Improve Power saving and efficiency in virtualized environment of datacenter by right choice of memory. Whitepaper



Similar documents
Leveraging Memory Technology to Cut Data Center Power Consumption

Whitepaper. Big Data implementation: Role of Memory and SSD in Microsoft SQL Server Environment

Power Efficiency Comparison: Cisco UCS 5108 Blade Server Chassis and Dell PowerEdge M1000e Blade Enclosure

Samsung DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 SDRAM

8Gb Fibre Channel Adapter of Choice in Microsoft Hyper-V Environments

Best Practices. Server: Power Benchmark

DELL. Virtual Desktop Infrastructure Study END-TO-END COMPUTING. Dell Enterprise Solutions Engineering

Power Efficiency Comparison: Cisco UCS 5108 Blade Server Chassis and IBM FlexSystem Enterprise Chassis

Dell Virtualization Solution for Microsoft SQL Server 2012 using PowerEdge R820

Accelerating Business Intelligence with Large-Scale System Memory

Solve your IT energy crisis WITH An energy SMArT SoluTIon FroM Dell

Summary. Key results at a glance:

White Paper on Consolidation Ratios for VDI implementations

Kingston Technology. KingstonConsult WHD Local. October 2014

Accelerating Business Intelligence with Large-Scale System Memory

Configuring and using DDR3 memory with HP ProLiant Gen8 Servers

How To Compare Two Servers For A Test On A Poweredge R710 And Poweredge G5P (Poweredge) (Power Edge) (Dell) Poweredge Poweredge And Powerpowerpoweredge (Powerpower) G5I (

Oracle Database Reliability, Performance and scalability on Intel Xeon platforms Mitch Shults, Intel Corporation October 2011

Qsan Document - White Paper. Performance Monitor Case Studies

Dell PowerEdge Servers Memory

Analyzing the Virtualization Deployment Advantages of Two- and Four-Socket Server Platforms

2 Enterprise. CounThru TM. Managed Print Solution. CounThru TM 2 Enterprise Managed Print Solution WHITE PAPER. Introduction. What is CounThru TM

Vendor and Hardware Platform: Fujitsu BX924 S2 Virtualization Platform: VMware ESX 4.0 Update 2 (build )

IOmark- VDI. HP HP ConvergedSystem 242- HC StoreVirtual Test Report: VDI- HC b Test Report Date: 27, April

ACANO SOLUTION VIRTUALIZED DEPLOYMENTS. White Paper. Simon Evans, Acano Chief Scientist

Marvell DragonFly Virtual Storage Accelerator Performance Benchmarks

Achieving a High Performance OLTP Database using SQL Server and Dell PowerEdge R720 with Internal PCIe SSD Storage

System Requirements for Microsoft Dynamics SL 2015

TCO Study: Business Value in Virtualization

Evaluation Report: HP Blade Server and HP MSA 16GFC Storage Evaluation

Kingston Technology. Server Architecture and Kingston Memory Solutions. May Ingram Micro. Mike Mohney Senior Technology Manager, TRG

Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010

Improving Microsoft Exchange Performance Using SanDisk Solid State Drives (SSDs)

VI Performance Monitoring

DIABLO TECHNOLOGIES MEMORY CHANNEL STORAGE AND VMWARE VIRTUAL SAN : VDI ACCELERATION

Dell Virtual Remote Desktop Reference Architecture. Technical White Paper Version 1.0

1-Gigabit TCP Offload Engine

Virtualization with the Intel Xeon Processor 5500 Series: A Proof of Concept

System Requirements for Microsoft Dynamics SL 2015

Host Power Management in VMware vsphere 5.5

BC43: Virtualization and the Green Factor. Ed Harnish

Cisco Unified Computing System and EMC VNXe3300 Unified Storage System

Table Of Contents. Page 2 of 26. *Other brands and names may be claimed as property of others.

