October Newsletter What does tax look like under a Coalition government? Now that the Abbott government is settling in, it is worthwhile to look at their promises and the commitments that they made in the run-up to the election. Here's a rundown on some of the more important commitments, although many don't have effective dates: Self education expenses: There will be no $2,000 cap on self-education expense deductibility. FBT and cars: The statutory formula method for car fringe benefits will not be abolished. Company tax rate to be cut to 28.5% from 1 July 2015. No changes to the GST rate before the next election although a proposed Tax Reform White Paper may cover possible GST reforms. Abolish the carbon tax. Abolish the mining resource rent tax (MRRT). Discontinue the tax loss carry-back measure (linked to the MRRT). Discontinue the small business instant asset write-off (currently $6,500). Remove accelerated depreciation for motor vehicles for small business (currently $5,000). Introduce a 1.5% levy on companies with taxable incomes above $5m to fund a Paid Parental Leave (PPL) Scheme from 1 July 2015 and give mothers six month's leave based on their wage (capped to an annual $150,000 salary) or the national minimum wage (whichever is the greater), plus super. The superannuation guarantee will increase from 9% to 12%, but will be delayed by 2 years, so that the 12% target is achieved in 2021 rather than 2019. What the ATO is up to with its FBT Audits Editor: The ATO says that it is using auditors from other compliance areas to check on employers providing benefits that may be liable to FBT. Employers outside the FBT system the ATO has advised that where compliance work (an audit) is being undertaken primarily on other taxes, ATO staff have been told to look at FBT issues where information held by the ATO indicates an FBT risk. For example, an employer may have motor vehicles registered in the business name, but no FBT return has been lodged or any employee contributions disclosed. The ATO says that additional FBT training is being provided to compliance staff in these
areas. FBT: What happens when two employees use the same car? Editor: "What happens when two employees, both using log books, use the same car and get different percentage uses?" Well, you basically take an average of the use between the two employees Example XYZ Pty Ltd supplied a car to employee A for the first four months of the 2013 FBT year. During this time, employee A maintained a valid logbook for a continuous 12 week period. Employee A then left the company and the vehicle was transferred to employee B, another employee of XYZ Pty Ltd. As employee B s job role was substantially different, she also maintained a valid logbook to cover her use of the vehicle for a continuous period of 12 weeks. The employee breakdown and business use percentage as per the logbooks was as follows: Employee Business kms Total kms Business % A 32,040 36,000 89% B 3,480 6,000 58% Based on the above, the business use percentage should be calculated on the total number of business kilometres travelled divided by the total kilometres travelled for the holding period: i.e., 32,040 + 3,480 = 35,520 divided by 42,000 resulting in a business use percentage of 84.57% (assuming this reflects the full FBT year). The following year would use the 58% provided by employee B's logbook. GIC and SIC rates for 2013 December quarter The ATO has released the 2013 December quarter rates for the General Interest Charge (GIC) and the Shortfall Interest Charge (SIC) as follows: GIC annual rate 9.6% GIC daily rate 0.02630137% SIC annual rate 5.6% SIC daily rate 0.01534246% Tax not always fair? What a surprise! Editor: The following three cases are good examples of why you should always get tax advice up-front before entering into financial transactions. Case 1 is the sad tale of a taxpayer who sold a property, didn't receive the full proceeds of the sale but still had to pay the taxman the GST, as if they had received the full amount. In this case, when the purchaser couldn't come up with the full amount at settlement, the taxpayer entered into a vendor's finance agreement. Under that agreement, the vendor effectively 'loaned' the balance of the purchase price to the purchaser.
As a result, the taxpayer had to pay GST on the full amount. In the end, the purchaser couldn't pay the full amount they owed to the vendor. Nonetheless, GST was still payable on the full contract price. Case 2 involved a taxpayer who deposited $430,000 into his super fund. When the GFC hit, he panicked and withdrew half. Six months later he reconsidered, and redeposited another $100,000. Now, you're only allowed to deposit $450,000 in your own contributions in a three year period (if you're under 65). But he thought that, on a net contribution basis, he was OK given that he had withdrawn about $200K. Unfortunately, the rules are simple. Don't contribute more than $450,000. He did and was slugged excess contributions tax on the extra $80,000 that went into the fund. Case 3 involved a council worker who claimed that he was also a share trader, not merely a share investor probably to be able to claim losses on sales of shares. Even though the taxpayer had turnovers of $934,575 and $385,938 in the years concerned, the AAT member presiding over the case said that while it was more than a hobby, it was not a business. The taxpayer even maintained an office specifically for the purpose of conducting his share trades and for accounting and tax calculations. Editor: Quite clearly, this was a "line ball" decision that unfortunately went against the taxpayer. Good advice would have cautioned him to prepare business plans and conduct himself in a more "business-like" way. Cases 1 and 2 could equally have gone the taxpayers' way with the right advice. Please Note: Many of the comments in this publication are general in nature and anyone intending to apply the information to practical circumstances should seek professional advice to independently verify their interpretation and the information s applicability to their particular circumstances. What does the new Government mean to you? On the first day of the Coalition Government, the new Prime Minister Tony Abbott instructed the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet to draft legislation to remove the Carbon Tax (to be completed within a month), with the intention of introducing the legislation on the first day of the new Parliament. It was the first foray into a myriad of tax and structural changes promised during the campaign. Let s take a look at what changes you can expect and how to capitalise on the timing of change: Will change occur? The new Government s major problem with bringing about legislative change is the Senate they do not have a majority. This election was a half Senate election and as such, the Greens will control the balance of power until 30 June 2014 and then micro parties will hold control. For controversial changes, such as the abolition of the Carbon Tax, the Government will not have the support of the Greens and the Labor Party have stated that they will not support the abolition of the tax although a compromise position is possible. So either the Government can negotiate with the micro parties and their myriad of vested
