Multiple Myeloma Workshop- Tandem 2014



Similar documents
UNDERSTANDING MULTIPLE MYELOMA AND LABORATORY VALUES Benjamin Parsons, DO Gundersen Health System Center for Cancer and

Multiple Myeloma Patient s Booklet

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Multiple Myeloma / Plasma Cell Leukemia Pre-HSCT Data

Multiple Myeloma How to Evaluate Response To Treatment and Relapse

Whole Antibody and Free Light Chain Production by Plasma Cells

MULTIPLE MYELOMA Review & Update for Primary Care. Dr. Joseph Mignone 21st Century Oncology


Current Multiple Myeloma Treatment Adapted From the NCCN Guidelines

Multiple Myeloma Making Sense of the Report Forms. Parameswaran Hari Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee

Multiple Myeloma. The term multiple myeloma is considered to be synonymous with myeloma, plasma cell myeloma, active and symptomatic myeloma.

FastTest. You ve read the book now test yourself

Understanding Protein Electrophoresis

I've Just Been Diagnosed. with Multiple Myeloma, What s Next?

Things You Don t Want to Miss in Multiple Myeloma

chronic leukemia lymphoma myeloma differentiated 14 September 1999 Pre- Transformed Ig Surface Surface Secreted Myeloma Major malignant counterpart

Use of free light chain analysis in the diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of multiple myeloma. Amitabha Mazumder, MD

MULTIPLE MYELOMA. Overview

Understanding Protein Electrophoresis

Outline. Question 1. Question 2. What is Multiple Myeloma? Andrew Eisenberger, MD

Table of Contents Accelerate Your Research Introduction I. From the Real World to the Lab II. Research Challenges III. How Can Conversant Bio Help?

Stem Cell Transplantation

Understanding Serum Free Light Chain Assays

New diagnostic criteria for myeloma

Multiple Myeloma Patient Handbook.

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) Facts

SOUTHWEST ONCOLOGY GROUP CLINICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATE (CRA) MANUAL. MYELOMA CHAPTER 10 REVISED: March 2008

Myeloma pathways to diagnosis UCLP audit

A Clinical Primer. for Managed Care Stakeholders

PATIENT HANDBOOK. Multiple Myeloma. Improving Lives Finding the Cure. Cancer of the Bone Marrow. Prepared by Brian G.M. Durie, M.D.

Background Information Myeloma

Plasma cell dyscrasias Mark Drayson

Multiple. Powerful thinking advances the cure

Multiple. Powerful thinking advances the cure

Investigation of B cell malignancies. Dr. Joanna Sheldon Protein Reference Unit St. George s s Hospital

NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE. Lenalidomide or Observation in Treating Patients With Asymptomatic High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Patient Handbook. Multiple Myeloma. International Myeloma Foundation. Until There is a Cure... There is the IMF. Cancer of the Bone Marrow

Collaboration to collect Autologous transplant outcomes in Lymphoma and Myeloma (CALM) Additional Questionnaire (MED C) INCLUSION CRITERIA CALM STUDY

NON SECRETORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA A CASE REPORT

Phase II: Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Neha Korde, MD, Clinical Investigator Ola Landgren, MD

Proteins. Protein Trivia. Optimizing electrophoresis

Information Pathway. Myeloma tests and investigations. Paraprotein measurement

Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: The Burning Questions. IWMF Ed Forum May Morie Gertz MD, MACP

MULTIPLE MYELOMA Treatment Overview

Chapter 2. S. Hovenga 1, J.Th.M. de Wolf 1, J.E.J. Guikema 4, H. Klip 2, J.W. Smit 3, C.Th. Smit Sibinga 5, N.A. Bos 4, E.

