UNIQA Group Group Embedded Value 2013. 10 April 2014 Kurt Svoboda, CRO



Similar documents
UNIQA Group Group Embedded Value May 2013 Kurt Svoboda, CRO

15 April 2015 Kurt Svoboda, CFRO. UNIQA Insurance Group AG Economic Capital and Embedded Value 2014

Embedded Value Report

Introduction 3 7. Assumptions 1. Covered Business 2. Market Consistent Embedded Value 2014 and its Components 3. New Business Appendix 19

Market Consistent Embedded Value Principles October CFO Forum

Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION Basis of Preparation Covered Business Definitions... 4

Market Consistent Embedded Value (MCEV)

Munich Re Market consistent embedded value REPORT 2010

Allianz. Market Consistent Embedded Value Report

Disclosure of Market Consistent Embedded Value as at March 31, 2015

Content. Pages Basis of preparation Covered business

Market Consistent Embedded Value Report 2014

Disclosure of European Embedded Value (summary) as of March 31, 2012

Disclosure of European Embedded Value (summary) as of March 31, 2015

SWEDBANK FÖRSÄKRING AB European Embedded Value

Disclosure of European Embedded Value as of March 31, 2015

MCEV reporting with mg-alfa

EUROPEAN EMBEDDED VALUE 2007

Disclosure of Market Consistent Embedded Value as of March 31, 2014

Leadership in life insurance. April 2015

AvivaSA Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Market Consistent Embedded Value Report. Half-year 2015

Market Consistent Embedded Value Basis for Conclusions October CFO Forum

Embedded Value of Life Insurance Companies in India. Presented by Philip Jackson FIA, FIAI Consulting Actuary

ING GROUP EMBEDDED VALUE REPORT 2007

Embedded Value 2014 Report

Conference Call on Interim Report 1/2009

Market Consistent Embedded Value in Non-Life Insurance: How to measure it and why

Main Business Indicators

Market Consistent Embedded Values

Principles and models for the Embedded Value calculation

Guide to Financial Reporting In Irish Life & Permanent plc European Embedded Value and IFRS

AXA s approach to Asset Liability Management. HELVEA Insurance Capital Adequacy and Solvency Day April 28th, 2005

Introduction. Coverage. Principle 1: Embedded Value (EV) is a measure of the consolidated value of shareholders interests in the covered business.

Key performance indicators

2013 Embedded Value Results Generating Value

Summary consolidated income statement 1. Operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns 2

Market-Consistent Embedded Value (MCEV)

Morgan Stanley 10th Annual European Financials Conference. Mark Wilson Chief Executive Officer. March 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary 3. Introduction 5. Purposes of the Joint Research Project 6

Welcome to Hannover Re's Analysts' Conference. Annual Results 2014

EVA/RAROC versus MCEV Earnings: A Unification Approach

Strong net income despite challenging environment

INSTITUTE AND FACULTY OF ACTUARIES EXAMINATION

Solvency Management in Life Insurance The company s perspective

ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD DECEMBER 2004 FRS 27 27LIFE ASSURANCE STANDARD FINANCIAL REPORTING ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD

How To Profit From A Strong Performance

Liquidity premiums and contingent liabilities

NN Group N.V. 30 June 2015 Condensed consolidated interim financial information

Agenda. Questions Deloitte & Touche LLP Deloitte Advisory Sp. z o.o. Adjusted Net Asset. Value (ANAV)

IASB/FASB Meeting Week beginning 11 April Top down approaches to discount rates

& Embedded value 2009

White paper Danica. White paper. Consolidation policy and business activities. at Danica Pension. Unaudited. February 2009.

The Empire Life Insurance Company

Financial performance

Canadian Life Insurance Company Asset/Liability Management Summary Report as at: 31-Jan-08 interest rates as of: 29-Feb-08 Run: 2-Apr-08 20:07 Book

Autumn Investor Seminar. Workshops. Managing Variable Annuity Risk

Hans Wagner AXA Group Life Chief Risk Officer. Ferdia Byrne Partner, KPMG. June, Congrès Annuel des Actuaires

MARKET-CONSISTENT EMBEDDED VALUE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MMI HOLDINGS INTEGRATED REPORT

Financial Review. 16 Selected Financial Data 18 Management s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Life Modeling. Beyond Solvency II risk management unplugged. PillarOne Conference in Brussels, April 1st and 2nd 2009

Guideline. Source of Earnings Disclosure (Life Insurance Companies) No: D-9 Date: December 2004 Revised: July 2010

International Financial Reporting for Insurers. August 19-21, Hong Kong. Session 2: Financial Reporting for Insurance Companies.

