IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE



Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/31/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. ( Plaintiff or Endeavor ), by and through its

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG (CHARLOTTESVILLE) DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv JRG-KNM Document 1 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

JUDGE RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION. v. Case No. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Broadband Graphics - infringement of Patent Law and Procedure

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:10-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. v. ) C.A. No.

Case 1:14-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 3:14-cv M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

Case 2:14-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:07-cv LED Document 1-1 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:12-cv RPM Document 1 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/02/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Case No.

CASE 0:12-cv RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/20/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 6:12-cv Document 1 Filed 10/22/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CA No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

Case5:15-cv NC Document1 Filed06/10/15 Page1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. JURY DEMANDED COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

GOODIX TECHNOLOGY INC., SHENZHEN HUIDING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. A/K/A SHENZHEN GOODIX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and

Case 6:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/23/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. ) IATRIC SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv ) v. ) ) FAIRWARNING, INC.

Case 1:12-cv RBJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF

Case 9:15-cv JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2015 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION 070CT~;Q PH12:02 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ?/lot II 6,b III lis'

Case 1:16-cv CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

Case 1:10-cv JBS -KMW Document 1 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case: 14-C V-9538 WI-IF

Case 2:09-cv TJW Document 1 Filed 09/23/2009 Page 1 of 8

Case: 3:14-cv bbc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/31/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case5:15-cv HRL Document1 Filed01/28/15 Page1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:13-cv JBA Document 1 Filed 11/14/13 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:15-cv WYD-MEH Document 1 Filed 12/17/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:12-cv SLR Document 8 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 216 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:15-cv MLC-LHG Document 1 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 1

How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California

Case 1:13-cv LY Document 1 Filed 02/08/13 Page 1 of 54 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND

Case 2:12-cv GMN-GWF Document 1 Filed 11/09/12 Page 1 of 7

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal

Case Doc 1 Filed 04/07/15 Entered 04/07/15 11:42:31 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13

Case 1:15-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF] hereby sues the Defendants, [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case4:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

Case3:15-cv JCS Document1 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:12-cv WJM-KMT Document 1 Filed 12/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 3:14-cv AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43

Plaintiffs, -against- The Plaintiffs, by their attorney, Leon Greenberg P.C., as and for a Complaint against the defendants, state and allege,

Case5:12-cv LHK Document261 Filed08/31/12 Page1 of 15. Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Apple Inc.

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MOBILE TRANSFORMATION LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Case No. A&E TELEVISION NETWORKS, LLC JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff Mobile Transformation LLC ("Plaintiff"), for its Complaint against Defendant A&E Television Networks, LLC ("Defendant"), hereby alleges as follows PARTIES 1. Plaintiff is a Delaware limited liability company. 2. Upon information and belief, Defendant is a Delaware limited liability company having a principal place of business at 235 East 45th Street, New York, NY 10017. Upon information and belief, Defendant may be served with process through its registered agent, The Corporation Trust Company, at Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, DE 19801. NATURE OF THE ACTION 3. This is a civil action for the infringement of United States Patent No. 6,351,736 (the "'736 Patent") under the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE 4. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a) because this action arises under the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq. 5. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because it is incorporated in Delaware and has purposely availed itself of the privileges and benefits of the laws of the State of Delaware. 6. Upon information and belief, more specifically, Defendant, directly and/or through authorized intermediaries, ships, distributes, offers for sale, sells, and/or advertises (including the provision of an interactive web page) its products and services in the United States and the State of Delaware. Upon information and belief, Defendant has committed patent infringement in the State of Delaware. Defendant solicits customers in the State of Delaware. Defendant has many paying customers who are residents of the State of Delaware and who each use Defendant's products and services in the State of Delaware. 7. Venue is proper in this judicial district as to Defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400(b). THE PATENT-IN SUIT 8. Paragraphs 1-7 are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 9. On February 26, 2002, the '736 Patent entitled "System and Method for Displaying Advertisements with Played Data" was duly and lawfully issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO"). The '736 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

10. Plaintiff is the exclusive licensee of the '736 Patent and possesses all rights of recovery under the '736 Patent, including the right to sue and recover all damages for infringement thereof, including past infringement. COUNT I PATENT INFRINGEMENT 11. Paragraphs 1-10 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated herein. 12. Upon information and belief and in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(a), Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe one or more claims of the '736 Patent by making, using, providing, offering to sell, and selling (directly or through intermediaries), in this district and elsewhere in the United States, systems and methods for displaying advertisements with played data, including via the website http//www.aetv.com (the Website ). More specifically, and by way of non-limiting example, the Website uses an embedded flash player to present a first data type of an interactive videogame, after the presentation of advertising data of a second type that includes a pre-roll video advertisement. 13. For purposes of the '736 Patent, when a web browser of a client device selects an interactive videogame from the Website, the web server that services the interactive video game downloads both the videogame data and the video advertisement data from a content repository. The web server then executes executable code created by the Website developers. The executable code includes both the first and second commands for the presentation of the first and second data types, respectively. The executable code couples the presentation of the first and second data types. That is, because the first and second data types are linked together via code, the presentation of the second data types causes the presentation of the first data type, automatically. The embedded flash player presents both the first and second data types to the

web browser of the client device. Namely, the video advertisement is presented prior to the presentation of the interactive videogame. As such, the selection and presentation of the videogame causes the presentation of the video advertisement. 14. To the extent such notice may be required, Defendant received actual notice of its infringement of the '736 Patent at least as early as the filing of the original complaint in this action, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 287(a). 15. Defendant's aforesaid activities have been, intentional, without authority and/or license from Plaintiff. 16. Plaintiff is entitled to recover from the Defendant the damages sustained by Plaintiff as a result of the Defendant's wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, which, by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. 284. 17. Defendant's infringement of Plaintiff's exclusive rights under the '736 Patent will continue to damage Plaintiff, causing irreparable harm for which there is no adequate remedy at law, unless enjoined by this Court. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Mobile Transformation LLC respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment against Defendant A&E Television Networks, LLC as follows A. An adjudication that Defendant has infringed the '736 Patent; B. An award of damages to be paid by Defendant adequate to compensate Plaintiff for its past infringement and any continuing or future infringement up until the date such judgment is entered, including interest, costs, and disbursements as

justified under 35 U.S.C. 284 and, if necessary to adequately compensate Plaintiff for Defendant's infringement, an accounting of all infringing sales including, but not limited to, those sales not presented at trial; C. A declaration that this case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C. 285; D. An award to Plaintiff of its attorney fees, costs, and expenses incurred in prosecuting this action; and E. An award to Plaintiff of such further relief at law or in equity as the Court deems just and proper. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff hereby demands trial by jury on all claims and issues so triable. Dated April 5, 2013 STAMOULIS & WEINBLATT LLC /s/ Stamatios Stamoulis Stamatios Stamoulis #4606 stamoulis@swdelaw.com Richard C. Weinblatt #5080 weinblatt@swdelaw.com Two Fox Point Centre 6 Denny Road, Suite 307 Wilmington, DE 19809 Telephone (302) 999-1540 Counsel for Plaintiff Mobile Transformation LLC