TEACHER CAPABILITY POLICY Guidelines and Procedural Document



Similar documents
Teacher appraisal and capability. A model policy for schools

Disciplinary Policy and Procedure

Disciplinary Procedures for Support Staff (covering unsatisfactory performance and misconduct)

Human Resources CAPABILITY POLICY & PROCEDURE. September 2012 Updated June of 18

NHS North Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group. HR Policies Managing Discipline

CAPABILITY AND POOR PERFORMANCE PROCEDURE

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

Redundancy & Redeployment Policy. Transformation & Human Resources

Disciplinary Procedures

PROCEDURE Police Staff Discipline. Number: C 0901 Date Published: 9 May 2013

Disciplinary Procedure

Sickness Absence Management Policy and Procedure

This policy has been created using the WBC Model Policy Version December 2013.

Sickness Absence Management Policy and Procedure

Attendance Management Policy Statement

BUCKINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL SCHOOLS GRIEVANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

Disciplinary procedure

DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Disciplinary Procedure

MANAGEMENT OF SICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

JOINT AGREEMENT ON GUIDANCE ON DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES IN FURTHER EDUCATION COLLEGES

HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES DISCIPLINARY. Date of Policy 1993 Date policy to be reviewed 09/2014

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

Greenhead College. Discipline and Grievance. (Senior Postholders) reviewed 02/15

DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Disciplinary and dismissal procedures for school staff

BARNTON PARISH COUNCIL (BPC)

Date Amendments/Actions Next Compulsory Review Date

Appendix 1 Guidance Note: Conducting an Informal Support Meeting. Appendix 2 Guidance Note: Conducting a Review meeting under Informal stage

Disciplinary policy INTRODUCTION

NHS North Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group

Disciplinary Policy and Procedure

1. INTRODUCTION SCOPE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES REPRESENTATION INVESTIGATIONS SUSPENSION...

This procedure applies where formal disciplinary action is commenced on or after 11 December 2013

Z:\Committee\ \PERSONNEL PANEL\ \POLICIES\Discipline Procdure.doc

Workforce Performance Management Policy and Procedure

Staff Sickness and Absence Policy Kelsey Primary School

Policy C11 Staff Disciplinary Policy and Procedure

Wiltshire Council Human Resources. Improving Work Performance Policy and Procedure

Broomley and Stocksfield Parish Council

Disciplinary Procedure

DISCIPLINARY MISCONDUCT PROCEDURE

Health & Wellbeing Framework. Absence Management Policy

NATIONAL JOINT COUNCIL FOR STAFF IN SIXTH FORM COLLEGES

Disciplinary Policy & Procedure. Version 2.0

Managing Employee Attendance in Schools

3. MISCONDUCT and GROSS MISCONDUCT The following list provides examples of misconduct which will normally give rise to formal disciplinary action:

SHORT TERM SICKNESS ABSENCE MANAGEMENT GUIDANCE NOTES (MGN32) Final

Glasgow Kelvin College. Disciplinary Policy and Procedure

DISCIPLINARY POLICY. 1. Introduction. 2. Structured support. 3. Formal action process 3.1. Investigations. 4. Notes of the Hearing and Investigation

Document Name Disciplinary Policy Accountable Body RADIUS Trust Reference HR.P2 Date Ratified 13 th August 2015 Version 1.5 Last Update August 2015

CROWTHORNE PARISH COUNCIL DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE. Adopted by Council - 5 November Table of Contents

DISPUTE RESOLUTION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE FOR TEACHING & SUPPORT STAFF IN SCHOOLS

Policy and Procedure. Managing Attendance. Policy and Procedure

Newcastle University disciplinary procedure

Cyngor Sir Powys County Council. Disciplinary Procedure for Teachers

Disciplinary and dismissal procedures for school staff

ROYAL HOLLOWAY University of London. DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE (for all staff other than academic teaching staff)

Disciplinary and Performance Management Policy & Procedure October 2010

Walsall Children s Services. Disciplinary Policy and Procedure. 1. Introduction

NEWMAN UNIVERSITY DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

Wotton-under-Edge Town Council

Little Stoke Primary School

Human Resources People and Organisational Development. Attendance Management Policy

Otley Town Council. Disciplinary Policy. Date Approved: 17 th February 2014 Revision Date:

THE HARRIS FEDERATION STAFF ATTENDANCE AND SICKNESS MANAGEMENT POLICY

STAFF DISCIPLINE, CONDUCT AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

SEN15-P69b 24 June University Ordinances

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURES DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Disciplinary and grievance procedures Draft Acas Code of Practice

