UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION



Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case: 4:15-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/24/15 1 of 7. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Case 1:15-cv RP Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal

Case 3:13-cv JBA Document 1 Filed 11/14/13 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:14-cv RNC Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

4:15-cv RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Plaintiffs, -against- The Plaintiffs, by their attorney, Leon Greenberg P.C., as and for a Complaint against the defendants, state and allege,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : : : : : : : : : : : : FOURTH AMENDED COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 05/24/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:13-cv JS-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.

Case 3:14-cv AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43

Case 1:15-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 05/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:11-cv JLK Document 1 Filed 11/16/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

Case 3:08-cv JAP-JJH Document 1 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORIGIA-~~T ~:J,-~T,>cURT SAVANNAH DIVISION j Ga. NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4:14-cv PMD Date Filed 06/10/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Bryana Bible, SECOND AMENDED CLASS Plaintiff, Court File No. 12-cv RHK-JSM INTRODUCTION

3:14-cv JFA Date Filed 04/18/14 Entry Number 28 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in

CIVIL DICTRICT COURT PARISH OF ORLEANS STATE OF LOUISIANA

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

Case 4:14-cv A Document 1 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 03/07/13 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

: : : : : : : : : : : x

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Roanoke Division ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 08/13/13 Page 1 of 9 : : : : : : : : : : :

Case3:13-cv JST Document27 Filed11/27/13 Page1 of 14

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 8:13-cv EAK-TBM Document 14 Filed 05/20/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID 49 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BUFFALO DIVISION. v. Case No.: 1:14-CV RJA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2016 Page 1 of 8 UNTIED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DEFENDANT S COUNTERCLAIM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DMSION. Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL PENALTY

1. This is a civil action brought pursuant to the Uniformed Services Employment and. Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, 38 U.S.C ( USERRA ).

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT

Case 1:14-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No.: 15-cv-157 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 2:11-cv SFC-RSW Document 33 Filed 06/29/11 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

virtue of Title VIII of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 806 of the Corporate and

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv RLV-AJB Document 1 Filed 05/14/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/21/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

9:10-cv MBS Date Filed 07/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 9:13-cv DPG Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2013 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF

Case 2:15-cv JNP Document 2 Filed 09/08/15 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:10-cv DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case Number XXX I. INTRODUCTION. 1. Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O., prepare immigration documents for customers for a

SPECIMEN. (1) a written demand for monetary damages or non-monetary relief;

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

)

Case 1:14-cv LY Document 32 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:02-cv TS Document 602 Filed 06/19/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 0:13-cv RSR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 9

Case5:15-cv HRL Document1 Filed01/28/15 Page1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. ) IATRIC SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv ) v. ) ) FAIRWARNING, INC.

Case 6:15-cv JRG-KNM Document 1 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/19/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case 3:10-cv JAP -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1

MARC D. LAVIK, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : C.A. No. PC 11- : DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, : DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, : STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, : COMPLAINT

Case 1:10-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Broadband Graphics - infringement of Patent Law and Procedure

Case 3:14-cv M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

Transcription:

Case 1:13-cv-02282-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/09/13 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION DE ANGELO BENTLEY, ) MARQUES ROBERTSON, ) IKEYMA MCKENTRY, ) individually, and on behalf of ) all similarly situated persons, ) ) CIVIL ACTION ) FILE NO. Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED FLOOD BROTHERS, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ) COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINT This action is brought on behalf of all Movers employed by Flood Brothers, Inc. ( Flood Brothers or Defendant ) within the United States. Flood Brothers willfully failed to pay Plaintiffs and other similarly situated employees proper overtime for all hours worked in excess of 40 per week, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq. ( FLSA ).

