) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-UNGARO-BENAGES/BROWN

Case 2:06-cv FCD-KJM Document 220 Filed 06/02/2009 Page 1 of 11

This Settlement and Release Agreement ("Agreement") is made as of this_ day of. IU:CI'rALS

A. Arizona School Risk Retention Trust ("Trust").

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE BETWEEN MARK LONG AND THE STATE OF OREGON RECITALS

F.S.B. v. Equity Title of Nevada; Case No.2: 12-cv ("Action''). The Settling Defendant

How To Settle A Lawsuit Against The City Of Naperville

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. to herein individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties." RECITALS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. of America, acting through the United States Department of Justice and the United States

Case 1:14-cv FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREF.MENT. CFDIC-R"), on the une hand, and Group One Mmtgage, Inc., ("the Settling Defendant")

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

~INAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE RECITALS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, on or about September 22, 2009 (the "Filing Date"), Long Island

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY. Appearing on behalf of the Named Plaintiff and the Class were attorneys Daniel P.

1. CLAIMANTTHE Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as receiver for McINTOSH COMMERCIAL BANK its heirs, successors and assigns ("FDIC-R").

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

reg Doc Filed 04/23/12 Entered 04/23/12 15:12:23 Main Document Pg 1 of 6

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 206 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 10 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #:

Case 4:08-cv RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10

cv UHL

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Whereas this civil forfeiture action (the "California Action") was filed on

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CASE NO. 1:12-CV-1179

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS

Case 4:13-cv RAS-DDB Document 141 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 2035

Settlement Agreement. This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into between and among (i) the

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND JEFF SCHMIDT

CLEARING MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT

Case3:12-cv CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12

Case 2:14-cv JFC Document 43 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Case 2:10-cv MAK Document 105 Filed 01/22/15 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION

CASE 0:99-md PAM Document 490 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

I (the "Policy"), which insured Hatfield according

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Man From Selling A Car To A Woman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE No. 09-CV JCC

Courtroom: 19 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

CLS Investments, LLC Instructions for the Solicitor Application and Agreement

Case4:13-cv KAW Document64 Filed12/16/14 Page1 of 5

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF YORK ) SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

rdd Doc 1181 Filed 08/10/15 Entered 08/10/15 11:09:58 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS

REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. THIS REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Regulatory Settlement

APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division NOTICE OF MOTION

Case 2:10-cv IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Sample Settlement Agreement and Release for an Employment Law Claim

Case 1:10-cv KMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2011 Page 1 of 9

THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is entered into by the States

ELMWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION V. CITY OF BERKELEY ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. RG MUTUAL RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SOLICITOR APPLICATION

Case 3:11-cv RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement (hereafter Agreement ) is entered into by

rdd Doc 402 Filed 10/25/13 Entered 10/25/13 16:17:31 Main Document Pg 1 of 10. (Jointly Administered)

Settlement Agreement & Mutual Release

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT RECITALS

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.

Case 4:05-cv Document Filed in TXSD on 08/01/13 Page 1 of 18 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Expedited Dispute Resolution Bond (P3 Form)

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL GENERAL RELEASE. This Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release ( Agreement ) is entered into

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365

SECTION I: Payment to FDIC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

Michael T. Gibbs, State Bar No Kevin L. Borgen, State Bar No Attorneys for Defendant MIRA COST A COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case5:12-cv EJD Document136 Filed01/29/15 Page1 of 7

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA.

Should the commission desire to adopt the proposed settlement agreement, the following resolution is presented for your consideration:

APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 4:13-cv RAS-DDB Document 142 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1584

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS AGREEMENT

COpyFORCERTIFICATION

GOVERNMENT PROSECUTIONS AND QUI TAM ACTIONS

DOCUhfCNT F-LEC~~OK~-y

mg Doc 1761 Filed 12/12/13 Entered 12/12/13 16:40:33 Main Document Pg 1 of 9 : : : (Jointly Administered) : Chapter 11 : : : :

Settlement Agreement Regarding Federal Lawsuit

This Notice applies to you if you have had a parking ticket issued at one of the MBTA s Honor Box Parking Lots.

ELECTRONIC INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT INTRODUCTION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CONSENT ORDER OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS COMMISSION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:11-md RGS Document 396 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) )

, and which are the basis for an action

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT NORTHERN DISTRICT FRANK FODERA, SR.

INSURANCE INDUSTRY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY COVERAGE UNIT THIS IS A CLAIMS MADE POLICY. PLEASE READ CAREFULLY.

