Accelerating Antibody Drug Development Using Novel ADCC Reporter Bioassays. Terry Surowy, PhD Research Manager



Similar documents
Tools for the Development of Functional Bioassays

Validated Cell-Based Assays for Rapid Screening and Functional Characterization of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies

A customizable ADCC assay service for antibodies & fusion proteins.

GloMax Discover and Explorer. State-of-the-art multimode readers for luminescence, fluorescence and absorbance detection.

EMABling Antibody Production Platform

Anti-CD38 anti-cd3 bispecific antibody in multiple myeloma

Potency Assays for an Autologous Active Immunotherapy (Sipuleucel-T) Pocheng Liu, Ph.D. Senior Scientist of Product Development Dendreon Corporation

Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: quality issues (revision 1)

Testing Services for Large Molecule Drug Development

Scientific Challenges for Development of Biosimilar Monoclonal Antibodies. Rafiqul Islam Director, Global Bioanalytical Services Celerion

Guidance for Industry Assay Development for Immunogenicity Testing of Therapeutic Proteins

Non-clinical development of biologics

KMS-Specialist & Customized Biosimilar Service

Assay Qualification Template for Host Cell Protein ELISA

Applying Statistics Recommended by Regulatory Documents

Development and validation of neutralising anti-drug antibody (Nabs) assays

Monoclonal Antibodies in Cancer. Ralph Schwall, PhD Associate Director, Translational Oncology Genentech, Inc.

HuCAL Custom Monoclonal Antibodies

Fighting the Battles: Conducting a Clinical Assay

Biopharmaceutical Process Evaluated for Viral Clearance

Enhancing Anti-Tumor Activity of Checkpoint Inhibition

ab Protein Sumoylation Assay Ultra Kit

MAB Solut. MABSolys Génopole Campus 1 5 rue Henri Desbruères Evry Cedex. is involved at each stage of your project

Instructions. Torpedo sirna. Material. Important Guidelines. Specifications. Quality Control

ADP/ATP Ratio Assay Kit (Bioluminescent)

Cell Discovery 360: Explore more possibilities.

Making the switch to a safer CAR-T cell therapy

B Cells and Antibodies

Towards Well-Defined ADCs (Antibody Drug Conjugates)

HuCAL Custom Monoclonal Antibodies

12. November 2013 Jan Endell. From library to bedside: Potential of the anti-cd38 antibody MOR202 in combination therapy of multiple myeloma

Step-by-Step Analytical Methods Validation and Protocol in the Quality System Compliance Industry

Technology Transfer of CMC Activities for MAb Manufacturing ge healthcare (

Accelerated Stability During Formulation Development of Early Stage Protein Therapeutics Pros and Cons of Contrasting Approaches

exactly. The need for efficiency in developing effective new therapeutics has never been greater.

Proto col. GoClone Repor ter Construc ts: Sample Protocol for Adherent Cells. Tech support: Luciferase Assay System

ASMS Regulated Bioanalysis Interest Group (RBIG) Workshop. Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADC) A Complex Problem in Regulated Bioanalysis.

Challenges in early clinical development of biologics

PRODUCT INFORMATION...

Luca Romagnoli, Ph.D. Business Development Manager

Antibody Purification and Labeling

From cells to therapeuticsvivalis. Humalex Fully human antibody discovery platform An integrated therapeutic development offering

Basics of Immunology

Interim Progress Report R&D Project 348. Development of a Field Test Kit for Detection of Blue-Green Algal Toxins

VETERINARY SERVICES MEMORANDUM NO

A Generic Kit-Based Approach for Quantifying Monoclonal Antibody Drugs Through Direct Digestion of Discovery Study Samples

Fast, easy and effective transfection reagent for mammalian cells

Qualification Study CHO 360-HCP ELISA (Type A to D)