FINANCIAL REVIEW. 18 Selected Financial Data 20 Management s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Embedded Value (EV) Reporting May 2009

FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR LIFE INSURANCE BUSINESS. V Rajagopalan R Kannan K S Gopalakrishnan

Successful cost management and strong investment income reflected in improved earnings

LIFE INSURANCE CAPITAL FRAMEWORK STANDARD APPROACH

Application of Interest Rate Swaps in Indian Insurance Industry Amruth Krishnan Rohit Ajgaonkar Guide: G.LN.Sarma

Guidance for the Development of a Models-Based Solvency Framework for Canadian Life Insurance Companies

Summary of the Paper Awarded the SCOR Prize in Actuarial Science 2012 in Germany (2 nd Prize)

Howelliott.Com: Aussie Insurance Company

GN47: Stochastic Modelling of Economic Risks in Life Insurance

ING Insurance Economic Capital Framework

GN45: Determining the With-Profits Insurance Capital Component

IFRS 4 Fáze II aneb dočkáme se konce nekonečného příběhu? Hana Havlíčková 4. října 2013, SAV, Praha

EVERY DAY MATTERS. Forward looking statements. Preliminary results March 2012

Company Report. Ping An (2318 HK) Sell Life & Health Insurance Industry 2013E target price: HK$68.46 (from HK$58.04 previously)

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2011

NN GROUP FINANCIAL SUPPLEMENT 1Q2016

IRSG Response to IAIS Consultation Paper on Basic Capital Requirements (BCR) for Global Systemically Important Insurers (G-SIIS)

Insurance. Life Insurance Rating Methodology. Global Sector Specific Rating Criteria. Summary. Scope of Criteria. Analysts.

Subject SA2. CMP Upgrade 2015/16. CMP Upgrade

Rating Methodology by Sector. Life Insurance

Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB)

Is the business model of insurance companies jeopardized?

Focus on Wealth Management in the UK life & pension market. June 24, 2010

CEIOPS-DOC-33/09. (former CP 39) October 2009

Featured article: Evaluating the Cost of Longevity in Variable Annuity Living Benefits

Report of the statutory actuary

HowWhat Does It All Mean to Be Successful in Real Estate?

SAVINGS PRODUCTS AND THE LIFE INSURANCE INDUSTRY IN CANADA

Press release Brussels/Utrecht, 17 November 2009 Q trading update

SOA International Experience Survey Embedded Value Financial Assumptions

Investor Relations Release

Allianz Malaysia Berhad (12428-W) Financial Results 4Q Analyst Briefing 29 February 2016

How To Change The Way Aussie Wealth Managers Report Profit On A Profit Basis

Strict cost management and improved underwriting result reflected in higher profit on ordinary activities

22 Investment property This note gives details of the properties we hold for long-term rental yields or capital appreciation.

HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited

Transcription:

UNIQA Group Group Embedded Value 2013 10 April 2014 Kurt Svoboda, CRO

Introduction Group Market Consistent Embedded Value Disclosure of Group Embedded Value (GEV) results: UNIQA discloses GEV results 2013 on the basis of the Market Consistent Embedded Value (a) (MCEV) principles Includes MCEV using bottom-up, market consistent methodology for main Life and Health businesses Split by the regions Austria, Italy and CEE (including Russia) Adjusted Net Asset Value (ANAV) for Property and Casualty, Life and Health businesses excluded from scope of MCEV on the basis of adjusted IFRS equity Independent review of methodology, assumptions and calculations for MCEV and calculations for GEV by B&W Deloitte GmbH (a) Copyright Stichting CFO Forum Foundation 2008 1

