Moody s Short-Term Insurance Financial Strength Ratings



Similar documents
How To Sell The Lily Funding Pty.Linconsistency Mortgage Backed Notes

Update: Rating Triggers in the U.S. Life Insurance Industry In 2004

Rating Action: Moody's reviews for downgrade the ratings of MBIA Inc. and of its lead insurance subsidiaries Global Credit Research - 21 Mar 2013

How Analytically-Driven Insurers Improve Ratings & Financial Projections

Rating Action: Moody's takes actions on 4 Norwegian regional banks

Impact of Hurricane Sandy on. and Reinsurance Industry

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to Los Angeles County Capital Asset Leasing Corporation CA's equipment lease revenue bonds

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Hypo Alpe Adria's guaranteed debt ratings to non-investment grade, ratings remain on review for downgrade

New Issue: MOODY'S: CITY OF SAN DIEGO'S SUBORDINATED WATER REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS RATED Aa3

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Scottish Widows' and Clerical Medical's subordinated debt ratings to Baa1(hyb); outlook stable

Policy for Withdrawal of Credit Ratings

Announcement: Moody's assigns Aaa/MR1 bond fund and market risk ratings to IMET 1-3 Year Fund Global Credit Research - 13 Jan 2012

Canadian Life Insurance Industry

Global Credit Research Credit Opinion 10 APR Credit Opinion: Meritz Fire & Marine Insurance Co Ltd. Meritz Fire & Marine Insurance Co Ltd

A. M. Best Company & The Rating Process

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades hybrid securities ratings in Denmark. Global Credit Research - 26 Feb 2010

Rating Action: Moody's places MBIA Insurance Corporation's B3 IFS rating on review for upgrade Global Credit Research - 14 Feb 2014

Moody's Ultimate Recovery Database

Rating Action: Moody's assigns first time ratings to Texas Capital Bancshares (issuer at Baa3)

Rating Action: Moody's changes Nexteer's Ba1 ratings outlook to positive Global Credit Research - 24 Nov 2015

Student Housing Revenue Bonds MJH Education Assistance Illinois IV LLC (Fullerton Village Project)

ESG and Fixed Income Investing

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aaa to mortgage covered bonds of Raiffeisen- Landesbank Steiermark

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aaa.br rating to Duke's BRL479 million debentures; outlook stable

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades CDC, OSEO and AFD to Aa1, negative; outlook changed to negative on Credit Mutuel group entities

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades LEAF Receivables Funding equipment backed ABS from 2011 and 2012

AFFIRMS A1 RATING ON $9 MILLION GENERAL OBLIGATION UNLIMITED TAX DEBT OUTSTANDING

Rating Action: Moody's reviews Royal Bank of Scotland's ratings for downgrade

Lessons Learned From Stress Testing Loan and Lease Portfolios TONY HUGHES, MANAGING DIRECTOR, HEAD OF SPECIALIZED MODELING

Rating Action: Moody's changes outlook to negative from stable on Argentine Banks' deposit ratings; affirms deposit ratings

How To Understand And Understand The Financial Sector In Turkish Finance Companies

Rating Update: Moody's upgrades Liberty University's (VA) bonds to Aa3; outlook stable

Policy for Record Retention for Rating Services

Kyobo Life Insurance Co., Ltd

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Puerto Rico GO and related bonds to Ba2, notched bonds to Ba3 and COFINA bonds to Baa1, Baa2; outlook negative

Credit Opinion: Guardian Life Insurance Company of America

The Future of insurance sales to buy rather than to sell. Will Halley

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Belfius Bank's senior unsecured rating at Baa1/P- 2; outlook stable

Credit Opinion: Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company

Credit Opinion: Akzo Nobel N.V.

Moody's: Increasing demand prompts rapid growth of cyber insurance market

General Obligation Limited Tax

Rating Action: Moody's rates Lincoln Finance Limited's Senior Secured Notes at B1 with a stable outlook

Credit Opinion: China Life Insurance Co Ltd

Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis on European RMBS

Rating Action: Moody's affirms ISAGEN's Baa3 Issuer rating and changed the outlook stable Global Credit Research - 15 May 2015

Investors Public Access to Information in the US Life Insurance Industry

Evaluation on Hybrid Capital of Life Insurance Companies

Credit Opinion: BH Securities, a.s.