Case 1:13-cv-02282-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/09/13 Page 2 of 11 NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Plaintiffs allege on behalf of themselves and other current and former Movers employed by Defendant in the United States, who choose to opt into this action pursuant to the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. 216(b) (the Collective Action ) that they are (i) entitled to unpaid wages from Defendant for overtime work for which they did not receive proper overtime premium pay, as required by the FLSA, and (ii) entitled to liquidated damages pursuant to the FLSA. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This is an action for unpaid overtime under the FLSA. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331, this Court has federal question jurisdiction over this Complaint. 3. Venue is also proper in this district and division pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2) because a substantial part of the events and omissions giving rise to this Complaint occurred within the Northern District of Georgia. PARTIES 4. Plaintiff De Angelo Bentley ( Bentley ) was an employee of Flood Brothers from approximately 2007 to February 2013. 5. Bentley s title during the relevant time period was Mover. 6. Plaintiff Marques Robertson ( Robertson ) was an employee of Flood Brothers from approximately 2009 to June 30, 2011. 2

Case 1:13-cv-02282-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/09/13 Page 3 of 11 7. Robertson s title during the relevant time period was Mover. 8. Plaintiff Ikeyma McKentry ( McKentry ) was an employee of Flood Brothers from approximately 2010 to October 2011. 9. McKentry s title during the relevant time period was Mover. 10. Flood Brothers did not pay Plaintiffs and other Movers overtime at a rate of 1 ½ their hourly rate for hours worked in excess of 40 per week. 11. Flood Brothers is a domestic Georgia corporation with its principal office address at 610 Waterfont Drive, Atlanta, Georgia. 12. Flood Brothers may be served with summons and a copy of the Complaint in this action by delivering process to its registered agent for service of process, John Flood, at 610 Waterfront Drive, Alpharetta, Georgia, 30336. COLLECTIVE ACTION ALLEGATIONS 13. Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated employees, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b). 14. Plaintiff and those similarly situated are individuals who were, or are, employed by Flood Brothers as Movers at any time within three years prior to filing this Complaint and who worked overtime but did not receive overtime compensation at a rate of 1 and ½ times their regular rate of pay (hereinafter the Collective Action Class ). 3

Case 1:13-cv-02282-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/09/13 Page 4 of 11 15. The Collective Action Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. Although the precise number of such persons is unknown, and the facts on which the calculation of that number is dependent are in the sole possession of Flood Brothers, upon information and belief there are more than one hundred members of the Collective Action Class, most of whom would not be likely to file individual suits because they lack adequate financial resources, access to attorneys, and/or knowledge of their claims. 16. Plaintiffs will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the members of the Collective Action Class and have retained counsel that is experienced and competent in the fields of wage and hour law and collective action litigation. 17. Questions of law and fact common to the members of the Collective Action Class predominate over questions that may affect only individual members because Flood Brothers has acted on grounds generally applicable to all members of the Collective Action Class. 4

Case 1:13-cv-02282-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/09/13 Page 5 of 11 STATEMENT OF FACTS 18. Flood Brothers is a commercial mover specializing in moving companies from one office location to another. 19. The primary job duty of members of the Collective Action Class was to go to customer locations and physically pack, unpack and move office furniture (e.g. tables, desks, chairs, file cabinets, computers etc.). 20. The vast majority of their time, members of the Collective Action Class engaged in manual labor consisting of physically packing, unpacking and moving office furniture at client locations. 21. Members of the Collective Action Class were closely supervised at the work sites by Project Managers and other Flood Brothers management who scheduled their work, supervised them, and assigned them job tasks. 22. Members of the Collective Action Class were paid by the hour. 23. Drivers employed by Flood Brothers, and not members of the Collective Action Class, transported the office furniture from one client location to another. 24. Members of the Collective Action Class did not drive trucks engaged in interstate commerce. 5

Case 1:13-cv-02282-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/09/13 Page 6 of 11 25. Members of the Collective Action Class were not required to ride in trucks engaged in interstate commerce. 26. Members of the Collective Action Class did not exercise judgment and discretion in loading trucks in such a manner that the safe operation of vehicles on the highways in interstate or foreign commerce would not be jeopardized. 27. The work performed by Members of the Collective Action class did not directly affect the safety of operation of motor vehicles in interstate or foreign commerce. 28. Members of the Collective Action Class are similarly situated under the FLSA because: (1) their primary job duty was to physically go to the office locations of Flood Brothers customers and pack, unpack and move office furniture; (2) they regularly worked in excess of 40 hours per week; and (3) they did not receive overtime compensation at a rate of 1 and ½ times their regular rate of pay. 29. At all relevant times, Flood Brothers required members of the Collective Action Class to regularly work hours in excess of 40 per week. 30. At all relevant times Flood Brothers was aware that members of the Collective Action Class regularly worked hours in excess of 40 per week. 6

