EFFECTIVE DATE: February 3, 2012

Similar documents
A. APPLICABILITY OF GUIDELINE

Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 No 7

Queensland DRUG REHABILITATION (COURT DIVERSION) ACT 2000

INFORMATION / FACT SHEET CRIME TO TRIAL PROCESS CRIMINAL COURT HEARINGS EXPLAINED

Queensland DANGEROUS PRISONERS (SEXUAL OFFENDERS) ACT 2003

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART THREE A CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE APPENDIX

IMPAIRED DRIVING CASES: NOTICE TO SEEK GREATER PUNISHMENT

THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE (PLEA NEGOTIATIONS AND AGREEMENTS) ACT

Court Record Access Policy

GUIDANCE Implementing Section 176 of the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014: Lowvalue

Defendants charged with serious violent and sexual offences (including murder)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) )

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Homicide Case Flowchart...3. Overview of Homicide Trial...4. Location of Local Court Houses...5. General Courtroom Diagram...

Adult Plea Negotiation Guidelines

THE YOUTH CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT: SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND. Department of Justice Canada. Ministère de la Justice Canada

Community Legal Information Association of Prince Edward Island, Inc.

Glossary. To seize a person under authority of the law. Police officers can make arrests

As part of their course on law and/or sociology in this module, participants will be able to:

Title 15 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE -Chapter 23 ALABAMA CRIME VICTIMS Article 3 Crime Victims' Rights

ALBERTA S JUSTICE SYSTEM AND YOU

CAUSE NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 49th DISTRICT COURT ZAPATA COUNTY, TEXAS

If the people who make the decisions are the people who will also bear the consequences of those decisions, perhaps better decisions will result.

AN ACT. The goals of the alcohol and drug treatment divisions created under this Chapter include the following:

Addiction Treatment Program for the purposes of subsection (2) of section 720 of the Criminal Code

Sentencing for Impaired Driving

Scope of the criminal representation contract

DISCLOSURE BY THE CROWN IN CRIMINAL CASES FIRST ISSUED: DECEMBER 23, 1999

Victims of Crime Act 2001

Criminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions

Attorneys convicted of crimes.

Criminal Justice and Courts Bill

Chapter 6. Commonwealth offences

Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill [AS INTRODUCED]

Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015

Abusive Behaviour and Sexual Harm (Scotland) Bill [AS AMENDED AT STAGE 2]

Compensation in criminal proceedings in Macedonia according to CPC and LRC. Aneta Trajkovska,, Lawyer Belgrade,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No Filed May 20, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, Jeffrey A.

TORONTO BAIL PROGRAM

Consequences of Convictions for Sex Crimes

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Provisional Sentencing for Children) Act 2013 No 7

THE JUSTICE PROCESS a Guide for Families

SENATE, No. 297 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 210th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2002 SESSION

Community Legal Information Association of PEI, Inc. Sexual Assault

Witness Protection Act 1995 No 87

LR Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal

Information for Crime Victims and Witnesses

Criminal Injuries Compensation Act, Part 1

Bail and Remand The Scottish Executive Action Plan

PROGRAM AUTHORIZATION

Maricopa County Attorney s Office Adult Criminal Case Process

Senate Bill No. 86 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security

WITNESS PROTECTION ACT

Who benefits from the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act and how?

A public protection order is a court order that will allow the detention of very high risk individuals at a secure facility within prison precincts.

Chapter 6B STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES. Last Amended: 1 July Manual of Legal Aid

64th Legislature AN ACT GENERALLY REVISING LAWS REGARDING SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION; REQUIRING THE

2015 IL App (3d) U. Order filed December 17, 2015 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2015

ATTORNEY GENERAL S GUIDELINES ON PLEA DISCUSSIONS IN CASES OF SERIOUS OR COMPLEX FRAUD

REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF

CHARGED with a CRIME What YOU

ADVOCATES AND SOLICITORS EXAMINATIONS COMMON EXAMINATIONS Civil Procedure and Criminal Procedure

Using Administrative Records to Report Federal Criminal Case Processing Statistics

The Rights of Crime Victims in Texas

YOU VE been CHARGED. with a CRIME What YOU. NEED to KNOW. Justice

Stages in a Capital Case from

CAYMAN ISLANDS. Supplement No. 9 published with Extraordinary Gazette No. 53 of 17th July, DRUG REHABILITATION COURT LAW.