Moody s Liquidity Model for U.S. Life Insurance Companies Model Revisions and Results: Year-end 2002 Data

Corporate Finance. Dogan Yayin Holding A.S. Credit Analysis. Moody s Global. Company Overview. January Table of Contents: Analyst Contacts:

Guarantees and Target Volatility Funds

Global Credit Research Credit Opinion 16 JUN Credit Opinion: Pacific Mutual Holding Company. Pacific Mutual Holding Company

Credit Opinion: AXA. Global Credit Research - 09 Jul Ratings. Contacts. Key Indicators. Opinion SUMMARY RATING RATIONALE.

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 Insurance Financial Strength Rating to Tryg Forsikring; positive outlook

MARE BALTIC PCC LIMITED

Moody's Views on Current Conditions in the US Life Insurance Industry

New Issue: MOODY'S ASSIGNS Aa3 RATING TO SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION'S WATER REVENUE BONDS

Rating Action: Moody's assigns first-time Ba1 CFR to Turkish Airlines; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 06 Mar 2015

Third Quarter 2014 Earnings Call

Introduction to Convertible Debentures

Credit Opinion: SkandiaBanken AB

Credit Opinion: Guardian Life Insurance Company of America

New York Life Insurance Co. 'AA+/A-1+' Rating Affirmed On Criteria Review; Outlook Stable

Credit Card Pool Performance Forecast

Psst! Wanna Buy a Used Life Insurance Policy?

economic & COnsumer credit Analytics Merchandise Line Estimates, Forecasts and ZIP Code Potential Methodology

Credit Opinion: ING Verzekeringen N.V.

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to the City of Arlington, TX's Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A&B; outlook is stable

Decomposing Mortgage Portfolio Risk: Default, Prepayment, and Severity YUFENG DING

Credit Opinion: AG Insurance

Residential Mortgage Portfolio Risk Analytics ROGER M. STEIN, ASHISH DAS

Rating Action: Moody's assigns B3 CFR to Outokumpu Oyj.; positive outlook Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2016

Australian Perspective on Developments in US Subprime Mortgage Market

D Duke Energy Carolinas coal Spill - A1 Rating

Cash Flow Settling into Low Level of Growth Amid Negative Outlook

Global Credit Research Credit Opinion 25 MAY Credit Opinion: SpareBank 1 SR-Bank. Sparebanken Rogaland. Stavanger, Norway.

Moody s Rates Rabobank Nederland s Senior Contingent Notes issued in 2010 at Baa2(hyb)

AnaCredit Gives Banks an Opportunity to Improve Data Management, but Challenges Remain

Guardian Life Insurance, Core Operating Subsidiaries 'AA+' Ratings Affirmed On Criteria Review, Outlook Negative

Ændring i rating outlook

Rating Action: Moody's changes outlook on Erste Group Bank's Baa2 senior ratings to positive

Rating Action: Moody's concludes review on four Belgian banks' ratings

Rating Research Services

Credit Opinion: Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank

New Issue: Moody's assigns A1 to Villanova University, PA's $139M Ser. 2015; outlook stable

Self-Storage Industry Is Poised for More Growth

OVERVIEW OF A DEBT FINANCING

JULY 2015 METHODOLOGY. Canadian Surveillance Methodology for CDOs of Large Corporate Credit

Rating Update: Moody's revises Rush University Medical Center Obligated Group's (IL) outlook to positive; A2 rating affirmed

Evaluating Insurers Enterprise Risk Management Practice

Credit Opinion: Letshego Holdings Limited

CREDIT FOCUS. Summary

Credit Opinion: Old Mutual Plc

Rising Default Rates Drive Growth in Debtor-in- Possession Lending. Larger Size and Broader Distribution Causing Greater Interest in Ratings for DIP s

Guide to the Dow Jones Corporate Bond Index

Credit Opinion: Ekspo Faktoring A.S.


Credit Opinion: SpareBank 1 Gruppen AS

Transcription:

November 1999 Special Comment Summary Contact New York Phone Robert Riegel 1.212.553.1653 Moody s Short-Term Insurance Financial Strength Ratings Moody s is introducing short-term insurance financial strength ratings to provide institutional investors and financial intermediaries with opinions about an insurance company s ability to meet its senior short-term policy claims. These ratings provide investors and contract holders with a simple system to measure an insurer s ability to repay punctually its senior short-term policy claims. The ratings apply to senior policyholder obligations that mature or are payable in one year or less. The tremendous growth of short-term funding agreements issued by life insurers and the recent liquidity problems at General American Life Insurance Company highlight the growing need for opinions on the short-term creditworthiness of insurers. These funding agreements are sold as an alternative to commercial paper to money market funds as well as to bank short-term investment funds and securities lending programs. SEC rule 2a-7 mandates that money market funds have their short-term investments rated, further driving demand for a way to gauge the relative risk of these investments. Moody s will use the same Prime ratings symbols for these ratings as it uses for other shortterm instruments and obligations. To date, Moody s has assigned short-term insurance financial strength ratings to 16 insurers, all of which are rated. Combined they have about $20 billion of putable funding agreements outstanding. Moody s Short-Term Insurance Financial Strength Ratings Special Comment continued on page 3