LOCAL DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

Employment Guidance Note

HR ADVISORY BULLETIN 1. Discipline & Grievance

In this Disciplinary Policy and Procedure, unless the context otherwise requires, the following expressions shall have the following meanings:

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE 1 POLICY STATEMENT & SCOPE

POLICY AND PROCEDURE

HR Services. Employee Handbook. Staff Disciplinary Procedures. 1. Introduction

SICKNESS ABSENCE MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE. With effect from xxxxxx

JIB NATIONAL WORKING RULES 19 AND 20

CAPABILITY POLICY. Date Impact Assessed: Version No: 1 No of pages: 20. Capability Policy Version 1 Page 1

BOROUGHBRIDGE TOWN COUNCIL S DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE POLICY

DISCIPLINE RUTLAND. limited by guarantee. Registered in England and Wales.

Staff Disciplinary and Dismissal Policy and Procedure January 2011

ABSENCE MANAGEMENT (STAFF)

POLICY FOR MANAGING SICKNESS ABSENCE

Transcription:

Human Resources Manual for Schools TEACHER CAPABILITY POLICY Guidelines and Procedural Document 1. Purpose This policy applies only to teachers or head teachers about whose performance there are concerns that the teacher appraisal policy has been unable to address. Its purpose is to enable such situation to be dealt with fairly, consistently and without delay with the aim of supporting the teacher/head teacher to achieve and maintain acceptable standards of performance. Following consultation with governing bodies, head teachers and teaching trades unions this policy is effective from September 2012 and will be reviewed in August 2015. 2. Person conducting the meeting The person conducting the meetings throughout the capability process will either be the chair of governors (for head teacher capability), head teacher or a member of the senior leadership team. 3. Support and representations at meetings Other than at the informal stage of the capability process, it is recommended that an HR Adviser be present at the meetings to offer advice and support and the teacher can also be accompanied by a trade union representative or a work colleague. 4. Transition to informal capability Where there are concerns about a teacher s performance that have been unable to be addressed through the teacher appraisal policy, the teacher will be notified in writing that the appraisal system will no longer apply or cannot be applied as the chair of governors, head teacher or member of the senior leadership team has judged that there are concerns about their performance. The letter will also tell them that they will be invited to attend an informal capability meeting. The objective is to provide support and guidance through the capability process in such a way that the teacher s performance improves and any concerns are resolved. The chair of governors, head teacher or member of the senior leadership team will meet the teacher informally and: give clear feedback to the teacher about the nature and seriousness of the concerns; give the teacher the opportunity to comment and discuss the concerns; agree any support (e.g. coaching, mentoring, structured observations, training, visits to other classes or schools), that will be provided to help address those specific concerns; make clear how, and by when, progress will be reviewed e.g. provide an action plan, review date and specify how improvement will be measured (it may be appropriate to Issued September 2012 Page 1 of 7

revise objectives, and it will be necessary to allow sufficient time for improvement. It is recommended the informal review period should be 4 weeks. clearly explain the implications and process if no or insufficient improvement is made which will be to progress to the formal capability meeting. 5. Monitoring and review period following an informal capability meeting A performance monitoring and review period of 4 weeks will follow the informal capability meeting. Formal monitoring, evaluation, guidance and support will continue during this period. Regular reviews will be held with the teacher throughout the monitoring and review period to inform them how there are progressing against objectives detailed in the action plan. The member of staff will then be invited to an informal review meeting. 6. Informal review meeting The teacher will be invited to an informal review meeting. At this meeting the person conducting the meeting will review the evidence about performance during the informal monitoring and review period. The teacher will be able to respond to concerns about their performance and to make any representations. If the person conducting the meeting is satisfied that the teacher has made sufficient improvement, the informal capability procedure will cease and the appraisal process will re-start. In other cases: If some progress has been made and there is confidence that more is likely, it may be appropriate to extend the informal monitoring and review period; If no, or insufficient improvement has been made during the informal monitoring and review period, the teacher will be invited to attend a formal capability meeting. 7. Formal capability meeting At least five working days notice will be given of the formal capability meeting. The notification will contain: sufficient information about the concerns about performance and their possible consequences to enable the teacher to prepare to answer the case at a formal capability meeting details of the time and place of the meeting advise the teacher of their right to be accompanied This meeting is intended to establish the facts. It will be conducted by the chair of governors (for head teacher capability meetings) or head teacher/member of the senior leadership team (for other teachers). Copies of any written evidence will be available at the meeting and it allows the teacher, accompanied if they wish, to respond to concerns about their performance and to make any relevant representations. This may provide new information or a different context to the information/evidence already collected. The person conducting the meeting may conclude: that there are insufficient grounds for pursuing the capability issue and that it would be more appropriate to continue to address the remaining concerns through the appraisal process. In such cases, the capability procedure will come to an end or, adjourn the meeting for example if they decide that further investigation is needed, or that more time is needed in which to consider any additional information, or In other cases, the meeting will continue Issued September 2012 Page 2 of 7

