Court Case Management System (CCMS)



Similar documents
The California Court Case Management System (CCMS)

Court Security. FACT SHEET April Court Security. Page 1 of 7

Justice Partner Data Integration Program

Programs for Self-Represented Litigants

Utah Courts Case and Document Management

CALIFORNIA COURTS AND THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA County of Sacramento th Street Sacramento, CA (916) Website

Maryland Courts, Criminal Justice, and Civil Matters

How To Become A Court Appointed Attorney

Elkins Family Law Task Force

The Texas Judicial System. Criminal Appeals, in Courts of Appeals, in District Courts, in County Courts, in

Statewide Integrated E-Payment Technology Experience Bulletin, TEB:

Do Californians Answer the Call to Serve on a Jury?

COMMISSION SURVEY ANALYSIS FOR CRIMINAL LAW SECTION N=7

INVITATION TO COMMENT

The NH Court System excerpts taken from

Technology Governance, Strategy, and Funding Proposal

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 17 1

Appellate Lawyer s Directory

INVITATION TO COMMENT W16-09

Restitution Basics for Victims of Offenses by Juveniles

California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS) Advisory Committee (CAC) Meeting Minutes. August 12, 2014

WHEREAS, this Circuit has recognized that the creation of specialized diversion programs

AB12 The California Fostering Connections to Success Act

FAMILY DRUG COURT PROGRAM

Table of Contents. E-Filing EF1 E-Filing. 8

Information for Those Convicted of Minor Consuming or Possessing Alcohol (MCA)

CLERK & COMPTROLLER PALM BEACH COUNTY GUARDIANSHIP REVIEW

CCMS V3 E-Filing CCTC-EFSP Connectivity Technical Guide

EARLY CARE & EDUCATION LAW UNIT WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SMALL CLAIMS COURT

MINNESOTA S EXPERIENCE IN REVISING ITS JUVENILE CODE AND PROSECUTOR INPUT IN THE PROCESS September 1997

FY13 Actual FY14 Budget FY15 Budget

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE 700 Civic Center Drive West P.O. Box Santa Ana, CA (877)

Chapter 3. Justice Process at the County Level. Brooks County Courthouse

CIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...

NJ Judiciary Criminal Justice Reform New Jersey Association of Counties December 18, 2015

Is a Dismissal the same as an Expungement?

Judicial Branch Overview

General District Courts

Attorneys: Frequently Asked Questions about E-filing

A GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING THE EMANCIPATION OF A MINOR

ALL SMALL CLAIMS SERVICE

How does AB 109 affect reduction of charges from felony misdemeanor and expungement? 1

Overview of Processes and Procedures for SCDMV

YOSEMITE REGIONAL OCCUPATIONAL PROGRAM CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles

GETTING THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

Finance Education: Jury Services Other:

FEDERALISM THE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN THE UNITED STATES

Assembly Bills 12 and 212 Written Report Requirements for Social Workers

OREGON ecourt INFORMATION FOR ATTORNEYS, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES & COMMUNITY PARTNERS

Karren S. Price. Assistant Professor. Criminal Justice

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY Third Judicial District Of Kansas Chadwick J. Taylor, District Attorney

THE EXPUNGEMENT PROCESS

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOUR RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED.

The paperless office has arrived.

STUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER NINE

INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT

The Criminal Justice Dashboard (The Dashboard) Category: Information Communications Technology (ICT) Innovations. State of Maryland.

Chapter 153. Violations and Fines 2013 EDITION. Related Laws Page 571 (2013 Edition)

CALIFORNIA CODES GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO

How TO APPEAL A DECISION OF A MUNICIPAL COURT

Glossary of Terms Acquittal Affidavit Allegation Appeal Arraignment Arrest Warrant Assistant District Attorney General Attachment Bail Bailiff Bench

TRIAL COURT COLLECTIONS POLICY GUIDELINES TABLE OF CONTENTS

SEALING OF RECORDS. Conviction / Acquittal / Dismissal CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY S OFFICE. DAVID ROGER District Attorney

APPEARANCE, PLEA AND WAIVER

SEALING YOUR JUVENILE RECORDS

The right to counsel in Utah An assessment of trial-level indigent defense services