Case 1:13-cv-02282-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/09/13 Page 7 of 11 31. At all relevant times, the express policy of Flood Brothers was not to pay members of the Collective Action Class overtime compensation at a rate of 1 and ½ times their regular rate of pay for hours worked in excess of 40 per week. 32. On information and belief, Flood Brothers unlawful conduct described herein is pursuant to a corporate policy or practice of minimizing labor costs by violating the FLSA and state wage and hour laws. 33. Flood Brothers was, or should have been, aware that state and federal law require it to pay employees performing non-exempt duties overtime at a rate of 1 and ½ their regular rate for all hours worked in excess of 40 per week. 34. Flood Brothers failure to pay members of the Collective Action Class overtime at a rate of 1 and ½ their regular rate for all hours worked in excess of 40 per week was willful and in bad faith. 7

Case 1:13-cv-02282-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/09/13 Page 8 of 11 Complaint. COUNT I Willful Failure Pay Overtime in Violation of the FLSA 35. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all preceding paragraphs of the 36. Flood Brothers engaged in a widespread pattern, policy and practice of violating the FLSA by failing to pay members of the Collective Action Class overtime at a rate of 1 and ½ their regular rate for hours worked in excess of 40 per week. 37. At all relevant times, members of the Collective Action Class were engaged in commerce within the meaning of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. 206(a) and 207(a). 38. The overtime wage provisions set forth in the FLSA apply to Flood Brothers and protect the members of the Collective Action Class. 39. At all relevant times, Flood Brothers was, and continues to be, an employer engaged in interstate commerce within the meaning of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. 206(a) and 207(a). 40. At all relevant times, Flood Brothers employed, and/or continues to employ, members of the Collective Action Class within the meaning of the FLSA. 41. Upon information and belief, at all relevant times, Flood Brothers has had gross revenues in excess of $500,000.00. 8

Case 1:13-cv-02282-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/09/13 Page 9 of 11 42. Plaintiffs consent in writing to be a party to this action, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b). 43. As a result of Flood Brothers willful failure to compensate the members of the Collective Action Class at a rate of 1 and ½ their regular rate for hours worked in excess of 40 per week, Flood Brothers has violated, and continues to violate, the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq., including 29 U.S.C. 207(a)(1) and 215(a). 44. The foregoing conduct, as alleged, constitutes a willful violation of the FLSA within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. 255(a). Because Flood Brothers violations of the FLSA were willful, a three-year statute of limitations applies, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 255. 45. Flood Brothers did not make a good faith effort to comply with the FLSA with respect to its compensation of Plaintiffs and the members of the Collective Action Class. 46. Due to Flood Brothers FLSA violations, Plaintiffs and the members of the Collective Action Class are entitled to recover from Flood Brothers their unpaid overtime wages for all of the hours they worked in excess of 40 per week, an additional and equal amount as liquidated damages for Flood Brothers willful 9

Case 1:13-cv-02282-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/09/13 Page 10 of 11 violations of the FLSA, prejudgment interest, reasonable attorneys fees and costs of litigation. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs and all members of the Collective Action Class who join this action demand a TRIAL BY JURY and the following relief: a. Designation of this action as a collective action and prompt issuance of notice pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b) to all similarly situated persons employed by Flood Brothers as Movers during the relevant time period, apprising them of the pendency of this action, permitting them to assert timely FLSA claims in this action by filing individual Consents to Join pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b) and tolling of the statute of limitations; b. A declaratory judgment that the practices complained of herein are unlawful under the FLSA; c. An award of unpaid wages for unpaid overtime compensation due under the FLSA; d. An award of liquidated damages as a result of Flood Brothers willful failure to pay overtime compensation; e. An award of prejudgment and post-judgment interest; 10

Case 1:13-cv-02282-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/09/13 Page 11 of 11 f. An award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys and expert fees; and g. Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted, this 9th day of July, 2013. /s/ Justin M. Scott Steven E. Wolfe Georgia Bar No. 142441 sewolfe@buckleyklein.com Justin M. Scott Georgia Bar No. 557463 jmscott@buckleyklein.com BUCKLEY & KLEIN, LLP Promenade II, Suite 900 1230 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Telephone: (404) 781-1100 Facsimile: (404) 781-1101 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11