CR 12-012 ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CREATING RULES



Similar documents
Statute interpreted: Section (2), Stats. Statutory authority: Sections (5) (b) and (2), Stats. Explanation of agency authority:

Saving the Details for Guidance EXAMPLE 1:

Safety and Professional Services General Part I, Chs. SPS EmR1415

What Is the Wisconsin Electronic Medical Records Credit?

Clearinghouse Rule

STATE OF WISCONSIN Department of Safety and Professional Services

CMS AND ONC FINAL REGULATIONS DEFINE MEANINGFUL USE AND SET STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD INCENTIVE PROGRAM

CR An order of the Board of Nursing to repeal and recreate chapters N 2 and 3 relating to nurse licensure and examining councils.

Board of Nursing in Iowa - A General Overview

AN ACT...; relating to: the budget.

B November 2, The Honorable Orrin G. Hatch Chairman The Honorable Ron Wyden Ranking Member Committee on Finance United States Senate

Critical Access Hospitals Electronic Health Record Incentive Payment Calculations

Clearinghouse Rule PROPOSED ORDER OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADOPTING RULES

Sunday March 30, 2014, 9am noon HCCA Conference, San Diego

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES. Electronic Health Records Incentive Program

Wisconsin Administrative Register

The Wisconsin Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program for Eligible Hospitals

CMS Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs 2015 Final Rule Overview Meaningful Use

STATE OF WISCONSIN BOARD OF NURSING

Notice of Hearing. The rule may be reviewed at HearingComments/.

Basis and Purpose Definitions Application Eligibility... 11

ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Human Services Department (HSD). [ NMAC - N, ]

An order of the Medical Examining Board to create chapter Med 24 relating to telemedicine.

Circular Letter: DHCQ

Health and Human Services Commission Council. Kami Geoffray, Medicaid & CHIP Program

Medicare Electronic Health Record Incentive Payments for Eligible Professionals

STATE OF WISCONSIN PSYCHOLOGY EXAMINING BOARD

Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) Proposed Rule Summary March 31, 2011

STATE OF WISCONSIN BOARD OF NURSING

CMS Proposes Rule for Electronic Health Record Standards and Specifications

State of Wisconsin / OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE

Achieving Meaningful Use in Presented by the SFREC

The deadline for submitting economic impact comments is January 10, PROPOSED ORDER

TABLE 22 MAXIMUM TOTAL AMOUNT OF EHR INCENTIVE PAYMENTS FOR A MEDICARE EP WHO DOES NOT PREDOMINATELY FURNISH SERVICES IN A HPSA

Santa Rosa Presents Webinar Series Electronic Health Records & Meaningful Use Incentives: Medicare & Medicaid

Chapter 815. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE Subchapter C. TAX PROVISIONS The Texas Workforce Commission (Commission) proposes the repeal of and new 815.

May 27, 2015 Joint Committee on Finance Paper #323. Business Tax Credit Notification Requirements (General Fund Taxes -- Income and Franchise Taxes)

EHR Incentive Payments Medicare and Medicaid Indiana

Moving Closer to Clarity

New Rules for the HITECH Electronic Health Records Incentive Program and Meaningful Use

Medicare Electronic Health Record Incentive Payments for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: May 2013

Session Objectives. Economic Stimulus Package. Electronic Medical Records Evaluation, Selection & Implementation Process

E N R O L L E D COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE. for H. B [Passed March 11, 2015; in effect ninety days from passage.]

B October 29, 2015

Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Supporting Meaningful Use. July 22, 2010

The Medicaid EHR Incentive Program: Overview, Program Integrity & Compliance

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Summary of Key Health Information Technology Provisions July 1, 2009

Details for: CMS PROPOSES DEFINITION OF MEANINGFUL USE OF CERTIFIED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (EHR) TECHNOLOGY. Wednesday, December 30, 2009

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rule

Medical Care Advisory Committee. Andy Vasquez, Deputy Director, Medicaid/CHIP Vendor Drug Program Health and Human Services Commission

HEALTH IT! LAW & INDUSTRY

Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Ten Points of Interest

Prefiled pursuant to Article III, Section 2(A)(4)(b)(i) of the Constitution of Louisiana.