Comparison of Serum Beta 2-Microglobulin and 24 hour Urinary Creatinine Clearance as a Prognostic Factor in Multiple Myeloma

Waldenström Macroglobulinemia, AL Amyloidosis, and Related Plasma Cell Disorders: Diagnosis and Treatment

Myeloma. Anne Grace, myeloma survivor. Support for this publication provided by

Myeloma. Ann Grace, myeloma survivor. This publication was supported in part by a grant from

Multiple Myeloma and Related Disorders. Zsolt Nagy

MULTIPLE MYELOMA. Version Date: February, 2015

Treatment results with Bortezomib in multiple myeloma

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines ) Multiple Myeloma. Version NCCN.org

Kharkov Regional Centre of Cardiovascular surgery V.N. Karazin Kharkov National University Department of Internal Medicine.

Multiple Myeloma F1 蘇 勇 誠 /MA 林 棟 樑

Treating myeloma. Dr Rachel Hall Royal Bournemouth Hospital

Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma. Hematology fellows conference 4/12/2013 Christina Fitzmaurice, MD, MPH

The Role of Bisphosphonates in Multiple Myeloma: 2007 Update Clinical Practice Guideline

A Focus on Multiple Myeloma

Malignant Lymphomas and Plasma Cell Myeloma

The Management of Myeloma & Plasma Cell Disorders

Study of serum protein electrophoresis in suspected cases of Multiple Myeloma.

Asymptomatic or smoldering myeloma with no symptoms and slow growing cancer cells

Myeloma. A guide for patients and families leukaemia.org.au

Pro Cure in Multiple Myeloma. Nicolaus Kröger Dept. of Stem Cell Transplantation University Hospital Hamburg Hamburg, Germany

A novel molecular mechanism involved in cancer development revealed by targeting MafB to hematopoietic progenitors

Multiple Myeloma. Scottsdale, Arizona Rochester, Minnesota Jacksonville, Florida CP

Introduction. Plasma Cell Neoplasms: Diagnosis. Dr. Kevin Imrie Updated August Updates (extensive re-write):

Multiple Myeloma. What is cancer?

Hematology Morphology Critique

for B cell Dyscrasias

Bone Disease in Myeloma

Shaji Kumar, M.D. Multiple Myeloma: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological

Multiple Myeloma and Amyloidosis: Optimism for Heretofore Incurable Diseases

Evolving Management of Multiple Myeloma: Todd M. Zimmerman, M.D. Associate Professor of Medicine Section of Hematology/Oncology

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines. Multiple Myeloma. Version NCCN.org. Continue

Multiple Myeloma. What is multiple myeloma? Low blood counts

Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Dyscrasias

Myeloma. A guide for patients, families and whanau

Bone Disease in Plasma. Cell Dyscrasias

Multiple Myeloma: Novel Agents. Robert A. Kyle, M.D. Germany June 28, Scottsdale, Arizona Rochester, Minnesota Jacksonville, Florida

Concise Review. of the Disease and Treatment Options. Improving Lives Finding the Cure. Multiple Myeloma Cancer of the Bone Marrow

Serum Protein Electrophoresis

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines ) Multiple Myeloma. Version NCCN.org. Continue

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is a serious, lifethreatening

Session 1 Plasma Cell Myeloma

Transcription:

Multiple Myeloma Workshop- Tandem 2014 1) Review of Plasma Cell Disorders Asymptomatic (smoldering) myeloma M-protein in serum at myeloma levels (>3g/dL); and/or 10% or more clonal plasma cells in bone marrow No related organ or tissue impairment (no end organ damage or bone lesions) Symptomatic plasma cell myeloma M-protein in serum or urine (no level is included) Bone marrow clonal plasma cells or plasmacytoma Related organ or tissue impairment (CRAB: hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, bone lesion) Oligosecretory Myeloma A subset of myeloma where the M-protein is very low in the serum (<1 g/dl) & urine (<200 mg/24 hours). Disease can be followed using serum free light chain assay (FLC) provided the ratio is abnormal & the involved FLC level is >10 mg/dl at baseline. Non-secretory myeloma A subset of myeloma where the serum & urine M-protein are absent by immunofixation electrophoresis. Light Chain myeloma Characterized only by a light chain in the serum or urine & lacks expression of the immunoglobulin heavy chain. Disease is readily detected by UPEP & urine immunofixation. Incidence of renal failure is higher in light chain myeloma. Primary Amyloidosis Caused by a plasma cell (or rarely a lymphoplasmacytic neoplasm) that secretes intact or fragments of abnormal immunoglobulin light chains (or rarely heavy chains), which deposit in various tissues & form β-pleated sheet structure (AL amyloid) that binds Congo red dye with characteristic birefringence. Light chain deposition disease (LCDD) Similar to amyloidosis in that abnormal light chains deposit in tissues causing organ dysfunction but do not form amyloid β-pleated sheets or bind Congo red dye. POEMS A rare syndrome that includes polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, and skin changes. 75-85% of patients have a serum M-protein that s either IgG lambda or IgA lambda; the quantity is typically low (median 1.1.g/dL). Osteosclerotic myeloma (a plasma cell neoplasm characterized by fibrosis and osteosclerotic changes in the bone trabeculae) is often a component of POEMS. In other words, these patients will not have lytic lesions on skeletal survey, but rather sclerotic white looking lesions.

2) Determining appropriate baseline to use when determining disease status 3) How to best report disease status when not all testing is done 4) Case Studies (2-3) 5) Tools

Multiple Myeloma- Defining what baseline to use when determining the best response to HSCT 1) HSCT is planned as part of initial therapy w/out prior disease progression or relapse. The baseline used to determine the best response to HSCT is the disease parameters obtained at the time of diagnosis. 2) Patients who have not received any chemotherapy within 6 months of HSCT, untreated relapse/progression or if the recipient has never been treated (rare). The baseline used to determine the best response to HSCT would be the disease parameters obtained immediately prior (within 30 days) to the start of the preparative regimen (not the disease parameters at time of diagnosis). 3) What if the patient had a disease progression or relapse of disease before HSCT? If a patient had disease progression or relapse of disease & was treated to reduce the myeloma burden before any preparative regimen was given for HSCT, the baseline used to determine the best response to HSCT would be the disease parameters obtained at the time of the relapse or progression. In other words, the baseline is reset to the time of the relapse or progression. Therefore, the disease parameters obtained at diagnosis or immediately prior to the start of the preparative regimen would not be used as the baseline to determine the best response to HSCT. 4) What if the patient had 2 or more disease progressions before HSCT? The appropriate baseline to use would be the disease parameters documenting the most recent disease progression. 5) What if the patient s initial therapy was changed to a different regimen due to toxicity & there was not a disease progression or relapse at any time prior to HSCT, what baseline is used to determine the best response to HSCT? The baseline used to determine the best response to HSCT is the disease parameters obtained at the time of diagnosis. 6) Tandem Transplantation w/out disease progression or relapse in between. Since this is considered one treatment, the pre-hsct baseline for determining the best response following the 2 nd HSCT would be the same baseline used prior to the 1 st HSCT (i.e. the disease parameters at diagnosis). Reference: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING DISEASE RESPONSE AND PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA TREATED BY HIGH-DOSE THERAPY AND HAEMOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION Joan BladÉ, Diana Samson,et al On behalf of the Myeloma, Subcommittee of the EBMT, (European Group for Blood, and Marrow Transplant), Chronic Leukaemia Working, Party and the Myeloma, Working Committee of the, IBMTR (International Bone, Marrow Transplant Registry), and ABMTR (Autologous Blood, and Marrow Transplant Registry) British Journal of Hematology Volume 102, Issue 5, Pages 1115-1123, 1998 10/28/10; updated 02/17/14

