3rd DAT Carrier Benchmark Survey



Similar documents
3rd DAT Carrier Benchmark Survey

6th Annual Broker Benchmark Survey DAT 2013

Apex TRUCKING COMPANY. Start Your Own TRUCKING COMPANY. America s Favorite Factor. Start Your Own

Truckload: Linchpin in Your Supply Chain By Mark Montague, Industry Pricing Analyst, DAT

KSM & McLeod Software OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKING PROJECT

Win by Losing: How to Respond Effectively to a Shipper s RFP

Bridging the Gap between Fleet Management and Transportation Management Systems

WHERE Technology & Logistics MERGE

Alabama Trucking Association Workers Compensation Fund P. O. BOX Telephone: (334) MONTGOMERY, AL Facsimile: (334)

Fleet Profitability. April 15th, 2008 David Mook - COO, TMW Systems Dennis Morgan - COO, Cowan Systems

Personnel Position Name Years % of Ownership President Operations Manager Safety Director Loss Control Contact Insurance Contact

BFI New Driver Quick List

EPA/NHTSA Phase 2 Fuel Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Standards for Heavy-Duty Trucks: Projected Effect on Freight Costs

Seven Best Practices for Improving Trucking Operational Effectiveness

Industry Outlook One Year Later. Presenter: Derek J. Leathers President & Chief Operating Officer Werner Enterprises

Logistics Made Easy. Go-To Transport s Green Bay Office Uses McLeod Software and TransCore DAT to Support Rapid Growth

Carrier Procurement Insights. Trucking Company Volume, Cost and Pricing Tradeoffs 2009

Diversifying Transportation Services Accelerating Business Performance With A Comprehensive TMS Approach

Quality Business Services Quality Business Services Quality Business Services Quality Business Services Quality Business Services Quality Business

Electronic Logging Devices

Integrated Fleet Management Solutions

TRUCK DRIVER SHORTAGE ANALYSIS 2015

Small Fleet Truckers (6-19 Revenue Units) Underwriting Checklist

Cargo Theft, Identity Theft, and Double Brokering Michele Greene, Group Product Manager, TransCore Freight Solutions

THE VALUE OF SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING: PITT OHIO'S EXPERIENCE. Geoffrey Muessig CMO / Vice President of Sales PITT OHIO

Net Income (Loss) (in millions) Total revenue (in thousands) $649,749 $652,627 $674,254 $684,549 $718,980

TMWSuite. Enterprise Management Software

How To Understand And Understand The Trucking Industry

Totally Internet Based Software. System Setup. Strategy Systems, Inc. PO Box 2136 Rogers, AR (479)

A Robust Approach to Procuring Transportation Services - Guarantee that the savings make it to your bottom-line

Executive Guide to Fleet Fuel Economy Part 1 of 2: Vehicle Configuration and Operating Factors Emphasizing Fuel Economy Pays Off...

Motor Truck Cargo Insurance Application

BASIC INFORMATION. Yes No in the last five years? Is applicant a Limited (incorporated) company? Yes No. Current Insurer: Policy No.

Full Accounting, Integrated Dispatch and Operations Software for LTL, Intermodal & Truckload

To separate a composite load into individual shipments and route to different destinations.

Shipments (thousands) 7,708

SIGNATURE NEEDED BY DECEMBER 31, G&P Trucking Company, Inc. Independent Contractor Operating Agreement

Telematics Survey. Uses, Challenges, and Opportunities

Feature List. Freight.Ware for Truckload Carriers. Included Features: 1 P a g e

Electronic Logging Devices

Truck Costing Model for Transportation Managers

Small Fleet Performance Management Tool (SFPMT) helps A1 Paper improve efficiency

GE Capital. Industry Research Update Truck Transportation. Key Developments. Industry Fundamentals

Web-Dispatch. Agent Training Manual. Buchanan Hauling & Rigging, Inc Industrial Road Fort Wayne, IN Phone: Fax:

Serving all of North America with one of the largest fleets on the continent

Transform the way you run your trucking ops with logistics info, load-matching, and GPS-tracking at your fingertips

Large Fleet Trucking Program Guidelines (20+ power units)

WE MOVE THE DICKENS OUT OF FREIGHT 5638 Georgetown Colony Drive Houston, Texas 77084

Logistics: Freight Carriers Introduction

INTRODUCING TRUCKERSBOOKS

How to Reduce Fleet Costs $$$

Loadmaster Enterprise

Trucking Capacity, a Limiting Factor for Growth in the Cement Industry?

Introduction. Why Focus on Heavy Trucks?