The Family Court Process for Children Charged with Criminal and Status Offenses in South Carolina

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND

Case 2:03-cr JES Document 60 Filed 02/19/08 Page 1 of 7 PageID 178 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Restoration of Civil Rights. Helping People regain their Civil Liberties

COPE Collaborative Opportunities for Positive Experiences

Courts & Our Legal System

HOW A TYPICAL CRIMINAL CASE IS PROSECUTED IN ALASKA

REPORT TO CRIME & DISORDER OVERVIEW & SCRUTINY PANEL. Title: OVERVIEW OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. Date: 27 th October 2009

Sexual Offences (Procedure and Evidence) (Scotland) Bill

Offender Rehabilitation Act 2014

APPLICATION FOR COMPENSATION 1 (Where there is no Court Order) Criminal Offence Victims Act S.33 Criminal Code S.663D

SENATE BILL No Introduced by Senator Blakeslee. February 18, An act to amend Section 1370 of the Penal Code, relating to competency.

Community Legal Information Association of PEI. Prince Edward Island, Inc.

New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990

LAWS OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CRIMINAL LAW ACT CHAPTER 10:04

Franklin County State's Attorney Victim Services

Assault Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS CHAPTER 100 REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT United States Attorney Northern District of Georgia

DRUG DIVERSION PROGRAM NORFOLK

CRIMINAL LAW AND VICTIMS RIGHTS

PART 37 TRIAL AND SENTENCE IN A MAGISTRATES COURT

CRIMINAL JUSTICE (COMMUNITY SANCTIONS) BILL 2014 GENERAL SCHEME

Motoring Offences: Guilty Pleas

REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS (Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act 2011) GUIDANCE NOTE

Chapter 813. Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants 2013 EDITION. Title 59 Page 307 (2013 Edition)

High-Risk Offenders. A Handbook for Criminal Justice Professionals. Solicitor General Canada

SECTION 8 GARDA SÍOCHÁNA ACT General Direction No. 2

New South Wales. 1 Name of Act 2 Commencement 3 Definitions 4 Who is a witness?

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

CRIMINAL JUSTICE (COMPENSATION ORDERS) (JERSEY) LAW 1994

A Working Protocol between ACPO, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), Her Majesty s Court & Tribunals Service (HMCTS), the Witness

AN INTRODUCTION COURT. Victim Services Department of Justice

# Magistrates' Courts Rules (Northern Ireland) 1984

Transcription:

CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH, MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL CROWN COUNSEL POLICY MANUAL ARCS/ORCS FILE NUMBER: 58100-00 EFFECTIVE DATE: February 3, 2012 POLICY CODE: DAN 1 SUBJECT: Dangerous Offender and Long Term Offender Applications CROSS-REFERENCE: Practice Bulletin Practice Directive POLICY A priority of the Criminal Justice Branch is to protect the community from high-risk, sexual and violent offenders by making dangerous offender and long term offender applications in appropriate cases. The protection of the public is the paramount concern. All Crown Counsel are responsible for identifying potential dangerous or long term offender applications, commencing with charge assessment for serious personal injury offences as defined by section 752. I. FOR A PREDICATE OFFENCE COMMITTED BEFORE JULY 2, 2008 A dangerous offender application should be commenced where there is a reasonable likelihood the court will be satisfied that an offender meets one of the definitions of dangerous offender contained in s.753 of the Criminal Code, there is no reasonable possibility of eventual control of the risk in the community, and the public would not be adequately protected by a determinate sentence followed by a long term supervision order. A long term offender application may be commenced only where Crown Counsel have sufficient information to determine that there is a reasonable possibility of eventual control of the risk in the community, that the public would be adequately protected by a determinate sentence followed by a long term supervision order and that it is unlikely that further information will become available that might support a dangerous offender application. Page 1 of 8