During the meeting, or any other meeting which could lead to a formal warning being issued, the person conducting the meeting will: identify the professional shortcomings, for example which of the standards expected of teachers are not being met; give clear guidance on the improved standard of performance needed to ensure that the teacher can be removed from formal capability procedures (this may include the setting of new objectives focused on the specific weaknesses that need to be addressed, any success criteria that might be appropriate and the evidence that will be used to assess whether or not the necessary improvement has been made); discuss and confirm any support that will be available to help the teacher improve their performance; (e.g. coaching, mentoring, structured observations, training, visits to other classes or schools), set out the timetable for improvement (see monitoring and review period below) and explain how performance will be monitored and reviewed. The timetable will depend on the circumstances of the individual case including the nature of the job but in straightforward cases this could be six weeks. It is for the head teacher/member of the senior leadership team/governing body to determine the set period. It should be reasonable and proportionate, but not excessively long, and should provide sufficient opportunity for an improvement to take place); and warn the teacher formally that failure to improve within the set period could lead to dismissal. where appropriate issue a written warning at this meeting or in very serious cases, this warning could be a final written warning. Please ensure that the person conducting the meeting has the delegated authority to issue the appropriate warning. A decision about issuing a warning should be made after all the facts have been considered, and any representations from the teacher have been considered. The person conducting the meeting should adjourn the meeting to consider the appropriate action before delivering a decision to the teacher. A letter must be sent to the teacher within 5 working days of the formal capability meeting confirming: the main points discussed at the meeting the outcome of the meeting Where a warning is issued, the letter will include: the matters covered in the bullet points above give information about the timing and handling of the review stage the procedure and time limits for appealing against the warning. Any appeal against a warning must be submitted in writing to the clerk of governors within 5 working days of receiving the letter setting out the grounds of appeal. The appeal will be heard, where practicable within 10 working days of notification of appeal. The appeal must not delay the progress of the procedure, unless the appeal decision leads to the matter being reconsidered. Issued September 2012 Page 3 of 7

8. Monitoring and review period following a formal capability meeting A performance monitoring and review period of 6 weeks will follow the formal capability meeting. Formal monitoring, evaluation, guidance and support will continue during this period. Regular reviews will be held with the teacher throughout the monitoring and review period to inform them how there are progressing against objectives detailed in the action plan. The member of staff will be invited to a formal review meeting, unless they were issued with a final written warning, in which case they will be invited to a decision meeting (see below). 9. Formal review meeting As with formal capability meetings, at least five working days notice will be given and the notification will give: details of the time and place of the meeting advise the teacher of their right to be accompanied At this meeting the person conducting the meeting will review the evidence about performance during the monitoring and review period. HR support will be provided at the meeting where requested. The teacher will be able to respond to concerns about their performance and to make any representations. If the person conducting the meeting is satisfied that the teacher has made sufficient improvement, the capability procedure will cease and the appraisal process will re-start. In other cases: If some progress has been made and there is confidence that more is likely, it may be appropriate to extend the monitoring and review period; If no, or insufficient improvement has been made during the monitoring and review period, the teacher will receive a final written warning. Please ensure that the person conducting the meeting has the delegated authority to issue the appropriate warning. As before, a letter must be sent to the teacher within 5 working days of the formal review meeting confirming: the main points discusses at the meeting the outcome of the meeting. Where a final written warning is issued, the letter will include: that failure to achieve an acceptable standard of performance (within the set timescale), may result in dismissal give information about the handling of the further monitoring and review period the procedure and time limits for appealing against the final written warning. Any appeal against a warning must be submitted in writing to the clerk of governors within 5 working days of receiving the letter setting out the grounds of appeal. The appeal will be heard, where practicable within 10 working days of notification of appeal. The appeal must not delay the progress of the procedure, unless the appeal decision leads to the matter being reconsidered. Issued September 2012 Page 4 of 7