Human CD4+T Cell Care Manual

Optimal Conditions for F(ab ) 2 Antibody Fragment Production from Mouse IgG2a

3 months 1.5 months 1.5 months. 1 month

MultiQuant Software 2.0 for Targeted Protein / Peptide Quantification

Microbiology AN INTRODUCTION EIGHTH EDITION

Overview of Phase 1 Oncology Trials of Biologic Therapeutics

Potelligent CHOK1SV. European Antibody Congress 30 Nov - 02 Dec, Geneva, Switzerland. Alison Porter, 2009 Lonza Biologics plc, Slough, UK

Biotechpharma company profile

CMC Writing for IND Applications. David H. McKenna, Jr., M.D. University of Minnesota April 10-11, 2007 Workshop

Blood, Plasma, and Cellular Blood Components INTRODUCTION

Genes to Proteins to Antibodies

A disease and antibody biology approach to antibody drug discovery

VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES: TEXT AND METHODOLOGY Q2(R1)

Challenges in the cgmp Manufacturing of hescs: Lessons Learned from Monoclonal Antibodies

Direct Antiglobulin Test (DAT)

TABLE OF CONTENT. Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. iii ENGLISH ABSTRACT THAI ABSTRACT. vii LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES. xvi ABBREVIATIONS.

GenScript Antibody Services

Valentina Gualato, Ph.D. Process Development Scientist

Regulatory perspective for successful antibody-drug conjugate development

Chapter 3.2» Custom Monoclonal

SCANTIBODIES Laboratory, Inc. Contract Monoclonal Antibody Production

THE His Tag Antibody, mab, Mouse

Development and Validation of a LC-MS/MS Method for Plasma Analysis of the Serotonin Metabolite: 5-Hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA)

Mouse IFN-gamma ELISpot Kit

Tissue Culture 1 Cell/ Microplates 2 HTS- 3 Immunology/ HLA 4 Microbiology/ Bacteriology Purpose Beakers 5 Tubes/Multi-

Mouse Insulin ELISA. For the quantitative determination of insulin in mouse serum and plasma

Classic Immunoprecipitation

Guidance for Industry

Analytical Test Method Validation Report Template

CD22 Antigen Is Broadly Expressed on Lung Cancer Cells and Is a Target for Antibody-Based Therapy

510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY

Automation of Cell Staining Technical Information Bulletin

Monoclonal Antibody. By Dr. Adel Gabr

Assay Migration Studies for In Vitro Diagnostic Devices Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff

Why is FTO important?

LightSwitch Dual Assay System DA010 (100 assays)

IN VITRO BINDING BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDY SUMMARY TABLES AND SAS TRANSPORT FORMATTED TABLES FOR DATASET SUBMISSION

Design of Experiments for Analytical Method Development and Validation

ELISA BIO 110 Lab 1. Immunity and Disease

DNA IQ TM Casework Pro Kit for Maxwell 16 A Validation Study

Blood-Based Cancer Diagnostics

Mouse Creatine Kinase MB isoenzyme (CKMB) ELISA

Predict Reactivity Note Chicken (100%), Sheep (100%), Rhesus Monkey (100%), Chimpanzee (100%), Bovine (100%), Guinea pig (100%)

International GMP Requirements for Quality Control Laboratories and Recomendations for Implementation

A Letter from MabVax Therapeutics President and Chief Executive Officer

Expectations for Data to Support Clinical Trial Drugs

Human Free Testosterone(F-TESTO) ELISA Kit

Validation and Calibration. Definitions and Terminology

Thermo Scientific SOLAµ SPE Plates Technical Guide. Consistent excellence. for bioanalysis

Transcription:

Accelerating Antibody Drug Development Using Novel ADCC Reporter Bioassays Terry Surowy, PhD Research Manager

Outline Antibody drugs and mechanisms of action (MOA) Introduction to ADCC and ADCC Reporter Bioassays Cells as reagents thaw-and-use format ADCC Reporter Bioassays, V and F variants Therapeutic Ab Testing - using V and F variants Bioassay using Glomax Discover - CFR 21 Part 11 2

