STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 1-



Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:10-cv KMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2011 Page 1 of 9

How To Get The Lesser Prairie Chicken To Live Outside Of The Coon Line

Case 3:01-cv RE Document 1757 Filed 04/19/2010 Page 1 of 9

Case 4:05-cv GTE Document 25 Filed 12/08/2005 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR CLARK COUNTY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:01-cv SI Document 2041 Filed 06/30/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case4:13-cv SBA Document40 Filed10/14/14 Page1 of 11

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 206 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 10 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #:

Case 1:11-cv JLK Document 99-1 Filed 08/05/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Courtroom: 19 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 2:15-cv DDP-AGR Document 1 Filed 05/07/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Windmill Inns of America, d/b/a Windmill Inn of Ashland, Defendant.

How To Decide If A Dam Removal Is Safe For Water Quality

Should the commission desire to adopt the proposed settlement agreement, the following resolution is presented for your consideration:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT

CHAPTER 8. FEDERALLY-LISTED ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA

District of Hawaii KEVIN W. McARDLE, Senior Attorney

~INAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION

Errors and Omissions Insurance. 1.0 Introduction and Definition

Case 2:10-cv IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 139

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. to herein individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties." RECITALS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

CASE 0:99-md PAM Document 490 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case4:14-cv JSW Document38-1 Filed01/21/15 Page1 of 13

Settlement Agreement Regarding Federal Lawsuit

Case 2:08-cv KI Document 75 Filed 08/27/2009 Page 1 of 9

How To Manage Water Resources In The Yakima Basin

AGREEMENT OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE AS TO LYON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., d/b/a U.S. BANCORP BUSINESS EQUIPMENT FINANCE GROUP

STREAMFLOW RESTORATION PRIORITY AREAS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Man From Selling A Car To A Woman

Case 3:14-cv AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE BETWEEN MARK LONG AND THE STATE OF OREGON RECITALS

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT

HSHS BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT BACKGROUND AND RECITALS

Case AJC Document 1 Filed 03/01/2008 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CONSENT ORDER OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 2:13-cv ES-JAD Document Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 4861 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT

Case 2:02-cv TS Document 602 Filed 06/19/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMPLAINT PARTIES. 2. COGA promotes the expansion of oil and gas supplies, markets, and transportation infrastructure.


FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/17/2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Bryana Bible, SECOND AMENDED CLASS Plaintiff, Court File No. 12-cv RHK-JSM INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs, -against- IAS Part 5 Justice Kathryn E. Freed. WHEREAS Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. THIS REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Regulatory Settlement

Health Plan Select, Inc. Business Associate Privacy Addendum To The Service Agreement

Case5:15-cv HRL Document1 Filed08/12/15 Page1 of 10

Case 1:11-cv LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 : : : : :

BENCHMARK MEDICAL LLC, BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT

Haro was at home with his family when they saw an intruder lurking in their backyard. When

HIPAA BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT

BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT ( BAA )

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY. Appearing on behalf of the Named Plaintiff and the Class were attorneys Daniel P.

CIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:11-cv GZS Document 37 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 169 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, on or about September 22, 2009 (the "Filing Date"), Long Island

Case 3:11-cv RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendant. JURISDICTION 1.

BUSINESS ASSOCIATE CONTRACTUAL ADDENDUM

HIPAA BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT

CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

F.S.B. v. Equity Title of Nevada; Case No.2: 12-cv ("Action''). The Settling Defendant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

HIPAA BUSINESS ASSOCIATE ADDENDUM

Case5:09-cv JF Document30 Filed03/04/10 Page1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

BCBSM MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE MANAGED CARE PROGRAM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE COLORADO JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE NUMBER

BROKER/SHIPPER TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

STEPHANIE M. PARENT (OSB #92590) Pacific Environmental Advocacy Center 100 15 SW Terwilliger Blvd. Portland, OR 972 1 9 Phone (503) 768-6736 Fax (503) 768-6642 parentalclark. edu Attorney for Plaintiffs COBY HOWELL United States Department of Justice C/O U.S. Attorney's Office 1000 S.W. Third Avenue Suite 600 Portland OR, 97204 Phone (503) 727-1023 Fax (503) 727-1 1 17 coby.howell@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendants IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON WILLAMETTE RIVERKEEPER, an Oregon nonprofit corporation and NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER, v. Plaintiffs, THE UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, THE NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, and THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Civil No. 07-CV- 1399 PK STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL Defendants. STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 1-

WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed this suit on September 20,2007, alleging violations of the APA and the ESA, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, and attorneys fees and costs; WHEREAS, in 1993, FWS listed the Oregon Chub as endangered under the ESA. WHEREAS, on or about August 3, 1996, FWS provided the Corps a biological opinion after review of the Corps' Biological Assessment for Oregon chub and operation of the Willamette River Hydro System. WHEREAS, in 1998, FWS listed the Columbia River populations of bull trout as threatened under the ESA. WHEREAS, in 1999, NMFS listed the Upper Willamette River Chinook Salmon Evolutionary Significant Unit ("ESU"), Lower Columbia Chinook Salmon ESU, Upper Willamette River Steelhead ESU, and Lower Columbia River Steelhead ESU as threatened under the ESA. WHEREAS, the ESA requires each federal agency to "insure that any action authorized, fbnded, or carried out by such agency... is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of habitat of such species which is determined by the Secretary... to be critical." 16 U.S.C. 1536(a)(2). WHEREAS, if an agency determines that action it proposes to take may adversely affect a listed species or its critical habitat, it must engage in formal consultation with the Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service ("the Services"), as delegates of the Secretary of Interior and the Secretary of Commerce, respectively. 16 U.S.C. $ 1536(a)(2); 50 STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 2-

CFR fj 402.14.. WHEREAS, section 7 consultation, is initiated when the action agency requests consultation according to the regulations at 50 C.F.R. fj 402.14(c). Consultation shall be concluded within the 90-day period beginning on the date on which initiated or within such other period of time as is mutually agreeable to the consulting agency and the action agency. 16 U.S.C. fj 1536(b)(l)(A); 50 C.F.R. $402.14(e).. WHEREAS, the Corps was authorized by Congress to construct, operate and maintain thirteen major dams in the Willamette Basin: Fall Creek dam on Fall Creek; Fern Ridge dam on the Long Tom River; Cottage Grove dam on the Coast Fork Willamette River; Dorena dam on the Row River; Big Cliff and Detroit dams on the North Fork Santiam Rwer; Green Peter on the Middle Santiam River, Foster Dam on the South Fork Santiam River; Blue River Dam on the Blue River, Cougar Dam on the McKenzie River; and Dexter, Hills Creek, and Lookout Point dams on the Middle Fork Willamette River, collectively known as the "Willamette Project." WHEREAS, the action agencies submitted the 2000 Final Biological Assessment (2000 BA) to the Services in April, 2000, regarding the effects on listed fish species of the Corps' and BOR's actions in operating the dams and reservoirs and maintaining contracts for water services for the withdrawal of water in the Willamette Basin. WHEREAS, the 2000 BA concluded that the continued operation of the Willamette Basin Project is "Likely to Adversely Affect" the Upper Willamette River Chinook salmon ESU, Upper Willamette River Steelhead trout ESU, Columbia River bull trout, and Oregon chub, among other species. STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WHEREAS, the Corps and BOR completed a supplemental BA on or about May 31, 2007 and submitted the supplemental BA to the Services on or about June 1,2007. WHEREAS, the Corps and BOR submitted to FWS an Addendum to the supplemental Biological Assessment on or about August 20,2007. WHEREAS, the agencies have not completed the consultation initiated in 2000, nor have the Services issued a Biological Opinion. WHEREAS, during those seven years, the Corps has continued to operate the thirteen major dams in the Willamette Basin for multiple uses including water storage, irrigation, flood control, recreation and hydropower. During those seven years the BOR has maintained previously issued water services contracts and issued temporary water service contracts with irrigation districts for the withdrawal of water from the Willamette Basin. NOW, THEREFORE, without the trial of any issue of fact or law, upon agreement of the Parties, and upon consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED as follows: I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This action is brought pursuant to the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. $8 1 54O(c) & (g), and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 58 701-706. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 3 1331 (federal question) and 16 U.S.C. 8 1540 (c) (the Endangered Species Act) to accept this settlement. 2. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 8 1391 and 16 U.S.C. 1540(g)(3)(A) because Plaintiff organizations have offices and members who reside in this STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 4-

district, named Defendants also have offices that reside in this district, and a substantial part of the alleged events or omissions occurred here. This case is properly filed in Portland, Oregon, pursuant to Local Rule 3.4 because a substantial part of the alleged events or omissions occurred in Portland Division counties. 11. DEFINITIONS 3. Whenever terms listed below are used in this Settlement Agreement, the following definitions shall apply: a. "WRK" and "NEDC" shall mean the Plaintiff in this action, Willamette Riverkeeper and Northwest Environmental Defense Center respectively. b. "Agencies" shall mean the Defendants in this action, the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Reclamation, the National Marine Fisheries Service, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. c. "Corps" shall refer to the United States Army Corps of Engineers d. "BOR" shall refer to the United States Bureau of Reclamation e. "Action Agencies" shall refer to the Corps and BOR. f. "Party" shall refer to either WRK and NEDC or the federal Agencies as defined above. g- "Parties" shall collectively refer to WRK and NEDC and the federal Agencies. h. "FWS" shall mean the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 1. "NMFS" shall mean the National Marine Fisheries Service, an agency within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.. STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

