CASE NO. 60CV-13-3009



Similar documents
PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Plaintiffs, Defendants

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Plaintiff, TARIN SAROKA, individually, and as the Personal Representative of the

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN BRYN DUFFY, MD and IN THE DISTRICT COURT SUSANNE MATTSSON DUFFY. Defendant. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

Case: 1:15-cv CAB Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/08/15 1 of 10. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Filing # Electronically Filed 12/29/ :48:06 PM

CAUSE NO. DC

CAUSE NO. JULIE TORBERT, as next friend of IN THE DISTRICT COURT PHILIP ORMSTON V. DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT

COMPLAINT. COMES NOW the Plaintiffs, JERRY BYNUM, as Personal Representative of the Estate

w' Floor - against - SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK Index No.: Date Filed: TAMARA VANDERHYDEN, Plaintiff,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, SALT LAKE COUNTY STATE OF UTAH. Case No. : Judge:

PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. MYRIAM DEL SOCORRO LOPEZ, by and through his undersigned counsel, and files this First

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF MISSOURI

IN THE STATE COURT OF COBB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Case 4:12-cv CDL Document 1 Filed 03/27/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

Case 3:10-cv DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9

1416-CV Plaintiff is a resident of Jackson County, Missouri and is the biological mother of

Plaintiffs, Defendants.

DATED: April 29, 2002 BARRY NOVACK

JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE DIVISION. MELISSA ROWE, Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of E.R

Case 3:14-cv P Document 1 Filed 06/30/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Attorneys at Law. Telephone: (312) Facsimile: (312) N LaSalle Street Suite 1524 Chicago, IL

PREVIEW. 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit.

Case 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/04/15 Page 1 of 46 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII. Case No.: CV-06-00~CK-LEK

vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff JAMES SCHAIRER, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby sues

FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/12/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/12/2013

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA. v. Civil Action No.:CL Plaintiff Demands Trial by Jury COMPLAINT

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY as Successor in Interest to the ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, C O M P L A I N T

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA

Nurse Anesthetist Application for Professional Liability Insurance Additional Insured Basis

Wrongful Death and Survival Actions In Maryland & the District of Columbia

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO. : v. : COMPLAINT FOR WRONGFUL : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

CAUSE NO. JUSTIN GROGG IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, vs. DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

2:11-cv ASB Date Filed 04/13/11 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 11

GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY PH: F: Attorneys for Plaintiff Henry Kent

*Reflex withdrawal from a painful stimulus is NOT considered a purposeful response.

CONUMONWEALTHOFKENTUCKY FA VETTE CIRCUIT COURT CASE NO. ;V -{ l-7031 DIVISIONS: W Main Street, Suite 512 C. T. CORPORATION SYSTEM

How To Sue A Hospital For Overstaffing

Filing # E-Filed 05/17/ :58:08 AM

Case 1:13-cv SEB-TAB Document 1 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NO. Defendant

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 10, 2010 Session

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA

1.1 Pursuant to Tex. R. Civ. P , plaintiffs move the Court for a Level 3 II. PARTIES

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, WEST DISTRICT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA * *

Mississippi Board of Nursing

Case4:13-cv DMR Document1 Filed12/11/13 Page1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Baltimore, MD * The Corporation Trust Inc 351 West Camden Street * Baltimore, MD KATHLEEN WARD, M.D South Hanover Street *

NOTICE OF CLAIM. Claimant, -against-

CASE NO: DIVISION: COMPLAINT. Jurisdiction and Venue 1. This is an action for damages in excess of $15,000.00, exclusive of costs and interest,

1. Set forth the following information as to the decedent:

CASE NO.: CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT. through undersigned counsel, and hereby sues Defendant, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., a Florida GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/16 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Complaint as permitted by Case Management Order # 4 and Implementing Order PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE DAMAGES WRONGFUL DEATH GENERALLY. 1

Under the Knife and Completely Aware: A Case of Intraoperative Awareness

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WINCHESTER DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv JS-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE CHATTANOOGA DIVISION

NC General Statutes - Chapter 90 Article 1B 1

Case 5:14-cv IPJ Document 1 Filed 10/14/14 Page 1 of 17

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF] hereby sues the Defendants, [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. BETWEEN: JEAN-FRANCOIS FARJON and REBECCA SOROKA. -and-

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Cause No. vs. ) ) Division No., ) ) Defendant.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

ALLOW NATURAL DEATH/WITHHOLDING AND/OR WITHDRAWING L I F E - S U S T A I N I N G T R E A T M E N T / NON-BENEFICIAL CARE AND RESUSCITATION POLICY

