Moving away from the C- Corporation: Understanding REITs, MLPs, PTPs and BDCs



Similar documents
Understanding Up-C IPO Structures The Tax Benefits Explained

HOUSTON BOSTON curbstonegroup.com MLP 101: INTRODUCTION TO MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS

MLP TAXATION KNOW YOUR OPTIONS. Global X Funds Cohen Fund Audit Services

S CORP vs. C CORP vs. LLC: WHICH IS RIGHT FOR YOUR BUSINESS?

Master Limited Partnerships for the Shipping and Offshore Industries Briefing

Choice of Business Entity. Choice of Business Entity

Master Limited Partnerships

Business Succession Planning Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. Member SIPC

Master Limited Partnerships 101:

FORMALIZING YOUR FIRM: LLC VERSUS S CORPORATION VERSUS C CORPORATION

Master Limited Partnership

Understanding the taxability of investments

USA Taxation. 3.1 Taxation of funds. Taxation of regulated investment companies: income tax

Comparison of Typical MLP and Yieldco Structures

The Business Organization: Choosing an Entity

When Acquirer or Target is Spelled with an S Special Considerations for S Corporations in Mergers and Acquisitions. C. Wells Hall January 25, 2007

Planning for Foreign Persons Investing in U.S. Real Estate

TAXATION OF REGULATED INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Session 11 - Corporate formation

Willamette Management Associates

Advanced Mergers & Acquisitions

MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS

Recapitalization: Estate Freeze Techniques

Foreign Person Investing in U.S. Real Estate

KMP / EPB Summary Tax Information Package

LLCs In The Real World. Larry L Gray, CPA

CORPORATE FORMATIONS AND CAPITAL STRUCTURE

A Comparison of Entity Taxation

U.S. Income Tax Return for an S Corporation

Micah W. Bloomfield and Mayer Greenberg, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP

Buying and Selling a Business Tax Considerations

S Corporations: 2013 Tax Update and M&A Issues & Considerations. November 15, 2013

Investment Structures for Real Estate Investment Funds. kpmg.com

REITs and infrastructure projects The next investment frontier?

Choosing tax-efficient investments

Considerations in the Health Care Company Tax Status Conversion from C Corporation to Pass-Through Entity

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ADMINISTRATION IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF. ABC, Inc., 123, LLC and an Individual

Employee Stock Ownership Plans for Banks and Bank Holding Companies The Tax-Exempt Stock Market

Session 19 -Taxable acquisitions

MLP - Master Limited Partnerships

TAX ISSUES IN SALES. The nature of the sale should govern the deal, not the tax consequences.

Obama Tax Compromise APPROVED by Congress

The UP-C Structure A Primer on Employing the Umbrella Partnership C-Corporation Structure in an IPO Joshua Ford Bonnie John C. Hart January 19, 2016

Different Types of Corporations: Advantages/ Disadvantages of Corporations

Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs)

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS

SCORE SAS 64 Sponsored by U. S. Small Business Administration ORANGE COUNTY CHAPTER 114, (714)

Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) Tim Fenn January 24, 2008

Technology Companies Practice Tax Practice Goodwin Procter LLP Goodwin Procter LLP

Black Stone Minerals, L.P.

Session 21 - More tax-free reorganizations

Scott s Real Estate Investment Trust. Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) March 31, 2009 and 2008

Choosing the Right Entity for Maximum Tax Benefits for Your Construction Company

Comparing REITs. kpmg.ca

Section 382: Traps for the Unwary Tax Executives Institute s 2008 Annual Conference Boston, MA

Buyers and Sellers of an S Corporation Should Consider the Section 338 Election

Important Information about Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)

L. IRC 501(c)(15) - SMALL INSURANCE COMPANIES OR ASSOCIATIONS

Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs): A General Primer. Tim Fenn. July 2012

The S-Corporation Election; Advantages & Disadvantages

o The filing and timing requirements are summarized on Exhibit A. Other Securities Law Issues

