U. S. Citizenship and Immigration



Similar documents
U. S. Citizenship and Immigration

PUBLIC COPY. identiging Qta b. and Immigration. invasion of pe~onal pdvay. prevent clear lr J unwmw. Services. U.S. Citizenship

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: 0

U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

' Administrative 2ddzr5? PUBLIC COPY. and Immigration. invasion of personal privacy. identifying data deleted to. U. S.

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C l(a)( 15)(H)(i)(b)

Specialty Occupations and Positions - Overview of the US Citizens Visa Agreements

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: UG

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: APR

FILE: EAC Office: VERh4ONT SERVICE CENTER Date: JUL

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: APR O

FILE: EAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: ' 28Q6

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: I ,, 1'.

and Immigration Services

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: ~ny 2 8

FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: SEP 3 9

PUBLIC COPY. u.s. Citizenship. invasion of&m~ml pivacy. and Imigration. identifying data deleted to. prevent ci6,aly unwarranted

PUBLIC COPY. and Immigration. invasion of personal privacy. identifying data deleted to prevent clearly c r-wmmted. U. S.

FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date:,,,

FILE: Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: hpff 0 g m#

and Immigration Services A/

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: 2 2 2OuS

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: APR

Petition for a ~on&nigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 10 1 (a)(l S)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. $ 1 lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)@)

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C l(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b)

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration

FILE: SRC Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: APR s

U. S. Citizenship. and Immigration. Services FILE: MAY 0 4. Petitioner: Beneficiary: PETITION:

and Immigration U. S. Citizenship Services FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: JAN Petitioner: Beneficiary: 8

PUBtlC COPY. identijring data deleted to. invasion of personal privacy. prevent clearly unwarranted. and Immigration. U.S.

~..,.~{! J)}.'- u.s. Citizenship. PUBLIC COpy. Identifying-cllllll4tD- invasion ofpersonal pnv~y. prevent clearly unw~ted. and Immigration Services

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: NOV

Petition for a Nonimrnigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b)

and Immigration Services

and Immigration U. S. Citizenship FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date:

PUBLIC COPY. 'nvotsion ofper~onal privacy. identifiir~g data deletbd to. and Immigration. pfevent clearly hinwmted. Services. U. S. Citizenship IN RE:

Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER

U. S. Citizenship and Immigration

Petition for a Nonimrnigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b)

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: JUN

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: AUG

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 4 1 lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b)

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: fim 2 g 2l)ljtj

PUBLIC COPY, and Immigration. invasion of personal privacy. identity 1 kt,!. :'.. k~~fltd U, prevent cleai r j L;L. -@ U. S. Citizenship.

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: &PI

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: NAR 1 6

pqj%lic COPY P= vent dearly u n w d %Ha$ -- on of oersona1 orkw data dekfed to &&&bg and Immigration U. S. Citizenship Services PETITION:

PUBLIC COPY. identieing data deleted to. and Immigration. invasion of personal privacy. U.S. Citizenship. prevent clearly u n w d.

What is a Proffered Position in the USA?

PUBLIC COPY. and Immigration. U.S. Citizenship. FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: ApR 1 g 2a)5

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b)

U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

U. S. Citizenship and Immigration

FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: AuG

flu^& identiiliagcbqldt6 PIlBLIC COPY invasion of personal privacy prevent clearly unwarranted

u. S. Citizenship PUBLIC COP'y invasion ofpersonal pnvacy identifying data deleted to prevent clearly unwarr~ted and Immigration Services

PUBLIC COPY. idaaifybgbdehib. prevent clearly uninvasion. and Immigration. of personal pivrey. U.S. Citizenship. Services. rn RE:

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 10 1 (a)(l S)(H)(i)(b) of the

FILE: LIN Office: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER Date:

apeatgiog data deleted to

FILE: Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date:

paeveat clearly unwarrante:

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1l01(a)(15)(H)(i)(b)

and Immigration Services U. S. Citizenship Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: MAR 1 4 WAC

and Immigration U.S. Citizenship Services l, -9 Office: VEMONT SERVICE CENTER D ~ PETITION:

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: APR F

FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date:

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b) ofthe Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b)

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) ofthe Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b)

Petition for a Nonirnmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b)

~ardon dbem erlmo PUBLIC COPY

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b)

FILE: LIN Office: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER Date: JUN

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: NOV C

invasion of personal privacy

FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: AUG

FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: DEC

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C (a)(lS)(H)(i)(b)

FILE: WAC Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: MAR

FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: A&

Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER

Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER

U.S.Citizenship and Immigration

How To Get A Nursing Job In Vermont

JB' U. S. Citizenship and Immigration. FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER ~ateja I

FILE: Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: EAC flay 3 0 ZW

Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER

How To Get A Job In The United States

f'(i,lx"'- ~~ Robert P. Wiemann, Chief Administrative Appeals Office u.s. Citizenship PUBLICCOP"i invasion ofpersonal privacy

Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1l01(a)(15)(H)(i)(b)

