UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON



Similar documents
SETTLEGOODE v. PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS, et al CV ST JURY INSTRUCTIONS FOLLOWING CLOSE OF EVIDENCE

Case 3:14-cv HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Plaintiffs, Defendants. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, Rebecca Weston, hereby accepts the Offer of

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII. Case No.: CV-06-00~CK-LEK

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

virtue of Title VIII of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 806 of the Corporate and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their

Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Massachusetts

Case 3:10-cv DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9

Case 5:14-cv OLG Document 9 Filed 07/31/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal

TITLE 34. LABOR AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION CHAPTER 19. CONSCIENTIOUS EMPLOYEE PROTECTION ACT. N.J. Stat. 34:19-1 (2007)

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, WEST DISTRICT

Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 New Mexico

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF IDAHO EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/04/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Southern Division) v. * Civil Action No.: * * * * ooo0ooo * * * * COMPLAINT

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Tennessee

Case 1:12-cv RLV-AJB Document 1 Filed 05/14/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California

Case 3:13-cv PK Document 5 Filed 09/19/13 Page 1 of 16 Page ID#: 57

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Plaintiff,

Case 8:13-cv EAK-TBM Document 14 Filed 05/20/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID 49 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Key Definitions: VT LEG # v.1

Case: 1:11-cv HJW Doc #: 3 Filed: 12/08/11 Page: 1 of 17 PAGEID #: 46 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:13-cv RBS Document 1 Filed 03/19/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION

CASE 0:12-cv RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No.

v. CASE NO.: VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH REQUEST FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 2:10-cv NBF Document 1 Filed 09/17/10 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Plaintiff, : X. Nature of the Action. 1. This is an action for breach of a settlement agreement, retaliation

Accountability Report Card Summary 2015 Kentucky

Case 2:10-cv JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

: : : : : : : : Plaintiffs, HOLLY SCHEPISI, NEIL McPHERSON, KEVIN DRAGAN, and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendant. JURISDICTION 1.

U ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTER DISTRICT OF KE TUCKY AT LOUISVILLE O. FILED ELECTRO ICALLY U IVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO HOSPITAL AUTHORITY,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Last Approval Date: May Page 1 of 12 I. PURPOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No.: 15-cv-157 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 2:14-cv DB Document 2 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case 3:13-cv JBA Document 1 Filed 11/14/13 Page 1 of 10

NOYES HEALTH ADMINISTRATION POLICY/PROCEDURE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

7:16-cv BHH Date Filed 03/01/16 Entry Number 6 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA SPARTANBURG DIVISION

Metropolitan Jewish Health System and its Participating Agencies and Programs [MJHS]

Case 3:14-cv M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

JOHN MURRAY ( Murray ), for his Complaint in this action against Defendant, Crystex Composites LLC ( Crystex ), alleges as follows:

Case 3:14-cv ST Document 126 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 15

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

Case 3:13-cv AC Document 16 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 11

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/16 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. into by and between ( Employee ) and ( the

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiffs, ) CASE NO. 08 CVH vs- ) JUDGE LYNCH

Case 1:15-cv RP Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

CASE NO.: CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT. through undersigned counsel, and hereby sues Defendant, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., a Florida GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

Case AJC Document 1 Filed 03/01/2008 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION

Transcription:

WILLIAM R. GOOODE Attorney at Law 4224 Southwest Melville Avenue Portland, OR 97201-1357 Telephone: (503) 244-9101 Fax: (503) 244-0019 e-mail: goodewilliam@hotmail.com Oregon State Bar ID No. 84049 Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON DR. PAMELLA E. SETTLEGOODE, ) ) Case No.: CV 00-313 ST Plaintiff, ) ) AMENDED COMPLAINT v. ) ) Civil Rights violations under PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Multnomah ) Rehabilitation Act, 29 USC School District No. 1; ) 794; 42 USC 1983; Equal Pay SUSAN WINTHROP; ) Act claim; and state claims ROBERT CREBO; and ) LARRY WHITSON. ) ) Defendants. ) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 1. The action arises under the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504, 29 USC 794; the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 USC 1983; and the Equal Pay Act, 29 USC 206(d). PAGE 1 - AMENDED COMPLAINT PARTIES 2. Plaintiff, DR. PAMELLA E. SETTLEGOODE (hereinafter "DR. SETTLEGOODE"), is a citizen of the United States, residing in Multnomah county in the State of Oregon. 3. Defendant, PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS, also known as Multnomah County School District No. 1 (hereinafter "PPS") is a