Overview Selected Health IT Provisions in The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)

AN ACT...; relating to: the budget.

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet

Medicare EHR Incentive Program - Tip Sheet for Critical Access Hospital (CAH) Payments Last Updated: September, Overview.

CMS FINALIZES REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MEDICAID ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (EHR) INCENTIVE PROGRAM

Health IT Policy Committee Meeting. Data Update. March 10, 2015

2015 SENATE BILL 503

Payment Adjustments & Hardship Exceptions Tipsheet for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: March 2014

A3436 GARCIA, EUSTACE 2

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2009 Session

Criteria and Terms of Use for the ONC Certified HIT Certification and Design Mark

MACRA Overview and RFI

Data Breach, Electronic Health Records and Healthcare Reform

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Tax Implications of Health Care Reform

RE: CMS-1345-P; Comments to Medicare Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations Proposed Rule

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Selected Funding Opportunities of Interest to Critical Access Hospitals

Loan Originator Compensation Requirements under the Truth In Lending Act

Senate Bill No CHAPTER 864

HITECH Act Update: An Overview of the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Regulations

Summary of Public Health Related Aspects of Recent ONC and CMS Final Rules Version 1.0

DETAILED SUMMARY--MEDCIARE SHARED SAVINGS/ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATION (ACO) PROGRAM

This Agreement is based on the following general principles:

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS. Briefing Paper on the Proposed Medicare Shared Savings Program

The proposed rule, including the analysis and text, is attached.

Health Information Technology in Texas. Stephen Palmer Director, Office of e-health Coordination May 11, 2010

Payment Adjustments & Hardship Exceptions Tipsheet for Eligible Professionals

Minnesota EHR Incentive Program (MEIP) Program Year Timeline for EPs, EHs and CAHs. Updated November 2015

Meaningful Use Modification Rules for Oct. 26, 2015 Author: Jennifer Swinnich, Associate Director, PAMED Practice Support

Adopting Electronic Medical Records: What Do the New Federal Incentives Mean to Your Individual Physician Practice?

EHR Incentive Funding for Medicare and Medicaid

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Requirements Primer

Some Tout CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Definition for Use of Electronic Health Records As Too Ambitious

Addressing Network Adequacy Issues With Innovative Business and Delivery Models

Health Information Technology

e-health snapshot E-Health Snapshot Shell August 2009

Authorized By: Holly C. Bakke, Commissioner, Department of Banking and Insurance

AMC/NOMA Article -- Stimulus Package Promotes Health IT Adoption Amy S. Leopard Walter & Haverfield LLP

EHR/Meaningful Use

How Medical Assistants Can Meet the CMS Meaningful Use Requirement

Health Care February 28, CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stage 2 Meaningful Use,

Authorized By: Steven M. Goldman, Commissioner, Department of Banking and Insurance

Update on Medicare electronic health records incentive payment program. Zach Gaumer, Matlin Gilman, and John Richardson April 5, 2012

Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Update May 29, Florida Health Information Exchange Coordinating Committee

AN ACT...; relating to: the budget.

CHAPTER 24 EMERGENCY GOVERNMENT Hazardous Discharge Response and Reimbursement

Transcription:

CR 12-012 ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CREATING RULES The Wisconsin Department of Revenue adopts an order to create Tax 2.985, relating to the electronic medical records credit. The scope statement for this rule, SS 032-11, was approved by the Governor on October 25, 2011, published in Register No. 671 on November 14, 2011, and approved by the Secretary of Revenue on November 28, 2011. Analysis by the Department of Revenue Stats. Statutes interpreted: ss. 71.07 (5i), 71.28 (5i), 71.47 (5i), and 73.15 (1) and (2), Statutory authority: ss. 73.15 (3) and 227.11 (2) (a), Stats. Explanation of agency authority: The department is authorized by s. 73.15 (3), Stats., to promulgate rules to comply with the provisions under ss. 73.15 (1) and (2), Stats., which provide: 73.15 (1) The department of revenue shall implement a program to certify health care providers as eligible for the electronic medical records credit under ss. 71.07 (5i), 71.28 (5i), and 71.47 (5i). (2) If the department of revenue certifies a health care provider under sub. (1), the department shall determine the amount of credits to allocate to the health care provider. The total amount of electronic medical records credits allocated to health care providers in any calendar year may not exceed $10,000,000. (3)The department of revenue shall promulgate rules to administer this section. The department is further authorized by s. 227.11 (2) (a), Stats., to promulgate rules interpreting the provisions of any statute enforced or administered by the agency if the agency believes it necessary to effectuate the purpose of the statutes enforced or administered by the agency. Section 227.11 (2) (a), Stats., provides: 227.11 (2) Rule-making authority is expressly conferred as follows: (a) Each agency may promulgate rules interpreting the provisions of any statute enforced or administered by the agency, if the agency considers it necessary to effectuate the purpose of the statute, but a rule is not valid if the rule exceeds the bounds of correct interpretation. All of the following apply to the promulgation of a rule interpreting the provisions of a statute enforced or administered by an agency: 1. A statutory or nonstatutory provision containing a statement or declaration of legislative intent, purpose, findings, or policy does not confer rule-making authority on the agency or augment the agency's rule-making authority beyond the rule-making authority that is explicitly conferred on the agency by the legislature. 2. A statutory provision describing the agency's general powers or duties does not confer rule-making authority on the agency or augment the agency's rule-making 1

authority beyond the rule-making authority that is explicitly conferred on the agency by the legislature. 3. A statutory provision containing a specific standard, requirement, or threshold does not confer on the agency the authority to promulgate, enforce, or administer a rule that contains a standard, requirement, or threshold that is more restrictive than the standard, requirement, or threshold contained in the statutory provision. Related statute or rule: There are no other applicable statutes or rules. Plain language analysis: This rule establishes procedures for: certifying health care providers as eligible for the electronic medical records tax credit under ss. 71.07 (5i), 71.28 (5i) and 71.47 (5i), Stats.; filing a claim for the electronic medical records tax credit under ss. 71.07 (5i), 71.28 (5i) and 71.47 (5i), Stats., including the method of application and information required; and allocating the electronic medical records tax credit to certified health care providers. Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation: The federal Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health IT promulgated 45 CFR 170 relating to health information technology (HIT) standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria and certification programs for HIT. These rules, in addition to the rules for meaningful use of certified electronic health records (EHR) technology under 42 CFR 495, are being used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) to administer an electronic health record incentive payment program. CMS will require health care providers participating in Medicare to adopt and use certified EHR technology or face penalties beginning in 2016. Comparison with rules in adjacent states: The department is not aware of a similar rule in an adjacent state. Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies: The department has created this rule order to comply with the statutory requirement to administer the implementation of the electronic medical records credit. No other data was used in the preparation of this rule order or this analysis. Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business: As explained above, this rule is created to administer Wisconsin s income and franchise tax laws. The rule itself does not have an effect beyond the statutes it interprets. As such, the department has determined that the rule does not affect small businesses. Anticipated costs incurred by private sector: This rule does not have a fiscal effect on the private sector. Effect on small business: This rule does not affect small business. Agency contact person: Please contact Dale Kleven at (608) 266-8253 or dale.kleven@revenue.wi.gov, if you have any questions regarding this proposed rule.. 2