Introduction Methodology MCEV for conventional life businesses in Austria and Italy are based on stochastic cashflow projections using market consistent capital market scenarios. Projections allow for management actions (e.g. profit participation or asset allocation); single risk free deterministic projection for Austrian and Italian unit linked and health businesses Explicit allowance for cost of guarantees and options Assumed policyholder profit participation allows for local supervisory laws and contractual agreements Explicit allowance for cost of residual non-hedgeable risk Best estimate assumptions based on recent experience for expenses, mortality and lapses Single risk free deterministic projection for MCEV calculations in CEE Life businesses Internal benchmarking to allow for cost of guarantees and options based on stochastic models Explicit allowance for cost of residual non-hedgeable risk 2

Introduction Methodology (continued) GEV allows for consolidation adjustments and minority interests Goodwill and value of business in force (VBI) eliminated in respect of businesses included in the scope of the MCEV calculations MCEV defined as: Free Surplus (FS), plus Required Capital (RC), plus Value of In-Force (VIF) determined as Present Value of Future Profits (PVFP) less less less Time Value of Financial Options and Guarantees (FOG) Frictional cost of Required Capital (FCRC) Cost of Residual Non-Hedgeable Risks (CRNHR) GEV defined as: Adjusted net asset value for Property and Casualty, Life and Health businesses excluded from scope of MCEV calculations Plus MCEV 3

Highlights Figures presented after minority interest GEV of 4,217mn or +45% Return on Group Embedded Value of 658mn (+23.2%) Extended Scope of MCEV calculations by Raiffeisen Life Insurance Russia Improvement of New Business Value to 58mn and a margin of 2.2% (2012: 1.5%), with an outstanding CEE (including Russia) NB-margin of 5.8% (2012: 6.9%) Positive effects of the new life strategy implemented as a part of the strategic UNIQA 2.0 programme; in particular the Group s ALM process led together with the main impact of higher interest level and lower interest rate volatility to: reduction in FOG to 217mn (2012: 393), in a challenging environment and lower interest sensitivity; -100bp leads to a change in MCEV of -10% (2012: -18%) 4

Summary of 2013 results after minority interest GEV influenced by strong operating earnings Group Embedded Value (after minorities, in millions) GEV increased (after minority interest) by 45% to 4,217m Successful Re-IPO in 2013 led to an increase in ANAV Strong operative development due to expenses improvement for Austrian Life & Health and increasing new business value have a positive impact on VIF which increases to 1,703m Decrease of FOG to 217m (-45%) Free surplus 334 359 Required capital 652 518 Life & Health Prop. And Casualty Total 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 Change over period Adjusted net asset value 986 877 1,529 804 2,515 1,681 50% Present value of future profits 2,120 1,810 n/a n/a 2,120 1,810 17% Cost of options and guarantees (217) (393) n/a n/a (217) (393) (45)% Frictional cost of required capital (81) (79) n/a n/a (81) (79) 2% Cost of residual non-hedgeable risk (119) (120) n/a n/a (119) (120) 0% Value of in-force business 1,703 1,218 n/a n/a 1,703 1,218 40% GEV/MCEV 2,689 2,096 1,529 804 4,217 2,900 45% 5

Return on restated and adjusted GEV Return on GEV (after minorities, in millions) 2013 2012 GEV as at 31 December previous year, reported 2,876 1,467 GEV as at 31 December previous year, restated 2,900 1,545 Opening Adjustments (65) (8) GEV as at 31 December previous year, restated and adjusted 2,834 1,536 Return on GEV 658 253 as a % 23.2% 16.5% GEV as at 31 December, before closing adjustments 3,492 1,789 Closing Adjustments 725 1,086 GEV as at 31 December 4,217 2,876 Return on GEV is shown after minorities and calculated on the basis of the restated and adjusted GEV as at 31 December 2012 Closing adjustments allow for the capital increase Return is driven by operating earnings on Life & Health and strong decrease of FOG for Austrian Life business 6