October 7, Major Issues in REIT Preferred Stock Terms

2 ND BIENNIAL ONTARIO NEW YORK LEGAL SUMMIT

Important. Click here to open the corporate tax reform Web page

Non-Financial Assets Tax and Other Special Rules

2:4 Letter to client regarding choice between LLC and S corporation

Christopher Davis Maryland Institute College of Art January 17, 2014

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Notes to Non-consolidated Financial Statements

International Structuring Involving Partnerships. November 6, 2015

To LLC or Not to LLC. Matt Rice. What is the right legal entity for your business?

Series of Shares B, B-6, E, F, F-6, O B, E, F, O O A, B

U.S. Tax Structures Utilized In Connection With Foreign Investment In U.S. Real Estate. Jack Miles Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Valuation of S-Corporations

Accounting for Equity Investments & Acquisitions

Incentive Stock Options

Transcription:

Moving away from the C- Corporation: Understanding REITs, MLPs, PTPs and BDCs Thomas A. Humphreys Remmelt A. Reigersman November 11, 2014 2014 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com

Agenda Overview Up-Cs REIT Conversions BDCs Optimized MLPs Kinder Morgan Exception Tax Reform? This is MoFo. 2

Overview: Primer on Tax Pass-Thrus Corporations subject to 35% federal income tax; shareholders subject to tax on dividends received at 39.6% maximum rate (20% for qualified dividends ) The U.S. Internal Revenue Code creates various pass-thru entities: Partnerships (general partnerships, limited partnerships or limited liability companies under state law) that are not publicly traded Publicly traded partnerships that engage in certain activities such as oil and gas production Real estate investment trusts ( REIT s) corporations for tax purposes that hold mostly real estate assets like real estate or mortgages and earn mostly passive income Regulated investment companies ( RIC s) corporations for tax purposes that hold securities and earn mostly passive income This is MoFo. 3

Common Theme Taxpayers will gravitate over time to structures that optimize the different entity taxation regimes They will use tax pass-thrus to the extent possible, with only those activities that must be in corporate solution in corporations At a certain size, certain pass-thrus (e.g., MLPs) may revert back to taxable corporation status (Kinder Morgan Exception) This is MoFo. 4

Up-C This is MoFo. 5

Up-C Historic Partners Public Investors The Up-C structure has become increasingly common for IPOs of companies that have historically operated as partnerships 100% Class B Shares (majority voting power) (0% economics) 100% Class A Shares (minority voting power) (100% economics) The Up-C structure derives its name from the UPREIT structure. Essentially, a newly formed corporation ( PubCo ) will be the entity that undertakes the IPO. PubCo will sit above an existing limited liability company (the LLC ) Partnership Interests PubCo Partnership or LLC Partnership Interest and Managing Member Operating Subsidiaries Up-C Structure Final State This is MoFo. 6

Up-C (cont.) Historic Partners Public Investors PubCo will be a holding company and will have as its subsidiary the LLC. The principal assets/operating business will continue to be at (or below) the LLC level PubCo will receive the IPO proceeds and downstream the proceeds to the LLC Partnership Interests 100% Class B Shares (majority voting power) (0% economics) PubCo Partnership Interest and Managing Member 100% Class A Shares (minority voting power) (100% economics) Partnership or LLC Operating Subsidiaries Up-C Structure Final State This is MoFo. 7

Typical Pre-IPO Structure - Corporation Historic Shareholders C Corporation Disadvantages Income from operating subsidiaries subject to entity-level tax when earned by the corporation Historic partners (and other shareholders) subject to tax when they receive dividends This is MoFo. 8

Typical Pre-IPO Structure - Partnership Historic Partners Advantage Partnership not subject to tax; income earned by operating subsidiaries taxable directly to partners LLC Disadvantage Listing partnership when going public may result in the partnership being taxed as a corporation This is MoFo. 9

