How to Identify a Lfiled and Unfiled Claim



Similar documents
How To Get A Settlement Program Award

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Between. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. And. The Counsel Listed on the Signature Pages Hereto. Dated As Of November 3, 2014

Complaint as permitted by Case Management Order # 4 and Implementing Order PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE

U.S. DUROM CUP SETTLEMENT PROGRAM AGREEMENT. Between. Zimmer, Inc. And. Claimants Liaison Counsel SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

CASE 0:13-cv DWF-FLN Document 17 Filed 06/19/13 Page 1 of 6. UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION TRANSFER ORDER

How To Get Out Of A Policy With Great Southern Insurance Company

IN RE: SKECHERS TONING SHOE : CASE: 3:11-md TBR PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION : : MDL No.: 2308

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO: ORDER AND REASONS

Case3:12-cv CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12

Case4:12-cv KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

The Judges of the Fulton Superior Court hereby create a "Business Case Division" (hereinafter referred to as the "Division").

EXHIBIT A-2 NET SETTLEMENT FUND PLAN OF ALLOCATION. valid, timely Proof of Claim and Release Forms ( Authorized Claimants ) under the Plan of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON In re Classmates.com Consolidated Litigation, Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF MOTION TO AUTHORIZE DISTRIBUTION OF THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND

case 3:12-md RLM-CAN document 2756 filed 09/18/14 page 1 of 11

Rule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se

Local Rules of the District Courts of Montgomery County, Texas

Case 2:10-md CJB-SS Document 8425 Filed 01/31/13 Page 1 of 20

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

Case 2:10-cv IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

) ) NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority vested in me as Chief Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, it is

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

COMBUSTION ENGINEERING 524(g) ASBESTOS PI TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CHESAPEAKE CIRCUIT COURT

Case 2:12-md Document 1262 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 16138

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

If you have been sued as a defendant in a civil case...keep reading.

Storm Damage Arbitration Agreement ADR Systems File # xxxxxxxxx Insurance Claim # xxxxxxxxxx

PROOF OF CLAIM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:09-cv JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : EXHIBIT A

Case 3:11-cv RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BIOMET, INC. AND

Case 2:02-cv TS Document 602 Filed 06/19/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Rule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state;

Case 2:10-md CJB-SS Document Filed 08/15/13 Page 1 of 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365

MASTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES

In re CRM Holdings, Ltd. Securities Litigation c/o GCG P.O. Box Dublin, OH Toll-Free: 1 (844)

Case 4:08-cv RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10

DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND COMPANY LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY APPLICATION

IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Dept 1A

ELECTRONIC FILER AGREEMENT [REVISED JANUARY 1, 2014]

Cy pres funds directed to BayLegal advance justice for the poor.

Case 1:11-cv LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 : : : : :

CASE 0:99-md PAM Document 490 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

COLLABORATIVE AGREEMENT GLOBAL DAMAGE CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

5/12/2015 AGGREGATE PROCEEDINGS PURPOSE OF AGGREGATE PROCEEDINGS

Case 1:09-md LAK-GWG Document 1188 Filed 04/26/13 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

POLICY NO LEGAL DEFENSE BENEFIT

Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS

Case 1:14-cv FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

JAMS Dispute Resolution Rules for Surety Bond Disputes

Enrolled Copy H.B. 287

TrademarkAuthority Legal Services Engagement Agreement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Between. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. And. The Counsel Listed on the Signature Pages Hereto. Dated As Of November 19, 2013

Rule 1A:4. Out-of-State Lawyers When Allowed to Participate in a Case Pro Hac Vice.

Form 6A ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) FORM

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

Section 2 Day Forward Major Jury Program

The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation. c/o The Garden City Group, Inc.

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE YOU MUST COMPLETE THIS CLAIM FORM AND SUBMIT IT BY NOVEMBER 23, 2013 TO BE ELIGIBLE TO SHARE IN THE SETTLEMENT.

Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association. Enacted November 18, 2015

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Hamilton v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., et al., Case No CIV-JIC United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

In re Weatherford International Securities Litigation c/o GCG P.O. Box Dublin, OH PROOF OF CLAIM FORM

: : before this court (the Court Annexed Mediation Program ); and

Local Rules through govern chapter 13 practice in cases filed after October 16, 2005.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

INTRODUCTION. States Constitution and 42 U.S.C against the State of New Jersey, New Jersey s

WASHINGTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PRO SE CUSTODY PACKET

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368

Case 6:66-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Compulsory Arbitration

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS PROCEDURAL RULES FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION HEARINGS

Settlement Reached in Local Clean Water Act Case May 19, Approved Joint Public Statement

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

LOSS MITIGATION PROGRAM PROCEDURES I. PURPOSE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Between. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. And. The Counsel Listed on the Signature Pages Hereto

Case 1:12-md PB Document 93 Filed 06/05/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Settlement Agreement Regarding Federal Lawsuit

This is a notice of a settlement of a class action lawsuit. This is not a notice of a lawsuit against you.

NOTICE TO THE BAR. /s/ Philip S. Carchman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Represented Settlement Agreement

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

[Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 2:14-cv JFC Document 43 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case5:12-cv EJD Document136 Filed01/29/15 Page1 of 7

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

United States District Court, District of Minnesota. Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv DWF/JSM

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: STRYKER REJUVENATE AND ABG II HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates toa lactions MDL No. 13-2441 (DW F/FLN) PRETRIAL ORDER NO.25 ORDER REGARDING REGISTRATION OF CASES AND CLAIMS The Court was informedon November 3, 2014 that a finalsettlement Agreement was enteredintobymdl Plaintiffs Co-LeadCounsel, the New JerseyMulti-County Litigation Plaintiffs Steering Committee, anddefendant Howmedica Osteonics Corp. (referredtoas Stryker Orthopaedics (hereinafter, Stryker )), on behalf of a l defendants, andthe Court having conducteda conference on November 3, 2014 during whichan overview of the proposedprivate settlement of certain Stryker Rejuvenate Modular andabg II Modular Hip Stem cases was discussedandthen placedon the record, andin furtherance of the private Settlement Agreement, the folowing order is herebyentered: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED BY THE COURT: 1. In order for this Court, the cooperating New JerseyMulticountyLitigation (Master Docket No. BER-L-936-13), andanyother cooperating courts tomanage this litigation, as we las toassist the parties toeffectuate the provisions of the private Settlement Agreement, it is necessarytoidentifya lfiledandunfiledclaims relating to

the ABG II Modular NeckHip Stem or the Rejuvenate Modular NeckHip Stem ( AffectedProducts ) (suchclaims, the AffectedProduct-relatedclaims ). 2. Counselfor anyaffectedproduct-relatedcase pending in this Court and/or counselwhohave anyclients whohave claims, filedor unfiled, connectedwiththe AffectedProducts, sha l(i) identifya lclients withfiledandunfiledaffected Product-relatedclaims, whether or not involving a revision surgery, andregardless of the client s ultimate decision regarding enrolment in the Settlement Program, (ii) provide the information for eachsuchclient as set forthon the Registration Declaration and Registration List, including identifying a linterestedcounselin eachfiledcase or unfiled claim and(iii) designate the PrimaryLaw Firm andcontacts as describedbelow. The Registration Declaration for representedandunrepresentedclaimants andthe form of Registration Lists, an example of whichis attachedheretoas Exhibit A, wi lbe made available throughthe Claims Processor, The Garden CityGroup, Inc. 3. Obligations of Counsel: a. Designation of PrincipalResponsible Attorney: The registration of eachfiledcase pursuant tothis Order must designate the PrincipalResponsible Attorneyandlegalassistant for that case. The PrincipalResponsible Attorneysodesignatedsha lbe jointlyidentifiedby the PrimaryLaw Firm andinterestedcounselbyname, state bar number, business address, ande-mailaddress. b. Designation of PrimaryLaw Firm: For eachfiledcase pending in either state or federalcourt, there must be a single designation of 2

a PrimaryLaw Firm. The PrimaryLaw Firm must alsoidentifya lof the clients in whichtheyare the PrimaryLaw Firm byserving a list of a lfiled AffectedProduct-relatedclaims--whether revisedor unrevised--in which suchlaw firm, or anyattorneyat suchlaw firm, is the PrimaryLaw Firm as of the date of this Order. c. Completion andservice of Registration List: The Primary Law Firm representing clients withclaims involving the AffectedProducts must prepare a Registration Declaration andregistration List, identifying a lsuchclients as set out below in 3(B) and3(c). Toobtain a copyof the Registration Declaration andregistration List, gotothe Claims Processor website, www.strykermodularhipsettlement.com, clickon the Registration tab andfolow the instructions. Beginning November 14, 2014, the completedregistration Declaration andregistration List sha lbe submittedtothe Claims Processor (as formattedfor the accurate and efficient transfer of the requiredinformation) nolater than December 14, 2014. Tosubmit these materials, goto www.strykermodularhipsettlement.com, clickthe Registration Button andfolow the uploadinstructions. NOTE: W HILE REGISTRATION IS MANDATORY PURSUANT TO THIS COURT ORDER, UPLOADING THE REGISTRATION DECLARATION AND REGISTRATION LIST ON THE CLAIM PROCESSOR S W EBSITE IN NO W AY SIGNIFIES A CLAIMANT S COMMITMENT OR INTENT TO ENROLL IN THE 3