Aon Risk Solutions. Trucking Practice. Specialized Services for the Nation s Road Transportation Industry. Risk. Reinsurance. Human Resources.

Onboard Technology. Innovation in Trucking. May 20, 2015 Presented by Douglas Sutherland

Supply Chain Trends in Intermodal

ONLINE FREIGHT SERVICES

FREIGHT MANAGEMENT TODAY: HOW TO COMPETE FOR CAPACITY

Transport Factoring, Inc.

5Star Submission Checklist & Questionnaire Trucking Program

Logistics Management for Mining Companies:

ANYTHING BUT FLAT. CRST and C.H. Robinson turn their attentions to increasing cost control and innovation for flatbed services.

Canal Truck Insurance Application

Swift Transportation Company (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Authority for $389 in as little as 3 weeks This includes MC, DOT & BOC-3 Any permits you may need can be applied for after you become active

American Fast Freight

Claiming Transportation Expenses

TRANSPORTATION OF LIVESTOCK BY MOTOR TRUCK TO THE KANSAS CITY MARKET

The Industries Better Way.

TRUCKING NAVIGATION GUIDE. David A. Miller, CPCU

Upon closer analysis, however, there are circumstances when renting a car instead of driving your own may indeed be the economically wise choice.

INSURANCE HISTORY & LOSS EXPERIENCE HAS ANY INSURANCE COMPANY CANCELED OR NONRENEWED YOUR POLICY IN THE LAST THREE YEARS? Yes No If Yes, explain.

How To Know The State Of Intermodal Trucking In The United States

Electronic Logging Devices. Summary, Challenges and Opportunities

Glossary of Terms. (425)

Coyote Logistics Acquisition July 31, 2015

COMMERCIAL AUTO TRUCKING APPLICATION

An Improved Transportation Management System for Domestic Surface Transportation Needs

Modeling Carrier Truckload Freight Rates in Spot Markets

Transcription:

DAT SPECIAL REPORT 3rd DAT Carrier Benchmark Survey February 2013

DAT SPECIAL REPORT 2 DAT Carrier Benchmark Survey Among the 514 trucking companies who took our online survey, most respondents fell into one of two groups: (1) for-hire carriers with small fleets (an average of 7.8 power units and 16 trailers, in a range from 2 to more than 500) and (2) owner-operators with a single truck that the owner drove under his own authority. A smaller number of respondents identified themselves as private fleets or asset-based brokers. Because those two groups operate under a different business model, their answers are not included in this report. Carriers Costs Rise Faster than Rates Throughout much of 2012, we noted that carriers costs were rising faster than their rates, and that outlook was confirmed. Year-over-year comparisons illustrate a point that has been made by a number of trucking industry analysts in 2012. To quote Donald Broughton of Avondale Partners, for example: the per-mile costs of operating a truckload carrier are going up at a pace twice that of the pricing power currently being achieved. In short, carriers costs are rising twice as fast as their revenues. Key Results Slip to 2010 Levels Key performance indicators declined in 2012 for all fleets surveyed, so that results were more similar to those reported in 2010 than in 2011. $16K For-hire carriers $14K Owner-operator Due to their low overhead, owner-operators achieved higher gross margins than for-hire carriers, on a per-truck basis. Monthly Profits Exceeded $3,000 Per Truck The small, for-hire fleets and owner-operators yielded gross profits of more than $3,000 per truck per month in 2012, based on revenues and costs reported. More Empty Miles, Shorter Hauls Empty miles increased in 2012, when compared with survey results in the previous year. Both for-hire carriers and owner-operators saw empty miles increase to 2010 levels. (The difference between 2012 empty miles and 2010 levels is not statistically significant.) Avg. % Of Miles Driven Empty Avg. Length Of Haul, One Way Avg. Total Miles Per Truck, Per Month Avg. Rate Per Loaded Mile, Including Fuel Surcharges (US$) Avg. Revenue Per Truck Major KPIs By Year For-Hire Carriers 11.6% 820 9,264 $1.73 For-Hire Carriers 9.9% 852 10,440 $2.05 14.9% 12.5% 754 9,734 8,236 $2.00 $1.75 10.2% 9,321 $2.10 15.8% 8,986 $1.95 $18,429 $17,684 $14,986 $16,168 $12,060 $14,431 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 866 Owner-Operator 920 878