New business value Improvement in a challenging environment New business value ( in millions) Before minorities After minorities 2013 2012 (a) Change 2013 2012 (a) Change Value of new business 61 43 40.2% 58 41 39.7% Annual premium equivalent (APE) 267 260 257 252 New business margin (as % APE) 22,8% 16,7% 22,5% 16,4% Present value of new business premiums (PVNBP) 2.700 2.737 2.638 2.682 New business margin (% of PVNBP) 2,3% 1,6% 2,2% 1,5% (a) Restated results for 2012 UNIQA Group s NBV improved in 2013 to a level of 61m Positive impact of expanded scope by Raiffeisen Life Insurance Russia New business volumes (PVNBP) decreased slightly in a challenging market environment for life insurance business because of higher interest rates for discounting (small increase in APE) New business margins vary by region and depend on the underlying business mix. Overall margins increased due to higher interest rates and lower interest rate volatility and because of improvement of expense situation for Austrian Life&Health business 7

Analysis of change Life and health after minority interest Restatement and opening adjustments mainly include extension of scope by Raiffeisen Life Russia and capital and dividend flows ( in millions) 438 23 2.689 Ongoing positive development of operating earnings resulted in an increase of 235m 2.056 75 1.981 58 101 134 Assumptions & Variance Roll Forward Increase in reference rates and lower implied volatilities influenced the GEV positively by 438m MCEV as at 31-12-2012 reported Restatement and adjustments MCEV as at 31-12-2012 restated New business Value Other operating earnings Economic Variance Other non op. Variance and closing adjustments MCEV as at 31-12-2013 reported 8

Economic assumptions 2013 MCEV calculations use reference rates based on swap rates as at 31 December 2013 including a liquidity premium. The liquidity premium is derived from observable market data and based on the approach used for internal risk capital calculations The 2013 calibration of the economic scenarios is based on implied volatilities EUR CZK HUF PLN RUB Reference rates (a) 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 1 year 0.30% 0.23% 0.26% 0.29% 2.89% 5.11% 2.65% 3.33% 6.87% 7.29% Liquidity premium in bp EUR CZ/HU/PL RUB Base premium 100% 39 14 0 5 years 1.16% 0.67% 1.17% 0.70% 4.04% 5.00% 3.63% 3.25% 7.13% 7.33% 10 years 2.12% 1.50% 2.02% 1.29% 5.31% 5.40% 4.20% 3.49% 7.71% 8.00% 15 years 2.61% 1.99% 2.52% 1.74% 5.36% 5.17% 4.32% 3.65% 8.35% 8.01% 20 years 2.75% 2.16% 2.82% 2.21% 5.05% 4.92% 4.35% 3.78% 8.60% 7.53% 25 years 2.84% 2.45% 3.04% 2.59% 4.87% 4.77% 4.35% 3.86% 8.39% 7.08% Participating life business 65% Unit and index linked business 0% Health business 65% 25 9 0 0 0 25 (a) Excluding liquidity premium Exchange rate Tax rate 2013 2012 2013 2012 UNIQA Austria 25.00% 25.00% UNIQA Italy 34.32% 34.32% UNIQA CZ 27.43 25.15 19.00% 19.00% UNIQA HU 297.04 292.30 19,00% + 2,3% (a) 19,00% + 2,3% (a) UNIQA SK - - 22.00% 19.00% UNIQA PL 4.15 4.07 19.00% 19.00% Raiffeisen Russia 45.32 40.33 20.00% 20.00% (a) Muncipal tax and innovation fee Other economic assumptions (EUR) 2013 2012 (a) Interest rate volatility (b) 23.07% 24.93% Equity volatility (c) 20.5% 25.98% Expense/medical inflation 2%/2% 2%/2% (a) after restatement (b) 10 to 10 implied swaption volatility (c) 10 years 9

Sensitivities Life and health after minority interests ( in millions) Change in market consistent embedded value Change in new business value Base value 2,689 100% 58 100% EV change by economic factors Risk free yield curve -100bp (271) (10)% (15) (26)% Risk free yield curve +100bp 134 5% 9 16% Equity and property market values -10% (136) (5)% 0 0% Equity and property implied volatilities +25% (6) 0% (1) (1)% Swaption implied volatilities +25% (135) (5)% (15) (26)% EV change by non-economic factors Maintenance expenses -10% 60 2% 6 10% Lapse rates -10% 47 2% 6 11% Mortality for assurances -5% 36 1% 3 5% Mortality for annuities -5% (4) 0% 0 0% Required capital equal to local solvency capital 15 1% 0 1% Additional sensitivity Removal of liquidity premium (154) (6)% (7) (13)% 10

