4. Nu-Tek, through Asim Niaz and Tauqir Khan, agreed to pay. the doctors at MMA in return for sending blood drawn from



Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION

BORIS SOKHA : Title 18, United States Code, Section 371 and Title 26, United States Code, Section 7201 I N F O R M A T I O N

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY I N D I C T M E N T. The Grand Jury, in and for the District of New Jersey,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COUNT ONE. THE SPECIAL AUGUST GRAND JURY charges:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

v. : Criminal Number: IRINA ZELIKSON : Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1349 and 982(a)(7) I N F O R M A T I O N

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

2004R01432/JWD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 09- v.

Case 1:12-cr LO Document 1 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

IN THE UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION. CR '-M- Dl.L-

INDICTMENT. The Grand Jury in and for the District of New Jersey, COUNT 1 (Conspiracy) 18 U.S.C At various times relevant to this Indictment:

Case 3:14-cr AWT Document 39 Filed 08/05/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. v. : DATE FILED:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGIN CHARLESTON GRAND JURY JULY 30, 2013 SESSION INDICTMENT COUNT ONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No (JMR) The United States of America, by and through its attorneys,

) (28 u.s.c. $ 2a6l(c))

herself as someone with influence at Dallas County. An aspect of the Corruption

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INDICTMENT COUNT ONE BACKGROUND

INTRODUCTION. At all times relevant to this Indictment, unless. 1. The Medicare program ( Medicare ) was a federal

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I N D I C T M E N T

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) No. 14 CR vs. ) Violation: Title 18, United States Code, ) Section 1347 CHARLES DEHAAN ) COUNT ONE.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Hon. Stanley R. Chesler. 18 u.s.c u.s.c u.s.c. 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA I N D I C T M E N T COUNT ONE. The Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE N 18 INDICTMENT INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

COUNT 1. The SPECIAL AUGUST 2012 GRAND JURY charges: a. Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. was a Chicago-based

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. v. : Criminal No. 08- I N F O R M A T I O N

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. v.

INTRODUCTION. At all times relevant to this Indictment, unless. 1. Donald & Co. Securities Inc. ("Donald & Co.") was

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FOR MAIL FRAUD AND WIRE FRAUD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Minnesota

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COUNT ONE. The SPECIAL FEBRUARY 2014 GRAND JURY charges: a. Company A, which was located in Indianapolis, Indiana, was a

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Hon. : v. : Crim. No. : JOHN F. BALLIRO : 18 U.S.C. 201(c), 371, 1001, : & 2 INDICTMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DMSION ) ) Filed: ) ) CRIMINAL INFORMATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CR-LENARD

Case 1:10-cr REB Document 1 Filed 04/22/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Complaint

I N D I C T M E N T. COUNT ONE (Racketeering) (Defendant Bergrin) The Grand Jury in and for the District of New Jersey, The Enterprise

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Securities Whistleblower Incentives and Protection

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Civil Division

Commodity Futures Trading Commission Commodity Whistleblower Incentives and Protection

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. ) No. ) ) ) ) ) COUNT ONE

First Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP

Case 1:05-cv CCB Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/2005 Page 1 of 18

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION INDICTMENT COUNTS ONE THROUGH SIX. The Scheme to Defraud

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION. ) ) ) ) No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INDICTMENT

Case 3:08-cv JAP-JJH Document 1 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Consultation Agreement and Acknowledgement of Receipt of Disclosures and Instructions

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : DATE FILED: I N F O R M A T I O N COUNT ONE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Defendant. ) 1. Defendant R. ALLEN SINCLAIR (*SINCLAIR') was the owner and operator of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

The defendant having waived in open court prosecution by. indictment, the United States Attorney for the District of New THE DEFENDANT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:05-cr Document 10 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 18. U.S. Department of. United States Attorney. 300 Virginia Street Suite 4000

Plaintiffs, Defendants. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, Rebecca Weston, hereby accepts the Offer of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) No. THE SPECIAL MARCH 2010 GRAND JURY charges:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No.:

~/

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Kansas City, Kansas, Docket)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:07-cr RWS-CCH Document 1 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR.THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr RBD-JBT-1.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. v.