Moody's Insurance Research Internet Address: www.moodys.com/insurance Author Robert Riegel Sr. Production Associate Ruth Manso-Rivera Copyright 1999 by Moody s Investors Service, Inc., 99 Church Street, New York, New York 10007. All rights reserved. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS COPYRIGHTED IN THE NAME OF MOODY S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ( MOODY S ), AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information is provided as is without warranty of any kind and MOODY S, in particular, makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any such information. Under no circumstances shall MOODY S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The credit ratings, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Each rating or other opinion must be weighed solely as one factor in any investment decision made by or on behalf of any user of the information contained herein, and each such user must accordingly make its own study and evaluation of each security and of each issuer and guarantor of, and each provider of credit support for, each security that it may consider purchasing, holding or selling. Pursuant to Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, MOODY S hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MOODY S have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MOODY S for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to $1,500,000. PRINTED IN U.S.A. 2 Moody s Special Comment

SO FAR, 16 SHORT-TERM INSURANCE FINANCIAL STRENGTH RATINGS ASSIGNED To date, Moody s has assigned 16 shortterm insurance financial strength ratings. (See Table 1) Moody s uses the same symbols for short-term insurance financial strength ratings as for Moody s short-term debt ratings. Moody s employs three designations, all judged to be investmentgrade, to indicate the relative repayment ability of the rated companies. (See Table 2) INSURANCE FINANCIAL STRENGTH RATINGS VS. DEBT RATINGS PRIORITY OF CLAIMS IS CRITICAL Moody s insurance financial strength ratings apply to the insurer s senior policyholder claims and obligations, unlike debt ratings on securities issued by insurance companies or, more likely, their parent or affiliate. This is an important distinction for a U.S. insurance company Table 1 Assigned Short-Term Insurance Financial Strength Rating Insurance Company Allstate Life Insurance Company Anchor National Life Insurance Company AUSA Life Insurance Company Combined Insurance Company of America First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance Company First SunAmerica Life Insurance Company GE Life and Annuity Assurance Company Jackson National Life Insurance Company Mitsui Marine & Fire Insurance Company Monumental Life Insurance Company Peoples Benefit Life Insurance Company Safeco Life Insurance Company SunAmerica Life Insurance Company Transamerica Life Insurance & Annuity Company Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company Travelers Insurance Company Rating Table 2 Short-Term Insurance Financial Strength Ratings Rating Prime-2 Prime-3 Not-Prime Repayment Ability Superior Strong Acceptable Not-Prime because there is a clear priority of claims structure favoring policyholders over other senior unsecured creditors in the event of an insurer insolvency or regulatory action. Moody s research indicates that in an insolvency, policyholder obligations typically suffer a much lower level of loss than even the most senior debt obligation. 1 However, in assigning this insurance financial strength rating, Moody s does not imply that any specific insurance company obligation is either legally enforceable or a valid senior obligation of a rated insurer. Although insurance holding companies or financing conduits are typically the issuers of debt securities, some insurance companies issue debt directly (e.g., surplus notes issued by several mutual insurers). Therefore, an insurance company can have both an insurance financial strength rating and debt ratings on securities. An insurer can also have two short-term ratings a short-term insurance financial strength rating covering its senior short-term policyholder obligations and a short-term debt rating covering its commercial paper obligations or other senior short-term financial obligations. In contrast to long-term ratings, Moody s short-term ratings primarily address the likelihood of timely payment. Nevertheless, the issue of priority of claims is also important for short-term investors, as the expected loss for commercial paper of an insurer is greater than the expected loss on its senior short-term policy obligations. Priority of claims is especially important for those investing in funding agreements, as the rules governing these contracts are not uniform across the various states. Some states accord the same level of security for funding agreements as they do policyholder obligations, while others regard funding agreements as subordinate to policyholder liabilities. SHORT-TERM VS. LONG-TERM INSURANCE FINANCIAL STRENGTH RATINGS Whereas Moody s long-term insurance financial strength ratings are opinions of the insurance company s ability to repay punctually all senior policyholder claims and obligations, the short-term insurance financial strength rating specifically addresses the insurer s ability to pay short-term policy obligations those that mature or are payable within one year or less. In contrast to long-term ratings, Moody s shortterm ratings primarily address the likelihood of timely payment. 1 See Moody s Special Comment "Life after Death Moody s Examines Life Insurance Insolvency," May 1999. Moody s Special Comment 3