recipient of federal funds subject to 504 of the Rehabilitation Act; and a government entity authorized under the laws of Oregon. 4. Defendant, SUSAN WINTHROP (hereinafter "Winthrop") is employed as a supervisor in the special education department of PPS, and was the immediate supervisor of Dr. Settlegoode. 5. Defendant, ROBERT CREBO (hereinafter "Crebo"), was employed as Director of Special Education of PPS, and supervised Winthrop. 6. Defendant, LARRY WHITSON (hereinafter "WHITSON") is employed as supervisor of a deaf and hard of hearing program, and employed by PPS. Claims for Relief COUNT ONE - 504 of Rehabilitation Act Violation 7. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 2 through 6. 8. Dr. Settlegoode was employed beginning the 1998-1999 school year ("first year") by PPS, as an Adapted Physical Education ("APE") teacher. Dr. Settlegoode continued to be employed by PPS during the 1999-2000 school year ("second year") in the same position. 9. In Dr. Settlegoode's first year and second year as an APE teacher, her assignment included several students with disabilities located at several schools in PPS, as well as students with disabilities at a campus of Portland Community College ("PCC"). 10. Her students with disabilities were the beneficiaries of federal funding subject to section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and Dr. Settlegoode was within the zone of interest of the Act's PAGE 2 - AMENDED COMPLAINT

requirements for the benefit of her disabled students. 11. PPS intentionally did not provide Dr. Settlegoode and her students adequate scheduling, equipment, facilities, or other support, to properly teach, consult, coach, or supervise the instruction of disabled students or locations assigned to her. PPS intentionally assigned to Dr. Settlegoode students located at several different school locations in a manner such that she could not reasonably provide appropriate instruction to disabled students in a non-discriminatory manner. Although assigned to a campus of PCC, Winthrop advised Dr. Settlegoode not to provide any services to disabled students at PCC. 12. Dr. Settlegoode reported incidents and situations in which her disabled students were subjected to discrimination; not provided free and appropriate education including after-school activities that was equal or equivalent to services provided to non-disabled students; inadequate facilities or services; hazardous facilities; improper employee conduct, including falsified reports or lack of required reports; mismanagement of funds; and other violations of laws ("deficiencies"). She made reports of these deficiencies at various times to her supervisors including Winthrop and Credbo, and PPS through its superintendent, Dr. Ben Canada. 13. In response to Dr. Settlegoode's reports, Defendant PPS, intentionally retaliated against her. 14. As a part of Defendant PPS s retaliation against Dr. Settlegoode, she was coerced to violate the Act and when she protested or refused to do so, her contract was not renewed for the PAGE 3 - AMENDED COMPLAINT

2000-2001 school year and she was discharged at the close of her second school year. 15. As a consequence of Defendant PPS s discriminatory and retaliatory acts described above, Dr. Settlegoode is entitled to injunctive and other equitable relief, including reinstatement to a teaching position; and if reinstated, Settlegoode should not be compelled to violate section 504 of the Act, nor should Defendant PPS be permitted to discharge or otherwise retaliate against Settlegoode if she refuses to violate the Act or in good faith reports violations of the Act. 16. Based upon Defendant PPS s intentional acts, by and through Winthrop and Crebo, Dr. Settlegoode is entitled to compensatory damages for her mental anguish and damage to her reputation in the amount of $300,000.00. 17. Dr. Settlegoode has retained the services of one or more attorneys in this action, and if she prevails is entitled to her reasonable attorney fees pursuant to 29 USC 794a(b). COUNT TWO - Color of State Law Violation, 42 USC 1983. 18. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 7 through 16. 19. The actions of Defendants PPS, Winthrop, Crebo, and Whitson were done under color of state law. 20. Dr. Settlegoode periodically participated in IEP's (Individual Education Program) meetings orally or in writing, in which she made recommendations or disclosed students' needs or program deficiencies to other participants, including parents of PAGE 4 - AMENDED COMPLAINT

