Quality Strategy for the Austrian Healthcare System. Version 1.0, May 2010



Similar documents
onsa VISIONS AND ACTION PLAN FOR THE PHD DEGREE PROGRAMME AT THE AARHUS FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES AARHUS UNIVERSITY

POSITION DESCRIPTION

LEARNING AND COMPETENCE Finnish National Board of Education (FNBE)

OUR MISSION. The mission of the USC Rossier School of Education is to improve learning in urban education locally, nationally and globally.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EDUCATION AND CULTURE


MINISTRY OF HIGHER EDUCATION, OMAN COLLEGES OF APPLIED SCIENCES STRATEGIC PLAN-PHASE

Oneida County Health Dept Performance Management. Learning Objectives. Public Health Performance Management

Aarhus University's policy for quality assurance in education

Standard Summary Project Fiche IPA centralised programmes

Implementation of a Quality Management System for Aeronautical Information Services -1-

The Helsinki Communiqué

Public Health Research - Perspective of a Statutory Health Insurance Company in Germany

OECD Informal Meeting of Ministers of Education / 17th OECD/Japan Seminar

Inventory of good practices

The Frankfurt School of Finance & Management The Institute for International Health Management The MBA in International Healthcare Management

Job Profile. Component Manager, Voice and Accountability Democratic Governance Facility (DGF) (Senior Adviser (N1)) Uganda

INSPIRE, The Dutch way Observations on implementing INSPIRE in the Netherlands

The RFID Revolution: Your voice on the Challenges, Opportunities and Threats. Online Public Consultation Preliminary Overview of the Results

Benefits of conducting a Project Management Maturity Assessment with PM Academy:

WFEO Model Code of Practice for Sustainable Development and Environmental Stewardship

A NEW AUSTRIAN GUIDELINE FOR TUNNEL SAFETY DOCUMENTATIONS

Decision on the Application of the Foundation for International Business Administration Accreditation (FIBAA) for Re-Accreditation Dated 12 May 2006

Council of the European Union Brussels, 24 November 2014 (OR. en)

Internationale Standards des HTA? Jos Kleijnen Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd

This iterative list of questions is designed to form an initial diagnostic questionnaire to assess a bank s current

Job Profile. Component Manager, Deepening Democracy Democratic Governance Facility (Senior Adviser (N1)) Uganda

PASADENA CITY COLLEGE

NMBA Registered nurse standards for practice survey

The Society of Actuaries in Ireland

AGF Position Paper: Future of care

How To Improve Mathematics Teaching

Institutional Certified Evaluation and Accreditation of Universities General Principles:

Native Vegetation Council. Strategic Plan

National Aged Care Alliance

Background and purpose of the meeting International Workshop on Methods for Health Economic Evaluations of Vaccines Berlin, May

PROJECT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

PRINCIPLES AND GOOD PRACTICES

Saint Francis Care Patient Care Services Advancement to Clinical Excellence Program (ACE Program) INTRODUCTION

How To Manage A Vet

United Kingdom Competition Network (UKCN) Statement of Intent

RESEARCH AND POLICY SUPPORT BUSINESS PLAN

IFMSA Policy Statement Global Policy on Medical Education

Kentucky Teaching Conditions Standards

Evolving the CPA Profession s Peer Review Program for the Future

AACN SCOPE AND STANDARDS

Alignment of ANCC Forces of Magnitude and TIGER Collaboratives

CAHPS Hospice Survey. What the Heck Does That Mean? What we will discuss today. Direction of CMS Policy THE ROAD TO PUBLIC REPORTING IN HOSPICE

Principles for application of international reference pricing systems

Recommendations on the development of medical education in Germany based on a review of model medical degree programmes

Consultation Paper. ESMA Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures. 13 February 2014 ESMA/2014/175

Certificate of EHR Compliance

Knowledge develops nursing care to the benefit of patients, citizens, professionals and community

BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH COMPETENCIES

Evaluation of the nation wide Integration Courses

Health Data Governance: Privacy, Monitoring and Research - Policy Brief

DRAFT. Corporate Governance Principles for Caribbean Countries

reflected and translated into policy orientations and priorities as well strategy documents and a management plan.