FILING A PERSONAL INJURY OR PROPERY DAMAGE LAWSUIT

AUTHORITY: POLICY: Applicability: Fee Schedule: Administrative Order

North Las Vegas Municipal Court. Strategic Budget Priorities Process (SBPP) Group July 2010

RECORD OF TRIALS, ARBITRATIONS AND DEPOSITIONS JOE C. SPURGEON, Ph.D. Certified Industrial Hygienist ( )

Municipal Court Convictions Court Cost Chart 01/01/2016 A B C D E F G H I J The costs and fees below must always be assessed upon conviction

PLACER COUNTY INDIGENT CRIMINAL DEFENSE ASSIGNED COUNSEL AND OTHER EXPERTS PROGRAM

ALABAMA s FELONY DUI STATUTE- A HISTORY. [This document was originally prepared by AOC and was later revised and updated by Patrick Mahaney.

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE COLORADO JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE NUMBER

How to Use the California Identity Theft Registry

ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE Judicial Administration Option

LOCAL RULES. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MERCER COUNTY, 35 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Rules of Criminal Procedure. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Transcription:

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS 455 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102-3688 Tel 415-865-4200 TDD 415-865-4272 Fax 415-865-4205 www.courtinfo.ca.gov FACT SHEET August 2009 Court Case Management System (CCMS) The California Court Case Management System (CCMS) is a statewide technology initiative to bring the courts together to use one application for all case categories. The project is being managed by the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), Southern Regional Office in Burbank, with the participation of more than 200 court representatives from more than 25 counties, the AOC Information Services Division, and the AOC Center for Families, Children & the Courts in San Francisco. CCMS Application The Court Case Management System (CCMS) will be deployed in all trial courts in California and hosted at the California Courts Technology Center. This sample CCMS screen allows the user to enter criteria and search for a specific case.

Page 2 of 5 CCMS began with the development of a criminal and traffic product called V2. Next, the V3 product was developed for civil, probate, small claims, and mental health case management. These two products are currently in use at seven California trial courts. V4 is the final development phase and will combine the functionality already developed in V2 and V3 with new functionality for family law and juvenile case categories. V4 will also include statewide reporting, court interpreter and court reporter scheduling, and integration with justice partner applications. Functionality The CCMS application manages civil, small claims, probate, mental health, criminal, traffic, family law, juvenile dependency, and juvenile delinquency cases. The following case management functionality is included in the product: Cases & Courtroom Case Initiation Case Management Calendaring Counter Filings Judicial Officer Screens Tentative Rulings Probate Notes Hearings/Courtroom Events Exhibits Register of Actions Disposition Appeals Fiscal Accounting (Business Office and Reports) Cashiering Collections Administration Person/Entity Management Work Queues/To-do Lists Resource Assignment Form/Notice and Document Generation Records Reporting Issuances Warrants The following functionality will also be developed to support the judicial branch: Unified family court Today, cases involving family members may be heard in different courts and judicial officers may not be aware that these individuals are involved in multiple cases. This can lead to conflicting orders based on incomplete information. As rules of court evolve, these cases could be coordinated if the related cases and family members can be identified at the time of filing. By providing a model that links individuals to family units and connects one family unit to another, CCMS will support the courts ability to manage a family in a unified manner. This will reduce the number of hearings, potentially lower the number of times children must testify, and lessen the risk of conflicting orders.

Page 3 of 5 Electronic filing (e-filing) The California CCMS is designed to allow the following capacities: Electronic service and noticing of case participants; and Receipt of electronic filings from e-filing service providers (third-party vendors), justice partners, and a state-owned e-filing provider. The AOC and lead courts completed design sessions to enhance CCMS e-filing functionality. Interfaces with California justice partners The CCMS project is a historic opportunity to improve data sharing between the courts and all of their justice partner agencies through the application of standard data definitions and universal technology. Examples of agencies identified for data exchanges include: Appellate Court Case Management System (ACCMS) California Highway Patrol (CHP) California Department of Social Services (CDSS) Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) California Department of Justice (DOJ) Local justice partners (e.g., prosecutors, public defenders, probation, sheriff) Statewide reporting The statewide data warehouse will give the judicial branch the ability to store and report information on case volume, types of orders, case duration, fee waivers, collection performance, and court costs (e.g., cost per courtroom hour). This will improve statistical information and enable better operational and policy decisions. The statewide data warehouse will facilitate the ability of the AOC to run statistical reports, thereby relieving court staff who currently produce and report this information. Remote access portals CCMS access will provide remote access to case transactions and information in the following ways: Public and courthouse portal. A public Web site will allow users to search for case information, pay fines and fees, request traffic school enrollment, request a continuance on a traffic case, access court calendars, and view certain case documents. Computer stations located inside courthouses will have the same functionality as the public Web site, as well as access to additional court documents and the ability to request certified copies. Registered public/justice partner portal. After establishing secure login credentials, case participants and justice partners will have remote access to their case information.