SECTION 1. Tax 2.985 is created to read: Tax 2.985 Electronic medical records credit. (1) PURPOSE AND SCOPE. The purpose and scope of this section is to establish procedures for all of the following: (a) Certifying health care providers as eligible for the electronic medical records credit under ss. 71.07 (5i), 71.28 (5i), and 71.47 (5i), Stats. (b) Filing an application for the electronic medical records credit under ss. 71.07 (5i), 71.28 (5i), and 71.47 (5i), Stats., including the method of application and information required. (c) Allocating the electronic medical records tax credit to health care providers certified under this section. (2) DEFINITIONS. In this section: (a) "Claimant" has the meaning given in ss. 71.07 (5i) (a), 71.28 (5i) (a), and 71.47 (5i) (a), Stats. (b) Electronic medical record means an electronic record of health-related information that includes patient demographic and clinical health information and has the capacity to provide clinical decision support; to support physician order entry; to capture and query information relevant to health care quality; and to exchange and integrate electronic health information with and from other sources. (c) Health care provider has the meaning given in s. 146.81 (1) (a) to (p), Stats. (d) Taxable year has the meaning given in ss. 71.01 (12), 71.22 (10), and 71.42 (5), Stats. (3) APPLYING FOR CERTIFICATION AND ALLOCATION. (a) The department shall provide a form to apply for certification and allocation of the electronic medical records credit under ss. 71.07 (5i), 71.28 (5i), and 71.47 (5i), Stats. The form shall require an applicant to provide all of the following information: 1. The type of health care provider license or certification held and the license or certification number. 2. The amounts paid in the taxable year for information technology hardware and software used to maintain electronic medical records. 3. A description of the information technology hardware and software, including the federal certification number issued pursuant to 45 CFR 170. 4. An explanation of how the information technology hardware and software is used to maintain electronic medical records. 5. Any other information, as determined by the department, necessary to certify a health care provider or allocate the credit under sub. (4). (b) Each application shall be completed and submitted to the department, no sooner than upon completion of the calendar year in which the amount under par. (a) 2. was paid, and no later than January 31 of the subsequent calendar year. 3

Note: An application for the electronic medical records credit may be filed beginning January 1, 2013. The application form will be available on the department's web site at www.revenue.wi.gov by December 2012. (4) CERTIFICATION OF APPLICANTS AND ALLOCATION OF CREDITS. (a) Based on the information provided in sub. (3) (a) 1. to 5., the department shall certify health care providers as eligible for the electronic medical records credit under s. 71.07 (5i), 71.28 (5i), or 71.47 (5i), Stats. (b) In conjunction with issuing a certification for an applicant, the department shall determine the amount of credit that the applicant may claim or distribute to its partners, members, or shareholders as follows: 1. If 50 percent of the total of the amounts under sub. (3) (a) 2. for all certified applicants does not exceed the $10,000,000 maximum total established in s. 73.15 (2), Stats., for allocations in each calendar year, the credit shall be equal to 50 percent of the amount the applicant paid during the calendar year for health information technology software certified pursuant to 45 CFR 170 and hardware used to run and access certified software. 2. If 50 percent of the total of the amounts under sub. (3) (a) 2. for all certified applicants exceeds the $10,000,000 maximum total established in s. 73.15 (2), Stats., for allocations in each calendar year, the $10,000,000 of credits shall be allocated to each certified applicant in proportion to the amount paid during the calendar year for health information technology software certified pursuant to 45 CFR 170 and hardware used to run and access certified software. Example: Health Care Providers A, B, and C are certified to claim the electronic medical records credit for the following amounts paid in 2012 for certified software and related hardware: A $8,000,000 B $12,000,000 C $4,000,000 The $10,000,000 of credits available for 2012 are allocated to A, B, and C, based on their proportionate share of the $24,000,000. A is allocated a credit of $3,333,333 (= [8,000,000 24,000,000] x $10,000,000), B is allocated a credit of $5,000,000 (= [12,000,000 24,000,000] x $10,000,000), and C is allocated a credit of $1,666,667 (= [4,000,000 24,000,000] x $10,000,000). (c) Following completion of the certifications and allocations under pars. (a) and (b), the department shall notify each applicant of the outcome of its application, including the amount of credit allocated to the applicant. SECTION 2. Effective date. This rule shall take effect on the first day of the month following publication in the Wisconsin Administrative Register as provided in s. 227.22 (2) (intro.), Stats. 4

Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis This rule order does not affect small businesses. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Dated: By: Richard G. Chandler Secretary of Revenue E:Rules/2985 Final Order 5