Multiple Myeloma Case Studies Case #1 A 65 yo patient is diagnosed with IgG kappa myeloma. Serum M-spike = 6 g/dl (or 6000 mg/dl) 24-hr urine M-protein = 1000 mg/24 hrs Bone marrow biopsy- 40% plasma cells Patient is treated with Velcade, Doxil & Dexamethasone (VDD) x 4 cycles Patient re-evaluated after 4 cycles of VDD. Serum M-spike = 2400 mg/dl Bone marrow aspirate- 15% plasma cells Disease status- PR Patient received Cytoxan for autologous stem cell mobilization. Labs were obtained immediately prior to the start of the prep regimen. Serum M-spike = 1600 mg/dl Bone marrow aspirate- 8% plasma cells What is the patient s disease status immediately prior to the start of the preparative regimen? A) Very Good Partial Remission (VGPR) B) Partial Remission (PR) C) Stable Disease (SD) D) I don t know- not enough information provided to make determination The patient underwent their autologous HCT. Lab studies were obtained at 60 & 100 days post HCT. SPEP/UPEP are negative for an M-spike at Day 60 & 100 Serum & Urine Immunofixation are positive for IgG kappa at Day 60 & 100 Bone marrow biopsy <5% plasma cells at Day 100 What disease response would you report for this recipient at 100 days post-hct? A) Partial Remission (PR) B) Very Good Partial Remission (VGPR) C) Near Complete Remission (ncr) D) Complete Remission (CR)

Case #2 A 55 year old AA male is diagnosed with IgG lambda myeloma. Results of the initial work-up include: Serum M-spike = 4 g/dl (or 4000 mg/dl) 24-hr urine M-protein = 1000 mg/24 hr Bone marrow aspirate = 60% plasma cells Patient received 2 cycles of Revlimid & Dex, then re-evaluated: Serum M-spike = 2000 mg/dl 24-hr urine M-protein = 190 mg/24 hr What is the patient s disease response after two cycles of Rev/Dex? A) Very Good Partial Remission (VGPR) B) Partial Remission (PR) C) Stable Disease (SD) The patient s PR status was confirmed with a 2 nd measurement. The patient received two additional cycles of Rev/Dex & re-evaluated for disease response. Serum M-spike = 2900 mg/dl 24-hr urine M-protein = 600 mg/24 hr Bone marrow aspirate = 30% plasma cells What is the patient s disease response after a total of 4 cycles of Rev/Dex? A) Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) B) Partial Response (PR) C) Stable Disease (SD) D) Progressive Disease (PD) Patient is switched to Vincristine, Adriamycin & Decadron (VAD) and is re-evaluated after two cycles. Serum M-spike = 1400 mg/dl 24-hr urine M-protein = 190 mg/24 hr Bone marrow aspirate = 15% plasma cells The plan is to give IV Cytoxan mobilization. What is the patient s disease response to the 2 cycles of VAD? The patient achieved a PR after two cycles of VAD. What studies were used as a baseline to make that determination? A) The studies obtained at diagnosis B) The studies obtained after first two cycles of Rev/Dex C) The studies obtained at time of progression

The patient underwent their autologous PBSC HSCT & has been evaluated monthly for the 1 st three months post HCT. Day +30 evaluation: Serum M-spike = 1000 mg/dl Serum immunofixation (+) for IgG lambda 24-hr urine M-protein = 190 mg/24 hrs Bone marrow aspirate = 7% plasma cells Day +60 evaluation: SPEP/UPEP- no monoclonal band Serum/Urine immunofixation (+) for IgG lambda 24-hr urine for M-protein = 90 mg/24 hrs Day +100 evaluation: SPEP/UPEP- no monoclonal band Serum/Urine immunofixation (+) for IgG lambda 24-hr urine for M-protein = 0 mg/24 hrs Bone marrow aspirate <5% plasma cells What is the best disease response to HCT that you would report at Day +100 for this patient? A) Stable Disease (SD) B) Partial Remission (PR) C) Very Good Partial Remission (VGPR) D) Near Complete Remission (ncr) E) Complete Remission (CR)