Handling Multimedia Under Desktop Virtualization for Knowledge Workers

Achieving a High-Performance Virtual Network Infrastructure with PLUMgrid IO Visor & Mellanox ConnectX -3 Pro

Dell Solutions Overview Guide for Microsoft Hyper-V

Where IT perceptions are reality. Test Report. OCe14000 Performance. Featuring Emulex OCe14102 Network Adapters Emulex XE100 Offload Engine

Hyper-V vs ESX at the datacenter

Datasheet Fujitsu Cloud Infrastructure Management Software V1

Big Data Performance Growth on the Rise

Server Consolidation for SAP ERP on IBM ex5 enterprise systems with Intel Xeon Processors:

InterScan Web Security Virtual Appliance

Citrix XenDesktop Modular Reference Architecture Version 2.0. Prepared by: Worldwide Consulting Solutions

Host Power Management in VMware vsphere 5

Transforming your IT Infrastructure for Improved ROI. October 2013

NetScaler VPX FAQ. Table of Contents

Microsoft Exchange Server 2007

BLACKBOARD LEARN TM AND VIRTUALIZATION Anand Gopinath, Software Performance Engineer, Blackboard Inc. Nakisa Shafiee, Senior Software Performance

Capacity Planning for Green IT Green IT Saving Costs Locally, Natural Resources Globally

Intel Virtualization and Server Technology Update

VMware VMmark V1.1.1 Results

White Paper. Recording Server Virtualization

WHITE PAPER. CounThru TM 2 Professional Managed Print Service. Introduction. Management Science

Power Efficiency Comparison of Enterprise-Class Blade Servers and Enclosures

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration

Expert Reference Series of White Papers. Visions of My Datacenter Virtualized

Tableau Server 7.0 scalability

System and Storage Virtualization For ios (AS/400) Environment

Avoid Paying The Virtualization Tax: Deploying Virtualized BI 4.0 The Right Way. Ashish C. Morzaria, SAP

IBM System x Enterprise Servers in the New Enterprise Data

Power Comparison of Dell PowerEdge 2950 using Intel X5355 and E5345 Quad Core Xeon Processors

Power and Cooling Innovations in Dell PowerEdge Servers

How to configure Failover Clustering for Hyper-V hosts on HP ProLiant c-class server blades with All-in-One SB600c storage blade

HP SN1000E 16 Gb Fibre Channel HBA Evaluation

HP recommended configuration for Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: HP LeftHand P4000 SAN

Introduction to Windows Server 2016 Nested Virtualization

Enhancing IBM Netfinity Server Reliability

Analysis of VDI Storage Performance During Bootstorm

Performance characterization report for Microsoft Hyper-V R2 on HP StorageWorks P4500 SAN storage

Best Practices for Virtualised SharePoint

Comparing Multi-Core Processors for Server Virtualization

VIRTUALIZATION-MANAGEMENT COMPARISON: DELL FOGLIGHT FOR VIRTUALIZATION VS. SOLARWINDS VIRTUALIZATION MANAGER

How To Build A Cisco Ukcsob420 M3 Blade Server

Brocade and EMC Solution for Microsoft Hyper-V and SharePoint Clusters

Table of Contents. P a g e 2

The MAX5 Advantage: Clients Benefit running Microsoft SQL Server Data Warehouse (Workloads) on IBM BladeCenter HX5 with IBM MAX5.

Accelerating Server Storage Performance on Lenovo ThinkServer

Evaluating Intel Virtualization Technology FlexMigration with Multi-generation Intel Multi-core and Intel Dual-core Xeon Processors.

MS Exchange Server Acceleration

Cisco Prime Home 5.0 Minimum System Requirements (Standalone and High Availability)

MaxDeploy Ready. Hyper- Converged Virtualization Solution. With SanDisk Fusion iomemory products

Virtualization of SAP Applications with VMware vsphere 5 on IBM ex5 enterprise systems. IBM SAP International Competence Center Walldorf, Germany

Virtualization of the MS Exchange Server Environment

Cloud n Service Presentation. NTT Communications Corporation Cloud Services

HP DDR4 SmartMemory Is finding reliable DRAM memory for your HP ProLiant Server series in your data center a major challenge?