Guide on Developing a HRM Plan

Curriculum for Doctoral Studies in. Nursing

GREEN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS. Recommended clauses and actions for sustainable property management. 01

The healthcare in Poland

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of XXX

Dear Colleagues, Best Regards, Pamela L. Quinones, RDH, BS

HTA NETWORK MULTIANNUAL WORK PROGRAMME

PLAN OF ACTION PARTNERSHIP FOR SUSTAINABLE TEXTILES

EFPIA HCP/HCO DISCLOSURE CODE

Healthcare Coalition on Data Protection

PRINCIPLES FOR EVALUATION OF DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE

Performance Management Readiness Survey

Concerning: Norwegian Nurses Organisation s input to the Green Paper on Modernising the Professional Qualifications Directive

Cedefop invites applications for the drawing up of a reserve list for the position of: Temporary post A*6 1 F/M

POSITION DESCRIPTION, PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETS

Strong support. Remaining concerns

Fundamental Principles of Performance Auditing

Tsukuba Communiqué. G7 Science and Technology Ministers Meeting in Tsukuba, Ibaraki May 2016

MAPPING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF POLICY FOR INCLUSIVE EDUCATION

Judicial Discretion in Drinking-Driving Cases: An Empirical Study of Influences and Consequences

Guidelines on Data Protection. Draft. Version 3.1. Published by

Consultation Paper on Minimum Benefit Regulations in the Irish Private Health Insurance Market

Backgrounder Heart Index

Guidelines of the Swiss University Conference for Academic Accreditation in Switzerland

Mobility for Better Learning

From Capability To Profitability Talent management a priority for the C-Suite. London, 3 rd November 2015

OPTIMIZING SCIENTIFIC VALUE: SMART AND SYSTEMATIC APPROACHES TO MEDICAL PUBLICATIONS

2008 by Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI) Godesberger Allee , Bonn

Self assessment tool. The Leadership Framework. Leadership Academy

Core Competencies for Public Health Professionals: Tier 2

Eurojust s Multi-annual. Strategic Plan Organisational developments. Centre of expertise. Operational work. Partners

DRGs and cost accounting across Europe: Which is driving which?

STRATEGIC PLAN SUPPORTING STUDENT SUCCESS

IT Service Provider and Consumer Support Engineer Position Description

The Vienna PhD School of Informatics Design, Implementation and Experiences

LEARNING AND COMPETENCE Strategy of the Finnish National Board of Education (FNBE)

PERFORMANCE-BASED BUDGETING METHODOLOGY AND TOOLS

THE APPLICATION OF A VALUE ASSURANCE SYSTEM TO OIL & GAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS (Guido Mattu, Franca Marini)

GENERAL PRINCIPLES TO BE RESPECTED IF THE WORDING OF AN AUTHORISED HEALTH CLAIM IS ADAPTED.

ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT MODEL (APM) FRAMEWORK

UNSOLICITED PROPOSALS

Good governance outcomes for CCGs: A survey tool to support development and improvement of governance

Transcription:

Quality Strategy for the Austrian Healthcare System Version 1.0, May 2010

Quality Strategy for the Austrian Healthcare System Version 1.0, May 2010 Wien, in May 2010 Commissioned by the Austrian Federal Health Commission (BGK)

