IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA



Similar documents
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION

COMPLAINT. Now come Plaintiffs, personal care attendants, consumers, surrogates,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. Plaintiff

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Flat Fee From Being Charged In Florida

NO. PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. Now comes, Tommy Adkisson, individually, in his official capacity as Bexar County

Case 1:07-cv B Document 7 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their

Case5:12-cv EJD Document136 Filed01/29/15 Page1 of 7

INTRODUCTION. States Constitution and 42 U.S.C against the State of New Jersey, New Jersey s

Case 1:14-cv ERK-JMA Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.

CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION. Greg Abbott, and complains of OLD UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ( Defendant ), and I.

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

Case 2:14-cv CW-BCW Document 62 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 6

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

Case 2:02-cv TS Document 602 Filed 06/19/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:14-cv FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case: EEB Doc#:9 Filed:12/03/14 Entered:12/03/14 15:52:25 Page1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:14-cv BO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY. Plaintiffs, Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 07/01/11 Page 1 of 8 SPRINT UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 3:15-cv MO Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 3:11-cv RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF

STATE OF MICHIGAN CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHTENAW HONORABLE:

MARC D. LAVIK, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : C.A. No. PC 11- : DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, : DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, : STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, : COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ALASKA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT re~ ~ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:13-cv SSB-SKB Doc #: 9 Filed: 03/11/14 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 31

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

NO. PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION. Plaintiff the STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through the Attorney General of Texas,

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv AC Document 16 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 11

Case5:15-cv HRL Document1 Filed08/12/15 Page1 of 10

Case 6:13-cv LRR Document 147 Filed 02/04/15 Page 1 of 9

COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST PLAINTIFF ECOSMART, LLC AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT AGAINST CARLOS ANTONIO CABRERA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

4:15-cv RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

Case 4:08-cv RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Case 2:07-cv LED Document 1-1 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:12-cv ADS-AKT Document 88-1 Filed 12/16/13 Page 56 of 64 PageID #: 1018 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG (CHARLOTTESVILLE) DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v.

CAUSE NO. ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC., IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF. v. DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Plaintiffs, -against- IAS Part 5 Justice Kathryn E. Freed. WHEREAS Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York

Case 2:14-cv JFC Document 43 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY. Appearing on behalf of the Named Plaintiff and the Class were attorneys Daniel P.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORIGIA-~~T ~:J,-~T,>cURT SAVANNAH DIVISION j Ga. NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF RICHMOND, STATE OF GEORGIA. NOW COMES the named plaintiff, for himse_if and all

BENCHMARK MEDICAL LLC, BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT

APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on

SAN FRANCISCO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 96: COORDINATION BETWEEN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE OFFICE OF CITIZEN COMPLAINTS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Should the commission desire to adopt the proposed settlement agreement, the following resolution is presented for your consideration:

JOHN MURRAY ( Murray ), for his Complaint in this action against Defendant, Crystex Composites LLC ( Crystex ), alleges as follows:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No.

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, TEXAS. CVS PHARMACY, INC. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COLORADO INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMISSION S TRIAL BRIEF

Senate Bill No. 86 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security

No THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2009

* Each Will Comply With LR IA 10 2 Within 45 days Attorneys for Plaintiff, Goldman, Sachs & Co.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:15-cv JNP Document 2 Filed 09/08/15 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:06-cv JF-SDP Document 69 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT

LENDER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT. By and Between. RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC., as Program Administrator. and., as Participating Lender

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA BLAINE GALLIHER, THOMAS JACKSON, ) TERRY SPICER, THOMAS D. DERMODY, ) FREDDIE WILLIAMS, JR., LINDA COLEMAN, ) MERIKA COLEMAN, and JAMES P. WRYE, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) CASE NO: CV - v. ) ) BRADLEY BYRNE, in his official capacity ) as Chancellor of the Alabama Postsecondary ) Education Department, THE ALABAMA ) POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION ) DEPARTMENT, THE ALABAMA STATE ) BOARD OF EDUCATION, RANDY MCKINNEY, ) in his official capacity as President Pro Tem of the ) Alabama State Board of Education, BETTY PETERS, ) in her official capacity as a member of the Alabama ) State Board of Education, STEPHANIE W. BELL, ) in her official capacity as a member of the Alabama ) State Board of Education, DR. ETHEL H. HALL, ) in her official capacity as Vice President Emerita of the ) Alabama State Board of Education, ELLA B. BELL, ) in her official capacity as a member of the Alabama ) State Board of Education, DAVID F. BYERS, JR., ) in his official capacity as Vice President of the ) Alabama State Board of Education, SANDRA RAY, ) in her official capacity as a member of the Alabama ) State Board of Education, and DR. MARY JANE ) CAYLOR, in her official capacity as a member of the ) Alabama State Board of Education. ) ) Defendants. ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF PARTIES 1. PLAINTIFF Blaine Galliher is an employee of a junior college and/or trade school subject to rules promulgated by the Alabama State Board of Education ( State Board ), 1

including Alabama College System Policies Number 220.01 and 609.04 ( Policies 220.01 and 609.04"). See Exhibits A & B hereto, respectively. 1 He is also a member of the House of Representatives of the State of Alabama. Plaintiff Galliher will stand for re-election in 2010. 2. PLAINTIFF Thomas Jackson is an employee of a junior college and/or trade school subject to rules promulgated by the State Board, including Policies 220.01 and 609.04. He is also a member of the House of Representatives of the State of Alabama. Plaintiff Jackson will stand for re-election in 2010. 3. PLAINTIFF Terry Spicer is an employee of a junior college and/or trade school subject to rules promulgated by the State Board, including Policies 220.01 and 609.04. He is also a member of the House of Representatives of the State of Alabama. Plaintiff Spicer will stand for re-election in 2010. 4. PLAINTIFF Thomas D. Dermody resides in Alabama House of Representatives District 21. He voted for, and is represented by, a house member who is also an employee of a junior college and/or trade school subject to Policies Number 220.01 and 609.04. Plaintiff Dermody wishes to have his elected representative actually represent him in the Alabama Legislature, and he desires to re-elect and be represented by, his current representative in 2010. Plaintiff Dermody is one of approximately half a million Alabamians currently represented in the Legislature by employees of the State Board. 5. PLAINTIFF Freddie Williams, Jr., resides in Alabama Senate District 26. He voted for, and is represented by, a state senator who is also an employee of a junior college and/or trade school subject to Policies Number 220.01 and 609.04. Plaintiff Williams wishes to 1 Policy 609.04 references Policy 611.01 which is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 2

have his elected representative actually represent him in the Alabama Legislature, and he desires to re-elect and be represented by, his current senator in 2010. Plaintiff Williams is one of approximately half a million Alabamians currently represented in the Legislature by employees of the State Board. 6. PLAINTIFF Linda Coleman is a member of the Alabama Senate who intends to seek employment with a junior college and/or trade school subject to Rules promulgated by the State Board, including Policies Number 220.01 and 609.04. Plaintiff Linda Coleman will stand for re-election in 2010. 7. PLAINTIFF Merika Coleman is a member of the House of Representatives of the State of Alabama who intends to seek employment in the future with a junior college and/or trade school subject to Rules promulgated by the State Board, including Policies Number 220.01 and 609.04. Plaintiff Merika Coleman will stand for re-election in 2010. 8. PLAINTIFF James P. Wrye is a resident of Alabama who intends to seek employment in the future as an educator, including employment with a junior college and/or trade school, and who intends to seek election in the future to the Alabama legislature. 9. DEFENDANT Bradley Byrne is Chancellor of the Alabama Postsecondary Education Department. 10. DEFENDANT Alabama Department of Postsecondary Education is a state agency falling under the auspices of the State Board responsible for administering certain rules and regulations and having certain responsibilities with respect to the states junior colleges and trade schools. 11. DEFENDANT Alabama State Board of Education is charged with promulgating 3

rules and regulations for the Alabama Postsecondary Education Department. 12. DEFENDANT Randy McKinney is President Pro Tem of the Alabama State Board of Education and a board member for District 1. 13. DEFENDANT Betty Peters is a member of the Alabama State Board of Education, District 2. 14. DEFENDANT Stephanie W. Bell is a member of the Alabama State Board of Education, District 3. 15. DEFENDANT Dr. Ethel H. Hall is Vice President Emerita of the Alabama State Board of Education and a board member for District 4. 16. DEFENDANT Ella B. Bell is a board member of the Alabama State Board of Education, District 5. 17. DEFENDANT David F. Byers, Jr. is Vice President of the Alabama State Board of Education and a board member for District 6. 18. DEFENDANT Sandra Ray is a board member of the Alabama State Board of Education, District 7. 19. DEFENDANT Dr. Mary Jane Caylor is a board member of the Alabama State Board of Education, District 8. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 20. This Court has jurisdiction, and venue is proper pursuant to Alabama Code Sec. 6-6-220 et seq., and Alabama Code Sec. 41-22-10 which provides for declaratory and injunctive relief to determine the validity and applicability of a rule in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County. Sec. 41-22-1 et seq. (AAPA). 4