LIQUIDITY ANALYSIS IS CRITICAL FOR DETERMINING SHORT-TERM ABILITY TO PAY CLAIMS Liquidity analysis, important in the credit analysis of our long-term ratings, is even more important in assigning short-term ratings. For example, the case study of General American Life (on which Moody s never maintained a short-term rating) demonstrated that an insurer s liquidity must be analyzed separately from its solvency to determine its ability to fund short-term liabilities. Over the past decade, experience (e.g., General American Life Insurance Company, Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company, Executive Life Insurance Company) has demonstrated that life insurance company failures are usually caused by liquidity problems. In such cases, state insurance regulators intervene with regulatory actions designed to benefit policyholders. In assigning short-term insurance financial strength ratings, our analysis focuses on liquidity and asset/liability management, in addition to the industry and company fundamental analysis that is incorporated into the evaluation of an insurer s long-term creditworthiness. The key analytic areas evaluated in determining the level of short-term risk are: Risk Analysis Concentration in short-dated liabilities Put option commitments Contractholder/distributor profile Low asset quality Less-liquid assets Highly interest rate sensitive assets Reinsurance % of liabilities due in a year or less % of liabilities containing put options granted to contractholders. Term of put option is important the shorter the put, the less time the issuer has to maneuver. Concentration of liabilities that have put options or near- term maturities with specific investors and /or distributors. Also assesses likely behavior of investor/distributor in a stress situation. % of low credit quality securities with greater potential for credit and market losses % of less-liquid assets with greater potential for market losses upon disposition % of assets that are sensitive to interest rate changes with greater potential for market losses and prepayment/extension % of liabilities reinsured to less-creditworthy insurers with higher potential for recoverability losses 4 Moody s Special Comment

Appendix: Definition of Short-Term Insurance Financial Strength Ratings Short-Term Insurance Financial Strength Ratings are Moody s opinion of the ability of the insurance company to repay punctually its short-term senior policyholder claims and obligations. These ratings apply to senior policyholder obligations that mature or are payable within one year or less. Specific obligations are considered unrated unless they are individually rated because a particular insurance obligation s standing would depend on its relative standing under the laws governing both the obligation and the insurance company. It is important to note that Moody s makes no representation that rated insurance company obligations are exempt from registration under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 or are issued in conformity with any other applicable law or regulation. Nor does Moody s represent that any specific insurance company obligation is legally enforceable as a valid senior obligation of a rated insurer. Moody s rating symbols for Short-Term Insurance Financial Strength Ratings are identical to those used for Short-Term Debt Ratings. Moody s employs the following three designations, all judged to be investment grade, to indicate the relative repayment ability of rated insurers: Insurers rated (or supporting institutions) have a superior ability for repayment of senior short-term policyholder claims and obligations. repayment ability will often be evidenced by many of the following characteristics: Leading market positions with highly valuable and defensible business franchises, strong financial fundamentals, and a very stable operating environment Conservative capitalization structure with moderate reliance on debt and ample asset protection High internal cash generation and broad margins in earnings coverage of fixed financial charges Assured sources of alternate liquidity and well-established access to a range of financial markets Insurers rated Prime-2 (or supporting institutions) have a strong ability for repayment of senior shortterm policyholder claims and obligations. This will normally be evidenced by many of the characteristics cited above but to a lesser degree. Market positions are somewhat weaker, and earnings trends and coverage ratios, while sound, may be more subject to variation. Capitalization characteristics, while still appropriate, may be more affected by external conditions. Ample alternate liquidity is maintained. Insurers rated Prime-3 (or supporting institutions) have an acceptable ability for repayment of senior short-term policyholder claims and obligations. The effect of industry characteristics and market compositions may be more pronounced. Variability in earnings and profitability and weaker capitalization with greater reliance on debt may provide less protection. Adequate alternate liquidity is maintained. Insurers rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories. Moody s Special Comment 5

Special Comment Moody s Short-Term Insurance Financial Strength Ratings To order reprints of this report (100 copies minimum), please call 800.811.6980 toll free in the USA. Outside the US, please call 1.212.553.1658. Report Number: 50431