LIMITED SCOPE REPRESENTATION



Similar documents
STANDARD 3.5 ON ASSISTANCE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS

Family Law: Limited Scope Representation (adopt forms FL-950 and FL-955, and Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.170)

Rule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se

1. As of August 31, 2014, there were 27,588 cases pending before the Court. The petitioners were self-represented in 19,721 (71%) of those cases.

ISBA Advisory Opinion on Professional Conduct

101 UNBUNDLED LEGAL SERVICES

Rule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state;

RULE 89. WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEYS; VISITING LAWYERS; TEMPORARY PRACTICE WITH LEGAL SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS

Case 6:66-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

PROPOSAL FOR PROTECTION OF COMMUNITY BASED LAWYERS PROVIDING DISCRETE TASK ASSISTANCE TO PARTIES IN THE SAME PROCEEDINGS

Justice Crisis in Colorado Report on Civil Legal Needs in Colorado

A. Accredited law school means a law school either provisionally or fully approved and accredited by the American Bar Association.

2015 IL App (1st) U. No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 14-23

Preparing a Federal Case

POST-DECREE OR POST-FINAL ORDERS

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FAMILY COURT

58 th UIA CONGRESS Florence / Italy October 29 November 2, 2014 FAMILY LAW COMMISSSION. Family Law Mediation and the Role of Today s Family Lawyer

NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE AND OSCEOLA COUNTIES, FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management.

RULE 63 DIVORCE AND FAMILY LAW

RULES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, STATE OF ILLINOIS (BOND AND MADISON COUNTIES)

NEW MEXICO BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION AN AGENCY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO STANDARDS FOR LEGAL SPECIALIZATION WORKERS COMPENSATION LAW

Can t Afford a Lawyer for your Appeal? The Appellate Pro Bono Program May Be Able to Help!

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES

CIRCUIT COURT. Uncontested Divorce Procedures Manual

: : before this court (the Court Annexed Mediation Program ); and

Preparing a Federal Case

M.R IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

SOCIAL SECURITY / SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME

LIMITED SCOPE REPRESENTATION IN MARYLAND A White Paper of the Maryland Access to Justice Commission September 2009

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

If you have been sued as a defendant in a civil case...keep reading.

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

WASHINGTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PRO SE CUSTODY PACKET

Case 2:10-cv CW Document 90 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE RECOMMENDED CASE HANDLING GUIDELINES FOR INSURERS

RULES GOVERNING THE OPERATION OF THE TEXAS ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOUNDATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

This is a notice of a settlement of a class action lawsuit. This is not a notice of a lawsuit against you.

Law Society of Saskatchewan Queen s Bench Rules of Court webinars Part 1: Overview

How To Run A Self Help Program

AGENDA FOR RULES COMMITTEE MEETING. October 9, 2015 (Friday)

NOTICE TO THE BAR. /s/ Philip S. Carchman

Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 01-3

MARQUETTE VOLUNTEER LEGAL CLINIC. Volunteer Attorney Training Professional Responsibilities of Limited Scope Representation

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON C STATE OF GEORGIA. AMENDED ORDER Il\1PLElVIENTING ELECTRONIC-FILING FOR CIVIL CASES

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 91-3

MARYLAND STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR COURT-APPOINTED LAWYERS REPRESENTING CHILDREN IN CUSTODY CASES

PLEASE TYPE OR WRITE LEGIBLY

UPL ADVISORY OPINION UPL (December 2004) Non-lawyer In-house Employee Legal Services

IN THE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF EDMONTON TANYA LABONTE, JESSE STECHYNSKY AND RHONDA MCPHEE. - and

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION

Guidelines for Outside Counsel New York University, NYU Langone Medical Center and Affiliates

The Supreme Court of Hawaii seeks public comment regarding proposals of the Hawaii Court Records Rules and Hawaii Electronic Filing and Service Rules.