j- "Services" shall collectively refer to FWS and NMFS. k. "Consult" or "consultation" shall refer to the process by which the action agencies consult with FWS or NMFS pursuant to section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. $1536(a)(2), and 50 C.F.R. Part 402. 1. "BiOp" shall mean the Biological Opinion for the Willamette Project. m. "Willamette Project" shall refer to the 13 dams in the Willamette Basin owned and operated by the Corps. 111. SCHEDULE FOR FEDERAL AGENCY COMPLETION OF THE WLLAMETTE PROJECT BIOLOGICAL OPINION 4. The Services shall provide the action agencies with a Final Biological Opinion on or before Friday July 11,2008. Within ten (10) days of providing the action agencies the Final BiOp, the Services shall provide Plaintiffs, through their attorney, written notice of the date on which the Services provided the Action Agencies the Final BiOp, along with a copy of the Final BiOp. 5. On or before Tuesday March 11,2008 the Services shall provide Plaintiffs with a status report on the section 7 consultation process. 6. Defendants represent that they intend to make every effort to comply with the terms of this Stipulation in good faith. If, however, through unforseen circumstances, events should change after the Stipulation becomes effective, Defendants will notify all other parties of record as soon as reasonably possible of the change and the reason therefor. The parties agree to attempt to work reasonably toward a mutually acceptable solution. In the event a solution is reached, the STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 6-

parties shall jointly move this Court to amend the Stipulation, as the parties agree that this Stipulation may be amended or modified only by order of this Court. If the parties are unable to agree, the parties reserve the right to seek judicial intervention to enforce, alter, or amend the terms and conditions of this Stipulation. 7. Based on Defendants agreement to produce a Final Biological Opinion on or before Friday July 11,2008, Plaintiffs agree to dismiss their First, Second and Third Claims for Relief with prejudice. Nothing in this Stipulation shall preclude Plaintiffs from bringing similar claims in a challenge to the Final BiOp. IV. DISMISSAL OF OTHER CLAIMS 8. Plaintiffs agree to dismiss without prejudice all other claims and shall not be precluded by this Stipulation from bringing the same or similar claims in a future suit. V. FEES AND COSTS 9. The United States agrees to pay, and WRK and NEDC agrees to accept $20,000 in full settlement of all claims by WRK and NEDC for its costs of litigation (including reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses) up to and including the date this Stipulated Settlement Agreement is executed by the Parties. Said payment shall be made to WRK and NEDC by electronic transfer to Plaintiffs' attorney's client trust account as follows:: Bank name: Key Bank Bank address: 35 15 SW Troy Street, Portland, Oregon 972 19 Routing #: 12300201 1 Account #: 370181011039 STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Name of account: DBA Stephanie M. Parent Attorney at Law Attorney Escrow Account/IOLTA Federal Tax #: 387-56-4038. This electronic transfer shall be made within a reasonable time period after the Court enters the Stipulated Settlement Agreement. 10. Plaintiffs reserve the right to seek an award for reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred after entry of this Stipulated Settlement Agreement in connection with any disagreement between the Parties concerning the interpretation, proposed modification, or performance of any aspect of this Stipulated Settlement Agreement. In the event that WRK and NEDC seeks such fees and costs, the Parties shall attempt to reach agreement as to the whether WRK and NEDC are entitled to any fees and costs or an appropriate amount of recovery. If the Parties are unable to reach agreement, WRK and NEDC may file an application with the Court for such recovery. VI. CONTINUING JURISDICTION 11. The parties agree that this Stipulation may be amended or modified only by order of this Court. 12. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter and allow this action to be reopened for the purpose of enabling the Parties to this Stipulated Settlement Agreement to apply to the Court for any further order that may be necessary to construe, carry out, enforce compliance andlor resolve any dispute regarding the terms or conditions of this Stipulated Settlement Agreement, and for granting any further relief as the interests of justice may require. 13. Nothing in this Stipulated Settlement Agreement shall be construed to limit the equitable STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 8-

powers of the Court. VII. EFFECTIVE DATE 14. This Stipulated Settlement Agreement shall become effective upon the date of its entry by the Court. If for any reason the District Court does not enter this Stipulated Settlement Agreement, the obligations set forth in this Agreement are null and void. 15. This Stipulation is not to be construed as a concession by any party as to the validity of any fact or legal position concerning the claims or defenses in this action. 16. Nothing in this Stipulation shall be interpreted or constitute a commitment or requirement that the agencies to obligate or pay finds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. 1341. 17. Nothing in this Stipulation shall be construed to limit or modify the discretion accorded the agencies by law with respect to the procedures to be followed in completing the actions set forth above. By Permission: /s/ Ste-phanie Parent STEPHANIE M. PARENT (OSB #92590) Pacific Environmental Advocacy Center 10015 SW Tenvilliger Blvd. Portland, OR 972 19 Phone (503) 768-6736 Fax (503) 768-6642 parent@lclark.edu Attorney for Plaintiffs /s/ Cobv Howell COBY HOWELL United States Department of Justice C/O U.S. Attorney's Office 1000 S. W. Third Avenue Suite 600 Portland OR, 97204 Phone (503) 727-1023 Fax (503) 727-1 1 1 7 coby.howell@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendants STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Based on the foregoing and finding good cause, the Court hereby enters this order incorporating the terms contained herein. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 2 6 dt&??@$ day of 2008 P~JQ~P STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT