SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE COUNTY



Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

Case AJC Document 1 Filed 03/01/2008 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION

How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT

Case mhm Document 1 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

O8. RECEIVED Civil Clk' Office. JUN Superior Court of th District of Cohmibja

Case4:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

MARC D. LAVIK, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : C.A. No. PC 11- : DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, : DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, : STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, : COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG (CHARLOTTESVILLE) DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/17/2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY

Case No.: CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTY OF WORKMANSHIP AND HABITABILITY. Plaintiffs,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT

Case 2:06-cv JF-SDP Document 69 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 15

Case 6:14-cv WSS Document 1-24 Filed 01/13/14 Page 1 of 35 EXHIBIT F

Case 1 :09-cv CKK Document 6 Filed 06/18/2009 Page 1 of 12

) CIVIL NO. v. ) WORLD CLASS NETWORK, INC., ) a Nevada corporation; ) COMPLAINT FOR ) RELIEF. DANIEL R. DIMACALE, an individual; )

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case3:13-cv JST Document27 Filed11/27/13 Page1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: 3:12-cv wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/05/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS

Case 1:14-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 2:14-cv JS-ARL Document 1 Filed 10/28/14 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 131. : : - against - : : : Defendant.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF

CIVIL DICTRICT COURT PARISH OF ORLEANS STATE OF LOUISIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. Civil Action No.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Windmill Inns of America, d/b/a Windmill Inn of Ashland, Defendant.

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF] hereby sues the Defendants, [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 2:15-cv SHL-dkv Document 1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 1 of 16 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Case 2:09-cv GZS Document 1 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Doc 1 Filed 04/07/15 Entered 04/07/15 11:42:31 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/15/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1

Case 1:05-cv JGK Document 1 Filed 04/04/05 Page 1 of 6. Plaintiff, : Civ. No. 05cv3493

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/21/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. ) IATRIC SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv ) v. ) ) FAIRWARNING, INC.

Case 1:11-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 07/01/11 Page 1 of 8 SPRINT UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff, Defendant.

Recent Developments and Emerging Issues in Coverage/Bad Faith Claims

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS KANSAS CITY-LEAVENWORTH DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 7 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

v. C.A. No. PC COMPLAINT 1. Plaintiff Daniel Doyle is a resident of the state of Connecticut and Founder and Executive

CASE 0:12-cv RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case Number XXX I. INTRODUCTION. 1. Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O., prepare immigration documents for customers for a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv PBS Document 1 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Case No.

COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST PLAINTIFF ECOSMART, LLC AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT AGAINST CARLOS ANTONIO CABRERA

Case 1:16-cv CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION. In Re: Bankruptcy No (Chapter 11) Filed Electronically

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No.

BEFORE THE FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

Attorneys for Plaintiff People of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Defendants.

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 07/01/14 Page 1 of 17

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 12 ORIGH~~AL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

The State of New Jersey, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

No. 45TH. Plaintiff EDGEWOOD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT files its Original Petition

Case 2:13-cv TOR Document 1 Filed 07/30/13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

COMPLAINT. Now come Plaintiffs, personal care attendants, consumers, surrogates,

ELECTRONIC INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal

Case 1:14-cv RBW Document 21 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CONSENT ORDER OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC

Transcription:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE COUNTY THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. -against- ) ) WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY, ) ) Defendant. ) ) COMPLAINT Plaintiff The BIG EAST Conference seeks through this action specific performance, injunctive relief and/or damages against Defendant West Virginia University. INTRODUCTION 1. This action arises from the breach by West Virginia University ( WVU ) of its obligations to the BIG EAST Conference and its Members, as expressly set forth in the BIG EAST Bylaws, which require any Member desiring to withdraw from the Conference to give at least twenty-seven months notice and to play all athletic competitions included in the Conference schedules until the effective date of the withdrawal. 2. Notwithstanding this express requirement, WVU has purported to withdraw from The BIG EAST Conference to join the Big 12 Conference on July 1, 2012, thereby breaching its obligations under the BIG EAST Bylaws.

3. Defendant WVU had knowledge of the express requirements of the BIG EAST Bylaws prior to indicating that it would not honor those Bylaws. 4. Absent relief, Defendant s actions will result in irreparable harm to the BIG EAST Conference and its Members, including damage to the Conference s reputation and goodwill, the quality of student life, alumni relations, and community relations. 5. In addition, Defendant s actions will result in significant monetary damages to the BIG EAST Conference and its Members. 6. Accordingly, Plaintiff seeks specific performance by Defendant WVU of the withdrawal requirements set forth in the BIG EAST Bylaws and/or injunctive relief precluding Defendant WVU from leaving the BIG EAST Conference before July 1, 2014. 7. Plaintiff also seeks damages from WVU for its improper actions. 2