Biological Product Monoclonal Antibody (mab) Drug Biological products are generally produced using a living system or organism. Biological products may be manufactured through biotechnology, derived from natural sources, or produced synthetically Source: FDA webinar, Feb 15, 2012 3

Mechanism of Action (MOA) for mab drugs In vitro bioassays of MAbs during drug development need to be reflective of in vivo MOA 4

Traditional ADCC bioassays using primary effector cells ADCC (antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity) Biology of ADCC NK cells are the primary effector cell in vivo NK cells require target cell-bound Ab to mediate ADCC FcgRIIIa Granzyme and perforin secreted lead to target (tumor) cell lysis Bioassay of therapeutic Ab in ADCC MOA Primary NK cells are used in an in vitro cellbased bioassay Blood donor effector cell source is highly variable and results in high assay variability 5

An Ideal Bioassay Reflective of the mechanism of action (MOA) of the biological product Well controlled (precise, accurate, robust, reproducible) Stability-indicating Usable as a QC lot-release assay Modified from Chana Fuchs (DMA/CDER) In this webinar, we will demonstrate how the ADCC Reporter Bioassay fulfills these elements 6

ADCC Reporter Bioassay principle Target-cell bound Ab binds to FcgRIIIa on effector cell activating pathway Luciferase reporter is readout of pathway activation state New reporter gene bioassay measures a step earlier in the pathway Image source: Leibson-PJ, Immunity 1997 Traditional readout is cytotoxicity, the ultimate endpoint 7

ADCC Reporter Bioassay FcgRIIIa V and F variants V158 or F158 158F/V or F/F FcyRIIIa 158 V/V >85% population ~10-15% population Less efficient Ab binding and ADCC More efficient Ab binding and ADCC 8

ADCC Reporter Bioassay FcgRIIIa V and F variants Surrogate assays that are reflective of in vivo MOA Precise, accurate, robust, reproducible, stability-indicating Suitable for biocomparability studies, QC stability studies etc. and other uses where the traditional assay falls short Complement primary cell-based ADCC bioassays in Ab drug development V158 or F158 9

ADCC Reporter Bioassay protocol Single day bioassay 1. Incubate control, reference or test antibody with target cells. 2. Add engineered effector cells containing: - FcgRIIIa (V158) or (F158) - NFAT-RE luc2 luciferase 3. Incubate to allow for pathway activation (as short as 6 hours). 4. Add luciferase detection reagent and measure luminescence. 10 10

ADCC Reporter Bioassay development 1. Developing low variability ADCC MOA Reporter Bioassays Thaw-and-Use cells Critical parameters and DoE optimization Robust reagents and assays Simple, homogeneous 2. Bioassay performance testing Accuracy Precision Specificity Linearity and range Robustness Stability-indicating Benchmarking Bioassay of multiple Abs Assay qualification 11

Cells as critical reagents in thaw-and-use format

Cells as critical reagents Traditional use of fresh cells from cell culture: slow and variable Time: 1-2 weeks Thaw for culture Cell culture Cell count, harvest, prepare for assay Read plates in e.g. GloMax Discover Thaw-and-use cells: fast, simple, and improved reproducibility Time: < 24hr Thaw-and-Use Resuspend in assay buffer, plate for assay Read plates in e.g. GloMax Discover 13

No cell culture required 1. Human cell lines (Jurkat, WIL2-S, Raji, U937, HEK293) Developed for immediate thaw-and-use in bioassay Designed for good recovery and robust response upon thawing 2. Thaw-and-Use format Cell propagation conditions & defined freezing protocol control assay performance for a consistent bioassay response No pre-culturing prior to assay means less variability introduced Same cells in bioassay, day to day Thaw-and-Use cells + 3. Minimizes pre-assay planning, time & labor Ample cell banks provide long-term supply means no cell culture required 14

Biological performance equivalent to fresh cells Fresh cells from continuous culture Frozen, thaw-and-use cells EC 50 =3.5ng/ml FI=34-fold EC 50 =2.9ng/ml FI=41-fold Assay specifics: E:T ratio = 6:1; fresh WIL2-S cells as target cells; Bio-Glo reagent; 20hr induction for fresh V variant effector cell assay; 6hr induction for thaw-and-use effector cell assay. 15

Cells as reagents (Thaw-and-use): Complete QC tests STR analysis cell ID profile (human) CO1 analysis (cytochrome oxidase) test for presence of species (human and other potential contaminants) Cell doubling time under propagation conditions Mycoplasma (Hoechst) Mycoplasma (Direct culture) Sterility Cell density Cell viability after thaw Fill volume ADCC Reporter Bioassay ( EC50 and fold induction) 16

V variant ADCC Reporter Bioassay

Identification of critical assay parameters for bioassay optimization Induction hours E: T ratio with Effector cell number constant Other parameters tested: Assay buffer: serum concentration, use of low IgG serum Cell numbers per well Pre-plating and incubation time: target cell plating, antibody/target cells incubation Assay plates: White flat, V- or U-bottom plates 18

Bioassay development using DoE Design of Experiments Allow understanding of the interactions between critical assay factors Minimizes amount of work needed to develop robust assays Variables: Induction time Target/Ab pre-incubation Effector cell number Target cell number Target cell / Ab Jurkat cell Target cell run induction time hr incubation time(mins) plating number (K) plating number (K) 1 5.5 30 75 10 2 5.5 30 75 12.5 3 5.5 30 90 12 4 5.5 30 90 15 5 5.5 45 75 10 6 5.5 45 75 12.5 7 5.5 45 90 12 8 5.5 45 90 15 9 6 30 75 10 10 6 30 75 12.5 11 6 30 90 12 12 6 30 90 15 13 6 45 75 10 14 6 45 75 12.5 15 6 45 90 12 16 6 45 90 15 Outputs & Results: Good response (fold induction) = 19-27 Good (low) L-term* values = 0.1-0.2 *L-term is a measure of assay precision around the EC 50 determination (log width of the 95% confidence interval around logec 50 ) 19

Bioassay qualification and performance testing Determination of parallelism and measurement of Potency relative to the reference antibody Linearity & Range: demonstration across the desired range of potencies Accuracy of observed versus expected potencies across the desired working range of potencies Precision: intra-assay precision (repeatability) and intermediate (interassay) precision Specificity to show response is dependent on specific antibody and not other components Stability-indicating to show the bioassay is capable of detecting loss of structural integrity of an antibody Robustness to demonstrate that the assay is not affected by small changes in protocol (e.g., induction time) ICH Guideline Q2 [R1] 20

