Case 2:15-cv-00348-CW Document 2 Filed 05/12/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION



Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA COMPLAINT

Case 3:14-cv AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43

defendant, Symphony Diagnostic Services, Inc. (doing business as MobilexUSA) ("Mobilex"),

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 05/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

1. This is a civil action brought pursuant to the Uniformed Services Employment and. Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, 38 U.S.C ( USERRA ).

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in

Case 2:10-cv JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS

Case 3:10-cv JAP -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1

Case 3:14-cv HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

virtue of Title VIII of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 806 of the Corporate and

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:10-cv DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 2:02-cv WHA-SRW Document 1 Filed 09/17/2002 Page 1 of 5 , '\ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

Case 3:15-cv LAB-BLM Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2013 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:14-cv CW-BCW Document 62 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO HOSPITAL AUTHORITY,

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:11-cv JLK Document 1 Filed 11/16/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 3:11-cv Document 1 Filed 06/30/11 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 7 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

: : : : : : : : : : : x

Case 1:15-cv RP Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case4:13-cv DMR Document1 Filed12/11/13 Page1 of 5

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 2:14-cv DB Document 2 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 10

Case 4:14-cv A Document 1 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

9:10-cv MBS Date Filed 07/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA INTRODUCTION

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case3:13-cv JST Document27 Filed11/27/13 Page1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORIGIA-~~T ~:J,-~T,>cURT SAVANNAH DIVISION j Ga. NATURE OF THE ACTION

3:14-cv CSB-DGB # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS (SPRINGFIELD DIVISION) COMPLAINT

JOHN MURRAY ( Murray ), for his Complaint in this action against Defendant, Crystex Composites LLC ( Crystex ), alleges as follows:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/21/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII. Case No.: CV-06-00~CK-LEK

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2016 Page 1 of 8 UNTIED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH

PIERCE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT 930 TACOMA AVE S, Room 239, TACOMA, Small Claims Information

4:15-cv RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:14-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 01/02/14 Page 1 of 6 : : : : : : : : : : :

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, WEST DISTRICT

COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST PLAINTIFF ECOSMART, LLC AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT AGAINST CARLOS ANTONIO CABRERA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 8:15-CR-244-T-23AEP PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. JURY DEMANDED COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

unlawful employment practices on the basis of disabilityand to provide appropriate relief to

Case5:15-cv HRL Document1 Filed08/12/15 Page1 of 10

UNIFORMED SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AND REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS ACT (USERRA) TRAINING. Report Tile UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMENDED COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv RJL Document 19 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION. v. Case No. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT

CIVIL DICTRICT COURT PARISH OF ORLEANS STATE OF LOUISIANA

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No.: 15-cv-157 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS LAWSUIT ASK TO BE INCLUDED DO NOTHING

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiffs, ) CASE NO. 08 CVH vs- ) JUDGE LYNCH

Case LT Filed 05/14/14 Entered 05/14/14 14:14:36 Doc 6 Pg. 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

CAUSE NO. DC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv DRD Document 1 Filed 05/06/13 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Case 2:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1

Case 1:09-cv Document 1 Filed 12/10/09 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY S FEES AND COSTS

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, SALT LAKE COUNTY STATE OF UTAH. Case No. : Judge:

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/04/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

Case 8:14-cv VMC-AEP Document 1 Filed 06/27/14 Page 1 of 13 PageID 1

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/02/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

Case 3:14-cv RNC Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 3:13-cv JBA Document 1 Filed 11/14/13 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case 2:10-cv NBF Document 1 Filed 09/17/10 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

Case 2:15-cv-00348-CW Document 2 Filed 05/12/15 Page 1 of 8 CARLIE CHRISTENSEN, United States Attorney (#0633) JARED C. BENNETT, Assistant United States Attorney (#9097) 185 South State Street, #300 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 524-5682 Attorneys for the United States of America IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION PAUL M. COSTELLO, Plaintiff, vs. VETERAN S TRADING COMPANY, LLC; Case No. 2:15CV348CW COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL REQUESTED Honorable Clark Waddoups Defendant. Captain Paul M. Costello, through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, complains against Defendant Veteran s Trading Company, LLC ( VTC ) as follows: 1. This is a civil action involving the Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of 1994 ( USERRA ), 38 U.S.C. 4301 to 4333. USERRA was enacted to encourage noncareer service in the uniformed services by, among other things, minimizing or eliminating the disadvantages to civilian careers that can result from such service. USERRA specifically protects veterans and Reserve component members from employment discrimination and provides reemployment rights with a pre-service employer following qualifying military service. 2. This Court has jurisdiction under 38 U.S.C. 4323(b)(1) and 28 U.S.C. 1331.