DAT SPECIAL REPORT 3 Length of haul declined, and the change was greater for the for-hire carriers (-11%) than for the owner-operators (-4.6%). A shorter haul usually correlates with higher rates, but that was not the case in 2012. Total miles per truck declined slightly, on average. For-hire carriers with multiple trucks and drivers had more flexibility to re-position assets and log 8.3% more miles than owner-operators. The O-Os typically had one truck and drove it themselves, so the truck was parked whenever the driver took a break for home visits and hours-of-service regulations. Rates per loaded mile appeared to dip for both groups, according to the respondents, but that result was not significantly different from 2011. Carriers and owner-operators reported higher rates in both 2012 and 2011 than they did in 2010. According to DAT Truckload Rate Index, average contract rates rose 3.8% in 2012, while spot market rates increased 0.9% nationwide. Monthly revenue per truck dropped, compared to the previous year, due to a combination of the decline in total miles and the increase in miles driven empty. Top 3 Profit Drivers: Rates, Fuel Efficiency and Asset Utilization Profitability was largely a factor of the rate per mile for both for-hire carriers and owner-operators. In second place, the most significant factor for the for-hire fleets was fuel efficiency. Owner-operators improved profitability most by getting a higher rate and reducing the percentage of miles driven empty. Rates per loaded mile (bottom) were the biggest factor in profitability for small, for-hire fleets as well as owner-operators. After securing a higher rate, for-hire carriers improved profits most when they boosted fuel efficiency (center.) For owner-operators, reducing empty miles (top) was the second-most important factor in determining profitability. G rouped by % of Miles Driven E mpty Avg. Profit/Los s Avg. R evenue per T ruck Profit Margin O wner-operator 0% -5% $4K $20K 5% 5.1% -10% $4K $16K 9% 11% -20% $14K 7% 21+% $1K $11K 4% G rouped by MP G Avg. Profit/Los s Avg. R evenue per T ruck Profit Margin F or-hire carrier <5.50 ($2K) $16K -11% 5.50-5.99 6.00-6.49 $5K $16K $17K 27% 15% 6.50+ $7K $17K 41% G rouped by R ate per L oaded Mile Avg. Profit/Los s Avg. R evenue per T ruck Profit Margin F or-hire carrier < $1.75 ($1K) $14K -2% $1.75 - $2.00 $17K 7% > $2.00 $8K $20K 13% O wner-operator < $1.75 $1K $12K 3% $1.75 - $2.00 > $2.00 $5K $16K $18K 9% 7%

DAT SPECIAL REPORT 4 Load Board is the Primary Source of Freight Load Boards Freightbrokers or 3PLs Contracts With Shippers For-Hire Carrier 37.1% 28.2% 31.1% Owner-Operator 45.1% 28.1% 22.8% Load boards were the primary source of freight for both for-hire carriers (37%) and owner-operators (45%) while freight brokers and 3PLs provided 28% of the loads hauled by both groups. Shippers provided 31% of loads to for-hire carriers and only 23% of owner-operators freight came from shipper contracts. Load Boards Improve Utilization for Van Fleets Increased use of DAT Load Boards led to an improvement in asset utilization, especially for fleets that included more than 50% van trailers. The downward slope of the line shows that the proportion between empty miles that were reduced as load board use increased. The relationship between load board use and empty miles was not significant for reefer or flatbed carriers. Empty miles were decreased Asset utilization increased Owner-Operators Achieved Higher Margins Due to their low overhead, owner-operators achieved higher gross margins than for-hire carriers, on a per-truck basis. The owner-operators had an average of 1.2 power units, and gross profit of $3,046 monthly per truck, for a 21% gross margin. For-hire carriers made an average of $3,892 per month for each of their trucks, across an average of 7.8 trucks, per fleet. Their total gross profit was $26,559 per month, representing an 18% margin. For details, see the tables below. 2012 Key Performance Indicators, by Fleet Type Monthly Revenue Per Truck $16,168 for-hire carrier $14,431 owner-operator Total Rate Per Loaded Mile $2.00 for-hire carrier $1.95 owner-operator Percent of Miles Driven Empty 12.5% for-hire carrier 15.8% owner-operator Total Monthly Miles per Truck 9,734 for-hire carrier 8,986 owner-operator Length of Haul, One-Way (Miles) 754 for-hire carrier 878 owner-operator Fuel Mileage per Gallon (MPG) 6.4 for-hire carrier 6.0 owner-operator Monthly Gross Profit Per Truck $2,903 for-hire carrier $3,046 owner-operator Gross Profit Margin, Before Taxes 18% for-hire carrier 21% owner-operator