10. Monitoring and review period following a formal review meeting A performance monitoring and review period of 4 weeks will follow the formal review meeting. Formal monitoring, evaluation, guidance and support will continue during this period. Regular reviews will be held with the teacher throughout the monitoring and review period to inform them how there are progressing against objectives detailed in the action plan. The member of staff will then be invited to a decision meeting (see below). 11. Decision meeting As with formal capability meetings and formal review meetings, at least five working days notice will be given and the notification will give: details of the time and place of the meeting and will advise the teacher of their right to be accompanied. At this meeting the person conducting the meeting will review the evidence about performance during the monitoring and review period. The teacher will be able to respond to concerns about their performance and to make any representations. If an acceptable standard of performance has been achieved during the further monitoring and review period, the capability procedure will end and the appraisal process will re-start. If performance remains unsatisfactory a recommendation to the governing body will be made that the teacher should cease working at the school. Consideration needs to be given to the teacher not being at work whilst these arrangements are being made. 12. Governing body The governing body should set up the appropriate committee to deal with the recommendation that the teacher should cease to work at the school with at least three governors. They must hear the representations and recommendations brought by the head, or other line manager conducting the capability evaluation, and any representations that the teacher may wish to make. The governing body should also set up the appropriate appeal committee to hear any appeal against a decision that the teacher should cease to work at the school. None of the governors who were on the appropriate committee that recommended the teacher should cease to work at the school should be on the appeal committee. 13. Dismissal For Voluntary Aided Schools, once the governing body has decided that the teacher should cease to work at the school, the governing body will dismiss the teacher. For Community Schools, once the governing body has decided that the teacher should cease working at the school, the governing body will write to the Children, Adults and Families Group informing the Corporate Director of their decision and the reasons for it. Where teachers work solely at this school, the Corporate Director, Children, Adults and Families will write to the teacher, within 14 days of the notification from the governing body, informing them: the reason for dismissal the date on which the employment contract will end the appropriate period of notice right of appeal Where the teacher works at more than one school, the Corporate Director, Children, Adults and Families may require them to cease work at that school (in addition to the above). Issued September 2012 Page 5 of 7

14. Appeal against dismissal/written or final written warning If a teacher feels that a decision to dismiss them or issue a written or final written warning is wrong or unjust, they may appeal in writing against the decision within five working days of the decision, to the clerk of governors setting out at the same time the grounds for the appeal. Appeals will be heard by the appropriate appeals committee, where practicable within 10 working days of receipt of the appeal. A teacher is entitled to be accompanied at an appeal hearing. The main points discussed at the meeting and the outcome will be confirmed in writing. 15. Expiry of warnings Any formal warnings issued under the capability procedure must be disregarded after the periods of time set out below: a written warning must be disregarded after a period not exceeding 6 months; and a final written warning must be disregarded after a period not exceeding 12 months 16. General principles underlying this policy Role of the governors Governors should not normally be involved with a capability procedure before the recommendation that the teacher ceases to work at the school stage. The exception to this is where a governor or governors are involved in considering an appeal against a warning, or in a capability procedure against a head teacher, when some governors may be involved in the monitoring and evaluation of performance. It is important to be prepared for the possibility of dismissal. The use of governors to hear any grievances or appeals against warnings should be limited to ensure a sufficient number of impartial governors remain available for the dismissal and dismissal appeal committees. Normally at least three governors are required for the dismissal committee and no fewer for the appeal, but where this number is not reasonable practicable, it can be reduced to two. Support for the teacher Those monitoring the performance should offer feedback and instruction to help the teacher improve performance. If training courses or assistance from colleagues would be helpful, these should be arranged as soon as possible, but should not interrupt the timing of the procedure. The objective is to provide support and guidance through the capability process in such a way that the teacher s performance improves and any concerns are resolved. ACAS code of practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures This policy will be implemented in accordance with the provisions of the ACAS Code of Practice. Confidentiality The capability processes will be treated with confidentiality. Consistency of treatment and fairness The Governing Body is committed to ensuring consistency of treatment and fairness and will abide by all relevant equality legislation. Definitions Unless indicated otherwise, all references to teacher include the head teacher. Delegation Normal rules apply in respect of the delegation of functions by governing bodies, head teachers and local authorities. Grievances Issued September 2012 Page 6 of 7

Where a member of staff raises a grievance during the capability procedure the capability procedure may be temporarily suspended in order to deal with the grievance. Sickness If long term sickness absence appears to have been triggered by the commencement of monitoring or a formal capability procedure, the case will be dealt with in accordance with the school s absence policy and will be referred immediately to the occupational health service. In some cases, it may be appropriate for formal procedures to continue during a period of sickness absence. Short term absences should not delay any part of the formal stage of the capability procedure. Legal considerations Lack of capability is a potentially fair reason for the dismissal of an employee, although the decision needs to be based on the facts and the employer needs to have followed a fair procedure. The employer will not have acted reasonably in dismissing an employee unless they have been given a fair warning and a chance to improve Equality and Diversity Statement The Governing Body is committed to promoting equality and valuing diversity in everything we do including service delivery and employment. Further details can be obtained by referring to the Equality and Diversity in Employment Policy Statement available on the Council s Intranet. Issued September 2012 Page 7 of 7