Up-C Structure: Immediately After Formation of C-Corp Historic Partners Company incorporated in Delaware with two classes of common stock, Class A and Class B. Class A is offered in the IPO and Class B is held by the Historic Partners and provides no economic rights, only voting rights Controlling voting interest 100% economic interest PubCo (Delaware C-Corp) LLC This is MoFo. 10

Up-C Structure: Immediately following IPO Public Shareholders* (Class A Holders) Historic Partners 100% economic interest Minority voting interest Cash Voting interest 100% economic interest PubCo (Delaware C-Corp) LLC * Public shareholders purchase their shares for cash in the IPO This is MoFo. 11

Up-C Structure: Final Structure Class A Holders Historic Partners 100% economic interest 40% voting interest PubCo (Delaware C-Corp) 60% voting interest 60% economic $ interest $ 40% economic interest Sole managing member LLC LLC interests convertible into shares of Class A common stock PubCo uses the proceeds received in the IPO to purchase LLC interests LLC redeems partnership interests from the Historic Partners (treated for tax purposes as a disguised sale or direct purchase of partnership interests by PubCo from the Historic Partners) (percentages are included only for illustrative purposes) This is MoFo. 12

Why an Up-C structure? Prior to the IPO, the business was conducted through an LLC, which is a pass-through structure and does not pay entity-level taxes Through the Up-C structure, the pass-through structure remains in place and PubCo pays the pre-ipo equity holders (LLC members) for the value of PubCo s tax attributes as those tax attributes are used after the IPO. This creates a market dynamic that permits value to be extracted from PubCo after the IPO, without decreasing the value of PubCo in the offering This is MoFo. 13

Why an Up-C structure (cont.)? To effectuate the Up-C structure, PubCo will enter into various arrangements with the LLC and its members. These include an LLC operating agreement and Tax Receivable Agreement ( TRA ). Generally, TRAs do not appear to impact the valuation of a corporation in its IPO This is MoFo. 14

Why an Up-C structure (cont.)? Public stockholders often do not assign full value to the tax attributes of a corporation. Similarly, public stockholders apparently do not discount the value of a corporation to account fully for future payments to be made under a TRA. Through the TRA, the IPO corporation pays for a valuable tax attribute (for example, a basis step-up) This is MoFo. 15

Tax Receivable Agreements PubCo (Delaware C-Corp) Tax Receivable Agreement Historic Partners 40% economic interest Sole managing member 60% economic interest LLC interests convertible into shares of Class A common stock LLC (percentages are included only for illustrative purposes) This is MoFo. 16

Benefits of the Tax Receivable Agreement Because the historic partners sell partnership interests to PubCo (rather than stock, as in a traditional IPO structure), PubCo receives a step-up in the tax basis of its assets This tax basis step-up is allocated to PubCo s share of the historic partnership s assets, and in many cases the step-up is primarily allocable to intangible assets that are amortizable on a straight-line basis over 15 years (so-called Section 197 intangibles) Through a TRA the historic partners effectively capture the majority of the value associated with the PubCo s tax basis step-up This is MoFo. 17

Benefits of the Tax Receivable Agreement (cont.) Under the terms of the TRA, PubCo is obligated to pay the historic partners in cash an amount equal to PubCo s tax savings generated by the tax basis step-up (typically 85% of such savings) Payments under the TRA are effectively treated as additional purchase price paid by PubCo for its interest in the historic partnership This is MoFo. 18

Benefits of the Tax Receivable Agreement (cont.) Illustration of Potential TRA Economics Amount of PubCo Tax Basis Step-Up* $300 million Amortization Period 15 years Annual Amortization $20 million PubCo Tax Rate (Federal & State) 40% PubCo Annual Savings $8 million TRA Payout Ratio 85% Annual Payment to Historic Partners** $6.8 million Total Payments to Historic Partners $102 million *Any future exchanges of partnership units for Class A shares of PubCo also may give rise to additional tax basis step-up for PubCo (thereby increasing the amounts payable under the TRA over time) **Payments under the TRA also give rise to additional tax basis step-up for PubCo (thereby increasing the amounts payable under the TRA over time) This is MoFo. 19