Case #3 A 60 yo male was diagnosed with symptomatic myeloma (IgG kappa) in May 2011. He had a prior history of smoldering myeloma diagnosed in November 2010. His treatment plan included tandem auto HCTs. Labs at diagnosis of symptomatic myeloma: Serum M-spike = 1.0 g/dl Serum FLC ĸ/λ ratio = 12.69 Urine M-spike = 175 mg/24 hours Bone marrow aspirate = 45% plasma cells Can urine studies be used to monitor the disease response to treatment? Patient received 2 cycles of Velcade & his disease was reassessed. Serum M-spike = 0.7 g/dl Serum FLC ĸ/λ ratio = 11.24 What is the disease status after 2 cycles of Velcade? A) Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) B) Partial Response (PR) C) Stable Disease (SD) Patient received 2 additional cycles of Velcade prior to HCT #1 & his disease was reassessed. Serum M-spike = 0.6 g/dl Serum FLC ĸ/λ ratio = 8.82 Bone marrow aspirate = 10% What is the disease status after 4 cycles of Velcade? A) Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) B) Partial Response (PR) C) Stable Disease (SD) The patient underwent their first autologous PBSC HSCT & was evaluated at Day 30 & Day 60. Day +30 evaluation: Serum M-spike = 0.6 Serum FLC ĸ/λ ratio = 6.87

Day +60 evaluation: Serum M-spike = 0.5 Serum FLC ĸ/λ ratio = 6.21 Bone marrow aspirate = 5% plasma cells What baseline was used to determine disease status at Day +60 post HCT #1? A) Labs obtained prior to conditioning for HCT #1 B) Labs obtained at diagnosis Patient undergoes HCT #2 in April 2012 & was evaluated at Day +30 & Day +100. Day +30 evaluation: Serum M-spike = 0.4 Serum FLC ĸ/λ ratio = 7.37 Day +100 evaluation: Serum M-spike = 0.7 Serum FLC ĸ/λ ratio = 2.35 What baseline was used to determine disease status at Day +30 & Day +100 post HCT #2? A) Labs obtained prior to conditioning for HCT #2 B) Labs obtained prior to conditioning for HCT #1 C) Labs obtained at diagnosis What is the disease status at Day +30? A) Stable Disease (SD) B) Partial Remission (PR) C) Very Good Partial Remission (VGPR) What is the disease status at Day +100? A) Progressive Disease (PD) B) Stable Disease (SD) C) Partial Remission (PR) Patient started Revlimid & Dexamethasone at Day +120 for persistent disease & was evaluated at 6 months post HCT #2. Six month evaluation: Serum M-protein = 0.4

What is the disease status at 6 months? A) Stable Disease (SD) B) Partial Remission (PR) C) Very Good Partial Remission (VGPR)

Multiple Myeloma Summary Patient Name : MR#: Physician: Diagnosis: Stage: Date Diagnostic biopsies/scan results Date Treatment Response Notes WBC Hgb Hct Plt Cr Ca Albumin Total protein Date SPEP M-spike IFE 24 hr urine protein UPEP M-spike IFE IgG IgA IgM B2 micro CRP Random urine protein Kappa light chain Lambda light chain Kappa lambda ratio

MULTIPLE MYELOMA FOLLOW-UP FORM NAME: MR#: TRANSPLANT DATE: Involved areas(circle): Serum Urine Marrow Skeleton Plasmacytoma Other: Diagnosis Data Pre-Tx Data DATE: DATE: HGB Beta2 micro HGB Beta2 micro Calcium C-Reac Pro Calcium C-Reac Pro Creatinine 24 hr urine Creatinine 24 hr urine Albumin UPEP Albumin UPEP IgG Marrow eval IgG Marrow eval IgA skeletal IgA skeletal IgM KLC IgM KLC M-spike LLC M-spike LLC SPEP K/L ratio SPEP K/L ratio Response F/U Data DATE: HGB Calcium Creatinine Albumin IgG IgA IgM M-spike SPEP Beta2 micro C-Reac Pro 24 hr urine UPEP Marrow eval skeletal KLC LLC K/L ratio Response Post-Tx MM Treatment Drug Dose Start Date Stop Date July 2008vc