Introduction The Austrian Federal Health Commission assigned the Quality Sub-Working Group [UAG Qualitative] the task to develop an all-austrian quality strategy incorporating the existing regulations in the GQG [Federal Law on Quality in the Healthcare System] and the agreement according to Article 15a B-VG [Federal Constitutional Act]. The strategy was drafted by the Sub-Working Group in cooperation with other decision-makers and quality experts, and was agreed by the Federal Health Commission [BGK] on 25 June 2010. The works were accompanied and continuously updated by GÖG/BIQG. The quality strategy is the basis for a coordinated and focused implementation of further quality activities. It is checked in regular intervals for its validity, applicability and implementation, and is adjusted accordingly. The strategy determines the continuous improvement process of the Austrian healthcare system. With the formulation and agreement of mutually supported objectives and responsibilities as the basis for action of the various stakeholders in the healthcare system, Austria pursues a path that has already been successfully taken by other states (such as Germany, Great Britain, the Netherlands, Norway or Sweden). The strategy below is aimed equally at decision-makers, financers and health providers, and shall serve to guide their actions accordingly. The quality strategy is publicly available and serves as an orientation guide to the interested public. Definition of terms contained in the quality strategy Healthcare system: The Healthcare system pursuant to this quality strategy means patient care for which the main part of the used resources is spent, as well as health promotion and prevention that are gaining importance. The quality strategy expressly refers to all of these areas. Quality: Quality means the level of performance of patient-oriented, transparent, effective and efficient services in all healthcare sectors. Quality is the degree of consistency between the treatment results and the previously mapped objectives of good treatment. Quality Strategy for the Austrian Healthcare System 1

Quality management: Quality management means coordinated activities for the management and control of an organization, aimed at improving the quality of the manufactured products or the offered services. Quality management serves to steer the individual influencing factors in their interplay towards the defined quality objectives, to evaluate and measure the results. Vision The Austrian quality strategy contributes significantly to the continuous further development, improvement and nationwide assurance of quality in all healthcare sectors. It supports the appropriate and most notably reliable healthcare provision to the population. Quality becomes the guiding and controlling criterion for the Austrian healthcare system. Values The quality strategy incorporates the following values: In terms of patient orientation, the people involved shall be in the focus of the decisions and actions, and shall be enabled to take an active part. Particular emphasis is placed on the safety of patients, of the staff and of the system. The services shall be performed effectively in terms of the best possible result and efficiently in terms of an economic use of resources. The equal treatment of female and male citizens in the access and use of healthcare services is encouraged by all decision-makers and healthcare providers. A participative and cooperative course of action for the development and implementation of the quality strategy ensures its sustained effect. Since decisions are made on the basis of rational, evidence-based considerations, the public healthcare system can develop into a learning system. In this system, incentives shall have priority over sanctions, and an interdisciplinary and cross-sector approach shall be encouraged. The greatest possible transparency facilitates continuous further development and assurance of the quality in the Austrian healthcare system. 2 GÖG/BIQG 2010, Quality Strategy

Preliminary remark on the objectives 1. The objectives are agreed in a binding form. The ways to reach these objectives may vary. 2. The objectives for a consistent quality strategy in the healthcare system, which have been developed jointly by the government, the federal states and the national insurance with the involvement of experts and professionals from all levels of the healthcare system, will be accepted as a commitment for all parties involved. However, it is agreed that the objectives may change as a result of foreseeable but also unforeseeable influences and changes in the course of the indicated periods. 3. Specifications of time and quantities are of an intending and anticipating nature but are considered realistic from today s perspective. They do not represent enforceable parameters but make it easier for all parties involved to determine in the future whether and to what extent the objectives set for themselves were achieved. 4. Certain structures and existing conditions of the healthcare system are currently not beneficial to the implementation of the objectives. However, all parties involved assume that the objectives should be pursued also with the current characteristics of the healthcare system. 5. A stronger focus on quality may lead to the development of rationalization opportunities and consequently to an increased efficiency in the healthcare system, in particular with regard to the interfaces. However, part of the indicated objectives will initially result in additional costs, at the level of the service providers as well as at the level of the decision-makers. The extent to which objectives are met therefore also depends on the available financial resources. 6. The pursuit of the objectives shall be jointly reviewed. After five years, the results will be discussed on the basis of an evaluation at a national conference of all parties involved. In the mean time, reflection will take place, and its results may be used as input and orientation guide, for example for the next agreement acc. to Article 15a B-VG. The information required for the evaluation will be provided by a national quality report that provides a progressive illustration of all sections (health promotion, patient care and prevention) and all sectors (ambulant and inpatient care and rehabilitation, and in any case the interfaces to the care sector). The report follows the objectives below. Quality Strategy for the Austrian Healthcare System 3