HOW TO FILE AN ANSWER

Rules for Bankruptcy Cases, B.E (1999) Translation

LOCAL RULES of THE CIVIL COURTS OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS -- including revisions approved by the Texas Supreme Court 12/7/05

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE

Homeline CLE Top Ten Ethical Issue That Impact Family Law Lawyers

A Practical Guide to. Hiring a LAWYER

Case: 4:13-cv SL Doc #: 32 Filed: 09/02/14 1 of 10. PageID #: <pageid> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

CONTEMPT OF CUSTODY ORDER SELF-HELP KIT

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS PROCEDURAL RULES FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION HEARINGS

Comparison of Newly Adopted Utah Rules of Professional Conduct with ABA Model Rules UTAH

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIL MEDIATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES

IN THE TIDRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER S (Supersedes Administrative Order S )

POLICY NO LEGAL DEFENSE BENEFIT

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

SECOND AMENDED ORDER DESIGNATING ALL CASES E-FILE AND SETTING FORTH CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS IN E-FILE CASES

Comparison of Newly Adopted New Hampshire Rules of Professional Conduct with ABA Model Rules NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNIFORM RULES SUPERIOR COURTS OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA COUNCIL OF SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES

ORANGE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION Formal Opinion (Ghostwriting by Contract Lawyers and Out-of-State Lawyers)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 13. September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND WILLIAM M.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Submitted On Briefs November 18, 2009

When should these forms be used?

Getting a Trial Date in Cowlitz County

COMBUSTION ENGINEERING 524(g) ASBESTOS PI TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES

Question 5. After the trial, Attorney sent a $500 gift certificate to Doctor, with a note thanking her for recommending that Peter call him.

The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements. By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form , Cover Sheet for Family Court Cases (01/10)

to Consolidate, ECF No. 13,1 filedon August 21, Therein, Sprinkle argued that this Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Pro Bono Scholars Program

RULE FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES

DATE ENGAGEMENT LETTER

Guidelines for Guardians ad Litem for Children in Family Court

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. SOME DEBTOR, Case No (Chapter ) Debtor. JUDGE [NAME OF JUDGE]

State of Delaware Industrial Accident Board

Grievances Against Lawyers & Judges

Chapter 4. Table of Contents

Executive Summary of the Texas Uniform Collaborative Law Act

NEW MEXICO BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION AN AGENCY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO STANDARDS FOR LEGAL SPECIALIZATION FAMILY LAW

INTRODUCTION TO LEGAL AID AND RELATED ETHICAL ISSUES I N N S O F C O U R T P U P I L A G E G R O U P 3 P R E S E N T A T I O N

RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES

Transcription:

LIMITED SCOPE REPRESENTATION Section _.1 What is Limit Scope Representation Section _.2 Scope of Representation Rule 4-1.2(c) Section _.3 Communication Rule 4-1.2(e) Section _.4 Appearance and Withdrawal of Counsel Rule 55.03 Section _.5 Duty to Investigate Rule 55.03 Section _.6 Service Rule 43.01 Section _.7 Litigant Awareness Program and Forms Rule 88.09 Section _.8 Use of LSR to Assist Low-Income Litigants Section _.9 References Section _.1 What is Limit Scope Representation Limited Scope Representation or LSR (sometimes called unbundled services ) is an agreement between a lawyer and client to perform discrete legal tasks. Examples of discrete legal tasks include, but are not limited to, legal advice or coaching, legal research, drafting legal documents or pleadings, and representing a client at a court hearing or mediation. This concept has frequently been utilized in legal services provided in business transactions but has not been commonly allowed in litigation. Traditionally, lawyers who enter their appearance for clients in a litigation matter were obligated to represent their client until the litigation was complete. The adoption of LSR rules by states across the country has changed this principle. In 2002, the American Bar Association ( ABA ) adopted amendments to the Model Rules of Professional Conduct to allow lawyers to perform discrete legal services for clients in litigation matters. In Missouri, LSR has been permitted by Rule 4-1.2 since about 1986. In 2007, the Missouri Supreme Court amended the Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct and the Rules of Civil Procedure to clarify and encourage this practice. Since 2002, approximately 40 states and the District 1