SETTLEMENT PROGRAM. NOR DOES IT SATISFY A CLAIMANT S ENROLLMENT REQUIREMENTS OR ELIGIBILITY TO RECEIVE BENEFITS UNDER THE SETTLEMENT PROGRAM. d. Information tobe ProvidedRegarding EachFiledCase: For eachfiledcase, the PrimaryLaw Firm sha lidentifyon the Registration List a lcases that are filedin these proceedings or in anyother federalor state court or tribunalin the UnitedStates in whichtheyserve as the PrimaryLaw Firm as of the date of this Order, andprovide the case and claim relatedinformation as set forthon the form Registration List. e. Information tobe ProvidedRegarding EachUnfiledClaim: The PrimaryLaw Firm sha lidentifyon the Registration List a lunfiled claims relating tothe AffectedProducts, whether or not involving a revision surgery, in whichcounselhas anyinterest, andsha linclude certain basic information about eachclaim as set forthon the requiredform. f. The PrimaryLaw Firm sha ldeclare on the Registration Declaration under oaththat (i) a lfiledcases andunfiledclaims in which theyare the PrimaryLaw Firm are identifiedon the Registration List, (ii) a linterestedcounselare identified, and(iii) that the claim-related information is accurate andcomplete. Counselsha lfurther certifyunder oaththat theyhave verifiedthat a lcases in whichtheyhave an Interest are, or wi lbe, identifiedon other Registration Lists submittedbyanother 4

PrimaryLaw Firm. 1 If there is anyclaim relatedtothe AffectedProducts for anyplaintiff or claimant--whether filedor unfiled, or whether or not involving a revision surgery--in whichan attorneyboundbythis Order has an interest andbelieves is not, or wi lnot be, listedon anyregistration List submittedbyanyother PrimaryLaw Firm, then suchattorneysha linclude the plaintiff or unfiledclaimant on his or her Registration List withthe information specifiedin paragraphs 3(B) and3(c) above, andsha lstate NoPrimaryLaw Firm Designated. g. Due Date for Service of Registration List: Registration wi l open on November 14, 2014. The Registration Declaration and Registration List sha lbe servedon the Claims Processor as specifiedabove nolater than December 14, 2014. h. Updates Regarding Change in Status: The PrimaryLaw Firm sha lserve an updatedreport regarding anychange in status of any Plaintiff or UnfiledClaimant identifiedon their Registration List. The updatedreport sha lbe in the form set bythe Claims Processor, andsha l include changes in status tobothunrevisedplaintiffs andunfiledclaimants andplaintiffs andunfiledclaimants withsubsequent additionalrevision surgeries. The Report sha lbe updatedon June 1 andnovember 1 of each calendar year folowing the service of the initialregistration List, andsha l 1 For purposes of registration, an electronic signature denotedby s/ is considered as binding as an originalsignature pursuant tofrcp 5(d)(3). 5

be servedon the Claims Processor whowi lpromptlydistribute tostryker andthe Settlement Oversight Committee ( SOC ). The updating requirement sha lcease upon June 1, 2016. 4. ProSe Plaintiffs andunrepresentedclaimants: A lpersons who representedthemselves pro se in proceedings relating tothe AffectedProducts anda l UnrepresentedClaimants withunfiledclaims relating tothe AffectedProducts (colectively Pro Se Plaintiffs andclaimants ) sha lcomplete the Registration Declaration. The Declaration is available bygoing tothe Claims Processor website, www.strykermodularhipsettlement.com, clicking on the Registration tab and folowing the instructions. Starting November 14, 2014, the completedregistration Declaration sha lbe submittedtothe Claims Processor (as formattedfor the accurate and efficient transfer of the requiredinformation) nolater than December 14, 2014. To submit these materials, gotowww.strykermodularhipsettlement.com, clickthe Registration tab andfolow the uploadinstructions. If the Pro Se Plaintiff Claimant is not able tosubmit the forms electronica ly, s/he sha lsendthe Registration Declaration via U.S. mailpostmarkednolater than December 14, 2014: Stryker Modular Hip Settlement, c/ogcg, PO Box10130, Dublin, OH 43017-3130. NOTE: W HILE REGISTRATION IS MANDATORY PURSUANT TO THIS COURT ORDER, UPLOADING THE REGISTRATION DECLARATION AND REGISTRATION LIST ON THE CLAIM PROCESSOR S W EBSITE IN NO W AY SIGNIFIES A CLAIMANT S COMMITMENT OR INTENT TO ENROLL IN THE SETTLEMENT PROGRAM. NOR DOES IT SATISFY A CLAIMANT S ENROLLMENT 6

REQUIREMENTS OR ELIGIBILITY TO RECEIVE BENEFITS UNDER THE SETTLEMENT PROGRAM. 5. Changes In Information: a. Changes in Information Regarding Attorneyor Represented Status Information: The PrimaryLaw Firm sha lserve written notice of anychanges tothe information providedon the Registration List, including but not limitedtothe acquisition or loss of PrimaryLaw Firm status for the case, anychange in information for the PrimaryLaw Firm, the Principal Responsible Attorney, or administrative contact for the case, anychange in designation of PrimaryLaw Firm status for anycase previouslylistedas NoPrimaryLaw Firm Designated, andanyother change of any information verifiedunder oath. If the change is a loss of PrimaryLaw Firm status or loss of an Interest in the case, the notice sha lalsoidentify the name of the attorneyand/or law firm, telephone number, e-mail, business address of the new representative for the Plaintiff or Unfiled Claimant or, if none, an affirmation of the Plaintiff or UnfiledClaimant s pro se status andthe telephone number, e-mailandaddress for the Plaintiff or UnfiledClaimant. Suchwritten notice must specifythe changed circumstances andbe servedwithin thirty(30) days of suchchange upon the Claims Processor. This obligation sha lterminate on June 1, 2016. b. Pro Se Plaintiffs andunrepresentedclaimants: A lpro Se Plaintiffs andunrepresentedclaimants sha lserve written notice of any 7

changes tothe information providedon the Registration List, including but not limitedtoanychange regarding contact information or the subsequent retention of counsel. If the change of information is the retention of counsel, the Pro Se Plaintiff or Claimant sha lprovide the attorneyname, address, telephone number ande-mailaddress for counsel. Suchwritten notice must specifythe changedcircumstances andbe servedwiththirty (30) days of suchchange upon the Claims Processor. This obligation sha l terminate on June 1, 2016. 6. Enforcement: A lcounselandpro Se Plaintiffs andunrepresented Claimants are requiredtocomplywiththis Order. Failure tomeet the requirements of this Order wi lsubject non-compliant parties andcounseltoa show cause hearing as to the reason for suchfailure andmaysubject suchpartyor counseltopenalties at the Court s discretion. 7. Compliance W ithcourt Orders: Pursuant tothe Settlement Agreement, a l plaintiffs andunfiledclaimants, whether representedor unrepresentedbycounsel, who elect toparticipate in the Settlement Program agree toabide byanyorders of the court in whichthe case is filedor, if it is an unfiledclaim, bythe MDL Court proceeding in furtherance of the Settlement Agreement, including PretrialOrder No. 24 issuedbythis Court or the Order Aiding Private Settlement issuedbythe New JerseyMCL, as applicable. 8

8. Joint Database: The Claims Processor sha lmaintain a database of a lcases andclaims identifiedpursuant tothis Order as set forthin further detailin the final Settlement Agreement. 9. Cooperation W ithother Jurisdictions: This Order is enteredin conjunction withcoordinatedproceedings pending in the New JerseyMCL (Master Docket BER-L-936-13. It is the intention of this Court toworkin cooperation withthe New JerseyMCL Court andanyother participating courts in a manner that promotes judicialeconomyandthat secures as complete a registration of a lclaims andpotential claims as possible, for use amongst the cooperating courts andtheir leadership counsel. It is alsothe intention of this Court toworkin cooperation withanyother state court or tribunalin whichclaims relating tothe AffectedProducts are pending. If there is any dispute concerning the implementation of this Order, this Court wi lcoordinate conferral among the courts for resolution of the issue, consistent withthe law of the various jurisdictions. Dated: November 13, 2014 s/donovan W. Frank DONOVAN W. FRANK UnitedStates District Judge 9