Demonstration of measurement of relative potency and repeatability Fold of Induction 35 30 25 20 15 10 Design: Two analysts Three days Four plates per day 100% vs 50% 100% vs 75% 100% vs 125% 100% vs 150% Repeatability 5 Measure repeatability plate1 plate2 plate3 plate4 0-10 -9-8 -7-6 -5 Log 10 [B1 antibody], g/ml A EC50 relative potency 102% 92% 100% control 102% % 40 ld of Induction Representative plate layout 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plate1 30 20 Fold of Induction 100%-1 4.230e-008 35 B no Ab dilu9 dilu8 dilu7 dilu6 dilu5 dilu4 dilu3 dilu2 dilu1 100% 30 C no Ab dilu9 dilu8 dilu7 dilu6 dilu5 dilu4 dilu3 dilu2 dilu1 50% D no Ab dilu9 dilu8 dilu7 dilu6 dilu5 dilu4 dilu3 dilu2 dilu1 100% 25 E no Ab dilu9 dilu8 dilu7 dilu6 dilu5 dilu4 dilu3 dilu2 dilu1 50% 20 F no Ab dilu9 dilu8 dilu7 dilu6 dilu5 dilu4 dilu3 dilu2 dilu1 100% G no Ab dilu9 dilu8 dilu7 dilu6 dilu5 dilu4 dilu3 dilu2 dilu1 50% H Precision = average of RSD (%) = 7.3% Accuracy = average of Recovery (%) = 95.8% Measured Potency (%) Mean Potency (%) SD % Recovery (%) 15 10 Antibody Sample RSD (%) day 1 48.5 day 2 50% 45.2 48.9 3.9 97.7 7.9 day 3 52.9 day 1 63.1 day 2 75% 62.9 66.4 5.9 88.5 8.9 day 3 73.2 day 1 112.1 day 2 125% 136.3 123.0 12.3 98.4 10.0 day 3 120.5 day 1 148.8 day 2 150% 150.4 147.6 3.6 98.4 2.4 day 3 143.6 Measure relative potency and parallelism 5 150% Linearity 0-10 -9-8 -7-6 -5 Log 10 [B1 antibody], g/ml 100%-2 4.693e-008 Y=1.026X-5.126 R2=0.995 100%-3 4.323e-008 100%-1 100%-2 100%-3 50% 100% 100%-4 4.245e-008 Assay with thaw-and-use effector and WIL2-S target cells Parallelism and relative potency determined with JMP Software 21

Observed potency Precision, accuracy, linearity and range of ADCC Reporter Bioassay Antibody Sample Measured Potency (%) Mean Potency (%) SD % Recovery (%) RSD (%) day 1 48.5 day 2 50% 45.2 48.9 3.9 97.7 7.9 day 3 52.9 day 1 63.1 day 2 75% 62.9 66.4 5.9 88.5 8.9 day 3 73.2 day 1 112.1 day 2 125% 136.3 123.0 12.3 98.4 10.0 day 3 120.5 day 1 148.8 day 2 150% 150.4 147.6 3.6 98.4 2.4 day 3 143.6 Intermediate Precision (Av of RSD(%)) 7.3% Accuracy (Av of % Recovery) 95.8% Linearity y= 1.016x 0.052 R 2 = 0.995 in the range of 50-150% relative potency Assay with thaw-and-use effector and WIL2-S target cells and anti-cd20 B1 antibody 175% 150% 125% 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% y = 1.0161x - 0.0516 R² = 0.9949 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% Expected potency 22

Summary of ADCC Reporter Bioassay Qualification studies Two independent assay characterizations were performed using ADCC reporter bioassay effector cells and CD20+ WIL2-S frozen, thaw-and-use target cells and anti- CD20 B1 antibody CD20+ Raji frozen, thaw-and-use target cells and anti- CD20 B1 antibody Performance characteristics support suitability of ADCC Reporter Bioassay for validation 23

ADCC Reporter Bioassay is specific Target cells, effector cells and specific antibody No Target cells No Effector cells or no FcgRIIIa No antibody or non-specific antibody Assay signal is dependent on: Presence of Target cells + Presence of FcgRIIIa receptor + Appropriate specific antibody 24

ADCC Reporter Bioassay is stability-indicating Activity of heat-stressed Rituximab Activity of heat-stressed Trastuzumab 25

ADCC Reporter Bioassay is robust Fold of Induction 30 20 10 1 Time of induction 1 6 7 14 Run Induction time EC 50 1 6.0hr 3.15x10-8 g/ml 2 5.5hr 3.83x10-8 g/ml 0-10 -9-8 -7-6 -5 Log 10 [B1 antibody], g/ml Fold of Induction 30 20 10 E:T ratio and cell # per well 1 7 13 16 Run E:T ratio E cell # T cell # EC 50 1 7.5:1 75k 10k 3.09x10-8 g/ml 2 6:1 90k 15k 3.83x10-8 g/ml 0-10 -9-8 -7-6 -5 Log 10 [B1 antibody], g/ml 26