AUTHORITY TO REPRESENT AND CONTINGENCY FEE AGREEMENT

How To Get The Lesser Prairie Chicken To Live Outside Of The Coon Line

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON BRA_N~DON MAYYIELD, et. al., Plaintiffs, V, UNITED STATES OF A~MERICA, et ai., Defendants. BRANDON MAYFIELD, et. al., Plaintiffs, V. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. CV06-305 AA Civil Action No. CV04-1427 AA STIPULATION FOR COM2~RON~SE SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE It is hereby stipulated by and between the undersigned plaintiffs and defendants, by and through their respective attomeys, as follows:!. Except as specifically provided in paragraph 8 be!ow, the United States of America agrees, in full settlement and satisfaction of any and all claims, demands, rights, and causes of action of whatsoever kind and nature for monetary, injunctive, declaratory, or any other form of relief, Page 1 of 9

arising directly or indirectly from or by reason of any and all injury or damage of any kind (including but not limited to bodily and personal injury (including emotional injury, death, injury to or loss of property, the consequences of any such injury, death, or loss, and attorney s fees or other legal costs, whether known or unknova~ and whether foreseen or unforeseen, resulting.or to result from, or relating to, the subjcct matter of the above-captioned actions, that plaintiffs or their guardians, heirs, executors, administrators, or assig-ns, and each of them, now have or may hereafter acquire, against the United States of,~_mcrica, its agents, servants, employees, and contractors, or any other person or entity, to: a. pay the sums of $1,900,000.00 to Brandon Mayfictd, $25,000.00 to Mona Mayfield, $25,000.00 to Shane Mayfield, $25,000.00 to ShariaMayfield, and $25,000.00 to Samir Mayfield, said entire Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00 to bc paid as described in paragraph 3 below; b. destroy the FISA take, as defined in paragraph 4 below; c. return the copies of the material wimcss materials to the plaintiffs, as defined in paragraph fi below; and d. apolo~ze to the plaintiffs, as spelled out in Attachment 3 hereto. 2. Except as specifically provided in paragraph 8 below, the plaintiffs and their guardians, heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, and each of them, agree to release, reimburse, indemnify, and hold harmless th~ United States of America, its agents, servants, employees, and contractors (including but not limited to Alberto R. Gonzales, John Ashcroft, Richard K. Werder, Ten-, Green, Michael Wieners, Eduardo Sanchez, and John T. Massey from and against any liability or further or flature litigation or pursuit by any of the plaintiffs, their Page 2 of 9

guardians, heirs, executors, administrators, or assigns of any claim encompassed by paragraph t above against any person or entity; and the defendants and their guardians, heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, and each of them, agree to release, reimburse, indemnify~ and harmless the plaintiffs from and against any liability or further or future litigation or pursuit by any of the defendants, their guardians, heirs, executors, administrators, or assigns of any claim encompassed by paragraph 1 above against the plaintiffs or any of them. 3. Payment of the Two Million Dollars referenced in paragraph 1.a. above willbe made by one government wire transfer to the trust account of plaintiffs attorney Gerry Spence. Plaintiffs attorneys agree to obtain a dismissal of the above-captioned actions with prejudice (including any appellate proceedkngs pending Ln either such action, and including appeal No. 04-30432 (9 th Cir. in the material witness proceeding,/-~ re: Federal Grand,Tury 03-01, Misc. No. 04-MC-9071 (D. Or., except as specifically provided in paragraph 8 below, with each party be~.ng its own fees, costs, and expenses. 4. The term the FISA take," as referenced in paragraph 1.b. above, is defined for purposes of tt ~is Stipulation for Compromise Settlement and Release as the corm nunications intercepts that were acquired by the FBI pursuant to the FISA electronic surveillance authority targeting Brandon Mayfield and the materials that were seized or reproduced by the FBI pursuant to the FISA physical search authority targeting Brandon Mayfield. Any materials, in whatever form or place, derived directly or indirectly from or related to the FISA take as defined herein that are not included within the above definition of such term shall be known as ~derivative FISA materials." The governrnent s obligation under paragraph 1.b. above, does not extend to derivative FISA materials. Page 3 of 9

5. The term "the copies of the material witness materials," as referenced in paragraph 1.c. above, is defined for purposes of this Stipulation for Compromise Settlement and Release as the copies, retained by the govervanent pursuant to the Order of September 20, 2004 of the HonorabIe Judge Jones of this Court after the originals had been returned to the plaintiffs, of the materials seized pursuant to search warrants issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon in May 2004 in In re: Federal Grand Jury 03-01, Misc. No. 04-MC-9071, No. 04-MC-9070 (A-(F, and No. 04-MC-9072 relating to the plaintiffs, except that such term does not include the classified National Defense Document that was seized pursuant to such search warrants. The plaintiffs agree that Elden M. Rosenthal, counsel for the plaintiffs, will retain the copies of the material witness materials for three years following the date on which this Stipulation for Compromise Settlement and Release is approved by this Court, and that Mr. Rosenthal wilt make such copies avaiiable in response to a request from an appropriate authority in connection with an officiai investigation or proceeding. 6. This SSpulation for Compromise Settlement and Release is not, and shouid not be consmaed as, an admission of liability or fautt on the part of the United States, its agents, servants, employees, or contractors. This settlement is entered into by the parties for the purpose of compromising disputed claims and avoiding the expenses and risks of further litigation. 7. It is agreed by and among the parties that each p~a--ty will bear his, her, or its own costs, fees, and expenses and that any attorney s fees owed by the plaintiffs wii1 be paid out of the settlement amount and not in addition thereto. 8. As indicated in paragraph 2 above, the parties agree that there is one specific claim that is not resolved as part of this settlement. As part of this Stipulation for Compromise Settlement Page 4 of 9