CAUSE NO. 2009V-224 FINAL JUDGMENT. BE IT REMEMBERED, that on December 20, 2011, came on to be heard the

Minnesota Professional & Medical Malpractice Law. Professional & Medical Malpractice Law

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

COMES NOW, Plaintiff, John Doe, and files this Original Petition and Request for

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Corporate Medical Policy

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF SUPERINTENDENCE FOR THE COURTS OF OHIO. Initial publication for comment

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, STATE OF COLORADO Court Address: 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202

CASE NO.: COMPLAINT. COMES NOW the Plaintiff, TRICIA NORMAN, Individually, and as Personal

CAUSE NO. RICHARD SANCHEZ, HEATHER IN THE DISTRICT COURT SANCHEZ, TODD KING AND LACI KING, Plaintiffs,

Complaint - Walmart Substance on Floor in Frozen Food Dept.

APPLICATION FOR NURSE ANESTHETISTS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE

AMENDED COMPLAINT. Plaintiff THOMAS J. BARRY hereby files this Complaint for damages against

Case 4:15-cv A Document 1 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1

Law and Motion Calendar Department Nine (10:00 a.m.) December 4, (2) Defendant Cheema s Motion to Strike Portions of 2 nd Amended Complaint.

CH CONSCIOUS SEDATION

Transcription:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS NINTH DIVISION KATRINA ANTHONY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JANETTE COOK MCDANIEL, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS VS. CASE NO. 60CV-13-3009 FIRST INITIATIVES INSURANCE, LTD., ST. VINCENT INFIRMARY MEDICAL CENTER, LITTLE ROCK ANESTHESIA SERVICES PLLC, JUAN CARLOS RAMON, MD; and VIRGINIA S. MAXWELL, CRNA, DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT COMES NOW Katrina Anthony, Individually, and as Administratrix of the Estate of Janette Cook McDaniel, Deceased, (collectively Plaintiffs ), and files this Original Complaint complaining of First Initiatives Insurance, Ltd.; St. Vincent Infirmary Medical Center ( St. Vincent ), Little Rock Anesthesia Services, PLLC ( LRAS ) and Juan Carlos Ramon, M.D. ( Dr. Ramon ) and Virginia S. Maxwell, CRNA ( CRNA Maxwell. ) In support thereof, Plaintiffs respectfully show the Court as follows: I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1.1. This Court has jurisdiction and venue is proper in Pulaski County, Arkansas because at least one of the Defendants has its principal office in Pulaski County, Arkansas and because the events that form the basis for liability occurred in Pulaski County, Arkansas. This case involves an amount in controversy that is within the jurisdictional limits of this Court. PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - Page 1

II. PARTIES 2.1. Plaintiff Katrina Anthony is the daughter and Executrix of the Estate of Janette Cook McDaniel, Deceased. She brings this action individually, and as Administratrix of the Estate of Janette Cook McDaniel, Deceased. Eugene McDaniel, Jr. is the surviving spouse of Janette Cook McDaniel, Deceased. Robin Anthony and Detrice Payne are the daughters of Janette Cook McDaniel, Deceased. 2.2 Defendant St. Vincent Infirmary Medical Center is a Corporation operating in the State of Arkansas as a hospital and doing business as St. Vincent Health System. Said Defendant may be served with summons by serving its registered agent for service of process, The Corporation Company, at 124 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1900, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201. 2.3. Defendant Little Rock Anesthesia Services, PLLC is an Arkansas entity operating in Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, and may be served with a summons by serving their registered agent, Michael Stone, at their principal place of business at 500 S. University Avenue, Suite 505, Little Rock, AR 72205. 2.4. Defendant Juan Carlos Ramon, M.D. is a licensed medical doctor residing and practicing medicine in Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, and may be served with process at his place of business at 500 S. University Avenue, Suite 505, Little Rock, AR 72205. 2.5. Defendant Virginia S. Maxwell, CRNA is a licensed nurse anesthetist residing and practicing in Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, and may be served with process at her place of business at 500 S. University Avenue, Suite 505, Little Rock, AR 72205. 2.6 Defendant First Initiatives Insurance, Ltd., is a Risk Pool providing liability coverage for entities associated with Catholic Health Initiatives including St. Vincent Infirmary PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - Page 2