Benchmarking: good correlation with cytotoxicity assay, less variability ADCC Reporter Bioassay, V Variant ADCC cytotoxicity bioassay (PBMCs from VV allele blood donors) A series of trastuzumab glycosylation blend mixtures were prepared by blending PNGase F treated (deglycosylated) and untreated trastuzumab (N-glycosylated). The antibody samples were tested with SK-BR-3 target cells, using untreated antibody as the 100% activity reference. 27

ADCC Reporter Bioassay can measure potency of different antibody drugs Suspension or adherent target cells can be used. Optimize E:T ratio and dose-range for different Ab and target cells Rituximab Trastuzumab CD20 + WIL2-S B cell line (suspension) as target Her2 + SK-BR-3 breast cancer cell line (adherent) as target 28

The ADCC Reporter Bioassay can be used in 96-well and 384-well plate format A. WIL2-S target cells B. Raji target cells Assay volume per well Target cells Antibody Effector cells Bio-Glo 96-well plate 25 µl 25 µl 25 µl 75 µl 384-well plate 5 µl 5 µl 5 µl 15 µl 29

F variant ADCC Reporter Bioassay

Why is an F Variant assay needed? The human FcgRIIIa receptor has a polymorphism at amino acid 158 resulting in either an F or V amino acid In the general population, 85% are F/V and F/F, while only 15% are V/V The V variant has a higher affinity for antibody Fc regions than the F variant, resulting in better ADCC activity In clinical trials with antibodies with ADCC activity, better responsiveness by V variant patients has been observed Developing Ab that are more effective at mediating ADCC through the F variant receptor should help patients that lack the V variant An F variant ADCC Reporter Bioassay can be used to evaluated engineered Abs for improvements in F variant ADCC activity 31

Bioluminescent ADCC Reporter Bioassay, F variant Protocol mab Surface antigen expressing Target cells, thaw-and-use or continuously cultured cells Engineered Jurkat Effector cells in thaw-and-use format Glomax Discover Response induction (6-24 hr) Bio-Glo Luciferase Assay Reagent 1. Incubate control, reference or test antibody with target cells. 2. Add engineered effector cells expressing: FcgRIIIa(F158) NFAT-RE luc2 luciferase upon ADCC pathway activation 3. Induce response in as little as 6 hours. 4. Add luciferase detection reagent and measure luminescence immediately in e.g. a Glomax Discover. 32

Assay development critical parameter: Effector to Target Ratio Suspension target cells Adherent target cells 10:1 6:1 4:1 15:1 10:1 33

Assay development critical parameter: Induction Time Fresh-from-culture effector cells Thaw-and-use effector cells 24hr 7hr 5hr 6hr 24hr 34

Bioassay Characteristics - ICH Guideline Q2 [R1] Qualification of Analytical Procedures Accuracy Precision: Repeatability (intra-assay precision) Intermediate precision (day to day, analyst-to analyst) Reproducibility (lab to lab) Specificity Linearity Range Robustness Assay validation by the customer Design: Two analysts Three days Four plates per day 100% vs 50% 100% vs 75% 100% vs 125% 100% vs 200% Glomax Discover provides technical elements for laboratories to comply with 21CFR part 11 35

Linearity and range with CD20 Ab 36

Accuracy, precision, linearity and range WIL2-S Target Cells Raji Target Cells Accuracy % Expected Relative Potency % Recovery % Recovery 50 87.7 101.3 75 90.4 99.2 150 95.1 107.8 200 103.1 99.3 Repeatability (%CV) 100% (Reference) 3.4 5.7 Intermediate Precision (%CV) 6.2 7.7 Linearity (r 2 ) 0.997 0.993 Linearity (y=mx+b) y=1.071x - 12.04 y = 1.017x + 0.596 37

Specificity No target cells No Ab or wrong Ab FcgRIIIa blocked Assay signal is dependent on: Target cells expressing relevant antigen Specific Ab Effector cells expressing FcgRIIIa receptor and NFAT-RE/luc2 No FcgRIIIa 38