Dangerous Offender and Long Term Offender Applications Page 2 of 8 DAN 1 II. FOR A PREDICATE OFFENCE COMMITTED ON OR AFTER JULY 2, 2008 The following three paragraphs take into account that, pursuant to the amendments to the Criminal Code effective July 2, 2008, on a finding that an offender is a dangerous offender, the court can impose either an indeterminate sentence, a definite sentence with a long term supervision order or a definite sentence alone. A dangerous offender application should be commenced whenever there is a reasonable likelihood the court will be satisfied that an offender meets one of the definitions of dangerous offender contained in section 753 of the Criminal Code. Where an offender has been designated a dangerous offender by the Court, Crown Counsel should ask the Court to impose an indeterminate sentence unless there is a reasonable expectation that a lesser measure will adequately protect the public against the commission by the offender of murder or a serious personal injury offence. Any decision to proceed contrary to the last two paragraphs must have the approval of the Assistant Deputy Attorney General, after Crown Counsel has consulted Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel. Statutory Presumption of Dangerous Offender Under section 753(1.1) there is a presumption that the dangerous offender definition is met where the offender has been convicted of a primary designated offence for which it would be appropriate to impose a sentence of imprisonment of two years or more and the offender was convicted previously at least twice of a primary designated offence and was sentenced to at least two years of imprisonment for each of those convictions. In such cases Crown Counsel must: 1. Request Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel to review the case, including the recommendation of Crown Counsel, and decide whether to seek an assessment remand under section 752.1. 2. Once the decision has been made, advise the Court pursuant to section 752.01 as to whether Crown Counsel intends to make an application for an assessment remand, and 3. On receipt of any assessment report, forward it, along with the recommendation of Crown Counsel, to Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel for their decision as to whether a dangerous offender application should be commenced.

Dangerous Offender and Long Term Offender Applications Page 3 of 8 DAN 1 In deciding whether to seek an assessment remand under section 752.1 or commence a dangerous offender application, under subparagraphs #1 and #3 above respectively, Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel should rely on the presumption under section 753(1.1) unless it is not in the public interest to do so, taking into account all the circumstances of the case, including: the impact on the victim(s) all available assessments the personal circumstances of the offender, including health and age the age of the prior convictions, and the circumstances of the prior convictions and of the predicate primary designated offence Breaches and Subsequent Serious Personal Injury Offences There are significant public interest factors in favour of proceeding with prosecutions for serious personal injury offences and breaches of long term supervision orders committed after an offender has been designated as a dangerous offender. Any decision not to proceed for reasons other than sufficiency of evidence must be approved by Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel and the reasons for the decision recorded. Where a person designated as a dangerous offender has subsequently been convicted of either a serious personal injury offence or of a breach of a long term supervision order committed on or after July 2, 2008, Crown Counsel should: 1. Request Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel to review the matter, including the recommendation of Crown Counsel, and to determine whether to seek an assessment remand under section 753.01. 2. On receipt of any assessment report, forward it, along with the recommendation of Crown Counsel, to Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel for their decision as to whether an application for an indeterminate sentence should be made. An application for an indeterminate sentence should be made unless there is a reasonable expectation that a lesser sentence, with or without a new period of long term supervision, will adequately protect the public against the commission by the offender of murder or a serious personal injury offence.