of Columbia have adopted some form of the ABA amendments and allow some form of LSR. Section _.2 Scope of Representation Rule 4-1.2(c) A lawyer may limit the scope of representation if the client gives written consent signed by the client. Rule 4-1.2(c). The written and signed consent must set forth the essential terms of the representation and the lawyer s limited role. Rule 4-1.2(c). The Comment to Rule 4-1.2 provides a sample written notice and consent form. The written consent requirement does not apply to an initial legal consultation with a lawyer or pro bono services provided by a nonprofit organization, court-annexed program, bar association, or an accredited law school. Rule 4-1.2(d). Any doubts about the scope of representation agreed to between a lawyer and client should be resolved in a manner that promotes the interest of justice and those of the client and opposing party. Rule 4-1.2, Cmt [2]. An agreement to provide LSR does not exempt a lawyer from the duty to provide competent representation; however, the limitation of the scope of representation may be considered when determining the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation required under the Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct. Section _.3 Communication Rule 4-1.2(e) A litigant to whom LSR is being provide or has been provided is considered unrepresented, so opposing counsel may speak to the litigant under the Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct. Rule 4-1.2(e) However, if the lawyer engaged in LSR services provides opposing counsel written notice of the time period within which opposing counsel shall communicate only with the lawyer, opposing counsel must oblige. Rule 4-1.2(e). Section _.4 Appearance and Withdrawal of Counsel Rule 55.03 A. Appearance A lawyer who appears for a client in a lawsuit is considered to be representing the client for all purposes in that case. Rule 55.03(b). A lawyer appears in a lawsuit by: 2

1. Participating in any court proceeding as counsel for any party; 2. Signing the lawyer s name on any pleading, motion, or other court filing; 3. Filing a written entry of appearance. However, a written entry of appearance may be limited by its terms to a particular proceeding or matter. Rule 55.03(b)(1-3). B. Withdrawal Entry of Limited Appearance If a lawyer appears in a lawsuit, the lawyer may only withdraw when the matter is completed or with leave of court. Rule 55.03(b) and Rule 4-1.16(c). However, a lawyer who appears in a lawsuit and has filed an entry of limited appearance may withdraw before the matter is completed and without obtaining leave of court. Rule 55.03(b) and Rule 4-1.16(c). An entry of limited appearance must be a written document filed with the court titled Entry of Limited Appearance. Rule 55.03(b). The Entry of Limited Appearance must state the physical and mailing addresses, telephone and facsimile number, and email address, if any, of each person for whom the lawyer is making a limited appearance. Rule 55.03(b). The Entry of Limited Appearance should also set forth the particular proceeding or matter that the representation is being limited to. A lawyer who has filed a proper entry of limited appearance withdraws from the lawsuit when the lawyer has fulfilled the duties set forth in the entry of limited appearance and has filed a withdrawal memorandum titled Termination of Limited Appearance. The Termination of Limited Appearance must affirm that the lawyer has fulfilled the duties set forth in the entry of limited appearance. Rule 55.03(b). If a lawyer follows these procedures correctly, the court cannot prevent the lawyer from withdrawing from the case, and the lawyer is under no ethical obligation to remain in the case even if ordered to do so by the court. Rule 55.03(b) and Rule 4-1.16(c). C. Signature on Court Documents - Appearance Every pleading, motion, and other filing must be signed by a lawyer of record or by the self-represented party. Rule 55.03(a). A lawyer who signs a document filed with the court is considered to be representing the parties for whom 3

the document was filed. Rule 55.03(b)(2). However, a lawyer who assists in the preparation of a pleading, motion, or other filing is not required to sign the document, so lawyers providing LSR do not have to sign the documents filed with the court. Rule 55.03(a). Furthermore, if a lawyer does not sign but is identified in a pleading, motion, or other filing as having assisted in the preparation of the document, the lawyer has not entered an appearance in the matter. Rule 55.03(b)(2). The Missouri Bar is encouraging lawyers who provide LSR legal services to advise the courts when they assist in drafting documents. Section _.5 Duty to Investigate Rule 55.03 A lawyer or litigant who files a document with the court certifies that to the best of the person s knowledge, information and belief, formed after a reasonable inquiry, that the allegations or other factual content contained in the document have evidentiary support or are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery. Rule 55.03(c)(3). However, a lawyer providing drafting assistance pursuant to a LSR arrangement may rely on the litigant s representations of facts, unless, the lawyer knows that such representations are false. Rule 55.03(c)(3). Section _.6 Service Rule 43.01 Every party to a lawsuit must be served with every pleading and motion filed in the case. Rule 43.01(a). If a party is represented by a lawyer, service must be made upon the lawyer. Rule 43.01(b). However, if a lawyer has filed an Entry of Limited Appearance, service must be upon the litigant and the lawyer until a termination of limited appearance is filed. Section _.7 Litigant Awareness Program and Forms Rule 88.09 Any litigant who participates in a domestic relations proceeding without a lawyer must complete a litigant awareness program. Rule 88.09(a). The program must include an explanation of the risks and responsibilities of selfrepresentation. Id. Litigants may complete this program by accessing the Missouri Supreme Court s website at www.selfrepresent.mo.gov. In addition, any litigant who participates in a domestic relations proceeding without a lawyer must use the pleadings, forms, and proposed judgment approved by the Missouri Supreme Court. Rule 88.09(b). These 4