THE PARTIES 8. Plaintiff The BIG EAST Conference is a District of Columbia not-forprofit corporation headquartered in Providence, Rhode Island. 9. Defendant West Virginia University is an institution of higher education with a main campus in Morgantown, West Virginia. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 10. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to R.I. Gen. Laws 8-2-13 and 8-2-14 because the amount in controversy exceeds ten thousand dollars ($10,000). 11. Venue is proper in the Superior Court in Providence County under R.I. General Laws 9-4-3 which allows an action to be brought in the Superior Court of the County in which Plaintiff dwells. The Big East Conference has its headquarters in Providence County. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 12. The BIG EAST Conference provides a jointly-governed body for sponsoring, supervising and regulating intercollegiate athletics, assists its Members in funding and promoting their intercollegiate athletics programs, and enhances the opportunities for participation in, and the level of competition of, men s and women s intercollegiate athletics on an equitable basis. 13. The Members of the BIG EAST Conference are Providence College, Georgetown University, St. John s University, Villanova University, Seton 3

Hall University, The University of Connecticut, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Marquette University, The University of Notre Dame, The University of Louisville, The University of Cincinnati, DePaul University, The University of South Florida, West Virginia University, Syracuse University, and The University of Pittsburgh. Certain of the Members do not participate in all of the Conference s sports. 14. To accomplish the Conference s goals, the participating Member schools have worked together on a number of collective activities, including, among other activities, creating annual conference schedules in which Conference teams play each other every season in 24 sports, negotiating and participating in joint agreements with respect to the sale of broadcast and other media rights, ongoing joint marketing efforts, and an ongoing effort to maximize the athletic and financial interests of the BIG EAST Conference and its member schools. 15. Defendant West Virginia University has been a Member of the BIG EAST since 1991. 16. In September 2006, the BIG EAST entered into a contract with ESPN for the broadcast of its football games, a contract worth tens of millions of dollars of revenue for the BIG EAST and its member schools over its duration. WVU voted to authorize the BIG EAST to enter into this contract. The contract is set to expire after the 2013 season, but it includes an exclusive 4

negotiating period for an extension, and the parties have been discussing an extension of that contract. The contract provides that if a member of the BIG EAST leaves during the term, the parties shall negotiate in good faith with respect to a reduction of the rights fee. 17. In September 2006, the BIG EAST entered into a six-year contract with ESPN, running through the 2013 season, to broadcast its men s and women s basketball games, a contract worth tens of millions of dollars of revenue for the BIG EAST and its member schools over its duration. WVU voted to authorize the BIG EAST to enter into this contract. The agreement between the BIG EAST and ESPN permits ESPN to negotiate a reduction in the rights fees it owes to the BIG EAST in the event that a member school leaves the Conference for any reason. 18. In 1994, the BIG EAST entered into a contract with CBS, which by subsequent amendment runs through the 2013 season, to broadcast its men s and women s basketball games, a contract worth tens of millions of dollars of revenue for the BIG EAST and its member schools over its duration. WVU voted to authorize the BIG EAST to enter into this contract. The agreement between the BIG EAST and CBS permits CBS to negotiate a reduction in the rights fees it owes to the BIG EAST in the event that a member school leaves the Conference for any reason. 5

19. Defendant WVU is a Member of the BIG EAST Conference and a party to the BIG EAST Bylaws and related agreements and thus has an existing contractual relationship with the BIG EAST and its member schools. BIG EAST BYLAWS WITHDRAWAL PROVISIONS 20. The Members of the BIG EAST Conference, including WVU, are governed by Bylaws. A true and correct copy of those Bylaws, as amended and effective presently, is attached as Exhibit A. 21. The BIG EAST Bylaws, to which WVU is a party, provide in Article 11 that a Member may unilaterally withdraw from the Conference by: (i) providing written notice to the Commissioner, copying each of the other members, with an effective date of withdrawal at least 27 months after the date of receipt (and which withdrawal date must be July 1 of the applicable year in which the withdrawal is to be effective); (ii) payment of a Withdrawal Fee of $5 million, with $2.5 million due upon the first delivery of the withdrawal notice (although under certain circumstances this amount would increase to $10 million for football-playing members); and (iii) playing all athletic competitions included in the conference schedules until the effective date of withdrawal. 22. The Bylaws expressly state the agreement of each Member, including WVU, that any attempted withdrawal without full compliance with these re- 6

quirements would cause irreparable harm to the Conference and to the nonwithdrawing Members for which there is no adequate remedy at law. 23. The Bylaws specifically provide that the Conference shall be entitled to seek and obtain injunctive relief, including but not limited to an injunction, requiring the Departing Member to comply with the withdrawal procedures and obligations set forth in the Bylaws. The Withdrawing Member is also required to pay the Conference s costs, including reasonable attorneys fees, associated with any proceeding seeking such equitable relief. 24. All BIG EAST member schools, including WVU, are required to adhere to and abide by the obligations set forth in the BIG EAST Bylaws. 25. The Bylaw provisions governing withdrawal from the Conference were adopted unanimously by the Members, including WVU. 26. The then-president of WVU, David Hardesty, and WVU s then-general counsel, Thomas Dorer, were among the principal drafters of the withdrawal provisions of the Bylaws, including the 27-month notice requirement. 27. The October 17, 2011 amendment to the withdrawal provisions was adopted unanimously by the Members eligible to vote, including WVU. BREACH OF THE BYLAWS 28. Despite these express provisions, to which it had agreed when it accepted membership in the BIG EAST and which it has subsequently confirmed through amendments to the BIG EAST Bylaws Defendant WVU 7