Additional Considerations Related to Up-C Structure The Up-C structure maintains continuing pass-through treatment (single level taxation) for the historic partners with respect to their proportionate share of net income realized by the partnership The historic partners obtain liquidity through the right to exchange partnership units for Class A shares of PubCo The Up-C structure provides a range of options for making strategic acquisitions and compensating employees (e.g., PubCo stock, PubCo options, and partnership units) This is MoFo. 20

Additional Considerations Related to Up-C Structure (cont.) PubCo becomes the managing member of the historic partnership and the historic partners retain voting control through Class B PubCo shares PubCo consolidates the historic partnership for financial statement purposes This is MoFo. 21

Miscellaneous Issues Related to Up-C Structure Anti-churning rules under Section 197 of the Internal Revenue Code Tax distributions to PubCo and historic partners Continuing administration of TRA and determination of annual payments to be made by PubCo to historic partners (reviewed and approved by PubCo audit committee in conjunction with outside advisors) Investment Company Act ( 40 Act ) status of PubCo This is MoFo. 22

REIT Conversions This is MoFo. 23

REIT Conversions Penn National Gaming CBS Outdoor This is MoFo. 24

Penn National Gaming Carlino Family 14.5% Public Penn National Gaming, Inc. ( PENN ) 19 Casinos Goal: separate the real estate from the operating assets and allow real estate to trade separately, achieving a higher valuation multiple for those assets This is MoFo. 25

Related Party Rents Rent paid to a REIT is not qualifying if REIT owns 10% or more of tenant Attribution rules: if a shareholder owns 10% (or more) of both REIT and tenant then REIT considered to own 10% (or more) of tenant This is MoFo. 26

Penn National Gaming (cont.) Exchange PENN Shares (to bring Family below 10%) Carlino Family REIT Shares Public PENN REIT This is MoFo. 27

Penn National Gaming (cont.) Public/Family 100% Tax Free Spin-off PENN Operating Assets Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. ( GLPI ) REIT This is MoFo. 28

Penn National Gaming (cont.) Public Family (9.9%) Family (16.3%) Penn ( OpCo ) Lease Rent GLPI ( PropCo ) REIT Real Estate TRS Two Casinos Distribution of GLPI stock is tax free Restrictions on PENN and GLPI stock sales post spin-off IRS private letter ruling confirms tax treatment This is MoFo. 29

CBS Outdoor Public 2 83% Tax Free Split-off CBS Corporation 1 CBS Outdoor Americas Inc. REIT 17% IPO This is MoFo. 30

CBS Outdoor (cont.) Public Public (former CBS shareholders that have elected to take REIT shares and give up their CBS shares) IPO shares CBS Lease Rent CBS Outdoor Americas Inc. REIT Real Estate (outdoor ad displays) This is MoFo. 31

BDCs This is MoFo. 32

BDCs Business development companies register with the SEC under the Investment Company Act of 1940 BDCs can either be partnerships for tax purposes or regulated investment companies under Subchapter M of the Code RIC provisions in IRC 851-855 are like REIT provisions: they permit a RIC to pay dividends to shareholders that the RIC deducts in computing taxable income RIC requirements include income tests (income from passive sources like dividends and interest) and asset tests (assets must be a diversified pool of securities) A publicly traded partnership that is registered with the SEC under the 40 Act must elect RIC status, i.e., it cannot be a PTP taxed as a partnership This is MoFo. 33