Case 2:15-cv-00348-CW Document 2 Filed 05/12/15 Page 2 of 8 3. Venue is proper in the District of Utah, Central Division because VTC has a place of business is in Park City, Summit County, Utah. 38 U.S.C. 4323(c)(2); 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), 125(2). FACTUAL BACKGROUND 4. Captain Costello is a disabled veteran from the United States Navy where he served as an F-18 fighter pilot. Since 1997, he has served as a United States Naval Reserve member. 5. VTC is classified by the Small Business Administration ( SBA ) as a Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business. VTC s headquarters are in Park City, Utah with sales offices in Florida, Maryland, Texas, and California. John Pierce and Jack Climer founded VTC. 6. Captain Costello began working for VTC on or about April 2006 and was given a 5% interest in the company. 7. In April 2008, VTC gave Captain Costello a 7% interest in the company. 8. In December 2008, Captain Costello was promoted to Vice President for Government Affairs for VTC and was given a small salary in addition to the aforementioned ownership interest. 9. Founder Jack Climer, who also was a disabled veteran, was removed as President of VTC based on a criminal conviction. Climer s removal as President jeopardized VTC s favorable contracting status as a Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business from the SBA, which required VTC to have a veteran with a disability rating serving as its President and participating in the day-to-day operations of the firm. 10. Consequently, founder John Pierce and principal Steve Culligan offered Captain 2

Case 2:15-cv-00348-CW Document 2 Filed 05/12/15 Page 3 of 8 Costello the job of President of VTC in January 2012. 11. As President, Captain Costello was given a larger salary, a 25% ownership interest, and a 9% interest in profit sharing. 12. John Pierce had a 45% ownership interest in VTC and a 61% profit sharing interest. Principals Jeffrey Brown and Steven Culligan had a 26% and a 4% ownership interest and a 6% and a 19% profit-sharing interest in VTC respectively. 13. As President, Captain Costello became subject to the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Veterans Trading Company, LLC ( Operating Agreement ). 14. Among other provisions, the Operating Agreement defines a member as any Person which is a holder of record of one or more Shares. The Operating Agreement also provides that [a]ll Members shall be Directors of VTC. The Operating Agreement expressly provides that members were to be treated as partners only for purposes of taxation. 15. The Operating Agreement further provides that a member may be expelled and may forfeit all his/her shares if, among other things, the member has two or more unexcused consecutive absences from mandatory special or regular meetings of the members or Board of Directors, after receiving sufficient notice under Section 6.02 and 6.04. 16. For special meetings section 6.02(g) authorizes 24-hours notice if given by telephone or in person, 48-hours notice if given by electronic means, and 5-days notice if sent by regular mail. 17. Section 6.04(d) requires not less than 10 nor more than 60 days[ ] notice for each meeting of Members. 3

Case 2:15-cv-00348-CW Document 2 Filed 05/12/15 Page 4 of 8 18. To maintain its SBA designation as a SDVOSB, Captain Costello assumed more of an active role in the day-to-day operations at VTC, which required him to participate in numerous conference calls and to attend many out-of-town meetings with suppliers and clients. 19. In August 2012, under the direction of John Pierce, Captain Costello convened a meeting of VTC company officers in Colorado Springs, Colorado to brief them on current and future military operations related to the North American Aerospace Defense Command. 20. On or about July 28, 2012, Captain Costello placed a call to John Pierce informing him that the Navy was calling Captain Costello to active duty. 21. Captain Costello began active military duty on October 12, 2012. 22. On May 7-8, 2013, under the direction of John Pierce, Captain Costello presided over a meeting of VTC members in Seattle, Washington. Captain Costello was able to attend and preside over this meeting while he was on approved personal leave from the military. 23. Despite being President of VTC, Captain Costello did not have sole decisionmaking authority to take the company in the direction he wanted. John Pierce, Steve Culligan, and Jeffrey Brown could control the contents of the documents that Captain Costello authored, the offers he could make or accept, the meetings that he could attend, and what he was authorized to represent to suppliers or clients. After meeting with suppliers or clients, Captain Costello would report back to Pierce, Culligan, Brown. In effect, Captain Costello worked for Pierce, Culligan, and Brown. 24. On or about May 15, 2013, Captain Costello was given notice via email at approximately 9:04 a.m. that a special meeting of VTC that would be held later that day. This 4