Building a Criminal Case For Prosecution of Public Works Violations ORANGE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY S OFFICE PUBLIC WORKS UNIT

Case 1:12-cr JB Document 2 Filed 01/24/12 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JAN 24 ZOIZ ~ FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 11-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Filed: Violations: 15 U.S.C U.S.C.

COUNT ONE. Conspiracy to Commit Bank Robbery. 1. On or about March 29, 2013, in the Southern

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

v. CASE NO. 8: 13-cr-237-T-23TBM 18 U.S.C. 371 DUANE CRITHFIELD and

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 2:14-cr AJS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

in the State of New Jersey who is not named as a defendant herein, and whose office was in Cranford, New Jersey. Defendant

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Richard Hanley and : Civil Action No. 04- Susan Hanley : v.

Willamette University College of Law Loan Repayment Assistance Program (LRAP)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INFORMATION COUNT ONE. At all times material to this information:

i san FRANCISCO VENUE

The Grand Jury in and for the District of New Jersey, COUNT ONE. (Conspiracy To Commit Mail Fraud)

CASE 0:14-cr JRT-JSM Document 1 Filed 08/05/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT DISTRJCT OF MINNESOTA

Transcription:

CBMcK/2009R00409 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Criminal No. v. : 26 U.S.C. 7201 DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS : INDICTMENT The Grand Jury in and for the District of New Jersey, sitting at Trenton, charges: COUNT 1 1. At all times relevant to this Indictment: a. Mercerville Medical Associates ( MMA ) was a medical practice located in Trenton, New Jersey. b. Defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS, a medical doctor, was employed by MMA and working to become a partner in the medical practice. c. Defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS resided in Pennsylvania. The Nu-Tek Kickbacks 2. As part of its practice, MMA, through its doctors, had blood drawn from patients and sent the blood to specified laboratories for testing as prescribed by the treating doctor. 3. Nu-Tek Diagnostic Lab ( Nu-Tek ) was a laboratory located in Langhorne, Pennsylvania that conducted scientific blood work for medical doctors. Asim Niaz and Tauqir Khan were principals of Nu-Tek.

4. Nu-Tek, through Asim Niaz and Tauqir Khan, agreed to pay the doctors at MMA in return for sending blood drawn from patients to Nu-Tek for scientific testing. 5. During 2002, defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS received approximately $33,000 for sending blood samples to Nu-Tek for testing which he used to buy into the MMA partnership. Payments from the Capitation Account 6. Horizon Health Insurance Company ( Horizon ) was a provider of health insurance services. 7. Health care providers such as MMA sometimes sign what are known as capitation agreements with health insurance companies such as Horizon whereby it is agreed that certain medical services will be provided to individuals insured by the health insurance company for a fixed cost. The amount of the payment is determined by the number of services provided and the number of patients that are cared for by a particular medical practice. The fixed payment is paid by the health insurance company to the medical services provider regardless of whether the patients actually seek medical care or not. 8. For the years 2002 and 2003 MMA had a capitation agreement with Horizon (hereinafter the Capitation Agreement ) whereby Horizon paid a monthly fee to MMA for services whether the services were provided or not. By virtue of the Capitation Agreement MMA received between $8,000 and $10,000 per month from 2