Dangerous Offender and Long Term Offender Applications Page 4 of 8 DAN 1 III. FOR ALL PREDICATE OFFENCES, REGARDLESS OF DATE OF COMMISSION The dangerous offender criteria do not limit applications to sexual offenders. Crown Counsel should also consider serious personal injury offences involving violence without a sexual component. The possibility of instituting a dangerous offender application should not be used to encourage a guilty plea in exchange for an agreement that Crown Counsel will not seek an assessment remand under section 752.1. Where defence counsel indicates that an accused might be willing to plead guilty in exchange for an agreement that the Crown initiate a long-term offender rather than dangerous offender application or not seek an indeterminate sentence on a dangerous offender application, Crown Counsel should not commit to any position on sentence until an assessment report has been completed and reviewed by Regional Crown Counsel. In exceptional cases, Crown Counsel may conclude on the basis of prior assessments or an opinion from a psychiatrist retained by the Criminal Justice Branch and the accused s history that a guilty plea in exchange for an agreement described above would be appropriate. In such cases, Crown Counsel should not commit to any position on sentence without first consulting Regional Crown Counsel. Pursuant to section 754, the consent of the Attorney General is required to commence a dangerous offender or long term offender application. Prior to seeking such consent, it is necessary for the Crown to seek an assessment remand from the Court under section 752.1 or 753.01. Approval to apply for an assessment remand must be obtained from the Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel. Upon receipt of an assessment report, Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel should assess the evidence, the recommendation of Crown Counsel and any applicable presumption, as to whether there is a reasonable likelihood that the accused may be declared either a dangerous offender or long-term offender, and consider whether to seek the consent of the Assistant Deputy Attorney General to the appropriate application. The Assistant Deputy Attorney General provides the consent to commence an application. (see the Practice Directive entitled Consent of the Attorney General). Following receipt of the Consent of the Attorney General to a dangerous offender application, where it appears that the evidence no longer supports such a designation, Crown Counsel must consult with Regional Crown Counsel and the Assistant Deputy Attorney General before a position is taken with respect to a long term offender designation or a determinate sentence.

Dangerous Offender and Long Term Offender Applications Page 5 of 8 DAN 1 DISCUSSION Flagging Potential Applications Where Crown Counsel determine that the accused is a potential dangerous or long term offender, they should call the manager of the High Risk Offenders Identification Program at Vancouver Headquarters (604 660-3918). The manager of that program may be able to provide relevant material such as Reports to Crown Counsel, Pre-sentence Reports, Reasons for Judgment, psychological assessments and the Corrections history of the accused, for subsequent review by trial Crown Counsel. The file should be flagged as a potential dangerous or long term offender application. Guidelines In order to identify cases for flagging, Crown Counsel should consider sections 752, 752.1, 753 and 753.1 and the following guidelines: 1. Section 752.1 provides that where an offender is convicted of a serious personal injury offence (defined in s.752) or an offence referred to in paragraph 753.1(2) (the long term offender definition), the Court shall remand the offender for the preparation of an assessment report where the Court is of the opinion there are reasonable grounds to believe the offender might be found to be a dangerous or long-term offender. 2. The protection of the public is the paramount concern. The Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Lyons affirmed that the primary purpose of the dangerous offender legislation is the protection of the public. This was reaffirmed in R. v. Johnson in the same Court. 3. For a predicate offence committed before July 2, 2008, where the offender meets one of the definitions of dangerous offender contained in sections 753 (a) and (b) but there is a reasonable possibility of eventual control in the community, and the public threat can be reduced to an acceptable level through a determinate sentence or a determinate sentence and a long term supervision order, an offender is not a dangerous offender (R. v. Johnson). 4. Crown Counsel should consider all available assessments in determining whether the accused is a dangerous offender. The Corrections history will often include: past psychological assessments; whether the offender has been offered, completed, failed or refused treatment; and the offender s parole history including any violations or denial of parole. Request for Review by Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel As soon as there is an indication of a guilty plea, or after a finding of guilt, Crown Counsel should request Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel to review the matter and determine