DAT SPECIAL REPORT 5 Financial Comparisons: For-Hire Carriers and Owner-Operators Revenues, Cost and Profits Revenue & Costs Per Mile For-hire carrier Total rate per loaded mile $2.02 Fuel per mile (based on $3.96 per gallon average) $0.70 Driver pay $0.45 License and registration fees $0.23 Lease or loan payment, for power unit $0.07 Lease or loan payment, for trailer(s) $0.03 Insurance $0.06 Tire replacement and maintenance $0.04 Other maintenance $0.06 Owner-operator $1.96 $0.67 $0.41 $0.24 $0.06 $0.02 $0.07 $0.05 $0.08 Revenue per Truck, per Month Monthly total miles driven per truck Percent (%) of miles driven empty Number (#) of power units in fleet Monthly revenue per truck For-hire carrier 9,697 12.7% 7.83 $16,521 Owner-operator 8,983 16.4% 1.32 $14,431 Costs and Gross Profits per Month Non-driver payroll, including benefits (US$) Rent or mortgage for business facilities Cell phone for business use Other monthly expenses Office phone, fax and internet Electricity and water Gross monthly profit per truck (US$) For-hire carrier $13,812 $1,620 $1,054 $750 $510 $376 $3,392 Owner-operator $2,457 $749 $451 $309 $199 $197 $3,046 For-Hire Fleets Made More Money For-hire carriers received a higher average rate per mile, and they achieved better fuel efficiency and asset utilization than the owner-operators. Due to higher operating costs, however, for-hire carriers had lower gross profit margins than owner-operators. The for-hire carriers, with an average of 7.8 power units, had additional costs associated with higher total miles driven per truck, as well as indirect expenses, including offices, other facilities and non-driver payroll. Revenues, profits and direct costs are expressed on a per-truck basis, while indirect costs are totaled and divided by the number of trucks in each fleet.

DAT SPECIAL REPORT 6 2013 Goals: Raise Prices, Reduce Costs Improving revenue while cutting costs were the top two goals expressed by carriers, earning above 2.5 on a scale of 0 to 3. The third place option was bring in new business. All three goals were shared by owner-operators and for-hire carriers. Rounding out their top five goals, for-hire carriers emphasized driver retention and adding power units or trailers, while owner-operators planned to add or improve technology in the cab and in the office. 2013 Priorities - ranked on a scale of 0 to 3 For-Hire Carrier Improve revenue per mile 2.8 2.7 Reduce costs 2.5 2.4 Bring in new business 2.2 2.1 Add or improve office technology 1.8 1.7 Add power units or trailers 2.0 1.5 Improve driver retention 2.1 1.3 Recruit and train new drivers 1.8 1.3 Add or improve in-cab technology 1.6 1.7 Owner-Operator 2013 Priorities Shared by carriers and owner-operators 1. Improve Revenue Per Mile 2. Reduce Costs 3. Bring In New Business 2013 Challenges: Fuel, Rules and Maintenance The cost of fuel was seen as the biggest challenge facing fleets and owner-operators in 2013, followed by regulatory compliance and equipment maintenance. Insurance, financing and credit were among the other top concerns shared by both groups. 2013 Challenges - ranked on a scale of 0 to 3 For-Hire Carrier Owner-Operator Fuel cost 2.7 2.8 CSA, HOS and other safety regulations 2.3 2.3 Equipment maintenance 2.3 2.2 Insurance 2.2 2.1 CARB and other environmental regulations 2.0 1.9 Financing and credit 2.1 1.8 Driver recruitment and training 1.9 1.3 Driver retention 1.9 1.3 2013 Challenges Cost of fuel biggest concern 1. Fuel Costs 2. Safety Regulations 3. Equipment Maintenance

DAT SPECIAL REPORT 7 Survey Respondents: 51% For-Hire, 34% Owner-Operator Most respondents to the annual DAT Carrier Benchmark Survey in the past three years have been owner-operators (blue) or for-hire carriers (orange). Among the owner-operators surveyed this year, 66% own a single truck (shown on the second chart below) and drive it under their own authority. This survey report separates for-hire carriers from owner-operators, for purposes of comparison, and omits answers from private fleets and asset-based brokers. 51.3% For-hire carrier 1% Other 8.4% Carrier-broker 4% Private fleet 34.4% Owner-operator 66% One truck with DOT authority 16% One truck, leased 13% Multiple trucks, with authority 2% Leased on, multiple trucks, drivers are employees of O-O 2% Other business structure 1% Leased on, multiple trucks, drivers are not employees How We Surveyed The Third Annual DAT Carrier Benchmark Survey drew 514 responses from DAT customers, including carriers, owner-operators, private fleets and asset-based brokers. They filled out an online questionnaire, anonymously providing detailed information about their fleet operations. This report is based on responses of the for-hire carriers and owner-operators only. The margin of error is plus or minus 7.4% for the for-hire carriers and 8.2% for owner-operators. Call 1.800.547.5417 DAT.com