disabled students. 21. Defendant Whitson participated in one or more IEP's in which Dr. Settlegoode participated, and Defendant Whitson: (A) improperly rewrote or falsified portions of one or more IEP's plans contributed to by Dr. Settlegoode; and (B) falsely reported to PPS that she was promoting an "adversarial" relationship. 22. Defendants Winthrop, Crebo, and PPS ratified the conduct of Defendant Whitson by retaliating against Dr. Settlegoode. 23. Dr. Settlegoode's statements and reports about the status of disabled students' programs and program deficiencies were protected under federal laws regarding disabled students' education, and Dr. Settlegoode's right to free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 24. PPS has a history of failing to provide a free and appropriate education to all disabled students in a nondiscriminatory manner for several years prior to Dr. Settlegoode's employment; and has a custom, pattern, or practice of attempting to coerce, discourage or preventing employees from disclosing information thereof. 25. Defendants Winthrop, Crebo, Whitson, and PPS attempted to restrain Dr. Settlegoode's speech. 26. As a proximate result of defendants' discriminatory and wrongful acts, Dr. Settlegoode has past monetary losses and will suffer future losses in an amount to be determined at trial up to $700,000.00. PAGE 5 - AMENDED COMPLAINT

27. The intentional conduct of Defendants PPS, Winthrop, Crebo, and Whitson, were illegal or in violation of societal norms and should be punished with punitive damages in the amount of one million dollars, or such other amount as determined at trial. 28. Dr. Settlegoode has retained the services of one or more attorneys in this action, and if she prevails is entitled to her reasonable attorney fees pursuant to 42 USC 1988. COUNT THREE - Equal Pay Act, 29 USC 206(d). 29. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 2 and 3. 30. During her period of employment with PPS for two school years from February, 1999, through June, 2000, Dr. Settlegoode was an athletic coach for more than five students participating on a track and field team located at Cleveland High School, and classified as: (A) Head Coach for a track and field team, with one or more assistant coaches working under her supervision; or (B) Assistant Coach - for a track and field team with one or more other assistant coaches working under her supervision. 31. During the 1999 and 2000 track seasons, Dr. Settlegoode was paid an hourly rate equal to her teaching salary each year, and was last paid at the rate of $27.71 per hour, which was less than the salaries described in paragraphs 32 and 33 below. 32. At various times during the course of her employment as PAGE 6 - AMENDED COMPLAINT

a coach at Cleveland High School, Dr. Settlegoode has performed work equal in skill, effort, and responsibility to the work of certain male employee coaches, including the head track coach or assistant track coach at Cleveland High School, who were paid a higher hourly wage by virtue of receiving pay equal to a percentage of $26,545.00 for 1998-1999, or $27,076 for 1999-2000, of 15% and 16% for head track coach, or 10% and 11% for assistant track coach (varsity), or 9% or 10% for assistant track coach. This constitutes a violation of 29 USC 206(d)(1). 33. Had Dr. Settlegoode been paid a wage equal to that of the male employees who performed equal work to the work she performed, she would have been paid at a rate of not less than $2,389.00 or $2,654.00 or $3,981.00 for the 1998-1999 track season, and $2,707.60 or $2978.36, or $4,332.16 for the 1999-2000 track season. STATE LAW CLAIMS COUNT FOUR - Whistleblower claim under ORS 659.530 34. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 18 through 24, and 26. 35. To the extent required a tort claim notice was sent to Defendant PPS. 36. Whitson aided or abetted PPS, as defined by ORS 659.030(1)(g), an unlawful employment practice. 37. In violation of ORS 659.510, Defendant PPS through Crebo and Winthrop, and Defendant Whitson attempted to or took disciplinary action against Dr. Settlegoode, or attempted to discourage, restrain, or coerce Dr. Settlegoode to refrain from PAGE 7 - AMENDED COMPLAINT