Dangerous Offender and Long Term Offender Applications Page 6 of 8 DAN 1 whether to seek an assessment remand under section 752.1 or 753.01. In seeking the review by Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel, Crown Counsel should provide a memorandum which: summarizes the history and circumstances of the convictions before the Court on which the application is based outlines all admissible relevant past conduct sets out the recommendation of Crown Counsel as to why the offender may be a dangerous or long term offender provides the opinion of Crown Counsel on the appropriate sentence includes copies of any Victim Impact Statement (VIS), criminal record, facts of any outstanding charges, and a copy of the Information or Indictment Where possible, Crown Counsel should prepare this information before plea or a finding of guilt. Decision to Make Application for an Order Remanding the Offender for Assessment Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel will review the information provided by Crown Counsel and decide whether to make the application for an assessment remand under section 752.1 or 753.01. If a decision is made not to make the application, reasons should be recorded in the file, the file should be archived, and a copy of the reasons sent to the Manager of the High Risk Offenders Identification Program. As required by section 752.01, the Court must be advised as to whether Crown Counsel intends to make an application for an assessment remand where the offender has been convicted of a primary designated offence for which it would be appropriate to impose a sentence of imprisonment of two years or more and the offender was convicted previously at least twice of a primary designated offence and was sentenced to at least two years of imprisonment for each of those convictions. Approval to proceed with an application for an assessment remand under section 752.1 or 753.01 must be obtained from Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel. Where the consent has been obtained in advance, Crown Counsel may indicate an intention to make an application for an assessment remand on the date of conviction. On the Crown s application for an assessment remand, evidence may need to be called, including previous psychiatric assessments and any criminal history, to satisfy the Court that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the offender might be found to be a dangerous offender or a long term offender. The Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission (FPSC) provides a service to the Courts in obtaining an assessment by a psychiatrist or psychologist from a rotational list of psychiatrists and psychologists trained by FPSC to conduct assessments. The clerk of the Court sends the assessment remand to FPSC which commences the assessment process.

Dangerous Offender and Long Term Offender Applications Page 7 of 8 DAN 1 The Manager of the High Risk Offenders Identification Program will send the offender s entire Corrections file to FPSC, obtained from Correctional Service Canada and provincial Corrections. Crown Counsel are responsible for supplying a binder containing the circumstances of the index offence, the offender s criminal history and any other information they wish the assigned expert to review in preparing their assessment, to the Dangerous Offender Hearing Co-coordinator at the Forensic Psychiatric Hospital, 604 524-7716. Crown Counsel should advise defence counsel of any material they have forwarded. Receipt of Assessment Report The Assistant Deputy Attorney General provides the consent of the Attorney General to commence a dangerous or long-term offender application, as the lawful deputy of the Attorney General pursuant to section 3(2) of the Crown Counsel Act. Defence counsel must be given seven days notice of the application for a finding of dangerous offender. Upon receipt of the assessment report, Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel should assess the evidence as to whether there is a reasonable likelihood that the court will be satisfied that the offender meets the definition of dangerous offender or long term offender, and consider whether to seek the consent of the Assistant Deputy Attorney General to the appropriate application. If Crown Counsel has strong concerns about the Court ordered assessment report they may make application under section 752.1 for a further assessment remand or request an opinion from a psychiatrist retained by the Criminal Justice Branch with the approval of Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel. Application for Consent of the Assistant Deputy Attorney General Where Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel decide to seek the consent of the Assistant Deputy Attorney General, each application for the consent should be in a tabbed binder and should include the following: an index the memorandum of Crown Counsel requesting a review by Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel a memorandum containing the opinion of Regional or Deputy Regional Crown Counsel, including an indication of the specific sentence being sought and the reasons for it the Court-ordered assessment any other relevant assessments or reports not included in the Court-ordered assessment a draft Consent of the Attorney General (Note: the substantive provisions of the Criminal Code that were in force on the date of each predicate offence must be cited in the notice, Consent and application.)

Dangerous Offender and Long Term Offender Applications Page 8 of 8 DAN 1 The application should be sent directly to the Assistant Deputy Attorney General. The signed Consent, if provided, will be returned by the Assistant Deputy Attorney General to Regional Crown Counsel. The Consent of the Attorney General, as provided by the Assistant Deputy Attorney General, should be filed with the Court at the commencement of the Crown s application. Determinate Sentence If the Court orders a determinate sentence or a determinate sentence to be followed by a period of long term community supervision, Crown Counsel, having regard to the principles expressed in R. v. Zinck, (2003), 171 CCC 3d 1 (SCC), should consider asking the Court to make an order under section 743.6 that the portion of the sentence that must be served before the offender may be released on full parole is one half of the sentence or ten years, whichever is less.