COUNT I. 21. On August 23, 2007, the State Board adopted Alabama Department of Post- Secondary Education Policies 220.01 and 609.04. 22. The State Board is an agency and said Policies are rules as defined by the Alabama Code Sec. 41-22-1 et seq., the Alabama Administrative Procedures Act (the AAPA). 23. In the course of passing Policies 220.01 and 609.04, the Board failed to comply with the requirements of the AAPA. 24. As a result of its failure to comply with the AAPA in passage of Policies 220.01 and 609.04, said policies are null and void. 25. Policy Number 609.04 will effectively prohibit Plaintiffs Galliher, Spicer and Jackson, and others who are similarly situated, from fulfilling their roles as members of the Alabama House of Representatives without sacrificing their positions as employees of the Alabama junior college and/or trade school in which they are currently employed. 26. Policy Number 220.01 will preclude Plaintiffs Galliher, Jackson, and Spicer, and others who are similarly situated, from being able to seek re-election to their positions in the House of Representatives in 2010 without sacrificing their employment with the junior colleges and/or trade schools in which they are currently employed. 27. Said policies will likewise preclude Plaintiffs Merika Coleman and Linda Coleman, and others who are similarly situated, from obtaining employment in a junior college and/or trade school in Alabama without sacrificing their respective positions in the Alabama Legislature. 28. Said policies will likewise deprive Plaintiff Wrye and other similarly situated 5

members of the public of any opportunity to serve in the Alabama Legislature if he obtains employment at a junior college and/or trade school in Alabama. 29. Said policies will also affect the rights and interest of Plaintiffs Dermody and Williams, and other similarly situated members of the public, in representation in the legislature by the candidate for whom they voted and who was duly elected by the people of their districts both in this term of the legislature and in any future terms. 30. Said policies are expected by defendants to go into effect and to be enforced against the Plaintiffs and to affect Plaintiffs rights and interests as early as September 2007. It is likewise expected that the Governor will call a special legislative session in October 2007. Thus, Plaintiffs are facing imminent threat of irreparable harm. 31. If these policies are implemented and those legislators employed by Alabama s junior colleges and trade schools are forced to resign their positions, the taxpayers of this state will be forced to pay for thirteen special elections to replace legislators who were elected less than ten months ago. The cost to the taxpayers for special primaries, run-offs, and general elections would be substantial. WHEREFORE, premises considered, Plaintiffs pray that this Honorable Court will assume jurisdiction of this case, will require defendants to answer within the time permitted by law and will in addition thereto: A. Promptly set this matter for hearing on preliminary injunction and upon said hearing preliminarily enjoin defendants, their agents and employees, and all those acting in concert with them, from implementing or enforcing the said Rules in any manner pending the final outcome of this case. 6

B. Set this matter for final hearing and upon said hearing: i. Issue a declaratory judgment that Policies Number 220.01 and 609.04 are null and void for failure of the Board to comply with the provisions of the AAPA. ii. Permanently enjoin defendants, their agents and employees, and all those acting in concert with them, from implementing or enforcing the said Rules in any manner until and unless defendants comply fully with the AAPA. iii. Grant to Plaintiffs such other, further and additional relief as to which they many be entitled. Additional Claims That May Become Ripe In addition to Count One as set forth above, in an abundance of caution Plaintiffs hereby give notice of additional claims presenting additional reasons why Defendants new policies are void, unlawful, and unenforceable. Plaintiffs contend that these additional counts are not ripe for adjudication, because Defendants new policies are simply not in force as a matter of law for the reasons set forth in Count One relating to the Administrative Procedures Act. The following additional claims would become ripe for adjudication if Count One was resolved against the Plaintiffs, or if the new policies otherwise become effective following compliance with the AAPA. Plaintiffs will file an amended complaint that contains expanded allegations as to these claims, if such action becomes appropriate. a) Defendants new policies numbered 220.01 ( Elected State Officials: Employment Prohibited ) and 609.04 ( Flexible Work Schedule ) are outside the scope of the 7