Case 2:15-cv-00348-CW Document 2 Filed 05/12/15 Page 5 of 8 electronic notice failed to comply with the Operating Agreement s requirement of 48-hours notice. Nevertheless, even had notice been adequate, Captain Costello was unable to attend the meeting because of his active military duties. 25. John Pierce and Steve Culligan set an investor meeting for June 18, 2013, which Captain Costello confirmed his attendance via email. Shortly after confirming his attendance at the June 18, 2013 meeting, Captain Costello received an email notifying him that the June 18, 2013 special meeting with a potential investor had been moved to June 19, 2013 to accommodate the investor s schedule. 26. Captain Costello informed Steve Culligan that military duties on June 19, 2013 would preclude Captain Costello from attending the meeting. 27. Steve Culligan responded to Captain Costello that the June 19, 2013 meeting could not be changed. 28. On June 13, 2013, six days before the rescheduled meeting, Captain Costello was no longer able to access his email on VTC s server. 29. On June 14, 2013, Captain Costello left a message for VTC s information technology contractor to fix the problem with Captain Costello s email access. The information technology contractor did not respond to Captain Costello. 30. On June 17, 2013, Captain Costello left a message for John Pierce to fix Captain Costello s denied access to VTC s email server. Pierce never responded. 31. On June 18, 2013, Captain Costello left a message for Steve Culligan asking him to fix Captain Costello s denied access to VTC s email server. Culligan never responded. 5

Case 2:15-cv-00348-CW Document 2 Filed 05/12/15 Page 6 of 8 32. On June 19, 2013, Captain Costello was attending to his military duties and was unable to join the meeting. 33. After the meeting on June 19, 2013, VTC s legal counsel called Captain Costello and informed him that his employment with VTC had been terminated for missing two consecutive member meetings. VTC s legal counsel also informed Captain Costello that his shares in VTC had been forfeited. VTC s legal counsel never indicated that Captain Costello s employment had been terminated because of poor performance. 34. On June 20, 2013, Captain Costello received a letter dated June 19, 2013, in which VTC s counsel reiterated that Captain Costello s employment relationship with VTC is hereby terminated because he missed two consecutive meetings. VTC s letter also discussed ways to smooth your transition as an employee from the Company.... VTC s letter never said that Captain Costello s employment was terminated because of poor performance. 35. Captain Costello s active military status ended on or about September 5, 2013, and he re-applied for employment at VTC on or about September 24, 2013. 36. VTC denied Captain Costello s application for re-employment. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Violation of 38 U.S.C. 4311) 37. Captain Costello incorporates herein paragraphs 1-36. 38. Captain Costello was an employee of VTC. 39. Captain Costello rendered service in the uniformed services as an active-duty reservist from on or about October 12, 2012 to September 5, 2013. 40. On June 19, 2013, VTC denied Captain Costello retention in employment and all 6

Case 2:15-cv-00348-CW Document 2 Filed 05/12/15 Page 7 of 8 the benefits thereof including but not limited to his salary, benefits, and ownership and distribution shares in VTC by terminating his employment. Captain Costello s membership, performance of service, and obligation to serve in the uniformed services was a motivating factor in the decision to terminate his employment. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Violation of 38 U.S.C. 4312) 41. Captain Costello incorporates herein paragraphs 1-40. 42. On or about July 28, 2012, Captain Costello gave advance notice of his October 12, 2012 active-duty military status to VTC member John Pierce. 43. Captain Costello had been absent from VTC by reason of service in the uniform services for fewer than five years. 44. Captain Costello timely submitted an application for re-employment within 19 days of ending approximately 11 months of active-duty military service. 45. VTC denied Captain Costello s request for re-employment. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Captain Costello requests that this Court grant the following relief: A. A declaration that VTC violated 38 U.S.C. 4311 by terminating Captain Costello s employment when his active-duty military service precluded him from attending two mandatory meetings; B. A declaration that VTC violated 38 U.S.C. 4312 by refusing to re-hire Captain Costello upon his timely application to be re-hired after his active-duty military service had ended; C. A declaration that one or both of VTC s above-referenced violations were willful ; 7

Case 2:15-cv-00348-CW Document 2 Filed 05/12/15 Page 8 of 8 D. An order requiring that VTC pay Captain Costello as liquidated damages an amount equal to the amount of his loss of wages and other benefits suffered by reason of VTC s willful failure to comply with the provisions of Title 38 of the United States Code; E. An order that VTC return Captain Costello s ownership and distribution shares and pay to Captain Costello all amounts that were distributed to shareholders between June 19, 2013 and the date of judgment; or F. In the alternative, if return of Captain Costello s ownership and distribution shares is not possible, then an order requiring VTC to pay Captain Costello in liquidated damages the fair value of those shares as determined at trial; G. An award of prejudgment interest on the amount of lost wages and value of Captain Costello s shares in VTC found due; H. An order requiring VTC to compensate Captain Costello for attorney fees heretofore expended, expert witness fees, expenses for litigation in this action, and expenses for medical care and treatment of health problems, including emotional distress, which VTC caused Captain Costello to suffer; and I. Any other relief that this Court deems just and equitable. DATED this 12th day of May 2015. CARLIE CHRISTENSEN United States Attorney /s/ Jared C. Bennett JARED C. BENNETT Assistant United States Attorney 8