Horizon. 9. The proceeds from the Capitation Agreement were not deposited into MMA s account but rather were deposited into a bank account in the names of the partners of MMA (hereinafter the Capitation Account ) and payments were made from the Capitation Account to MMA doctors. 10. During 2002, defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS received approximately $24,000 from the Capitation Account reflecting his portion of moneys earned pursuant to the Capitation Agreement. The Robert Wood Johnson Loan 11. In or about February, 2000, in contemplation of hiring the defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS, MMA entered into an agreement with Robert Wood Johnson Hospital (hereinafter RWJH ). Under the agreement, RWJH loaned $150,000 to MMA which was to be paid to MMA in monthly installments of approximately $4,166.67. The loan agreement between MMA and RWJH included a loan forgiveness provision whereby repayment of the loan would be forgiven in exchange for the defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS providing medical services to RWJH for three hours per week over a three year period. The monthly proceeds from the loan were not deposited into MMA s account but rather were deposited into the Capitation Account. 12. During 2002, defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS received approximately $41,670 from the Capitation Account reflecting his 3

portion of moneys earned pursuant to the loan agreement between RWJH and MMA. 13. On or about August 12, 2003, defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS signed and caused to be filed with the Internal Revenue Service a 2002 U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, Form 1040. That return stated that his taxable income for the calendar year 2002 was $175,134, and that he was due a refund of $4,072. The tax return that was filed by defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS failed to report the approximately $33,000 that he received as kickbacks from Nu-Tek; the approximately $24,000 from the Capitation Account reflecting his portion of moneys earned pursuant to the Capitation Agreement; and the approximately $41,670 from the Capitation Account reflecting his portion of moneys earned pursuant to the loan agreement between RWJH and MMA. 14. The 2002 tax return filed by defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS was false in that it understated his taxable income and claimed a refund to which he was not entitled. Defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS total corrected taxable income for the year was approximately $284,765, upon which an additional income tax of approximately $41,013 was due and owing to the United States. 15. On or about August 12, 2003, in the District of New Jersey, defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS did knowingly and willfully attempt to evade and defeat a 4

substantial part of the income tax due and owing to the United States in that he signed and caused to be filed with the Internal Revenue Service the tax return described in paragraph 13, knowing it to be false and fraudulent as described in paragraph 14. In violation of Title 26, United States Code, Section 7201. 5

COUNT 2 1. Paragraphs 1 through 4; 6 through 9; and 11 of Count 1 are realleged and incorporated as if fully set forth herein. 2. During 2003, defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS was credited with having paid approximately $27,000 for his purchase into the MMA partnership. The approximately $27,000 for which he was credited had been paid by Nu-Tek in exchange for his sending blood samples to Nu-Tek for testing. 3. During 2003, defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS received approximately $30,105 from the Capitation Account reflecting his portion of moneys earned pursuant to the Capitation Agreement. 4. During 2003, defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS received approximately $12,501 from the Capitation Account reflecting his portion of moneys earned pursuant to the loan agreement between RWJH and MMA. 5. On or about October 15, 2004, defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS signed and caused to be filed with the Internal Revenue Service a 2003 U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, Form 1040. That return stated that his taxable income for the calendar year 2003 was $512,403, and that there was a tax due and owing of $129,424. The tax return that was filed by defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS failed to report the approximately $27,000 that he received as kickbacks from Nu-Tek; the approximately $30,105 from the Capitation Account reflecting his portion of moneys earned 6

pursuant to the Capitation Agreement; and the approximately $12,501 from the Capitation Account reflecting his portion of moneys earned pursuant to the loan agreement between RWJH and MMA. 6. The 2003 tax return filed by defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS was false in that it understated his taxable income and claimed a refund to which he was not entitled. Defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS total corrected taxable income for the year was approximately $583,137, upon which an additional income tax of approximately $26,620 was due and owing to the United States. 7. On or about October 15, 2004, in the District of New Jersey, defendant DEMETRIOS PERDIKIS did knowingly and willfully attempt to evade and defeat a substantial part of the income tax due and owing to the United States in that he signed and caused to be filed with the Internal Revenue Service the tax return described in paragraph 5 knowing it to be false and fraudulent as described in paragraph 6. 7201. In violation of Title 26, United States Code, Section A TRUE BILL FOREPERSON RALPH J. MARRA, JR. Acting United States Attorney 7