An Argument for Uniform E-Discovery Practice in Cross-Border Civil Litigation

Similar documents

Southern General Insurance Co. v. Holt: Defining "Duty" in the Duty-to-Settle Doctrine as Applied to Third-Party Insurance Claims in Georgia

Taming the Beast Open Records and Discovery for

Forum of International Development Studies 21 (Mar. 2002)

WHAT MATTERS MOST TO CORPORATE COUNSEL IN E-DISCOVERY MANAGEMENT. Presenting the results from BDO s inaugural Inside E-Discovery Survey

The Intrusive Nature of Discovery in U.S. Patent Litigation

Digital Government Institute. Managing E-Discovery for Government: Integrating Teams and Technology

Delivering Global Ediscovery Successfully. Emily A. Cobb, Ropes & Gray Andrew Szczech, Kroll Ontrack Thomas Sely, Kroll Ontrack

CIVIL PROCEDURE ESSAY #1.

Cyber Tech & E-Commerce

Le storytelling : un outil de gestion des connaissances

Take an Enterprise Approach to E-Discovery. Streamline Discovery and Control Review Cost Using a Central, Secure E-Discovery Cloud Platform

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE WISCONSIN JUDICIAL COUNCIL MADISON, WISCONSIN April 16, 2010

L'après projet ERP : Retour d'expérience sur un changement qui n'a pas eu lieu

Navigating E-Discovery, And The

Systèmes d'information et Management

In-House Solutions to the E-Discovery Conundrum

Delegate Invitation & Information Pack 26 th 28 th July 2011, Speke Resort & Conference Centre Munyonyo, Kampala, Uganda

DOCUMENT RETENTION STRATEGIES FOR HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS

TEXAS ENHANCED FLAT-RATE LIBRARY

Resource Allocation in Seventh-day Adventist Elementary Schools: an Educational Production Function Study

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. DISTRICT OF NEVADA NO. 2:13-cv APG-PAL SPECIAL MASTER DANIEL B. GARRIE E-DISCOVERY SUMMARY AND ORDER

How To Write A Letter To The European Commission On A Number Of Issues

NightOwlDiscovery. EnCase Enterprise/ ediscovery Strategic Consulting Services

U.S. Litigation (Strategic Preparations and Statistics)

Business Court 2012 Annual Report

Amendments to the Rules to Civil Procedure: Yours to E-Discover. Prepared by Christopher M. Bartlett Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP

Record Retention, ediscovery, Spoliation: Issues for In-House Counsel

Joe Matthews. Joseph M. Matthews, P.A.

Melbourne Central Catholic High School HONORS DIPLOMA APPLICATION Completed application due to Guidance by: March 13, 2015 *This application includes

Compliance Requirements and Social Media Usage: FINRA and SEC

Organizations today are faced with an CORPORATE COUNSEL PROVIDE AN INSIDE LOOK AT THE STATE OF E-DISCOVERY EXECUTIVE REPORT

FTI MANAGED E-DISCOVERY SERVICES

THE PHONE RINGS FROM DOWN SOUTH: WHAT ISSUES SHOULD I CONSIDER FOR EXPANDING MY U.S. FRANCHISE INTO CANADA?

ETEEAP APPLICATON FORM INSTRUCTION:

AAS Paralegal Program Student Survey

PRETRIAL LITIGATION IN A NUTSHELL. R. LAWRENCE DESSEM Professor of Law University of Tennessee ST. PAUL, MINN. WEST PUBLISHING CO.

Elaine M. Michaud, Esq.

Ontario Bar Association Conference Pleading Your Causes of Action to Win June 13, 2005

Oklahoma Supreme Court Declares Oklahoma s Lawsuit Reform Act of 2009 Unconstitutional

Cross-border Challenges for e-discovery

Enrolled Copy H.B. 287

white paper Mitigate Risk in Handling ediscovery Data Subject to the U.S. Export Control Laws and Regulations

Master of Laws (LLM) (Intellectual Property Law)

Indemnity Agreements & California s Crawford Decision: Its Implications and Strategies for Defense

International Family Law

Health Information Management CTAG and Alignment. CTAN #1: Introduction to Health Information Management:

State v. Continental Insurance Company

AFRICAN ECONOMIC CONFERENCE 2013

Purpose: To ensure that e-discovery Requests and Litigation Hold Notices are received, routed and responded to in a timely and thorough manner.

FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP APPLICATION Completed application due to the front office by: March 13, 2015 *This application does not

Michigan's New E-Discovery Rules Provide Ways to Reduce the Scope and Burdens of E-Discovery

Acknowledgments Introduction: Welcome to the Labyrinth. CHAPTER 1 Gathering the Evidence 1. CHAPTER 2 Third-Party Experts 25

Employee Relations. Howard S. Lavin and Elizabeth E. DiMichele

School of Professional Studies in Business and Education (SPSBE) Registrar records RG

SHORT GUIDE STRATEGIC LITIGATION

WORK EXPERIENCE: Southern Illinois University Paralegal Studies Program Faner Hall, Mail Code 4540 Carbondale, Illinois

ediscovery: In-house vs. Outsource?

PARKVIEW CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER, INC. Respondent, Parkview Care and Rehabilitation Center, Inc Merrick Road Massapequa, New York

Transcription:

Journal of Business & Technology Law Volume 7 Issue 2 Article 4 An Argument for Uniform E-Discovery Practice in Cross-Border Civil Litigation Daniel B. Garrie Daniel K. Gelb Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/jbtl Part of the Civil Procedure Commons Recommended Citation Daniel B. Garrie, & Daniel K. Gelb, An Argument for Uniform E-Discovery Practice in Cross-Border Civil Litigation, 7 J. Bus. & Tech. L. 341 (2012) Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/jbtl/vol7/iss2/4 This Articles & Essays is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Business & Technology Law by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact smccarty@law.umaryland.edu.

Daniel B. Garrie* and Daniel K. Gelb** Introduction This article addresses electronic evidence and discovery Journal of Business & Technology Law 341

Overview I. E-Discovery and Electronically Stored Information 342 Journal of Business & Technology Law

Vol. 7, No. 2 2012 343

344 Journal of Business & Technology Law

Vol. 7, No. 2 2012 345

346 Journal of Business & Technology Law

Vol. 7, No. 2 2012 347

348 Journal of Business & Technology Law

Vol. 7, No. 2 2012 349

II. Overview of How E-Discovery Is Handled in Various Forum Countries 350 Journal of Business & Technology Law

Vol. 7, No. 2 2012 351

352 Journal of Business & Technology Law

Vol. 7, No. 2 2012 353

354 Journal of Business & Technology Law

Vol. 7, No. 2 2012 355

III. Making E-Discovery Uniform Across Borders 356 Journal of Business & Technology Law

Vol. 7, No. 2 2012 357

Conclusion 358 Journal of Business & Technology Law

Vol. 7, No. 2 2012 359