Page 4 of 5 Interpreter scheduling CCMS will provide the courts with the ability to communicate their needs for interpreter services. Using the CCMS, both regional and local court interpreter coordinators can track assignments flagged for interpreter services and manage the scheduling of interpreters. Courts will also have the ability to create reports on the use of interpreter services to meet their reporting requirements. Court reporter scheduling The CCMS application will have the ability to track court reporter status, demographic data, and assignments. CCMS Goals CCMS moves beyond the vision of focused efficiency improvements for selected case types and aspires to deliver improved efficiency for all cases, and improved quality of justice by providing venue transparency across all case types at all courts. 1 Venue transparency is a primary objective of the California CCMS project and will allow judicial officers access to information regardless of jurisdiction so they may have the most complete information to make decisions. CCMS This project supports the Judicial Council s strategic plan to create a branchwide infrastructure for service excellence. 2 In addition, the following CCMS specific project goals support the strategic plan of California s judicial branch of government: Support courts of different sizes and demographics. Efficiently manage system enhancements, especially those that arise from legislative changes. Reduce cost and improve the quality of internal court processes by eliminating paper and automating the work process. Establish standard procedures that will make it easy for courts to use a common solution with minimum customization. Utilize a common approach for all case categories based on best practices, a contemporary architecture, and continued technology evolution. Improve responsiveness, reduce cost, and improve justice coordination by establishing electronic interfaces with state agencies and justice partners. Provide opportunity to implement shared services in the future through a single system that can be used at all courts. Improve ability to respond to external requests for statistical information by providing a statewide repository of case information. 1 Gartner Inc., California Court Case Management System (CCMS) Business Case (Dec. 2007), p. 3. 2 Judicial Council of California, Justice in Focus: The Strategic Plan for California s Judicial Branch 2006 2012 (2007), pp. 46 49.

Page 5 of 5 History of CCMS In 2001, an assessment was performed to understand the viability of the case management systems used by the courts. A number of courts were facing critical needs because of outdated systems, deficient technical support, inability to meet legislative and reporting requirements, and significant maintenance costs. This study concluded that a custom solution would be required to meet the needs of the local trial courts. Also, during this time, the Superior Courts of San Diego, Los Angeles, Ventura, and Orange Counties were considering the replacement of their existing case management systems and confirmed that available vendor products did not meet their requirements. After a convergence effort to reduce the number of case management systems, it was agreed that collaboration on the development of a statewide system was a better approach. In early 2002, after review and approval by the Judicial Council, the courts and the AOC agreed on a common solution, and the California CCMS project was initiated. A governance structure for CCMS was established, which includes an oversight committee, steering committee, and regional program office. The oversight committee consists of the presiding judges of the five CCMS lead courts (the Superior Courts of Los Angeles, Orange, Sacramento, San Diego, and Ventura Counties) and the regional administrative director of the AOC Southern Regional Office. The steering committee consists of the executive officers of the five lead courts and their information technology officers. A 2007 study conducted by Gartner Inc. quantified the benefits of CCMS and confirmed that CCMS will dramatically improve efficiency at the courts and provide efficiencies for the public and organizations that interact with the courts. 3 Project Timeline Design and development of the final phase of the CCMS product began in July 2007 and will be completed by late 2010. Deployment planning activities will begin in late 2009. Contact: For questions and the most current information available, please send an e-mail to: CCMS@jud.ca.gov 3 Gartner Inc., California Court Case Management System (CCMS) Business Case (Dec. 2007), p. 2.