Medical Center and is located in the Cayman Islands. Defendant, First Initiatives Insurance, Ltd, is the proper defendant in the event St. Vincent Infirmary Medical Center is afforded charitable immunity. III. FACTS 3.1. On October 15, 2012, 47-year-old Janette Cook McDaniel was admitted to St. Vincent in Little Rock, Arkansas for elective right knee replacement surgery by Dr. Paul Edwards. She was known to be at moderate to high risk for pulmonary complications during surgery due to her history of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD), asthma, and obstructive sleep apnea. Specifically, Ms. McDaniel was known to be at high risk for cessation of breathing if she were to be medicated and left alone lying on her back due to her physical size, her large fleshy neck, and the condition of her lungs. For this reason, it was known that when sedated this patient required close monitoring so that she would not die needlessly upon receiving sedation. 3.2. On the morning of the surgery, Janette Cook McDaniel was pre-medicated with Reglan and Pepcid. She also received 10mg of Oxycodone. No contemporaneously created nursing records are available to show precisely when these drugs were administered; all related notes were added as late entries in the medical chart. 3.3. At 6:50 AM, an order was given that Janette Cook McDaniel be placed on continuous pulse oximetry via telemetry transmitter and be given supplemental oxygen. These orders required physician notification if: a) her respiratory rate is less than 10 breaths per minute, b) her blood oxygen saturation is less than 92% on room air, or c) she became difficult to arouse. PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - Page 3

3.4. At 7:00 AM, Dr. Romans placed an epidural catheter and sedated Janette Cook McDaniel with medications and then left her alone in the pre-op room. She was left unattended and without any effective monitoring, much less the close monitoring that this patient required in order to detect immediately if she were to stop effective breathing. 3.5. Sometime between 7:00 a.m. and 7:29 a.m. the patient stopped breathing due to the medications she had been given. But, no one was monitoring the patient so no one noticed. 3.6 At 7:29 am, nursing personnel returned to take Janette Cook McDaniel to the Operating Room. On arrival to the OR, adroit personnel noticed that the patient was dead. CRNA Maxwell gave supplemental oxygen and applied monitors, but no CPR was performed. Dr. Romans was called and pronounced her dead at 7:45 AM. IV. PRINCIPAL/AGENCY 4.1. At all times material hereto, Dr. Ramon was acting, not only in his individual capacity, but also as an agent, representative, and/or employee of Little Rock Anesthesia Services and acting within the scope of such agency/employment. Under the doctrines of agency and respondeat superior, Dr. Ramon and Little Rock Anesthesia Services are jointly and severally liable for the acts and omissions of Dr. Ramon. 4.2. At all times material hereto, the nursing staff at St. Vincent were acting, not only in their individual capacities, but also as agents, representatives, and/or employees of St. Vincent and acting within the scope of such agency/employment. Under the doctrines of agency and respondeat superior, the nursing staff and St. Vincent are jointly and severally liable for the acts and omissions of the nursing staff. PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - Page 4

4.3. At all times material hereto, CRNA Maxwell was acting, not only in her individual capacity, but also as an agent, representative, and/or employee of Little Rock Anesthesia Services and/or St. Vincent and acting within the scope of such agency/employment. Under the doctrines of agency and respondeat superior, CRNA Maxell and Little Rock Anesthesia Services and/or St. Vincent are jointly and severally liable for the acts and omissions of CRNA Maxwell. V. NEGLIGENCE & GROSS NEGLIGENCE 5.1. Defendants were negligent and fell below the applicable standards of care in their treatment of Janette Cook McDaniel. As a direct and proximate cause of the negligence and gross negligence of Defendants, Janette Cook McDaniel died needlessly. A. DR. RAMON / LITTLE ROCK ANESTHESIA SERVICES 5.2 Defendants Dr. Ramon and Little Rock Anesthesia Services were negligent and grossly negligent in the following respects: a) failing to be physically present, or have other qualified personnel present, to continually monitor and evaluate Janette Cook McDaniel after anesthesia services began; b) failing to be available to diagnose and respond to Janette Cook McDaniel s medical emergency following the administration of anesthesia; c) failing to assure that Janette Cook McDaniel s oxygenation, ventilation, circulation, and temperature were being continually evaluated after anesthesia services began; and/or d) failing to render timely and appropriate resuscitative efforts/care to Janette Cook McDaniel, to include CPR and Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) protocols. 5.3 Each of these acts/omissions was a direct and proximate cause of the Janette Cook McDaniel s death and Plaintiffs damages herein. PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - Page 5