approved forms can also be located on the Missouri Supreme Court s website at www.selfrepresent.mo.gov. Rule 88.09 does not require the use of the approved forms when the record clearly establishes that a lawyer has drafted the documents. If an attorney s name or signature appears on a document or a notice of "Entry of Limited Appearance" has been filed which indicates that the attorney has drafted the relevant document(s), then the approved forms are not required because the litigant is represented by counsel with respect to those document(s). In its discretion, the court can waive the use of the approved forms pursuant to Rule 88.09(b), and the court should consider waiving this requirement if it appears from the record that a lawyer has assisted a self-represented litigant in drafting the pleadings or other legal documents. Pursuant Rule 55.03(a), an attorney who assists in the preparation of a legal document on behalf of a selfrepresented litigant is not required to include his or her name or signature on the document. In addition, an attorney assisting in the preparation of a legal document on behalf of a self-represented litigant is not required to file a notice of "Entry of Limited Appearance" indicating that the attorney has drafted the relevant document(s) filed by a self-represented litigant. (NOTE: If an attorney signs a pleading without filing a notice of "Entry of Limited Appearance," he or she has entered a general appearance. Rule 55.03.) The intent and purpose of Rule 88.09 is to promote and ensure that self-represented litigants file legal documents that are legally sufficient. Therefore, if it is apparent to the court that an attorney has assisted in the preparation of legal document(s) filed by a self-represented litigant, the court in its discretion should strongly consider waiving the requirement that the approved forms be utilized. However, Rule 88.09 does not contemplate waiving the requirement of the litigant awareness program, and the litigant should complete the litigant awareness program if the litigant intends to participate without a lawyer in any aspect of a domestic relations proceeding. Section _.8 Use of LSR to Assist Low-Income Litigants Many low-income persons with legal problems have the choice of suffering without access to justice or attempting represent themselves and presenting their own case to the court. The increasing number of pro se litigants is a growing burden to the courts, which creates confusion for litigants, delay for judges and attorneys, and frustration for all. Litigants are better prepared and better served with the representation of an attorney. LSR is an efficient way for litigants of modest or no means to obtain the services of a lawyer, and LSR gives lawyers the 5

flexibility to assist needy clients on a limited pro bono basis and/or agree to represent a client on a limited basis for a reduced fee. For these reasons, the Missouri Bar and the Missouri Supreme Court are promoting the use of LSR. The Missouri Bar is educating its members on LSR and encouraging its members when appropriate to provide LSR legal services to low-income litigants. The Bar is encouraging lawyers who practice LSR to file and sign the legal documents they draft. The Bar is also encouraging lawyers to file entries of limited appearances, so it is clear who is drafting the documents filed in a case and what extent the lawyer is representing the litigant. If a lawyer drafts but does not sign a legal document filed in a case, the Bar is suggesting that lawyers include the following statement on the document: This is a true copy of the above document as prepared with the assistance of (name of lawyer) on (date). The Missouri Supreme Court is also encouraging the use of LSR. If you want to learn more about LSR, you can go to the Missouri Supreme Court s website at www.courts.mo.gov and search under Publications, Handbooks & Manuals Judge s Tool Kit on Pro Bono Legal Assistance. Section _.9 References 1. Missouri Supreme Court Rules 55.03, 43.01 and 88.09. 2. Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct 4-1.2 and 4-1.16. 3. Judge s Tool Kit on Pro Bono Legal Assistance 4 www.selfrepresent.mo.gov. 6