Objectives 1. Continuous improvement of the process and results quality is advanced. a) An interdisciplinary approach across all sectors is used in terms of integrated care. b) Special emphasis is placed on the quality of the indications for service provision and the necessity of the services. c) HTA and EBM are used as decision support. d) Process orientation must be visible and be lived in the healthcare facilities, corresponding standards must be set and evaluated on a regular basis. e) Evidence-based, interdisciplinary treatment standards across all sectors are developed, implemented and their implementation is evaluated. These methodically correct standards are used for quality development, and their mandatory compliance is ensured as a rule. The healthcare system pays more attention to patient benefit and its optimisation. f) Comparable surveys on the patients satisfaction with the care in all healthcare sectors are conducted in regular intervals. g) Comparable health surveys are conducted in regular intervals. h) Instruments for results quality measurement are jointly developed and implemented in all healthcare sectors. i) Indicators for patient safety are developed that ensure compliance with the EU requirements. 2. Quality assurance and quality management are designed across all sectors. a) Raising awareness with decision makers, service providers and patients is increased. b) Minimum requirements / General conditions of quality management systems in all healthcare facilities are established, continuously further developed and evaluated. 3. Transparency of the healthcare system is ensured. a) Availability of data records for quality assessment is systematically improved, emphasis is to be placed on comparable, valid documentation. These are used to increasingly generate nationwide registers. b) Indicators in particular for processes and results are continuously recorded, with due regard to data protection, giving priority to the use of routine documentation, consequently respecting the principle of work efficiency. Feedback and benchmarking systems are introduced. If data of different facilities are compared, the risk will be adjusted according to scientific criteria. The principle of continuous learning shall apply. 4 GÖG/BIQG 2010, Quality Strategy

c) Transparency of offer, performance and result of the healthcare services is introduced, continuous evaluation becomes a principle. d) Quality reports from all healthcare sectors are established and published on a regular basis. The responsibilities and deadlines for drafting the reports and/or the provision of necessary information with regard to the structure, quality and quantity to the author(s) of the reports are agreed in a binding form. e) A generally accessible internet health portal will be set up, which is independent from individual interests. 4. A risk and safety culture is established. a) Patient safety as well as the safety of the healthcare staff is ensured. b) A comprehensive catalogue of measures for the reporting and treatment of adverse events, medical/clinical errors and near errors is established at different levels. A system-oriented approach must be adopted for this purpose, and the analysis must focus on improving the organization process. c) In the context of patient safety, the principle of no-fault reparation should be aspired. 5. Incentives for continuous quality improvement are provided. 6. Quality-assured basic training, further and advanced training in theory and practice, independent from individual interests, are ensured for members of the healthcare professions for permanent preservation of skills and increased competence. a) Professionalization of healthcare providers in the areas of quality management and quality assurance is promoted in all facilities and all sectors of the healthcare system. b) The subject of quality management is included in the basic training, further and advanced training of the healthcare providers to a defined extent (definition of minimum contents, modular structure). c) Benefits granted for example by medical technology companies and pharmaceutical companies etc. to healthcare providers and decision-makers must be disclosed. 7. Mutual support, increased cooperation and coordination of the implementation of the quality objectives at the level of the government, the federal states and the national insurance are ensured. a) The BIQG acts as central, scientifically independent coordination unit. 8. After the BGK has decided on the strategy, operational objectives will be developed until the end of 2010, which shall subsequently be approved by the BGK. Quality Strategy for the Austrian Healthcare System 5