B. VIRGINIA S. MAXWELL, CRNA respects: 5.4. Defendant CRNA Maxell was negligent and grossly negligent in the following a) failing to be physically present, or have other qualified personnel present, to monitor and evaluate Janette Cook McDaniel after anesthesia services began; b) failing to be available to diagnose and respond to Janette Cook McDaniel s medical emergency following the administration of anesthesia; c) failing to assure that Janette Cook McDaniel s oxygenation, ventilation, circulation, and temperature were being continually evaluated after anesthesia services began; and/or d) failing to render timely and appropriate resuscitative efforts/care to Janette Cook McDaniel, to include CPR and Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) protocols. 5.5. Each of these acts/omissions was a direct and proximate cause of the Janette Cook McDaniel s death and Plaintiffs damages herein. C. ST. VINCENT INFIRMARY MEDICAL CENTER 5.6. Defendant St. Vincent was negligent [both directly, by and through its employees or agents, and by and through the conduct of its managing member(s) and member(s) and administrator(s)] in the following respects: a) failing to have/enforce written policies to assure that patients undergoing anesthesia such as Janette Cook McDaniel are adequately monitored after the anesthesia has begun; b) failing to have/enforce written policies to assure that patients undergoing anesthesia such as Janette Cook McDaniel are continually monitored with a pulse oximeter with a working alarm when blood oxygenation drops to unsafe levels, as well as continual clinical observation/assessment of ventilation, heart rate, and blood pressure; c) failing to have/enforce adequate protocols, policies and procedures to assure that patients who arrest following the administration of anesthesia such as Janette Cook McDaniel receive adequate resuscitative effort to include CPR and Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) protocols; PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - Page 6

d) failing to assure the nurses adequately monitored Janette Cook McDaniel following the administration of anesthesia; e) failing to assure the nurses timely recognized the signs, symptoms, and findings of inadequate ventilation in Janette Cook McDaniel following the administration of anesthesia; and/or f) failing to assure OR personnel provided timely and appropriate resuscitative efforts to Janette Cook McDaniel, to include CPR and Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) protocols when she was known to have suffered cardiorespiratory arrest. 5.7. Each of these acts/omissions was a direct and proximate cause of the Janette Cook McDaniel s death and Plaintiffs damages herein. VI. DAMAGES 6.1 The Plaintiff, in her capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Janette Cook, seeks the following damages on behalf of the Estate: (a) (b) (c) Medical expenses; Funeral and burial expenses; The pain and anguish and suffering that Janette Cook suffered prior to her death; and (d) Damages for the value of the loss of Janette Cook s life. 6.2 The Plaintiff, individually and in her capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Janette Cook seeks the following damages on behalf of the wrongful death beneficiaries: (a) Damages for the mental and emotional anguish suffered by each as a result of the death of Janette Cook; and (b) Pecuniary loss any wrongful death beneficiary has or will suffer as a result of the death of Janette Cook. 6.3 At the time of Janette Cook McDaniel's death, she was gainfully employed and PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - Page 7

earning a livelihood for herself and contributing to her family. She was 47-years old and was in reasonably good health, with a normal life expectancy. 6.4. Plaintiff further seeks exemplary/punitive damages, in an amount to be determined by the jury, for Defendants reckless and/or malicious conduct. The need to attend to and continually monitor high-risk patients while under anesthesia is well known in general, and specifically in reference to Janette Cook McDaniel. Here, Defendants consciously disregarded these risks, leaving Janette Cook McDaniel unattended and unmonitored after her anesthesia began. She died needlessly as a result. Given the practices of these healthcare providers, it was not a matter of if someone would die from this type of behavior, it was simply a matter of who would die. For these reasons, Plaintiffs seek punitive damages in an amount necessary to make an example of Defendants, so that in the future no other healthcare provider or institution will place a patient at such extreme and needless risk of harm. VII. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 7.1. Plaintiffs demand trial by jury in this matter pursuant to the Arkansas State Constitution, Article 2, Section 7 and Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 38. FOR THESE REASONS, Plaintiffs respectfully request each Defendant be cited to appear and answer herein; that upon a final hearing or trial of the cause, judgment be entered for the Plaintiffs against Defendants for damages in an amount within the jurisdictional limits of the Court; post-judgment interest at the highest legal rate, costs of court; and for such further relief to which Plaintiff is justly entitled. PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - Page 8

Respectfully submitted, THE GIRARDS LAW FIRM /s/ James E. Girards James E. Girards, AR Bar No. 2006017 J. Michael Ramey, AR Bar No. 2000128 10,000 N. Central Expressway, Suite 750 Dallas, Texas 75231 jim@girardslaw.com mike@girardslaw.com Telephone 214/346-9529 Facsimile 214/346-9532 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - Page 9