policies that the State Board of Education is authorized by law to adopt. The State Board of Education only has the authority to adopt policies on certain subject matters, under Ala. Code 16-60-111.4. Policies 220.01 and 609.04, however, do not fall within those subject matters. These policies are ultra vires and therefore null and void. b) Policies 220.01 and 609.04 are void and unlawful because they conflict with Ala. Code 17-1-4. Each of those policies denies certain State employees the right to participate in political activities to the same extent as any other citizen, and is therefore in conflict with 17-1- 4. Furthermore, insofar as policy 220.01 reflects a refusal to approve leave for the purpose of fulfilling the duties of legislative office, that policy is also in conflict with Ala. Code 17-17-5. c) Policies 220.01 and 609.04 are void and unlawful because they conflict with the Fair Dismissal Act, Ala. Code 36-26-100 et seq. The meaning, intention, and effect of the policies is to terminate the employment of any person working for one of the State s two-year colleges who remains, or becomes, a legislator; the status of being a legislator and of performing the duties of a legislator is made a firing offense, without any regard to whether the employee s job performance is detrimentally affected at all by the employee s service as a legislator. This is in conflict with Ala. Code 36-26-102, which enumerates the permissible causes for termination of non-probationary employees of the two-year colleges; that list of permissible causes does not include the mere status of being a legislator or of performing the duties of a legislator. Policies 220.01 and 609.04 also require termination for reasons which are prohibited under Ala. Code Sec. 36-26-102. d) Policies 220.01 and 609.04 are unconstitutional; they conflict with various provisions of Alabama s Constitution and violate rights that are protected by that Constitution. 8

They constitute an attempt to impose a qualification for holding legislative office i.e., one cannot hold legislative office if he or she is employed in one of the State s junior colleges or trade schools and therefore conflict with Article IV of the Constitution, including but not limited to Section 47 thereof. e) Plaintiffs reserve the right to add additional claims pursuant to Ala. R. Civ. P. 15. 9 s/robert D. Segall Shannon L. Holliday (HOL088) Robert D. Segall (SEG003) Copeland, Franco, Screws & Gill, P.A. P.O. Box 347 Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0347 Telephone: 334-834-1180 Facsimile: 334-834-3172 Email: holliday@copelandfranco.com Email: segall@copelandfranco.com Attorneys for Blaine Galliher, Thomas Jackson, and Terry Spicer J. Cecil Gardner (GAR039) The Gardner Firm, P.C. P.O. Box 3103 Mobile, Alabama 36652 Telephone: 251-433-8100 Facsimile: 251-433-8181 Email: cgardner@thegardnerfirm.com Attorney for Thomas D. Dermody and Freddie Williams, Jr. Fred D. Gray Gray, Langford, Sapp, McGowan, Gray & Nathanson P.O. Box 830239 Tuskegee, Alabama 36083-0239 Telephone: 334-727-4830 Facsimile: 334-727-5877 Attorney for Linda Coleman and Merika Coleman

Edward Still (STI-009) Edward Still Law Firm LLC Suite 201 2112 11th Ave S Birmingham AL 35203-3352 Telephone: 205-320-2882 Facsimile: 877-264-5513 Email: Still@votelaw.com Attorney for James P. Wrye DEFENDANTS TO BE SERVED VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Bradley Byrne Alabama Postsecondary Education Department 401 Adams Avenue Montgomery, AL 36104 The Alabama Postsecondary Education Department 401 Adams Avenue Montgomery, AL 36104 The Alabama State Board of Education Gordon Persons Building 50 North Ripley Street Montgomery, AL 36130 Randy McKinney P.O. Box 2999 Gulf Shores, AL 36547 Betty Peters 3507 Huntington Place Dothan, AL 36303 Stephanie W. Bell 3218 Lancaster Lane Montgomery, AL 36106 10

Dr. Ethel H. Hall 7125 Westmoreland Drive Fairfield, AL 35064 Ella B. Bell 2634 Airwood Drive Montgomery, AL 36108 David F. Byers, Jr. Two Metroplex Drive Suite 111 Birmingham, AL 35209 Sandra Ray 2008 University Boulevard Tuscaloosa, AL 35401 Dr. Mary Jane Caylor P.O. Box 18903 Huntsville, AL 35804 11