ANAV Reconciliation of IRFS equity to ANAV ( in millions) 2013 2012 (a) Consolidated IFRS equity 2,789.9 2,017.6 Goodwill and value of business in force for MCEV companies (162.3) (167.3) Differences in valuation of assets and liabilities (93,1) (148.2) Adjusted net asset value before minority interest 2,534,6 1,702.1 Minority interests (20,0) (20.9) Adjusted net asset value after minority interest 2,514,6 1,681.2 (a) Restated results for 2012 Goodwill and VBI are deducted in respect of the Life and Health businesses included in the scope of the MCEV calculations Differences in valuation of assets and liabilities include unrealised gains on property assets and loans that are not shown at market values under IFRS differences from equity holdings between IFRS balance sheet values and market values Minority interests are deducted to obtain the ANAV after minority interest. 11

Regional analysis Results split by regions Austria, Italy and CEE Embedded value 2013 by region (after minorities, in millions) Positive development of PVFP in all regions. Austria outstanding due to improvement on expenses and positive effects caused by increasing interest rates Strong improvement in FOG because of increased interest rates and lower interest rate volatility CEE shows stable profitable growth due to high new business margins 2013 2012 (a) Austria Italy CEE Total Austria Italy CEE Total Free surplus 264 33 38 334 296 34 30 359 Required capital 551 63 37 652 426 55 37 518 Adjusted net asset value 815 96 75 986 722 89 67 877 Present value of future profits 1,894 79 147 2,120 1,635 35 140 1,810 Cost of options and guarantees -168-43 -6-217 -336-50 -7-393 Frictional cost of required capital -75-5 -2-81 -74-4 -2-79 Cost of residual non-hedgeable risk -110-4 -5-119 -110-3 -6-120 Value of business in-force 1,541 27 134 1,703 1,115-22 126 1,218 Life and health MCEV 2,356 123 210 2,689 1,836 66 193 2,096 As a % of total Life MCEV 87.6% 4.6% 7.8% 100.0% 87.6% 3.2% 9.2% 100.0% (a) Restated 12

Regional analysis VNB split by regions Austria, Italy and CEE Value of new business 2013 by region (after minorities, in millions) 2013 2012 (a) Austria Italy CEE Total Austria Italy CEE Total Value of new business 32 4 22 58 11 3 27 41 Annual premium equivalent (APE) 118 70 70 257 126 58 68 252 New business margin (as % APE) 27.1% 5.7% 31.6% 22.5% 8.7% 5.6% 40.2% 16.4% Present value of new business premiums (PVNBP) New business margin (% of PVNBP) 1,653 603 382 2,638 1,797 490 394 2,682 1.9% 0.7% 5.8% 2.2% 0.6% 0.7% 6.9% 1.5% (a) Restated Margins in Austrian Life & Health business increase mainly due to favourable economic variance Stable new business margin in Italy Outstanding CEE NB-margin of 5.8%, strongly driven by UNIQA CZ and Raiffeisen Life Insurance Russia. Decrease in NB-margin compared to last year because of less favourable regional mix within CEE region. 13

Key figures Implied Discount Rate / Internal Rate of Return / Free Surplus Generation Implied Discount Rate 2013 in %, based on inforce business Internal Rate of Return 2013 in %, based on new business Compared to 2012: Group IDR reduces due to lower FOG Group IRR increases because of improved profitability of new business Free Surplus Generation 2013 (Life) in EUR mn, and as a % of opening MCEV Free Surplus Generation 2012 (Life) in EUR mn, and as a % of opening MCEV Free Surplus Generation: Operative improvements strengthen free surplus Improvement of net free surplus generation in Life (from 3.6% to 4.3%) 13.0% 4.3% 15.6% 3.6% 14

Disclaimer Cautionary statement regarding forward looking statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and it might not be possible to achieve the predictions, forecasts, projections and other outcomes described or implied in forward-looking statements A number of important factors could cause results to differ materially from the plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions expressed in these forward-looking statements These forward-looking statements will not be updated except as required by applicable laws 15