discussing or communicating any information that she believed evidenced a violation of federal law, state law, mismanagement or misuse of funds. 38. Dr. Settlegoode is entitled to the relief provided in ORS 659.035(3), ORS 659.530, and ORS 659.121, including the greater of $250.00 or her compensatory damages alleged, injunctive relief including back pay and reinstatement, and reasonable attorney fees. COUNT FIVE - Defamation 39. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 7, 8, 9, 12, 16, 20, 21, and 35. 40. Whitson, Winthrop, and Crebo published false and defamatory statements to others that Dr. Settlegoode was unprofessional, promoting adversarial relationships, and incompetent in the performance of her profession as a teacher. 41. Defendants PPS is liable for Dr. Settlegoode's damage to her reputation in the community. WHEREFORE, plaintiff seeks the following relief: 1. COUNT ONE - 504 of Rehabilitation Act Violation against Defendant Portland Public Schools: a) injunctive relief, both preliminary and permanent, as described in paragraph 15; b) compensatory damages as set forth in paragraph 16; and c) reasonable attorney fees pursuant to 29 USC 794a(b). 2. COUNT TWO - Color of State Law Violation, 42 USC 1983 against Defendants Portland Public Schools, Susan Winthrop, Robert PAGE 8 - AMENDED COMPLAINT

Crebo, and Larry Whitson: a) in addition to the injunctive relief as to PPS, Winthrop, and Crebo, her damages as set forth in paragraphs 16 and 26; b) punitive damages as set forth in paragraph 27; and c) reasonable attorney fees pursuant to 42 USC 1988. 3. COUNTY THREE - Equal Pay Act against Defendant Portland Public Schools: a) Damages in the form of backpay in such amount as the Court shall find Plaintiff has been unlawfully underpaid; b) Liquidated damages in an amount equal to Plaintiffs s actual damages for this count; c) reasonable attorney fees pursuant to 29 USC 216(b). 4. COUNT FOUR - ORS 659.510 against Defendant Portland Public Schools: a) the greater of $250.00 or her compensatory damages up to $1,000,000.00; b) injunctive relief to prevent future violations of ORS 659.510; and c) reasonable attorney fees under ORS 659.121. 5. COUNT FIVE - Defamation against Defendant Portland Public Schools for compensatory damages as set forth in paragraph 16, for damage to her reputation. Dated this day of June, 2000. WILLIAM R. GOODE OSB 84049 (503) 244-9101 Attorney for Plaintiff PAGE 9 - AMENDED COMPLAINT

TRUE COPY CERTIFICATE STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Multnomah ) I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have prepared the foregoing copies of a AMENDED COMPLAINT, and have carefully compared the same with the originals thereof; and that each such copy is a true and correct copy of the original thereof and of the whole thereof. William R. Goode - OSB 84049 ================================================================= Date: I HEREBY CERTIFY that I served the attached AMENDED COMPLAINT on the respect ive parties and/or attorneys for parties whose names and addresses appear below, which, as to each such party or attorney, is the regular office address, or the address last given on a paper filed by him/her in the above entitled cause and served on me, on the date hereinabove indicated, by: depositing in the Post Office at Portland, Oregon, true copies of said documents, certified by me to be such, addressed to said party or attorney at said address; transmitting a copy by telephonic facsimile to the attorney identified below to his facsimile device at the telephone number listed below his name. X By hand delivery to counsel s office. WILLIAM R.GOODE Attorney at Law 4224 Southwest Melville Avenue Portland, Oregon 97201-1357 Voice (503) 244-9101 FAX (503) 244-0019 Sharon Toncray, Esq. Miller, Nash, LLP 111 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 3500 Portland, OR 97204 PAGE 10 - AMENDED COMPLAINT