Specificity Antibody isotype Order of response: hu IgG1, hu IgG3, mouse IgG2a >> hu IgG2, hu IgG4, mouse IgG1 39

Stability-indicating heat stressed samples Potency and Efficacy EC 50 increases (right shift) Fold induction decreases 40

Measure potencies of different mab biologic drugs Suspension or adherent target cells can be used. Optimize E:T ratio and dose-range for different Abs and target cells Three best-selling mab biologic drugs that possess ADCC as a main MOA Rituximab, anti-cd20, chimeric IgG1. Trastuzumab, anti-her2, humanized IgG1. Cetuximab, anti-egfr, chimeric IgG1. Target cell: SK-BR-3 Target cell: A431 41

V and F variant ADCC Reporter Bioassays for better characterization of Ab during drug development Results align with expected differences in biological activity via V and F receptors Trastuzumab HER2+ SKBR3 target cells Cetuximab EGFR+ A431 target cells Effector cell EC50 (g/ml) Fold Induction V 4.1e-008 107.4 F 1.3e-007 58.1 Effector cell EC50 (g/ml) Fold Induction V 1.2e-008 24.4 F 2.7e-008 10.1 42

Suitable instrumentation for ADCC Reporter Bioassays across Ab drug development workflow GloMax Discover Superior Performance Broader dynamic range to measure extreme ranges Better sensitivity for low-level samples Lower well-to-well cross talk for confidence Flexible Modular design so you choose the capability you need Automation-friendly to support your workflow 6 to 384-well plate formats Integrated with Promega Assays Optimized and Pre-loaded Promega Assays Spend less time optimizing your experiment 21CFR part 11 GloMax Discover provides required technical elements of a part 11 compliant system to be used with the appropriate laboratory workflow 43

Summary of ADCC Reporter Bioassays ADCC Reporter Bioassays Alternative cell-based bioassays to quantify potency of antibodies reflective of ADCC mechanism of action Based on target cell-bound antibody activation of FcgIIIa receptor signaling pathways in the effector cell Bioluminescent NFAT-RE-luciferase reporter bioassay with readout from engineered effector cells The bioassays are simple, robust, specific, precise and accurate Suitable for stability studies, use in biocomparability assays, antibody engineering to improve efficacy, reflective of in vivo MOA Effector cells are well-controlled reagents in thaw-and-use format 44

References: 1) Cheng, Z. J., Garvin, D., Paguio, A., Moravec, R., Engel, L., Fan, F., and Surowy, T. (2014). Development of a robust reporter-based ADCC assay with frozen, thaw-and-use cells to measure Fc effector function of therapeutic antibodies. J. Immunol. Methods 414, 69. 2) Chung, S., Quarmby, V., Gao, X., Ying, Y., Lin, L., Reed, C., Fong, C.,Lau,W.,Qiu, Z.J., Shen, A., et al., (2012). Quantitative evaluation of fucose reducing effects in a humanized antibody on Fcgamma receptor binding and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity activities. MAbs 4, 326. 3) Chung, S., Lin, Y.L., Reed, C., Ng, C., Cheng, Z.J., Malavasi, F., Yang, J., Quarmby, V., Song, A. (2014). Characterization of in vitro antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity activity of therapeutic antibodies impact of effector cells. J. Immunol. Methods 407, 63. 4) Promega Application Notes www.promega.com/discover i. Measuring the ADCC Reporter Bioassay Complete Kit (WIL2-S) Signal on the GloMax Discover System ii. Validation and Comparability Studies with ADCC Reporter Bioassays Ulrike Herbrand, Sabrina Schöbel, Sascha Kramm, Simone Scotti, Charles River Biopharmaceutical Services GmbH, Erkrath, Germany 45

THANK YOU! Questions? 2013. Proprietary Information. Not for further distribution. 46