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 Performance on VMware vsphere 4.1

7 Real Benefits of a Virtual Infrastructure

Express5800 Scalable Enterprise Server Reference Architecture. For NEC PCIe SSD Appliance for Microsoft SQL Server

Design Considerations for Increasing VDI Performance and Scalability with Cisco Unified Computing System

Energy Constrained Resource Scheduling for Cloud Environment

Transcription:

Whitepaper Save power and improve efficiency in virtualized environment of datacenter by right choice of memory A cooperation of Microsoft Technology Center & Samsung Semiconductor Document Version: 2.1 Authors: Microsoft: Ramazan Can (Blog: http://ramazancan.wordpress.com); Frank Koch Samsung Semiconductor: Insu Choi (insu.choi@samsung.com), Insuk Suh, Huichung Byun, Peyman Blumstengel Contacts: Frank Koch, Microsoft Green IT Evangelist Europe, frankoch@microsoft.com Peyman Blumstengel, Samsung Semiconductor Europe, peyman.b@samsung.com Document Revision: 2.1 1 May 2011

Introduction This Whitepaper describes the results of a joint Proof of Concept (PoC) to verify the power savings achieved by leveraging advanced DRAM process technology within server systems used in a virtualized environment. For this purpose we have compared the power consumption behavior of two identical server systems populated with modules based on 50nm process technology (called in this document Non-Green DDR3) with those based on 30nm technology (hereafter called Samsung Green DDR3). We have populated the systems in three different configurations with 48GB, 96GB and 144GB of memory. Summary of Results Samsung Green DDR3, a leading edge DRAM technology, will reduce the total power consumption of server systems in a data center running virtualized environments up to 15% or 30W per system when compared to Non-Green DDR3 at a different deployment level per CPU in a server. In addition Samsung Green DDR3 can achieve a greater power reduction when it is populated with more DIMMs per channel. Our measurements show that the difference in power consumption between Samsung Green DDR3 and Non-Green DDR3 actually increases as more DIMMs are populated in each channel of a CPU. AC power measurements using the Windows -based program consume.exe show that the 30nm-class modules consume 6~11% less power than 50nm-class modules over all load levels. The higher the memory population the greater the relative power saving. SPECPower benchmark tests show the efficiency (Data throughput per consumed power) of servers based on 30nm DRAM modules are up to 10% better than the 50nm based platform over all system loadings and consume up to 30W less power. As the system is more densely populated with memory, the difference becomes more significant. Table 1. Analysis of a rack consisting of 30 systems in a data center with PUE =2 Samsung Green DDR3 vs. Non-Green DDR3 Saving on system level Saving in cooling Total saving in DC (PUE=2) Cost of energy Life cycle Total cost saving: 1 system 30 systems Value 30 W Not measured 60 Watt 1.5 Euro /Watt/anno 4 Years 360 Euro /life cycle 10800 Euro /life cycle Document Revision: 2.1 2 May 2011

Test Environment Test systems: two identical Dell PowerEdge R710 servers Intel Westmere-EP, two sockets CPU: 2x Intel Xeon X5670 6C/12T 2.93GHz 12MB Storage: ISCSI connected shared LUN with 900GB OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise with Hyper-V role and active power profile Balanced Memory: Seven configurations based on 8GB modules comprising 2Gb chips; 30nm vs. 50nm class Workload: Microsoft consume.exe (executed in each Virtual Machine (VM)) Total Memory Green Memory (30nm Class) Non-Green Memory (50nm Class) Memory Voltage 1.5V 1.35V 1.5V 1.35V 48GB (1DPC*) 1333Mbps 1333Mbps 1333Mbps 96GB(2DPC) 1333Mbps 1333Mbps 144GB(3DPC) 800Mbps 800Mbps * DPC :DIMM Per Channel Table 2. Summary of memory configurations tested. Hyper-V Host1 (Non-Green DDR3) Non-Green DDR3: 8GB 2Gb based 50nm class components, running at only 1.5V (Samsung Part number: M393B1K70BH1-CH9) - 1 x DPC: 6units x 8GB 2Rx4 1333Mbps 1.5V= 48GB total deployment - 2 x DPC: 12units x 8GB 2Rx4 1333Mbps 1.5V= 96GB total deployment - 3 x DPC: 18units x 8GB 2Rx4 800Mbps 1.5V= 144GB total deployment Hyper-V Host2 (Samsung Green DDR3) Samsung Green DDR3: 8GB 2Gb based 30nm class components, running at either 1.35V or 1.5V according to Intel POR (Samsung Part number: M393B1K70DH0-YH9) - 1 x DPC: 6units x 8GB 2Rx4 1333Mbps 1.35V= 48GB total deployment - 2 x DPC: 12units x 8GB 2Rx4 1333Mbps 1.5V= 96GB total deployment - 3 x DPC: 18units x 8GB 2Rx4 800Mbps 1.5V= 144GB total deployment Document Revision: 2.1 3 May 2011

Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise with all available Windows Updates (01.28.2011) and Hyper-V role. Activated power saving profile Balanced The test scope is based on Microsoft Hyper-V hypervisor-based server virtualization technology. 10 VMs were created per Hyper-V host. The memory usage of the VMs can be increased depending on the available memory at the host system. The configurations for all VMs are: 4x vcpu, Dynamic Disk, Synthetic Network Card; OS: Windows 2008 R2; Roles/Features: none BIOS Settings Intel-VT and Disable Execution Bit enabled + Power Management Control is set to OS Control Document Revision: 2.1 4 May 2011

Test Results Total DIMM Power Consumption Total memory power consumption under each 1DPC/2DPC/3DPC configuration Power consumption difference: 30nm class memory consumes up to 50% less power Total System AC Power Consumption Total system AC power consumption under each 1DPC/2DPC/3DPC configuration Power consumption difference: 30nm class memory consumes up to 11% less power Document Revision: 2.1 5 May 2011

Workload analysis of consume.exe To simulate a workload with high memory load of the system, consume.exe from the Windows SDK was used. The SDK can be downloaded for free from the Microsoft download center. (see references) Consume.exe Pattern Analysis Result The CPU load of consume.exe is relatively low, compared to the normal load within a Data Center The CPU idle time is up to 90% (vs. normal Data Center workload: 60~70%) Document Revision: 2.1 6 May 2011

Spec power results: Six units x 8GB 2Rx4 Samsung Green DDR3 vs. Non-Green DDR3 Document Revision: 2.1 7 May 2011

12 units x 8GB 2Rx4 Samsung Green DDR3 vs. Non-Green DDR3 Document Revision: 2.1 8 May 2011

18 units x 8GB 2Rx4 Samsung Green DDR3 vs. Non-Green DDR3 Document Revision: 2.1 9 May 2011

Abbreviations and references used in this paper: SPEC and the benchmark name SPECpower are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. http://www.spec.org The Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC) is a non-profit corporation formed to establish, maintain and endorse a standardized set of relevant benchmarks that can be applied to the newest generation of high-performance computers. SPEC develops benchmark suites and also reviews and publishes submitted results from our member organizations and other benchmark licensees. DPC: DIMM per Channel, number DRAM DIMMs modules populated into each available CPU Channel. In this set up the CPUs each have three channels for memory PUE: Power Usage Efficiency, a key performance indicator of a data center in terms of power consumption efficiency for IT. It is calculated as the ratio of total data-center power consumption to IT power consumption. Rank: memory rank is a specific memory area of 72 bits wide for RDIMMs that can be addressed by the CPU at one time. 8GB module based on 1Gb comprises 72 components. Each 18 units of DRAM components in x4 organization build a data width of 72 leading to four ranks. In other words, each separate area of memory discretely accessible with width of 72 bits is one rank. Consume.exe: part of the Microsoft Windows Software Development Kit (SDK) for Windows 7 and.net Framework 4 (ISO) http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?familyid=35aeda01-421d-4ba5-b44b-543dc8c33a20 About companies Microsoft Technology Center (MTC) Microsoft Technology Centers (MTCs) are collaborative environments that provide access to innovative technologies and world-class expertise, enabling you to envision, design, and deploy solutions to meet your exact needs. http://www.microsoft.com/mtc/ Samsung Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is a global leader in semiconductor, telecommunication, digital media and digital convergence technologies with 2010 consolidated sales of US$135.8 billion. Employing approximately 190,500 people in 206 offices across 68 countries, the company consists of eight independently operated business units: Visual Display, Mobile Communications, Telecommunication Systems, Digital Appliances, IT Solutions, Digital Imaging, Semiconductor and LCD. Recognized as one of the fastest growing global brands, Samsung Electronics is a leading producer of digital TVs, semiconductor chips, mobile phones and TFT-LCDs. For details on Samsung Memory visit: www.samsung.com/greenmemory Document Revision: 2.1 10 May 2011