution has been found to meet clearly stated requirements and criteria and that there are reasonable grounds for believing that it will continue to meet them. What is Accreditation? The accrediting agency establishes standards, or criteria, to assess the formal educational activities of the institution. Also evaluated are governance and administration, financial stability, student personnel services, institutional resources, student t academic achievement, institutional effectiveness, and relationships with constituencies inside and outside the institution. Accreditation is also needed to ensure students are eligible to apply for financial aid and that the institution is eligible to apply for certain grants.

The North Central Association (NCA): is one of 6 regional accrediting bodies. NCA serves 19 states including Ohio. Understanding our Accrediting Affiliation Higher Learning Commission i (HLC) is the branch of NCA that accredits institutions of higher education. Academic Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) is one of the options for accreditation through the HLC of NCA that is structured around quality improvement principles and processes.

AQIP s goal is to infuse the principles and benefits of continuous improvement into the culture of colleges and universities in order to assure and advance the quality of higher education. Understanding AQIP AQIP allows an organization to demonstrate acceptable institutional quality as defined by the HLC. The process of accreditation provides an opportunity for critical self analysis leading to improvement in quality, aswell asan an opportunity for benchmarking, consultation and advice from peers at other institutions.

Understanding AQIP What is the value of AQIP Accreditation? At the heart of AQIP is the belief that Lake Erie College can be a better place to go to school and work if each of us attempts to improve the quality of what we do every day. Participation in AQIP involves structured goal setting, networking, and accountability activities.

Understanding AQIP AQIP Accountability Activities include Strategy Forum Ati Action Projects Action Project Progress Reports Systems Portfolio Systems Appraisal Quality Check up Reaffirmation

Understanding AQIP Strategy Forum Isa workshop that provides an institution witha supportive, peer facilitated process that will stimulate and assist it in selecting, critically examining, and committing to Action Projects that will drive quality improvement.

Action Projects Are projects that create a foundation for an institution s improvement initiatives and demonstrate the vitality of its commitment to quality. AQIP institutions commit to three to four projects that will move it closer to being the institution it wants to be. At least one action project must relate directly to Helping Students Learn. Understanding AQIP Action Project Progress Reports These annual progress reports, submitted to the HLC each year, include: 1)progress made,based on timelines, goals and measures; 2) problems and challenges we encountered; and 3) outstanding successes and discoveries made.

Understanding AQIP Systems Portfolio This document presents an overview of our institution that explains the major systems we use to accomplish our mission. AQIP institutions assemble a Systems Portfolio every four years and answer questions under nine AQIP characteristics.

Understanding AQIP Systems Appraisal A team of trained reviewers who read and produce an Appraisal Feedback Report that assesses the maturity of, and identifies strengths and opportunities for improvement within each, of the AQIP Systems Portfolio s nine characteristics.

Understanding AQIP Quality Check up A team of trained evaluators who conduct a visit to a.) affirm the accuracy of the organization s Systems Portfolio; b.) review Action Projects and strategies identified to capitalize on the strengths and opportunities for improvement; c.) assure continuing i quality improvement commitment; and d.) confirm the institution s compliance with accreditation expectations.

1. Maintain SYSTEMS PORTFOLIO 2. ACTION PROJECT updates AQIP Cycle Action Cycle Every Year Strategy Cycle 4 Year Accreditation Cycle 7 Year 1. Systems Appraisal of SYSTEMS PORTFOLIO 2. STRATEGY FORUM Cycle 1. QUALITY CHECK UP Visit 2. Reaffirmation of Accreditation

Action Cycle one year cycle Drives continuous improvement by having every AQIP college or university tackle three or four Ati Action Projects. Organizations can complete Action Projects and begin new ones at any time. Each fall, we provide Action Project Updates to AQIP on the progress of current projects, and AQIP provides written feedback on these reports. Improvements in the processes an institution employs or the performance results it achieves are incorporated into its published Systems Portfolio. Where we are

Where we Strategy Cycle four year cycle are Drives improvement by having every AQIP organizationcreate or complete an up to date Systems Portfolio A System Appraisal of the Systems Portfolio provides institutions with written, actionable feedback they can use to create strategies and actions that will move them quickly toward achievement of their goals. Participation in a Strategy Forum drives organizations to use this feedback kin shaping new strategies, aligning systems, and creating specific Action Projects.

