MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDER, U.S. AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL EGLIN, EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA



Similar documents
MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY MANAGEMENT)

DEPARTMENT-LEVEL ACCOUNTING ENTRIES FOR FY1999. Report No. D August 18, Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Department of Defense

Information Technology

ort Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE OF THE STANDARD ARMY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM-REHOST Report Number

Department of Defense

Funding Invoices to Expedite the Closure of Contracts Before Transitioning to a New DoD Payment System (D )

ODIG-AUD (ATTN: Audit Suggestions) Department of Defense Inspector General 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA

Report No. D September 29, Financial Management of International Military Education and Training Funds

Information Technology

Department of Defense. SUBJECT: Department of Defense Medicare Eligible Retiree Health Care Fund

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Medical Encounter and Coding at Military Treatment Facilities

DoD Methodologies to Identify Improper Payments in the Military Health Benefits and Commercial Pay Programs Need Improvement

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Fellowships, Scholarships, Training With Industry (TWI), and Grants for DoD Personnel

DoD Needs to Improve the Billing System for Health Care Provided to Contractors at Medical Treatment Facilities in Southwest Asia

Department of Defense

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Financial Management

Audit of the Transfer of DoD Service Treatment Records to the Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Defense. SUBJECT: Settling Personnel and General Claims and Processing Advance Decision Requests

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process

INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 4800 MARK CENTER DRIVE ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA

ODIG-AUD (ATTN: Audit Suggestions) Department of Defense Inspector General 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA

Allegations of the Defense Contract Management Agency s Performance in Administrating Selected Weapon Systems Contracts (D )

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Subject: Military Personnel Strengths in the Army National Guard

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Government Accountability Office (GAO) Reviews and Reports

April 17, Human Capital. Report on the DoD Acquisition Workforce Count (D ) Department of Defense Office of Inspector General

Delinquent Medical Service Accounts at Brooke Army Medical Center Need Additional Management Oversight

PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the

GAO AIR FORCE WORKING CAPITAL FUND. Budgeting and Management of Carryover Work and Funding Could Be Improved

Defense Health Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Budget Estimates Operation and Maintenance Private Sector Care

AAMFT Report: MFTs in the Military

a GAO GAO DEFENSE WORKING CAPITAL FUND Military Services Did Not Calculate and Report Carryover Amounts Correctly

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

AUDIT REPORT Audit of Controls over GPO s Fleet Credit Card Program. September 28, 2012

Implementation of the DoD Management Control Program for Navy Acquisition Category II and III Programs (D )

THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

Supply Inventory Management

Delinquent Medical Service Accounts at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center Need Additional Management Oversight

THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

STATEMENT BY MR. CHRISTOPHER A. MILLER PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER DOD HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS BEFORE THE SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Presidential Recognition on Retirement from Military Service

Summary of Public Law The Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 (The Choice Act of 2014)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Followup Audit: Enterprise Blood Management System Not Ready for Full Deployment

Army Commercial Vendor Services Offices in Iraq Noncompliant with Internal Revenue Service Reporting Requirements

Distribution of Funds and Mentoring of Finance Officers for the Afghanistan National Army Payroll Need Improvement

April 19, Human Capital. DoD Security Clearance Process at Requesting Activities (D ) Department of Defense Office of Inspector General

Statement of Mr. William H. Reed Director, Defense Contract Audit Agency Senate Armed Services Committee April 19, 2007

Small Business Contracting at Marine Corps Systems Command Needs Improvement

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Acquisition Decision Memorandum for the Defense Integrated Military Human Resources System

DoD Did Not Negotiate Rates With Overseas Health Care Providers and Generally Paid Claims as Billed

Status of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Cost, Schedule, and Management Actions Taken to Address Prior Recommendations

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATIONS AGENCY PHASE II. Department of Defense

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL DOD INTERIM FEDERAL ACQUISITION COMPUTER NETWORK CERTIFICATIONS. Department of Defense

Report No. D May 14, Selected Controls for Information Assurance at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency

Department of Defense MANUAL

Defense Logistics Agency Effectively Managed Continental U.S. Mission-Critical Batteries

Navy s Contract/Vendor Pay Process Was Not Auditable

VA Office of Inspector General

U.S. Army Contracting Command Rock Island Needs to Improve Contracting Officer s Representative Training and Appointment for Contingency Contracts

Subj: NAVY MEDICINE DATA QUALITY MANAGEMENT CONTROL PROGRAM

The Army s Information Technology Contracts Awarded Without Competition Were Generally Justified

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW REPORT

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

VA Office of Inspector General

Transcription:

INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 400 ARMY NAVY DRIVE ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22202 REPORT NO. 91-051 February 25, 1991 MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDER, U.S. AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL EGLIN, EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA SUBJECT: Report on the Fiscal Year 1989 Evaluation of the Alternate Use of CHAMPUS Funds at the U.S. Air Force Systems Command Regional Hospital Eglin (Project No. OFC-0002.03) Introduction This is our final report on the audit of the FY 1989 Evaluation of the Alternate Use of CHAMPUS Funds at the U.S. Air Force Systems Command Regional Hospital Eglin (the Regional Hospital), Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. The overall objective of the audit was to determine whether the surgery project initiated by the Regional Hospital would, if implemented, reduce the costs of the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS). We also evaluated applicable internal controls established to identify, document, and monitor costs of the proposed surgery project. The audit was made from September 1989 through April 1990 at the direction of Congress. We visited the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs), the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Financial Management and Comptroller), and the Air Force Systems Command to monitor the status of the surgery project. The audit covered the project's operations from June through September 1989. A representative from the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) assisted the audit team in monitoring the surgery project and in performing this audit. Discussion The audit determined that the surgery project reduced CHAMPUS costs by $427,627 for the 4 months of its operation. We also determined that the proposed annual savings of $1.3 million were reasonable. In addition, about $105, 000 of CHAMPUS funds intended for alternate use projects had been used instead for routine operations and maintenance of the Regional Hospital. Internal controls at the Regional Hospital were adequate to ensure that project costs were identified and properly

2 monitored. The audit disclosed no material internal control weaknesses as defined by Public Law 97-255, Office of Management and Budget Circular A-123, and DoD Directive 5010.38. Scope of Audit The audit included an evaluation of accounting records, management reports, workload data, and statistics supporting the surgery project. We held discussions with the hospital commander and with resource management and project personnel at the Regional Hospital. We verified a CHAMPUS cost reduction of $427,627, based on 282 surgical procedures performed at the Regional Hospital between June and September 1989. This performance audit was made in accordance with auditing standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States as implemented by the Inspector General, DoD, and included such tests of internal controls as were considered necessary. Background CHAMPUS is a DoD health benefits payment program for all active duty dependents, retirees and their dependents, and survivors of deceased members of the uniformed services. Active duty service members and Medicare eligibles are not covered by CHAMPUS. Benefits parallel those available under other major health care plans and include inpatient health services, physician and hospital charges, medical supplies, and mental health services. Since 1985, CHAMPUS costs and work load have grown rapidly. Medical treatment facilities (MTF's) have reduced the services they provide; as a result, eligible persons have obtained more commercial medical care paid by CHAMPUS. To cut CHAMPUS costs and improve care in MTF's, Congress authorized the Military Departments in 1988 to use appropriated funds for purposes other than payment of CHAMPUS claims. These funds were authorized for innovative health care projects to provide in-house medical care to CHAMPUS eligibles at lower cost than commercial health care providers. Each Military Department was authorized to use up to $50 million in CHAMPUS funds on test projects. In September 1988, the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Heal th Affairs) proposed to Congress a plan for the alternate use of CHAMPUS funds. The proposal contained two review mechanisms: the Military Departments would have to submit quarterly status reports to the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs), and a DoD monitoring team would visit selected project sites. The Inspector General, DoD, was included as a full partner in the monitoring process with primary responsibility for fiscal and workload auditing of the

3 projects. On November 10, 1988, the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) issued the Alternate Use of CHAMPUS Funds Test Implementation Plan to the Military Departments. The Regional Hospital at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, initially proposed two test projects: mental health and surgery services for the CHAMPUS-eligible population in the Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, area. The mental health services project was deleted from the Air Force's implementation plan on December 21, 1988. The administrator at the Regional Hospital determined that this project was no longer feasible. The surgery project would allow the hospital to increase its operating room hours by 48 hours per week and perform a wide range of surgical procedures. The project was expected to recapture 39 surgical admissions per month, or 234 surgical admissions, for the 6 months ended September 30, 1989. This estimate was based on data from area hospitals that participated in the CHAMPUS program. It was estimated that savings from the surgery project would reduce CHAMPUS costs by about $1.3 million over a 1-year period. The Air Force funded the surgery project at $249, 000, the amount of CHAMPUS funds authorized for release by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs). Audit Verification We visited the Regional Hospital twice to accomplish our audit objectives. The first visit, in September 1989, disclosed that required project reports and records had not been prepared, and audit verification could not be accomplished. As a result, the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) withheld approval for the release of CHAMPUS funds to continue the project in FY 1990 pending completion of our audit. On our subsequent visit to the Regional Hospital in November 1989, we evaluated project reports and related records. In FY 1989, the surgery project was operational for 4 months and 282 surgery procedures were performed. The cost to operate the surgery project was $144,074 and included civilian pay, professional services, custodial services, and (physicians' and surgeons' fees were paid by CHAMPUS supplies under the partnership program). We verified this cost and estimated a recaptured cost of $571,701, based on the diagnosis-related group (DRG) rates that CHAMPUS paid to local hospitals for equivalent surgery procedures during FY 1989. A comparison of total operating costs to recaptured costs for the 4 months showed savings of $427,627.

4 We determined that the proposed savings of $1.3 million were reasonable. We found that the work load estimated in the proposal was understated but had no significant impact on the overall proposed savings. Although the 282 surgical procedures performed in the first 4 months exceeded the estimated 156 surgical admissions (39 admissions per month x 4), the savings of $427,627 were almost 97 percent of the estimated savings for the period. The proposal was based on historical data obtained from area hospitals that participated in the CHAMPUS program. Hospital personnel could not explain the increased work load. If the work load continues at the same rate, we estimate that the project could save over $1.3 million annually. We determined that internal controls established by the hospital were adequate to ensure that project costs were identified and properly monitored. We also compared the project's funded amount to verified project costs and determined that about $105,000 of CHAMPUS funds had been commingled with operations and maintenance funds. These funds did not support the project. This use of CHAMPUS funds was unauthorized and was not in accordance with the approved use of the funds. Air Force Systems Command advised us that $105,000 in operations and maintenance funds was being transferred to the CHAMPUS account. Prior Audit Coverage This project was begun in FY 1989; therefore, no prior audit coverage had been accomplished. We provided a draft of this report to the addressees on December 10, 1990. Because we made no recommendations, no comments were required from management, and none were received. Copies of this final report are being distributed to the activities listed at Enclosure 1. The courtesies extended to the audit staff (listed at Enclosure 2) are appreciated. If you have any questions about this audit, please contact Mr. James G. McGuire, Program Director, at (804) 766-9108, or Mr. Michael F. Yourey, Project Manager, at (804) 766-3268. Enclosures cc: Secretary of the Air Force Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) Robert J. Lieberman Assistant Inspector General for Auditing

FINAL REPORT DISTRIBUTION Off ice of the Secretary of Defense Comptroller of the Department of Defense Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs) Department of the Air Force Secretary of the Air Force Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Financial Management and Comptroller) Surgeon General, U.S. Air Force Headquarters, U.S. Air Force Systems Command Commander, U.S. Air Force Systems Command Regional Hospital Eglin Non-DoD Activities Off ice of Management and Budget U.S. General Accounting Office, NSIAD Technical Information Center Congressional Committees: Senate Subcommittee on Defense, Committee on Appropriations Senate Committee on Armed Services Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs Senate Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Armed Services House Committee on Appropriations House Subcommittee on Defense, Committee on Appropriations House Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Appropriations House Committee on Armed Services House Committee on Government Operations House Subcommittee on Legislation and National Security, Committee on Government Operations ENCLOSURE 1

AUDIT TEAM MEMBERS Nancy L. Butler, Director, Financial Management Directorate James G. McGuire, Program Director, Health and Human Resources Management Michael F. Yourey, Project Manager Robert J. Hanlon, Team Leader Danny o. Hatten, Auditor Fred W. Rossbach, Auditor Susanne B. Allen, Editor ENCLOSURE 2