interests or call a double dissolution but even then there is no certainty that the end result will give them greater control in the Senate. Tax and Tax reform There are a number of tax changes we know the Government intend to make. These include: Abolition of the Minerals Resource Rent Tax (mining tax) and a series of related measures including the loss carry back scheme, increase to the instant asset write off, accelerated depreciation and rephrasing of the planned increases to the superannuation guarantee rate. Abolition of the Carbon Tax Company tax rate cut by 1.5% from 1 July 2015 Parental leave levy - 1.5% levy on companies with a taxable income above $5 million (and apply to taxable income in excess of $5 million). And of course, there are the changes that will never happen that were announced by the Rudd Government during the election campaign including the abolition of the statutory formula method for calculating the taxable value of car fringe benefits. Then there are the tax changes we don t know. As part of their reform agenda, the Government intend to create a comprehensive White Paper on tax reform. There has been a lot of recent speculation about the intended reforms including a potential increase in the GST rate - since ruled out by the Prime Minister. Business If you are in small business, be aware that some tax concessions available to you are planned to be removed and some planned taxes will be removed. If you can take advantage of the tax concessions available under the former Government, do it now. As long as the changes are not retrospective (which is unlikely), whatever you can take advantage of, you get to keep. For example, the loss-carry back rules will be abolished in conjunction with the mining tax but you can utilise these measures until the law changes. The loss carry back rules offer a way for many businesses to offset tax they have paid in previous years against current year losses. So, if your company is likely to be in a loss position for the 2013 income year and paid tax in the 2012 income year, we encourage you to send in your tax return information as soon as possible as the company may be entitled to a cash refund from the ATO. For small business, if you need to buy depreciating assets in your business computers, machinery, cars, etc., then the there is currently an upfront write-off of $6,500 per item up for grabs between now and when the law changes. Currently, if your business qualifies as a small business and can access the simplified depreciation rules, any depreciating assets you buy below $6,500 can be written off in the year of purchase. If your business is registered for GST the $6,500 is GST exclusive, if not, the $6,500 is the GST inclusive amount. The write off will potentially reduce back to $1,000 when the law changes. It s also worth noting the likely impact on business when and if the Carbon Tax is abolished. The Government has already warned that fines of up to
$1.1m will apply to entities that introduce or maintain price increases, surcharges attributable to the carbon tax. So, If your business ever published any sort of commentary blaming the carbon tax for your price increases and let s face it, there was a stage there when the Carbon Tax was blamed for just about everything short of the high level of teenage pregnancy in Australia - then you might want to pay attention. Superannuation The good news on superannuation is that the Government has stated that it will not make any unexpected detrimental changes to superannuation we won t move the goalposts. For employers, the Government had flagged that it will slow the phased increase to superannuation guarantee in conjunction with the removal of the mining tax. In addition, the Government intends to give small business the option to remit compulsory superannuation payments directly to the ATO. For all those concerned about inadvertently breaching the contributions cap, the Government has noted that it will develop a process that addresses all inadvertent breaches of the contribution caps where an individual can show that their mistake was genuine and the error would result in a disproportionate penalty. For those with a SMSF, there will be a review of minimum pension payment levels. Individuals & families Sometimes no change can be a good thing. The Government has stated that it will not change the current income tax thresholds or pension and benefit fortnightly rates. The SchoolKids bonus that offers up to $820 per child to cover education expenses will be abolished. The bonus was funded by the mining tax. One of the most controversial of the Government policies during the election campaign was the introduction of a paid parental leave scheme at replacement wage. Scheduled for 1 July 2015, the scheme provides mothers with 26 weeks of paid parental leave at their full replacement wage or the national minimum wage (whichever is greater) plus superannuation. The replacement salary is capped at $150,000. Fathers will also be able to take 2 weeks paid parental leave (concurrently with mothers or separately) at their actual wage. Australia is currently one of only two countries with a paid parental leave scheme that doesn t base its payment on a woman s actual wage. The intention is to fund the paid parental leave scheme with a 1.5% levy on companies with a taxable income above $5 million (the levy applies to the taxable income above $5m). Infrastructure It s worth noting the level of infrastructure projects the Government has committed to. In addition to delivering the troubled National Broadband Network, the Government has promised billions of dollars in roadway projects including the Bruce Highway, Pacific Highway from Newcastle in NSW to Brisbane, the WestConnex project in Sydney, the Gateway motorway in Brisbane, Swan Valley Bypass, complete the Perth Gateway, upgrade
Adelaide s North-South Road Corridor and a whole lot more. How business operates and develops projects across State borders will be assisted by a planned one-stop-shop for environmental approvals. The initiative, if they can make it work, will overcome many of the horror stories of national projects. SMSFs top half a million mark The ATO regularly releases a statistical report on Self Managed Superannuation Funds (SMSFs). The latest report shows that the growth in SMSFs dropped by around 10% over the last 12 months but establishments remain high. There are now over half a million SMSFs in Australia with almost a million SMSF members. Australian SMSFs hold assets worth approximately $495bn at June 2013. A majority of SMSFs have a total asset value of between $500k and $1m with the median asset value per member at over $292k. The material and contents provided in this publication are informative in nature only. It is not intended to be advice and you should not act specifically on the basis of this information alone. If expert assistance is required, professional advice should be obtained. Quote of the month We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit. Aristotle