and Release, the United States agrees not to oppose the filing of the plaintiffs Proposed Amended Complaint (Attachment 1 hereto, and as part of this Court s approval of this Stipulation for Compromise Settlement and Release (as described further in paragraph 11 below, this Court grants leave for the plaintiffs to file such Amended Complaint. The parties agree that the sole claim that is not released as part of this settlement and that is at issue in such 7~a~nended Complaint is the plaintiffs claim that 50 U.S.C. 1804 (relating to electronic surveillance under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and 50 U.S.C. 1823 (relating to physical searches under such Act violate the Fourth Amendment on their face, and the parties agree that the soie relief that wili be awarded should the plaintiffs prevail on such claim is a declaratory judgment that one or both of such provisions is in violation of the Fourth Amendment and that, if such a declaratory judgment is entered with respect to one or both of such provisions and becomes final and not subject to further judicial review, the United States shali not use such provision(s with respect to the plaintiffs. The parties further agree that this claim will be litigated based solely on the Amended Complaint, *.he parties Recitation of Stipulated Facts (Attachment 2 hereto, and memoranda of taw, and that no answer to the Amended Complaint wil! be filed; no discovery, evidentiary hearing, or other factual proceedings of any kknd will occur at any stage; and the plaintiffs complaint will not be further amended. The parties further agree that the United States reserves the right to raise any and all defenses and arguments, including but not limited to lack of jurisdiction, in opposition to such claim, and that the United States does not necessarily agree with the allegations of the Amended Complaint, but that the United States stipulates, for purposes of this Iitigation only, to the facts recited in the Recitation of Stipulated Facts. Page 5 of 9

9. The persons signing this Stipulation for Compromise Settlement and Release warrant and represent that they possess full authority to bind the persons on whose behalf they are signing to the terms of the settlement. As to the plaintiffs who are minors, the plaintiffs must obtain court approval of the settlement at their expense. The plaintiffs agree to obtain such approval in a timely manner, time being of the essence, In the event t~he plaintiffs fail or are unable to obtain such court approval, this Stipulation for Compromise Settlement and Release is null and void. Plaintiffs further agree t~hat the United States may void this settlement at its option in the event such approval is not obtained in a timely manner. t0. The parties agree that t~.is Stipulation for Compromise Settlement and Release, including ali attacmnents, may be made public in its entirety, and the plaintiffs expressly consent to such release and disclosure pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b. 11. The parties agreement is conditioned upon this Court s approval of all terms of this Stipulation for Compromise Settlement and Release, including all attachments. If this Court does not approve all terms of this Stipulation for Compromise Settlement and Release, including all attachments, this Stipulation for Compromise Settlement and Release is null and void. 12. It is contemp!ated that this Stipulation for Compromise Settlement and Release may be executed in severa! counterparts, with a separate signature page for each party. All such counterparts and signature pages, together, wit1 be deemed to be one document. Executed this ~ day of,2006. APPROVED AS TO FORM: THE SPENCE LAW F12~M LLC BRAN~DON MAYFIELD, Plaintiff Page 6 of 9

GEILRY SPENCE, of Attorneys for Pl~intiffs Execmed this day of,2006. MONA MAYFIELD, Plaintiff ROSENTHAL & GREENE, P.C. Executed this day of,2006. Elden M. Rosenthal, of Attorneys for Plaintiffs MICHELE LONGO EDER, LLC MONA MAYFIELD, as guardian ad litem for SHANE MAYFIELD, Plaintiff Michele Longo Eder, of Attorneys for Plaintiffs Executed this day of,,2006. MONA MAYF~LD, as guardian ad litem for SHARL~k MAYF]~ELD, Plaintiff Executed this day of..,2006. MONA MAY-FIELD, as guardian ad litem for SAxMIR MAYFIELD, Plaintiff Page 7 of 9

Executed this ~ day of,2006. ELIZABETH J. SHAPIRO Attorney for Defendants UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, and ALBERTO GONZALES Executed this day of,2006. RICHARD K. WERDER, Defendant Execmed this day of,2006. TERRY GREEN, Defendant Executed this day of,2006. MICHAEL WIENERS, Defendant Executed this day of., 2006. EDUARDO SANCHEZ, Defendant Page 8 of 9

Executed this day of.2006. APPROVED AS TO FOtLM: GREENSPUN, DAVIS & LEARY, P.C JOHN T. MASSEY, Defendant Christie A. Leary, of Attorneys for Defendam Massey APPROVED this day of., 2006: THE HONORABLE AN~ L. AIKEN United States District Judge Page 9 of 9