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

invasion of persona1 privacy

Selecting a Specialty Occupation Based on Contract Laws

identitjring dat? Meted t6 ppevent cler~iy tmwmanted

U. S. Citizenship and Immigration

PUBUC COPY. identieing data d cw to paevent clady r~tmw. inv orf me^ U. S. Citizenship and Immigration. TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: MC 2 6 2m

U. S. Citizenship. and Immigration Services. FILE: EAC Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date:

(b)(6) Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER

Transcription:

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Mass Ave., N.W., Rm. A3042 Washington, DC 20529 U. S. Citizenship and Immigration % FILE: WAC 04 072 5 1073 Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: Au 2 8 1 2e/03 PETITION: Petition for a Nonirnmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1 lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS : This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. Robert P. Wiemann, Director Administrative Appeals Office

DISCUSSION: The director of the service center denied the nonirnrnigrant visa petition and the matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed. The petition will be denied. The petitioner is a jewelry wholesaler. It seeks to employ the beneficiary as a software engineer, applications. The petitioner, therefore, endeavors to classify the beneficiary as a nonimrnigrant worker in a specialty occupation pursuant to section lol(a)(ls)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 1 lol(a)(l5>(h)(i)(b). The director denied the petition because the evidence of record does not establish that the job offered qualifies as a specialty occupation. On appeal, the petitioner submits a brief and additional evidence. Section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 3 1184(i)(l), defines the term "specialty occupation" as an occupation that requires: (A) (B) theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 3 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), to qualify as a specialty occupation, the position must meet one of the following criteria: (I) A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement for entry into the particular position; (2) The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree; (3) The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or (4) The nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that knowledge required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) interprets the term "degree" in the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty that is directly related to the proffered position. The record of proceeding before the AAO contains: (1) Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2) the director's request for additional evidence; (3) counsel's response to the director's request; (4) t11e director's denial letter; and (5) Form I-290B and supporting documentation. The AAO reviewed the record in its entirety before issuing its decision. The petitioner is seeking the beneficiary's services as a part-time software engineer, applications. Evidence of the beneficiary's duties includes: the Form 1-129; the attachments accompanying the Form 1-129; the company support letter; and counsel's response to the director's request for evidence. According to this evidence, the beneficiary would perform duties that entail applying principles and techniques of computer

science to plan architecture for the company's web system and to design, develop and write customized web applications software; analyzing user needs and developing software solutions with the aim of optimizing operational efficiency for global business; utilizing knowledge of computer technology and languages, including PHP, JavaScript, HTML, Server and SQL for designing and developing; analyzing and designing database management software with integration into websystem; conducting software development, testing, debugging and troubleshooting of application by modifying and/or correcting program errors to meet specifications. The petitioner did not indicate the minimum qualifications for the proffered position. The director issued a request for additional evidence. The director requested a more detailed description of the work done, including specific job duties and the percentage of time to be spent on each duty. The director also requested additional information about the petitioner such as federal income tax returns and quarterly wage reports. h response, the petitioner stated that the duties and percentage of time to be spent on each duty are as follows: Apply principles and techniques of computer science to design and develop customized software applications for the company (100%): Planning architecture for company's web system and design, developing design, developing and writing customized web applications software (20%); Analyzing and designing database management software with integration into web system (20%); Analyzing user needs and developing software solutions with the aim of optimizing operational efficiency for global business (20%); \ Utilizing knowledge of computer technology and languages, including PHP, JavaScript, HTML, Server and SQL for designing and developing (15%); Conducting software development, testing, debugging and troubleshooting of application by modifying andlor correcting program errors to meet specifications (15%); Reporting or recommending resolution to the management (10%). The petitioner indicated that the minimum education, training and experience necessary to do the proffered job of software engineer, applications requires a master's degree in computer science. The petitioner stated that a baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement for entry into the particular position of software engineer and quoted sections from the occupation section of the Department of Labor Occupational Outlook Handbook (the Handbook): "most employers prefer to hire persons who have at least a bachelor's degree and broad knowledge and experience with computer systems and technologies." The director determined the record did not contain sufficient evidence demonstrating that a degree requirement is the industry standard for this position, or that the beneficiary's duties are so unique that they can only be performed by an individual with abilities beyond the industry standard. Additionally, the director determined that the petitioner has not demonstrated a bachelor's degree is required because the job duties are so complex that someone may not perform them with the minimum educational background gained through a bachelor's degree program. Thus, the director determined that the proffered position was not a specialty occupation. On appeal, counsel states that the proffered position is a specialty occupation. Counsel states that the director failed to consider relevant factors and ignored the petitioner's detailed explanation of its unique and specific needs. Counsel contends that the petitioner is a leader in the highly competitive Los Angeles jewelry market. Counsel asserts that the petitioner has about 5000 sales orders per week and a weekly inventory of 10,000

items. Without documentary evidence to support the claim, the assertions of counsel will not satisfy the petitioner's burden of proof. The assertions of counsel do not constitute evidence. Matter of Obaigbena, 19 I&N Dec. 533, 534 (BIA 1988); Matter Of Laureano, 19 I&N Dec. 1 (BIA 1983); Matter of Ramirez- Sanchez, 17 I&N Dec. 503, 506 (BIA 1980). Counsel explains that the petitioner needs a highly trained software engineer to design and implement such technologies to improve its competitive position. Upon review of the record, the petitioner has established none of the four criteria outlined in 8 C.F.R. 3 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). Therefore, the proffered position is not a specialty occupation. The AAO first considers the criteria at 8 C.F.R. $9 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(I) and (2): a baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is the normal minimum requirement for entry into the particular position; a degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations; or a particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree. Factors often considered by CIS when determining these criteria include: whether the Handbook reports that the industry requires a degree; whether the industry's professional association has made a degree a minimum entry requirement; and whether letters or affidavits from f m or individuals in the industry attest that such firms "routinely employ and recruit only degreed individuals." See Shanti, Inc. v. Reno, 36 F. Supp. 2d 115 1, 1165 (D.Minn. 1999)(quoting HirdIBlaker Corp. v. Suva, 712 F. Supp. 1095, 1102 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)). In determining whether a position qualifies as a specialty occupation, CIS looks beyond the title of the position and determines, from a review of the duties of the position and any supporting evidence, whether the position actually requires the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and the attainment of a baccalaureate degree in a specific specialty as the minimum for entry into the occupation as required by the Act. The AAO routinely consults the Handbook for its information about the duties and educational requirements of particular occupations. Counsel states that the duties of the proffered position are performed by software engineers, applications. The Handbook discloses that the duties of the proffered position are performed by computer applications software engineers. Like the beneficiary, who will analyze user needs and develop software solutions with the aim of optimizing operational efficiency for global business, the Handbook reports: Computer applications software engineers analyze users' needs and design construct and maintain general computer applications software or specialized utility programs. These workers use different programming languages, depending on the purpose of the program. The programming languages often used are C, C++, and Java, with Fortran and COBOL used less commonly. Some software engineers develop both package systems and systems software or create customized applications. The petitioner fails to establish the first criterion because although the Handbook states most employers prefer to hire persons who have at least a bachelor's degree and broad knowledge of and experience with a variety of computer systems and technologies, it is not a requirement for entry into the field. The Handbook specifically notes that for systems engineering jobs that place less emphasis on workers having a computer related degree, computer training programs leading to certification are offered by systems software vendors. Accordingly, the petitioner cannot establish that a baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent in a specific specialty is the normal minimum requirement for entry into the proffered position. There is no evidence in the record that would establish the second criterion - that a specific degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations.

Nor is there evidence in the record to establish the third criterion at 8 C.F.R. 5 213.2(h)(4)(iii)(A): that the petitioner normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position. The fourth criterion at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) requires that the petitioner establish that the nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that the knowledge required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree. Once again, the Handbook indicates that some employers prefer to hire persons who have at least a bachelor's degree, but that it is not a requirement for an entry-level position in the field. The petitioner submits a letter from a software company whose author indicates that he "highly recornrnend[s] [the petitioner] to hire a professional software engineer for the secured website programming in both languages." The author recommended hiring a professional software engineer with a minimum of a bachelor's degree. The petitioner has not related the listed duties to its business of importing and the distribution of jewelry. The petitioner has not provided evidence of the size and complexity of its business such as its 50 retail customers, and 5,000 sales orders per week, upon which the petitioner bases its need for a highly trained software engineer, with at least a bachelor's degree in a computer related field. To determine whether a particular job qualifies as a specialty occupation, CIS does not simply rely on a position's title. The specific duties of the proffered position, combined with the nature of the petitioning entity's business operations, are factors to be considered. CIS must examine the ultimate employment of the alien, and determine whether the position qualifies as a specialty occupation. CJ: Defensor v. Meissner, 201 F. 3d 384 (5fi Cir. 2000). The critical element is not the title of the position nor an employer's self-imposed standards, but whether the position actually requires the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree in the specific specialty as the minimum for entry into the occupation, as required by the Act. The petitioner has not shown, in relation to its business, that the duties of the proffered position are so complex or unique that they can be performed only by an individual with a degree in a specific specialty. Although some computer software engineer positions may be considered specialty occupations, the petitioner's description of the duties associated with this position did not demonstrate that the preponderance of the beneficiary's duties would be so complex that they would require a baccalaureate degree in a specialty. Again, the Handbook reveals that the duties of the proffered position would be performed by a computer software engineer, an occupation that does not require a specific baccalaureate degree. Thus, the petitioner fails to establish the fourth criterion at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). As related in the discussion above, the petitioner has failed to establish that the proffered position is a specialty occupation. Accordingly, the AAO shall not disturb the director's denial of the petition on the ground that the proffered position does not qualify as a specialty occupation. The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1361. The petitioner has not sustained that burden. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. The petition is denied.