Accreditation Cycle seven year cycle Drives quality assurance withreviews of evidence from both the action cycles and strategy cycles. A Quality Check up visit to the institution a year or two before its Reaffirmation of Accreditation review confirms the improvements it is making as well as the accuracy of the evidence it has provided to AQIP while providing helpful feedback and consultation on specific issues of its choosing. Where we are

Action Projects: New (2011 2012) Create New Program Review process Where we are Create IR/Assessment/Accreditation WebPages withresource tools Development of Academic Recruitment Strategy Plan Assess current Exit process: graduation certification and withdrawals

Action Projects: Retired Retention To develop a college retention committee designed to study and propose changes that increase college wide retention. The primary focus will be academic. However, otheraspectsof of retention will be addressed (student life, financial aid packaging, etc). Establish common data usage process Provide a clear set of definitions of varied data fields used for communications. This would include policy regarding "snapshot" dates, types of data to be included, specific field definition, and access Assessment of studentlearning and program effectiveness Phase II This is a follow up to our first assessment Action Project: Our goal is the development of an updatedplanplan for assessment of student learning and program effectiveness. Where we are

Action Projects: Retired cont d Create a new campus wide system to manage AQIP processes To identity a plan that provides a clearer communication route across all AQIP working groups and provides a set of guidelines for communication and management of AQIP information and projects Updated AQIP Communication Process Provide a clear description of the AQIP process to the entire campus community Establish a systematic institutional manner of assessment This project will identify and examine consistent and direct measures for assessing institutional progress toward achieving institutional goals. Where we are

Action Projects: Retired cont d Development of a campus wide governance system To develop a system of governance that will serve all constituencies within the college community. Review and revise our core curriculum to make use of a newly developed vision of the college and an understanding of our core values to review and revise our core curriculum. To review our majors and academic programs as a whole by working on the core curriculum first. Develop a plan for re visioning the college To look at ways of reviewing our mission statement and then develop a vision of the college, with specific, realistic steps: 1) assessing the current image of the college; 2)determining our core values; 3)developing the vision. Where we are

Where we are Current Strategy: update the Systems Portfolio (see template on shared S: drive) Due November 2012 Feedback F kexpected tdspring 2013

What is the AQIP Systems Portfolio? AQIP has identified nine categories for institutions to show evidence of continuing to meetthe the HLC s Criteriafor Accreditation. Understanding AQIP The Systems Portfolio is designed to presents an overview of our institution that explains the major processes, programs and services we use to accomplish our mission. We assemble a Systems Portfolio every four years and AQIP expects each institution to use the nine categories to structure its System Portfolio while providing evidence in each to show you are also meeting the Criteria for Accreditation.

Criteria for Accreditation? Understanding AQIP The HLC s Criteria for Accreditation are organized under five major headings. Criterion One: Mission and Integrity Criterion Two: Preparing for the Future Criterion Three: Student Learning and Effective Teaching Criterion Four: Acquisition, Discovery, and Application of Knowledge Criterion Five: EngagementandServiceand

Using the nine AQIP Categories: Each AQIP Category deals with a related group of processes, and allows an institution to analyze, understand, and explore opportunities for improving these processes and the interrelationships among them. Nine Categories Each of the nine categories contains a section of each of the following Context for the Analysis Processes Results Improvement

The nine AQIP Categories are 1) Helping Students Learn Nine Categories 2) Accomplishing Other Distinctive Objectives 3) Understanding Students & Other Stakeholders Needs 4) Valuing People 5) Leading & Communicating 6) Supporting Institutional Operations 7) Measuring Effectiveness 8) Planning Continuous Improvement 9) Building Collaborative Relationships

Where evidence is likely to appear in a Systems Portfolio that an institution is meeting the Commission s common Criteria for Accreditation? Crit terion One Crit terion Two ee Crit terion Thr 1. Helping Students Learn X X X 2. Accomplishing Other Distinctive Objectives X X X 3. Understanding Students & Other Stakeholders Needs Crit terion Fou ur Crit terion Five X X X X 4. Valuing People X X 5. Leading and Communicating X X X 6. Supporting Institutional Operations X 7. Measuring Effectiveness X X X X 8. Planning Continuous Improvement X 9. Building Collaborative Relationships X X

AQIP Category One Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching learning processes that underlie your organization s credit and non credit programs andcourses courses, and on the processes required to support them.

AQIP Category Two Accomplishing Other Distinctive Objectives addresses the key processes (separate from your instructional programs and internal support services) through which you serve your external stakeholders the processes that contribute to achieving your majorobjectives objectives, fulfilling your mission, and distinguishing yours from other educational organizations.

AQIP Category Three Understanding Students and Other Stakeholders Needs examines how your organization works actively to understand student and other stakeholder needs.

AQIP Category Four Vli P l l i ti Valuing People explores your organization s commitment to the development of your faculty, staff, and administrators.

AQIP Category Five Leading and Communicating addresses how your leadership and communication processes, structures, t and networks guide your organization in setting directions, making decisions, seeking future opportunities, and communicating decisions and actions to your internal and external stakeholders.

AQIP Category Six Supporting Institutional Operations addresses the organizational support processes that help to provide an environment in which learning can thrive.

AQIP Category Seven Measuring Effectiveness examines how your organization collects, analyzes, distributes, ib t and uses data, information, and knowledge to manage itself and to drive performance improvement.

AQIP Category Eight Planning Continuous Improvement examines your organization s planning processes and how your strategies and action plans help you achieve your missionand vision.

AQIP Category Nine Building Collaborative Relationships examines your organization s relationships current and potential to analyze how they contribute to the organization s accomplishing its mission.