announced publicly on October 28, 2011 that it had applied to and been accepted to the Big 12 Conference, and that WVU would begin participating in Big 12 Conference athletic events in July 2012 (i.e., two years before the earliest effective date upon which WVU could withdraw from the BIG EAST). 29. On October 28, 2011, WVU sent a purported notice of withdrawal to the Commissioner of the BIG EAST stating that WVU purported to withdraw from the BIG EAST on June 30, 2012. A true and correct copy of this notice is attached at Exhibit B to this Complaint. 30. Amplifying WVU s intention to breach the Bylaws, WVU s President James P. Clements stated in published news releases that, [WVU s] intent is clearly July 1 we ll be a member of the Big 12. 31. By such conduct, Defendant WVU has both breached and unequivocally stated an intent to breach its contractual obligations to the BIG EAST. 32. In its October 28, 2011 news release, available on its website, the Big 12 Conference announced that it would accept WVU as a full conference member effective July 1, 2012 and that the Mountaineers will begin competing in the Big 12 beginning with the 2012 13 athletic season. INJURY TO PLAINTIFFS 33. Defendant, through its actions, has intentionally injured the reputation, goodwill and financial interests of the BIG EAST and its Members. 8

34. The withdrawal of Defendant WVU prior to July 1, 2014 would trigger rights on the parts of ESPN and CBS to negotiate for reductions in the rights fees payable under their respective contracts for the broadcast of BIG EAST football and men s and women s basketball games. 35. Moreover, if WVU were to leave the Conference prior to the 27-month period required by the Bylaws, the BIG EAST and its Member Schools will be irreparably harmed because it will be impossible to reschedule all of the Conference athletic contests in a fair and equitable manner. In addition, the BIG EAST and its Member Schools will likely incur additional costs and unquantifiable injuries resulting from having to reschedule or cancel contests for the 2012 13 and 2013 14 seasons. 36. Defendant s unlawful conduct as set forth herein was and continues to be willful, deliberate, and in bad faith. 37. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant s unlawful conduct has caused and likely will continue to cause injury to Plaintiff. COUNT ONE - BREACH OF CONTRACT 38. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 37 as if fully set forth herein. 39. The BIG EAST Conference Bylaws constitute a valid and enforceable contract between and among the BIG EAST and its members, including WVU. 9

40. Defendant WVU is a member of the BIG EAST Conference and is thus obligated to adhere to the provisions set forth in the BIG EAST Bylaws. 41. By the actions set forth above, WVU has materially breached the Bylaws by not complying with the withdrawal provisions in Article 11 of the Bylaws. 42. As a direct and proximate result of WVU s breach, Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer substantial damages and irreparable harm, as set forth above. 43. Pursuant to the Bylaws, Plaintiff is entitled to seek and obtain injunctive relief, including but not limited to an injunction requiring WVU to comply with the withdrawal procedures and obligations, including the obligation to participate fully in all scheduled Conference athletic events during the 2012 13 and 2013 14 seasons (i.e., through and including June 30, 2014). 44. Pursuant to the Bylaws, Plaintiff is also entitled to an award of costs, including reasonable attorneys fees, associated with this proceeding. 45. In addition, Plaintiff is entitled to damages for the harms that can be quantified in an amount in excess of $10,000 to be proven at trial as a result of WVU s breach of its obligations under the Bylaws. 10

PRAYER FOR RELIEF Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court: 1. Order specific performance of WVU s obligations under the Big East Bylaws, including full compliance with the withdrawal provisions of Article 11 (including the requirement that WVU participate fully in all Conference athletic events scheduled for up to and including June 30, 2014); 2. Issue an injunction prohibiting WVU from leaving the BIG EAST absent such compliance; 3. Require Defendant to pay an amount to be determined at trial to compensate the Plaintiff for all damages sustained as a result of Defendant s unlawful conduct described above, plus interest thereon; 4. Award Plaintiff the costs of this suit and their reasonable attorneys fees; and 5. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems appropriate. Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury. Respectfully submitted, Of Counsel: Joseph V. Cavanagh, Jr. Stephen J. Reid COVINGTON & BURLING LLP Joseph V. Cavanagh, III 1201 Pennsylvania Ave., NW BLISH & CAVANAGH LLP Washington, DC 20004-2401 Commerce Center (202) 662-6000 30 Exchange Terrace Providence, RI 02903-1765 (401) 831-8900 11