Optimized MLPs This is MoFo. 34

MLP Basics In 1987 Congress passed IRC section 7704 which treats a publicly traded partnership as a corporation for federal income tax purposes The exceptions to the rule were substantial, however A partnership with 90% or more qualifying income for the taxable year was excepted and, therefore, treated as a corporation Qualifying income includes the normal types of passive income including interest, dividends, rents, etc. However, income from natural resources was also included This is MoFo. 35

MLP Basics (cont.) Broad definition of natural resource income: income and gains derived from the exploration, development, mining or production, processing, refining, transportation (including pipelines transporting gas, oil, or products thereof), or the marketing of any mineral or natural resource (including fertilizer, geothermal energy, and timber), industrial source carbon dioxide, or the transportation or storage of any fuel described in subsection (b), (c), (d), or (e) of section 6426, or any alcohol fuel defined in section 6426(b)(4)(A) or any biodiesel fuel as defined in section 40A(d)(1). This is MoFo. 36

MLP Basics (cont.) Issuer Business Description Offer Date Antero Midstream Partners LP Shell Midstream Partners, L.P. Dominion Midstream Partners, LP Owns, operates and develops midstream gathering, compression and pipeline assets Owns and operates crude oil and refined product pipelines Owns, operates and develops natural gas infrastructure assets 11/10/2014 10/29/2014 10/15/2014 USD Partners LP Owns a crude oil rail terminal 10/8/2014 JP Energy Partners LP Owns, operates and develops midstream energy assets 10/2/2014 This is MoFo. 37

Optimized MLPs Public (Tax Exempts/non-U.S.) C Corp ( blocker ) Public (U.S.) MLP This is MoFo. 38

Hiatus in MLP Rulings March 2014 Why? When will it end? This is MoFo. 39

Kinder Morgan Exception This is MoFo. 40

Kinder Morgan Exception Kinder Morgan, Inc. ( KMI ) is the general partner of two large publicly traded partnerships: Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP and El Paso Pipeline Partners LP; it also owns the voting interests in another publicly traded entity treated as a corporation for tax purposes: Kinder Morgan Management LLC On August 10, 2014 Kinder Morgan announced plans to purchase the outstanding interests in these three entities. Going forward, KMI, a C corporation for tax purposes, will operate all these businesses with a total enterprise value of $140 billion CEO Richard D. Kinder: This transaction dramatically simplifies the Kinder Morgan story by transitioning from four separately traded equity securities today to one security going forward This is MoFo. 41

Takeaways Continued expansion of UP-C structure and C Corp/MLP structures Real estate intensive businesses will continue to attempt to unlock value through REIT conversions and spin-offs There may be a natural limit on the size of a pass-through (or maybe not ) This is MoFo. 42

Tax Reform? This is MoFo. 43

Tax Reform? Beginning in 2013 Rep. Dave Camp (R-MI) released discussion drafts of draft tax reform legislation No legislation has been introduced No hearings have been held on the discussion drafts Rep. Camp is retiring this year Impact of recent elections? This is MoFo. 44

Tax Reform? Pass-Thru and Certain Other Entities Publicly traded partnership exception restricted to mining and natural resources partnerships Prevention of tax-free spinoffs involving REITs Certain short-life property not treated as real property for purposes of REIT provisions Repeal of special rules for timber held by REITs Non-REIT earnings and profits required to be distributed by REIT in cash This is MoFo. 45

Tax Reform? Pass-Thru and Certain Other Entities Debt instruments of publicly offered REITs and mortgages treated as real estate assets Reduction in percentage limitation (to 20% from 25%) on assets of REIT which may be taxable REIT subsidiaries Recognition of net built-in gain on assets when a C corporation converts to a REIT or RIC, or when a REIT or RIC acquires assets from a C corporation in a carryover basis transaction This is MoFo. 46

Contact Information Federal Tax Thomas A. Humphreys (212) 468-8006 thumphreys@mofo.com Remmelt A. Reigersman (212) 336-4259 rreigersman@mofo.com This is MoFo. 47